|
This owns, I hope it turns out to be good.
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:08 |
|
|
Limited playable maybe? Rubble makes bounce effects stick for a bit longer.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
Siivola posted:Limited playable maybe? Rubble makes bounce effects stick for a bit longer. It's potentially constructed playable. Counter spell on opponent's T3, keep all their lands tapped T4 (or wait until later). This is the type of thing that can let control decks get to a late game. They need to accumulate card advantage without getting too far behind on board.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
I like how the name of the second part would suggest it destroys lands but lol of course we can't have that in standard
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
Wurzag posted:I like how the name of the second part would suggest it destroys lands but lol of course we can't have that in standard Pairing land destruction to this would be incredibly dumb.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:24
|
|
|
If you want to see Haumph utterly failing at piloting a deck and most likely get timed out check out his stream. He may be worse at this ironworks deck that anyone else alive.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Siivola posted:I'm kinda hoping they'll ban the Felidar and nothing else. Just to see if a T2 deck manages to rise up to challenge Mardu Good Stuff. I beat Mardu Vehicles literally 99.9% of the time using 4C Energy TurboFog.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
Ein Sexmonster posted:Pairing land destruction to this would be incredibly dumb. What if it said destroy target tapped land?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
Pull from tomorrow makes Jeskai Shaeeli great again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:39
|
|
|
Siivola posted:I'm just shitposting. Two devs left the design team for unspecified reasons, but I think both Stoddard and Hayes are still on the payroll: http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/amonkhet-down-business-part-1-2017-04-03 my completely speculative read on this was that they were pulling their more experienced devs onto whatever the big 25th anniversary stuff is gonna be that they've been hinting at
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
It's too bad they already used "Reduce to Ashes" in SoI because the stay-tapped function would make a lot more sense as a cloud of stifling grit than actual ruin. And they could have illustrated it with the would-be fireball getting dispersed into a whirlwind of soot instead of generic blue swirl #54. EDIT: And, for gently caress's sake, the double-wide depiction of the top half of these stupid things is ideal for depicting both spell-casters in a the confrontation, for once. If they're going to have this stupid looking frame then why not play to its loving strengths?? Eikre fucked around with this message at 20:54 on Apr 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:I beat Mardu Vehicles literally 99.9% of the time using 4C Energy TurboFog. somehow i don't beleive you've played 1000 games with the deck
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:50
|
|
|
Well, Jeskai control was a thing for a little while. Maybe this will help kickstart that again? E: silly me, that also slides nicely into Grixis control 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:somehow i don't beleive you've played 1000 games with the deck Don't diss my FNM testing yo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
I haven't been updating my spreadsheet but are the people that think this is good, the same people that think new Force Spike is bad? Because if so, lol.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
InterrupterJones posted:Well, Jeskai control was a thing for a little while. Maybe this will help kickstart that again? How will any control deck ever exist when we've got the powerful Dynavolt Tower pushing them out of the meta?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:somehow i don't beleive you've played 1000 games with the deck at least in the 700 range
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
someone post these decklists! http://www.starcitygames.com/article/34890_Todd-VS-Ross-UR-Dynavolt-VS-WB-Aggro-Featuring-Amonkhet.html
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
I only ever hear two things about SCG Premium: 1) Complaints about it being a rip off 2) Requests for the contents
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
odiv posted:I only ever hear two things about SCG Premium: Occasionally there's an interesting idea or two. BUUUUUT the overwhelming majority of content is absolute dreck that you can get from mtgs forums just as easily.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
ThePeavstenator posted:How will any control deck ever exist when we've got the powerful Dynavolt Tower pushing them out of the meta? Pull is a better win condition than Tower....
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
odiv posted:I only ever hear two things about SCG Premium: Maybe the people who request the content should consider buying the content
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
Lone Goat posted:I haven't been updating my spreadsheet but are the people that think this is good, the same people that think new Force Spike is bad? You can't it a new force spike if it costs more than U, this is the law. Abstruse Interference, Spell Snip, Runeboggle, Stymied Hopes, Frightful Delusion, all of those counter unless the player pays 1, but no one's called those new Force Spikes, so accept that it's just a shittier Miscalculation, or never darken my rumpus room again!
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:You can't it a new force spike if it costs more than U, this is the law. Daze, a new force spike
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:16
|
|
|
ThePeavstenator posted:It's potentially constructed playable. Counter spell on opponent's T3, keep all their lands tapped T4 (or wait until later). This is the type of thing that can let control decks get to a late game. They need to accumulate card advantage without getting too far behind on board.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
ThePeavstenator posted:How will any control deck ever exist when we've got the powerful Dynavolt Tower pushing them out of the meta? I mean, for Jeskai there's always Fragmentize. Otherwise, control will play like it always does: draw go style, now with some cheaper spells rolling in from Amonkhet that they'll probably like.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:Maybe the people who request the content should consider buying the content You must not follow the thread very much
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
I played a lot of Mistbind Clique but "tap your lands" and "your lands don't untap next turn" are similar enough effects that they excite me. In a rare intelligent move, the land lockdown being a Flashback effect means they can't be recurred for stasis shenanigans.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
Siivola posted:I'm a bit iffy on Rubble because it's three mana to keep three mana tapped. You draw, land, play Rubble, they draw, land, pass. To get any real value out of this you kinda need some kind of advantage already on board. That's what Planeswalkers are for. Chandra and Gideon are still around and still obscenely powerful.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
Madmarker posted:Occasionally there's an interesting idea or two. BUUUUUT the overwhelming majority of content is absolute dreck that you can get from mtgs forums just as easily. Gotta love that CFB has better players, better content, a better appearance, and is free. Plus more reasonable prices if you're feeling guilty and not ordering from tcg.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:That's what Planeswalkers are for. Chandra and Gideon are still around and still obscenely powerful. For bonus points a turn 5 Chandra nets you the flashback if you haven't missed a land drop
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
odiv posted:I only ever hear two things about SCG Premium: I don't have the correct password for the shared account or I would just post it. SCG articles are absolute poo poo. I only ever read it when me and friends use up the free premium from IQ's. Far too often the requested content isn't worth the copy and paste for whoever wants it. To tell you the truth, most mtg articles are incredibly bad these days. Pros don't want to give up their edge and instead post the bare minimum to get paid or keep their contract. The only people who want to tell you everything they know are medium players at best.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:45
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Pull is a better win condition than Tower.... InterrupterJones posted:I mean, for Jeskai there's always Fragmentize. Otherwise, control will play like it always does: draw go style, now with some cheaper spells rolling in from Amonkhet that they'll probably like. The joke is that Tower is not a good deck but we keep hearing about it because WotC is huffing their own farts insisting that this format isn't just 2 decks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
Sickening posted:I don't have the correct password for the shared account or I would just post it. This has been true for a while and it's sad because there are many skills that high-level magic players have that require practice and training and can't just be imparted in an article such that top players should really worry less about "giving away their secrets." Mediocre players are going to suddenly be able to read the opponent or play well under pressure just because you wrote about it in an article and your deck tech is going to be public as soon as the event is over. Also "knowing the rules" is a key skill that many, many players just do not have because they never actually read them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:00
|
|
|
What is the best way to sell off my collection? I got really lucky with my pulls from MM3 and wound up with liliana, goyf, and an Arid mesa. I keep seeing the "value" of these cards on sites, but I only ever play limited. I looked into selling on tcg and they pay less than I expected. Also tried to sell in a Facebook group in my area, no takers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:06
|
|
|
ThePeavstenator posted:The joke is that Tower is not a good deck but we keep hearing about it because WotC is huffing their own farts insisting that this format isn't just 2 decks. The point at which you could tell they were lodged firmly up their own rear end was when they posted the infamous Tower Triangle: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
Roshambo posted:What is the best way to sell off my collection? I got really lucky with my pulls from MM3 and wound up with liliana, goyf, and an Arid mesa. I keep seeing the "value" of these cards on sites, but I only ever play limited. I looked into selling on tcg and they pay less than I expected. Also tried to sell in a Facebook group in my area, no takers. Well, it can be a little complicated. Try out the buy/trade/sell thread on this forum, I am sure someone has the link. Other goons should be willing to buy those cards. If you want to sell your collection in bulk, the best options are going to a gp or convincing someone local to buy it on facebook.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:someone post these decklists! may this shared account never die  
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
ShaneB posted:may this shared account never die Yeah that wasn't worth the trouble, but good on shaneb.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:08 |
|
|
Sickening posted:Well, it can be a little complicated. Try out the buy/trade/sell thread on this forum, I am sure someone has the link. Other goons should be willing to buy those cards. https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3679632
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:11
|
|