Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
jabby
Oct 27, 2010

AP posted:

I can see the appeal of letting Corbyn stay on to fail, I don't think it will make much difference though as his supporters are so dumb they'll look for any excuse not to take responsibility during the aftermath. That's why I see the Labour split coming. A one party state (Scotland somewhat excluded) isn't healthy for the country and Labour is currently lead by complete idiots.

You think in order to prevent a one party state we should take the only opposition party that consistently polls above 10% and split it into two parties?

I'm not sure you know what you're talking about.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Taear
Nov 26, 2004

Ask me about the shitty opinions I have about Paradox games!

AP posted:

Logic won't work, Corbyn vowed to retain the triple-lock for pensioners and most people here thought it was a good idea.

When even the Tories think pensioners have done quite well over the past few years compared to normal working families you can rely on Corbyn to walk into the trap of promising to continue to throw money at them for no real benefit. Pensioners mostly vote Tory, the principled ones that you might have appealed to just noticed you tried to bribe them.

Pensioners are doing well. But they're also voters. The ones that actually turn out.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

They are also people, and the party of the welfare state should not be in the business of taking money from those supported by said state before a great many other options have been exhausted.

learnincurve
May 15, 2014

Smoosh
I'm still going to go with if the local labour councillors don't bother campaigning or sending out leaflets because they, like Kinnock, believe the election to be in the bag, and the Tory councillors buy four pages, including the front cover, of a local newspaper with a very high circulation and send in Theresa loving May to Clay Cross of all places, then it might not be entirely Corbyn's fault that they suffered monumental losses in the Derbyshire council elections.

Edit: seriously, all they needed to do was go "poo poo they've got one over on us, Jeramy you need to come down here quick and point at a couple of closed down banks looking angry!"

learnincurve fucked around with this message at 01:09 on May 6, 2017

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006

Seaside Loafer posted:

Put pissflaps and hakimashou on ignore and it gets semi-readable

When people remember to stop loving quoting them.

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006

learnincurve posted:

I'm still going to go with if the local labour councillors don't bother campaigning or sending out leaflets because they, like Kinnock, believe the election to be in the bag, and the Tory councillors buy four pages, including the front cover, of a local newspaper with a very high circulation and send in Theresa loving May to Clay Cross of all places, then it might not be entirely Corbyn's fault that they suffered monumental losses in the Derbyshire council elections.

Edit: seriously, all they needed to do was go "poo poo they've got one over on us, Jeramy you need to come down here quick and point at a couple of closed down banks looking angry!"

The Tory who won the West Midlands mayoral election is widely assumed to have done so because he (as the former MD of John Lewis) spent about 10 times more on the election than the rest of the candidates put together. Democracy's dead, people just vote for whoever has the deepest pockets.

Nude Bog Lurker
Jan 2, 2007
Fun Shoe

hakimashou posted:

*Noted three time election winner and last labour leader to beat the tories Tony Blair.

The only Labour Prime Ministers anybody under 50 can remember were poo poo - Vote Labour 2017!

learnincurve
May 15, 2014

Smoosh
It costs nothing to knock on doors, it was utter complacency at a grass roots level. They assumed that there was no way a ex-mining area would vote Tory. They were in part right, In a few areas they didnt, they voted Lib dem instead of labour which was unfortunate because the lib dem areas all voted Tory.

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer

Nude Bog Lurker posted:

The only Labour Prime Ministers anybody under 50 can remember were poo poo - Vote Labour 2017!
Hey remember when ESA existed to help flatten educational attainment between classes, the FJF existed to help people coming out of uni who couldn't find work, and Sure Start existed to help people with kids? Truly a worse time than nowadays.

ShaneMacGowansTeeth
May 22, 2007



I think this is it... I think this is how it ends

Julio Cruz posted:

When people remember to stop loving quoting them.

A reminder that if people must quote the flappable one, to replace the quoted text with this:

AP
Jul 12, 2004

One Ring to fool them all
One Ring to find them
One Ring to milk them all
and pockets fully line them
Grimey Drawer

OwlFancier posted:

lol if you think the tories are cutting pensions out of "fairness" and lol if you think that defunding pensioners is needed to pay for other things.

I didn't say that, the Tories have avoided committing to the triple lock because they fully intend to break it. They have tax rises signaled to the electorate targeted at their core voters, that's how scared of Corbyn they are.

And yes for a normal person assuming you can pay for everything and the reason the Tories don't because they are evil is how the 2010 election was fought and how the 2015 election was fought. Look how well that turned out, while in the real world what the Tories did closely matched what Darling had actually planned in 2010

AP
Jul 12, 2004

One Ring to fool them all
One Ring to find them
One Ring to milk them all
and pockets fully line them
Grimey Drawer

jabby posted:

You think in order to prevent a one party state we should take the only opposition party that consistently polls above 10% and split it into two parties?

No ideally you kick the loonies out of the Labour party or at least keep them under control but I think it's too late for that.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I am not prepared to support a party that campaigns on dismantling the welfare state. That is an integral part of our society and I have absolutely no use for a party which does not share that view.

Irony Be My Shield
Jul 29, 2012

jBrereton posted:

Hey remember when ESA existed to help flatten educational attainment between classes, the FJF existed to help people coming out of uni who couldn't find work, and Sure Start existed to help people with kids? Truly a worse time than nowadays.
Blair did good things but he also lied to lead us into a war of aggression. Even if you forgive him for that the wider public has not.

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel

AP posted:

I didn't say that, the Tories have avoided committing to the triple lock because they fully intend to break it. They have tax rises signaled to the electorate targeted at their core voters, that's how scared of Corbyn they are.

And yes for a normal person assuming you can pay for everything and the reason the Tories don't because they are evil is how the 2010 election was fought and how the 2015 election was fought. Look how well that turned out, while in the real world what the Tories did closely matched what Darling had actually planned in 2010

"I think XYZ is going to happen"

"You think XYZ SHOULD happen? Someone who supports XYZ is awful! " is a very very common form of tedious pissantry that you run into a lot from the corybnistas and similar.

The brilliant Nick Cohen from the Guardian put it really really well in his appeal to them.

He acknowledged that sure, the Party Member types like corbyn and picked him, but gave them a solemn warning of what was to come and a desperate admonition:

"In my respectful opinion, your only honourable response will be to stop being a loving fool by changing your loving mind."

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/19/jeremy-corbyn-labour-threat-party-election-support

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer

Irony Be My Shield posted:

Blair did good things but he also lied to lead us into a war of aggression. Even if you forgive him for that the wider public has not.
A war of aggression every currently important Tory also voted for. The differences between them on other stuff are quite important.

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

hakimashou posted:

The brilliant Nick Cohen

gently caress off, genocide-lover

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

AP posted:

No ideally you kick the loonies out of the Labour party or at least keep them under control but I think it's too late for that.

Splitting Labour would lead to five opposition parties (Old Labour, New Labour, Lib Dems, UKIP and Greens) all taking somewhere between zero and fifteen percent of the vote, and the Tories sitting on 40% plus. That would not be an improvement on what we have now.

serious gaylord
Sep 16, 2007

what.

I genuinely couldn't even imagine it would be this bad.

AP
Jul 12, 2004

One Ring to fool them all
One Ring to find them
One Ring to milk them all
and pockets fully line them
Grimey Drawer

hakimashou posted:

"I think XYZ is going to happen"

I eagerly await someone posting a strong defense of the "principled" Corbyn policy of retaining the triple lock for any reason other that it might gain some votes.

AP
Jul 12, 2004

One Ring to fool them all
One Ring to find them
One Ring to milk them all
and pockets fully line them
Grimey Drawer

jabby posted:

Splitting Labour would lead to five opposition parties (Old Labour, New Labour, Lib Dems, UKIP and Greens) all taking somewhere between zero and fifteen percent of the vote, and the Tories sitting on 40% plus. That would not be an improvement on what we have now.

Macron

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

AP posted:

Macron

I'm afraid you have the wrong country

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

AP posted:

I eagerly await someone posting a strong defense of the "principled" Corbyn policy of retaining the triple lock for any reason other that it might gain some votes.

How about the fact that the current state pension is about £8300 a year.

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer

AP posted:

No ideally you kick the loonies out of the Labour party or at least keep them under control but I think it's too late for that.

What loonies? The 'far left' of Labour want the NHS protecting, more houses and, worker rights and a fairer society. They're not after full communism. If this is too much for you and other 'moderates' I don't know why any of us bother. What is it you want from the opposition to the Tories?

For the record I think Corbyn is trash. But not because of his policies. I don't think he is a 'loony'. But if you have issues with the basic left wing ideas that have been floated then maybe you're not really a labour voter anyway.

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel

Regarde Aduck posted:

What loonies? The 'far left' of Labour want the NHS protecting, more houses and, worker rights and a fairer society. They're not after full communism. If this is too much for you and other 'moderates' I don't know why any of us bother. What is it you want from the opposition to the Tories?

For the record I think Corbyn is trash. But not because of his policies. I don't think he is a 'loony'. But if you have issues with the basic left wing ideas that have been floated then maybe you're not really a labour voter anyway.

A "loony" is anyone who thinks "jeremy corbyn should be leader of the labour party."

The test never needs to get to anything about policy.

hakimashou fucked around with this message at 02:24 on May 6, 2017

Private Eye
Jul 12, 2010

Don't be so bloody gay, Cambo

jabby posted:

Since you're like the third person to miss my point, it was a sarcastic comment on the fact that Labour councils will suffer from greater budget cuts than their Tory counterparts.

Oh good. It was sarcasm. You almost had me thinking you were a tit there.

GEORGE W BUSHI
Jul 1, 2012

AP posted:

Macron

congratulations on being so politically unaware that you can't tell the difference between a presidential election conducted under a run off system and a first past the post parliamentary election.

serious gaylord posted:

I genuinely couldn't even imagine it would be this bad.


a respectable third place for Plaid Cymru. Maybe they should expand nationally under the justification this all belonged to the cymry before the perfidious Saxons and the even more perfidious Scots infested our fair isle.

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


hakimashou posted:

A "loony" is anyone who thinks "jeremy corbyn should be leader of the labour party."

The test never needs to get to anything about policy.

Alternatively they are someone who cares about your leftie-bashing concern troll comments

Well maybe they're not loonies, but that doesn't make the second part of the sentence any less true

Private Speech fucked around with this message at 03:38 on May 6, 2017

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel
Jonathan Freedland has a very good piece in the Guardian about what's going on:

"Blaming others won’t do. Instead, how refreshing it would be, just this once, if Corbyn and McDonnell put their hands up and took even a small measure of responsibility for this calamitous result. Instead of always playing the besieged victim, they could accept that, as Enoch Powell once observed, a politician complaining about the press is as absurd as a sailor complaining about the sea. Navigating a way through is simply what they have to do.

It would mean admitting that they have failed to deliver what they promised. They said they would win back Scotland, energise the Labour base, galvanise non-voters, lure back Ukip defectors and pull in Greens – and not one of those things has happened. Yet in the face of all this, they dig in and cling on, refusing to budge.

Why are they so stubborn? It can’t be a tenacious commitment to socialism. Corbyn and McDonnell’s programme includes nothing remotely as leftwing as, say, the £5bn windfall tax on the utilities promised, and implemented, 20 years ago by the supposed “evil neoliberal” Tony Blair.

Having finally won control of the Labour party after three decades of Stakhanovite effort, what radical programme have these great revolutionaries pledged to the nation? Four extra bank holidays.

The good news for Labour is that what I saw in the focus groups were people unimpressed by the Tories, desperate for an opposition and itching to vote Labour again if only Corbyn would get out of the way. It suggests a new leader could take the fight to Theresa May very rapidly. The bad news is that once people have broken a lifelong Labour habit – and shattered a taboo by voting Tory – they may never come back.""

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/05/jeremy-corbyn-blame-meltdown-labour-leader

hakimashou fucked around with this message at 05:16 on May 6, 2017

JFairfax
Oct 23, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

hakimashou posted:

Jonathan Freedland has a very good piece in the Guardian about what's going on:

"Blaming others won’t do. Instead, how refreshing it would be, just this once, if Corbyn and McDonnell put their hands up and took even a small measure of responsibility for this calamitous result. Instead of always playing the besieged victim, they could accept that, as Enoch Powell once observed, a politician complaining about the press is as absurd as a sailor complaining about the sea. Navigating a way through is simply what they have to do.

It would mean admitting that they have failed to deliver what they promised. They said they would win back Scotland, energise the Labour base, galvanise non-voters, lure back Ukip defectors and pull in Greens – and not one of those things has happened. Yet in the face of all this, they dig in and cling on, refusing to budge.

Why are they so stubborn? It can’t be a tenacious commitment to socialism. Corbyn and McDonnell’s programme includes nothing remotely as leftwing as, say, the £5bn windfall tax on the utilities promised, and implemented, 20 years ago by the supposed “evil neoliberal” Tony Blair.

Having finally won control of the Labour party after three decades of Stakhanovite effort, what radical programme have these great revolutionaries pledged to the nation? Four extra bank holidays.

The good news for Labour is that what I saw in the focus groups were people unimpressed by the Tories, desperate for an opposition and itching to vote Labour again if only Corbyn would get out of the way. It suggests a new leader could take the fight to Theresa May very rapidly. The bad news is that once people have broken a lifelong Labour habit – and shattered a taboo by voting Tory – they may never come back.""

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/05/jeremy-corbyn-blame-meltdown-labour-leader

Lol yes Enoch Powell had some good ideas and was a nice lad who meant well

ronya
Nov 8, 2010

I'm the normal one.

You hate ridden fucks will regret your words when you eventually grow up.

Peace.

hakimashou posted:

... a politician complaining about the press is as absurd as a sailor complaining about the sea. Navigating a way through is simply what they have to do.

focused-grouped, headline-guided triangulation is a major ideological point of contention, not a minor side issue, surely

we don't describe it in terms of "false consciousness" any more but there is still a broad assumption amongst the Labour left that 1) the people at large are left-wing, but 2) are not yet consciously organised as such, and 3) await only a movement that can awaken this latent tendency

the iron logic of triangulation is terminally limiting for the ideological imagination. it implies that the space of the possible is very, very small. it implies the death of radical change. it implies that the degree to which a government can pursue an agenda to the left is not set by the conviction and passion of one's supporters - who, after all, still only count for one vote each, however passionately they mark their ballot - but by the relative indiscipline of the right, and vice versa.

Nude Bog Lurker
Jan 2, 2007
Fun Shoe

JFairfax posted:

Lol yes Enoch Powell had some good ideas and was a nice lad who meant well

lol you didn't read the article and you and your uni mates are going to hand the country over to the Tories forever

The Insect Court
Nov 22, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

JFairfax posted:

Lol yes Enoch Powell had some good ideas and was a nice lad who meant well

Turns out the real Rivers of Blood are going to be Labour's come June 8th. :c00l:

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames
I suppose Labour's path to victory in June could be engaging with non-voters on social media and at rallies?

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

OwlFancier posted:

The Tees Valley mayor actually covers a surprising amount of the countryside outside of the actual boro.

Middlesbrough South has been becoming an increasingly Tory constituency for years and years now, for example. It's really only the actual centers that are that strong Labour, the point of the mayoral post is to give tories a way to overrule Labour councils.

Fact check: Tom Blenkinsop increased his majority at the last election, with the Tories losing vote share.

The 'Tees Valley' is a labour heartland. If a Tory mayoral candidate can win here then any constituencies in it are at risk in June

GaussianCopula
Jun 5, 2011
Jews fleeing the Holocaust are not in any way comparable to North Africans, who don't flee genocide but want to enjoy the social welfare systems of Northern Europe.
Just fyi, when the German SPD replaced their odious leader they jumped in the polls and closed an 20% gap - it's now widening again because people in their hearts know that left-wing parties are all bad, but in the UK it seems like the Conservatives are even worse, so an actual functioning Labour party might have been something good.

ronya posted:

focused-grouped, headline-guided triangulation is a major ideological point of contention, not a minor side issue, surely

we don't describe it in terms of "false consciousness" any more but there is still a broad assumption amongst the Labour left that 1) the people at large are left-wing, but 2) are not yet consciously organised as such, and 3) await only a movement that can awaken this latent tendency

the iron logic of triangulation is terminally limiting for the ideological imagination. it implies that the space of the possible is very, very small. it implies the death of radical change. it implies that the degree to which a government can pursue an agenda to the left is not set by the conviction and passion of one's supporters - who, after all, still only count for one vote each, however passionately they mark their ballot - but by the relative indiscipline of the right, and vice versa.


You can nudge a country on a certain path and still navigate towards a certain, far away goal. In the case of the UK a deeper integration into the EU for example would have been much more effective in furthering the goals of the left (e.g. worker rights, social welfare, you name it) than the idea of leaving because with the perfect being the enemy of the good. Or, to quote Shakespeare not Voltair "striving to better, oft we mar what's well".

GaussianCopula fucked around with this message at 07:41 on May 6, 2017

Ewan
Sep 29, 2008

Ewan is tired of his reputation as a serious Simon. I'm more of a jokester than you people think. My real name isn't even Ewan, that was a joke it's actually MARTIN! LOL fooled you again, it really is Ewan! Look at that monkey with a big nose, Ewan is so random! XD
https://excelpope.wordpress.com/2017/05/05/rant/

I think it’s fair to say that the past 18 months have put me firmly on the anti- side of the Corbyn argument. On Twitter I’ve made a lot of jokes at the expense of Corbyn and his supporters, on Facebook, and in real life, I’ve argued and debated with them, been round and round their loops of obfuscation and denial, but I’ve never been angry with them.

Until now.



I think this is probably quite a common sentiment.

communism bitch
Apr 24, 2009

GaussianCopula posted:

Just fyi, when the German SPD replaced their odious leader they jumped in the polls and closed an 20% gap - it's now widening again because people in their hearts know that left-wing parties are all bad, but in the UK it seems like the Conservatives are even worse, so an actual functioning Labour party might have been something good.



You can nudge a country on a certain path and still navigate towards a certain, far away goal. In the case of the UK a deeper integration into the EU for example would have been much more effective in furthering the goals of the left (e.g. worker rights, social welfare, you name it) than the idea of leaving because with the perfect being the enemy of the good. Or, to quote Shakespeare not Voltair "striving to better, oft we mar what's well".

gently caress off nazi oval office

Serotonin
Jul 14, 2001

The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of *blank*

serious gaylord posted:

I genuinely couldn't even imagine it would be this bad.

Im sorry for your loss. They've still got one seat though and if you ask very nicely Nige might come back.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ewan
Sep 29, 2008

Ewan is tired of his reputation as a serious Simon. I'm more of a jokester than you people think. My real name isn't even Ewan, that was a joke it's actually MARTIN! LOL fooled you again, it really is Ewan! Look at that monkey with a big nose, Ewan is so random! XD

jabby posted:

You think in order to prevent a one party state we should take the only opposition party that consistently polls above 10% and split it into two parties?

I'm not sure you know what you're talking about.
To be fair he said he sees it coming, not that it should happen.

  • Locked thread