|
404notfound posted:Instax Square coming: Interesting. They did the obvious thing for image area: (Height x Width) Instax Mini: 62 x 46 mm Instax Square: 62 x 62 mm Instax Wide: 62 x 99 mm
|
# ? Sep 19, 2016 21:51 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:32 |
|
crap nerd posted:I live in hope that lomo or someone will accidentally make an instax back that can be easily retrofitted to mount onto a rb67 Same but a 500cm
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 15:23 |
|
Engadget hands-on with the Leica Sofort: https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/20/leica-sofort-instax-camera-hands-on/
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:39 |
|
OK, I guess Fujifilm made a decision to get big into the licensing / rebadging game. There's going to be a Michael Kors edition: http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/9/21/12993216/michael-kors-fujifilm-instax-camera https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/21/michael-kors-x-fujifilm-instax-mini-70/
|
# ? Sep 21, 2016 15:29 |
|
unpacked robinhood posted:Now that they've killed FP-100 there's no way to shoot old instant cameras right ? Except for impossible film I mean You can get an custom Instax back for the Polaroid 600SE or the Mamiya Universal. Costs around $290. You have to modify your camera a little by removing a piece of metal that does nothing but was left over from manufacturing process. So currently I can shoot Instax Wide, Fuji FP100/3000 and 120 film on my 600SE. Others have modified cameras like the 250 or 350 to shoot Instax Wide but its a bitch. I've experimented with shooting Instax mini in Polaroid cameras but its just not worth the hassle.
|
# ? Sep 21, 2016 21:10 |
|
This may be a dumb question but is there any major difference between instax mini and wide beyond the size of the picture like there is between 35mm and 120mm (like depth of field, etc.) or are the typical instant cameras not capable of taking advantage of such things??
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 20:30 |
|
The apertures on those cameras are so small (f12 for the mini and f14 for the wide) that format size would make any differences in DOF completely negligible.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 20:50 |
|
BANME.sh posted:The apertures on those cameras are so small (f12 for the mini and f14 for the wide) that format size would make any differences in DOF completely negligible. Ah but the Lomos are all f8 and the Mint Instaflex TL70 is 5.6. Both at a price premium over the Fujis of course.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 20:59 |
|
Modifying Instax cameras to use vintage lenses: https://www.lomography.com/magazine/325005-analogue-artisan-albertino-on-the-magic-of-instant-photography-and-modified-cameras
|
# ? Nov 11, 2016 19:48 |
|
There's obviously a demand for a higher end instax with manual controls why doesn't Fuji just make one already
|
# ? Nov 11, 2016 20:55 |
|
Amazon is currently doing 25% off on the second generation Instax Mini printer: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01GTKG6RA
|
# ? Nov 20, 2016 20:48 |
|
Guys, is there any reason I shouldn't order the Instax 26 over the 70 and save 30+ bux? edit: even the fujifilm.com doesn't tell me the lens focal length and battery type. Talk about dumbing down. whatever7 fucked around with this message at 04:07 on Dec 22, 2016 |
# ? Dec 22, 2016 04:01 |
|
assuming the 26 is an updated 25:
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 11:52 |
|
8th-snype posted:assuming the 26 is an updated 25: Thanks. Ok so no self timer I can live without. But no tripod socket? Goddamn it Fuji! You got my money! The 8 cleanly is missing a lot of features but its the most good looking one. I think it will be most popular in the parties. whatever7 fucked around with this message at 19:14 on Dec 22, 2016 |
# ? Dec 22, 2016 19:10 |
|
Went to a Lowrider show And a fake owl in the backyard
|
# ? Dec 31, 2016 18:17 |
|
I got an Instax mini 8 for Christmas and I bought six packs of film for it off of Amazon, figuring that would last me for a while. I'm already halfway through it. Send help.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2017 06:43 |
|
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 01:55 |
|
Like a budding T Rich
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 02:38 |
|
Anybody try the new monochrome Instax film yet?
|
# ? Jan 24, 2017 02:29 |
|
|
# ? Feb 12, 2017 19:46 |
|
Untitled by Phillip Chicola, on Flickr Untitled by Phillip Chicola, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 8, 2017 20:43 |
|
404notfound posted:Anybody try the new monochrome Instax film yet? I ran a pack through my SP1, it looks good but not worth it for printer people who can convert to B&W
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 02:36 |
|
Might finally retire my SX70s, since I bought a Instax Wide 300 last night. I typically only shoot instant for special events and got pretty fedup with the recent batch of Impossible Projects film for the development time at the last wedding. Has anyone here adapted Instax Wide to a 600SE back? It looks simple enough and Id love to bring the big guy back into the action.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2017 16:26 |
|
The Instax Square camera and film are now officially announced. http://instax.com/square/ https://www.engadget.com/2017/04/19/fujifilm-instax-square-sq10/ Available for Pre-order at your favorite supplier, to be released on May 8, 2017.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 17:36 |
|
Rastor posted:The Instax Square camera and film are now officially announced. *sigh* Goodbye, money!
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 17:40 |
|
That thing is pretty thin, I wonder if it's actually shooting onto the film or if it's projecting the digital copy onto the film like what the instax printer does. I am betting that's what they're doing.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 18:00 |
|
BANME.sh posted:That thing is pretty thin, I wonder if it's actually shooting onto the film or if it's projecting the digital copy onto the film like what the instax printer does. I am betting that's what they're doing. I am betting that as well. There are rumors/leaks that there will later be a cheaper camera that lacks the digital features and just takes photos directly onto film.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 19:10 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOc6Tci3ktQ http://instax.com/square/
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 21:20 |
|
28mm f2.4 and 4 inch minimum focus distance, not bad at all.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 21:42 |
|
Is anything stopping people from using instax film in a medium/large format camera? Just lack of adapters?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 21:50 |
|
BANME.sh posted:That thing is pretty thin, I wonder if it's actually shooting onto the film or if it's projecting the digital copy onto the film like what the instax printer does. I am betting that's what they're doing. probably just a digital camera + printer if they're saying you can print from the SD card akadajet posted:Is anything stopping people from using instax film in a medium/large format camera? Just lack of adapters? Yeah, I've seen some pictures of instax cameras frankensteined on to medium format cameras
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 22:10 |
|
akadajet posted:Is anything stopping people from using instax film in a medium/large format camera? Just lack of adapters? You can recalibrate a rangefinder, but depth to film plane can be a problem for anything SLR-based (it's way too deep, most of the time). For large format, Zach over at Mercury Camera does a neat conversion from Instax Wide to the 4x5 Graflok back, and produces a replacement ground glass for it, too.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 22:28 |
|
akadajet posted:Is anything stopping people from using instax film in a medium/large format camera? Just lack of adapters? https://www.instantoptions.com/shop/instax/ The square format gives me hope for a TLR conversion.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 14:43 |
|
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 18:37 |
|
Untitled by Phillip Chicola, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 22, 2017 00:06 |
|
Tony Two Bapes posted:Untitled by Phillip Chicola, on Flickr yospos, bitch!
|
# ? Apr 22, 2017 03:03 |
|
akadajet posted:yospos, bitch! I don't understand?
|
# ? Apr 22, 2017 11:31 |
|
Tony Two Bapes posted:I don't understand? 219 is the yospos forum number (forumid=219)
|
# ? Apr 22, 2017 14:41 |
|
I was in DC recently
|
# ? Apr 24, 2017 18:26 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:32 |
|
I don't know who Shawn Mendes is but he has his own Instax bundle https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-Instax-Shawn-Mendes-Bundle/dp/B01M7ZDXEQ EDIT: Oh a mini 9 model on pre-order https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-Instax-Mini-Instant-Camera/dp/B06WWL4JD8
|
# ? May 8, 2017 19:10 |