|
loquacius posted:Scuttlebutt in the Trump thread is that he somehow, inexplicably, unbelievably managed to make himself an enemy of Jared Kushner Kushner Jewish. Bannon hates 'em. 
HootTheOwl fucked around with this message at 19:18 on Apr 5, 2017 |
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 19:08
|
|
and Kushner's bloc is currently more powerful so Bannon is getting edged out
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 03:23 |
|
|
 you guys don't really "get" sarcasm do you
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
Farking Bastage posted:Here's some Bennett for now. That's quite insulting to Playboy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
The big question is, how will Garrison respond to president Kushner? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
The level of willful density needed to create cartoons such as this and the many other "it's the Dems who are the clowns/kids/obstructionists" cartoons already posted must approach that of neutronium.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
You voted for Trump, you pants-crapping idiot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
Man, this would look bad if the GOP had not spent the last eight years being reasonable and measured adults, perfectly willing to achieve compromise in order to help the country.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 20:31
|
|
|
Which video was that Ramirez? Was it the video of trump blatantly encouraging a foreign state to hack his opponents during a national debate? I bet it was probably that one.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
Ramirez's stubbornness has always been this weird manifestation of just vomiting up soundbites and talking points, regardless of relevance. I'm not even sure he knows what this phrase means anymore, and he sure doesn't know how to make it applicable here. Regardless of any of that, we're still on the "it's the fault of the people who found out there was wrongdoing, not of the people who DID the wrongdoing!" which is weird considering how much cheerleading guys like Ramirez usually do for government whistleblowers. Literally the opposite of reality and "no you". Aaand what the gently caress does that even mean? Like I get that Branco's fully willing to buy that the EPA is evil and the only way to fix its crooked regulations are to loving destroy it entirely but what would a "socialist mop" look like anyway?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
CampingCarl posted:Didn't someone say some rich right wing guy in Israel gives him a bunch of money? I think that was just his pleas from back in December for people to become part of "the Dry Bones 36," which is a religious reference and not necessarily proof he has 36 people paying him $3,000 a year for his dumb comics. Stultus Maximus posted:The Republicans will change the rules so that a simple majority instead of 3/5 is required to confirm a supreme court justice meaning that from now on, there is no limit to how blatantly partisan a justice can be and be confirmed if the majority party also holds the white house. Nitpick: You only need a simple majority vote to confirm a Supreme Court justice. That won't change. But if someone filibusters, you currently need 60 Senators to vote to end discussion and move on to the vote. Democrats lowered that to a simple majority for other judicial appointments (long after it would've helped them), and Republicans are threatening to do the same for Supreme Court appointments if the Democrats try to filibuster. Republicans say they really don't want to make that change, since they might want to filibuster in the future, but they're going to do it anyway, unless they can convince however many Democrats (8? 10?) to vote with them to move on to a final vote.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 20:50
|
|
|
Looking forward to the lovely Pepsi comics tomorrow. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
FronzelNeekburm posted:Republicans say they really don't want to make that change, since they might want to filibuster in the future, but they're going to do it anyway, unless they can convince however many Democrats (8? 10?) to vote with them to move on to a final vote. I'm hoping that during the 2018 elections the American people realize that the majority of the problems we faced over the proceeding 10 years have been either created or exacerbated by people with (R)'s next to their names. I know it is a foolish hope since this is the American people. A people who have long since divorced themselves from facts and reality or who have become totally apathetic towards politics.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
Lodin posted:Looking forward to the lovely Pepsi comics tomorrow. What happened
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
Government created the market by making the messes, and now the Head of State is participating in that market when he acquired the mop. So, actually, that is socialism Branco! quote:
Uh, I'd buy that bobblehead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
Hihohe posted:What happened "Pepsi has pulled its controversial ad suggesting you can solve police brutality with soda" http://www.vox.com/culture/2017/4/5/15186216/pepsi-ad-kendall-jenner-black-lives-matter-controversy
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
SSNeoman posted:
I find this one great because my first response reading it was "Yeah, that probably doesn't help." Heaven forbid other countries show some level of animosity toward us for spending a shitload of money on a bottled version of a resource that some places desperately lack.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
That's so Ramirez!
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
Grimdude posted:I find this one great because my first response reading it was "Yeah, that probably doesn't help." And that we're ruining those countries by taking their water, eg. Fiji brand bottled water.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
Horrible Lurkbeast posted:"Pepsi has pulled its controversial ad suggesting you can solve police brutality with soda" Looking forward to Garrison's A huge hulking fat woman with pink hair pouring coke down her throat while screeching"TRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGERED!" In the background a devious looking black man in a hood with a gun labeled BLACK LIVES MATTER. A man in a Pepsi shirt trembles. "I....I... just wanted to help!" Then a 50 paragraph screed about how BLM should bow down to Pepsi for deeming them worthy of a commercial.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Lodin posted:Looking forward to the lovely Pepsi comics tomorrow. A very, very ill-advised ad that suggested soda solves social issues.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 22:04
|
|
|
The "best" part of the Pepsi commercial comics we'll see is going to be how they'll claim "Libtards everywhere HATED it so much that Pepsi felt compelled to remove it!" When in fact, most people will have very little to say about it aside from articles you read about it. Not to mention the fact that the only thing to blame for them withdrawing the commercial is the same thing that encourages businesses to offer a "Press 1 for English" option: capitalism.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:A very, very ill-advised ad that suggested soda solves social issues. "Coke has those awesome ads of how their drink brings people together. How can we one-up this?"
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
ATTRACTIVE WHITE FEMALE PEPSI® AVATAR hands ice-cold can of PEPSI® to RIOT POLICE™. RIOT POLICE™ begin to BREAK DANCE furiously
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
The commercial is so bad I can't help but suspect they knowingly made it the way they did to cause controversy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
I dunno what the hell she's on about either so I'd probably answer with some nonsense too. edit: I've seen so many "late stage capitalism: the video" type posts about that Pepsi ad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:28
|
|
|
Johnny Walker posted:The commercial is so bad I can't help but suspect they knowingly made it the way they did to cause controversy. Yeah, it's hard to watch that ad without imagining an exec saying "viral" with jazz hands
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:39
|
|
|
I think ad execs are just dense, toneless people
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
Jay Rust posted:I think ad execs are just dense, toneless people
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:43
|
|
|
Jay Rust posted:I think ad execs are just dense, toneless people This is just an IRL SNL skit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imUigBNF-TE
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:44
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:I imagine at the bottom of the ad agency are creative people who lean left but their boss tells them to make an ad that mocks everything they stand for and they are like "ok" because that's capitalism. Or they thought it would go "viral" but not that it would be the bad, controversial viral
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
We've all heard of "a thing happened" cartoons, that was just "a thing happened" ad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 00:07
|
|
|
Fully-geared riot police drinks liquid sugar, enters diabetic shock
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
Jay Rust posted:I think ad execs are just dense, toneless people
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
Benson: 1 2D'Antuono:  3Wilkinson:  4And this O'Reilly news gives me an excuse to repost this classic: Bill O'Reilly posted:Ashley was now wearing only brief white panties. She had signaled her desire by removing her shirt and skirt, and by leaning back on the couch. She closed her eyes, concentrating on nothing but Shannon’s tongue and lips. He gently teased her by licking the areas around her most sensitive erogenous zone. Then he slipped her panties down her legs and, within seconds, his tongue was inside her, moving rapidly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 01:35
|
|
Lodin posted:Looking forward to the lovely Pepsi comics tomorrow. Super same. loquacius posted:
Your post needed more labels.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 01:37
|
|
|
 1A civics lesson from a slaver.  2"Eh, not really. Reid's move applied to lower court judges, and Republicans now enjoy that same power."  3
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
Merrick Garland tho?
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
Cloks posted:Merrick Garland tho? See, Obama had no mandate to appoint him. The American people made it abundantly clear that they wanted a Republican-appointed justice when they voted Trump in by a margin of -3,000,000 votes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 03:23 |
|
|
Apple Pie Hubbub posted:
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 04:05
|
|
