|
Steel frame building cannot collapse without explosive demolition. This is a fact. You are entitle to your opinion however you're not entitled to your own facts. The story about "the collapse" is made up by those people who kidnapped Geordie Leforge so they could get their brainwaves covered/ recovered. So, Genius, have some of my memory.
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 10:19 |
|
|
FecLives posted:Steel frame building cannot collapse without explosive demolition. This is a fact. You are entitle to your opinion however you're not entitled to your own facts. The story about "the collapse" is made up by those people who kidnapped Geordie Leforge so they could get their brainwaves covered/ recovered. So, Genius, have some of my memory. On the other hand, recorded history
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:33
|
|
|
FecLives posted:Steel frame building cannot collapse without explosive demolition. This is a fact. You are entitle to your opinion however you're not entitled to your own facts. The story about "the collapse" is made up by those people who kidnapped Geordie Leforge so they could get their brainwaves covered/ recovered. So, Genius, have some of my memory. still laughing that the best argument you can come up with requires you to pretend that a jet aircraft's full load of fuel detonating doesn't count as an explosion pictured: definitely not an explosion which is in no way damaging a building 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
Jet fuel is not a hi explosive. Those are only instant flashes that were not sustained long enough and did not achieve a hi enough temperature to melt or significantly weaken the steel. Your sensationalism is noted. Thanks for the visual aide.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
FecLives posted:Jet fuel is not a hi explosive. Those are only instant flashes that were not sustained long enough and did not achieve a hi enough temperature to melt or significantly weaken the steel. Your sensationalism is noted. Thanks for the visual aide. The fire continued to burn you jackass it didn't magically disappear
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
FecLives posted:Jet fuel is not a hi explosive. Those are only instant flashes that were not sustained long enough and did not achieve a hi enough temperature to melt or significantly weaken the steel. Your sensationalism is noted. Thanks for the visual aide. expert in explosives and structural engineering, can't spell common english words correctly can you do me a favor and just copy paste whatever you're googling here instead of badly translating it into gibberish? at least that should make more sense
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
also lol at "jet fuel is not an explosive. combustion engine? illuminati plot, there was this inventor in dallas who invented one weird trick the car companies dont want you to know..."
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
I guess you need a welding class so you could learn to apply your genius I've given you.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:also lol at "jet fuel is not an explosive. combustion engine? illuminati plot, there was this inventor in dallas who invented one weird trick the car companies dont want you to know..." Inveneted a perpetual motion device out of a potato and a glass of water
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
FecLives posted:I guess you need a welding class so you could learn to apply your genius I've given you. LMAO since when did welding make anyone an expert in engineering By this logic I should be an expert in many things since I grew up in the sticks learning to weld and drive farm equipment and tear apart engines before I even grew pubes
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
For you physics challenged a hi explosive is a chemical reaction. C4 is an example. A low explosive is not a chemical reaction. Black powder or kerosene fit into this group. Those low explosives generate significantly less energy and are not capable of producing enough explosive force to cause the effect witnessed.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
FecLives posted:For you physics challenged a hi explosive is a chemical reaction. C4 is an example. A low explosive is not a chemical reaction. Black powder or kerosene fit into this group. Those low explosives generate significantly less energy and are not capable of producing enough energy. Good thing nobody said the impact in and of itself caused the collapse and that the incredible hot flames generated by BURNING JET FUEL helped to weaken the supports
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
FecLives posted:I guess you need a welding class so you could learn to apply your genius I've given you. funny you should mention https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
also lol at black powder is not a chemical reaction try harder dude. way way way harder
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
What were called "the supports" were actually not the load bearing structure, those load bearing structures were the 47 columns. The "supports" mentioned were not the 47 columns, only the riveted cross sections that were not responsible for holding the floors up. The PBS special was in error. El Puerco fucked around with this message at 21:09 on May 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Black power is a slow burn.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
you are embarassingly bad at this and, even worse, boring. go practice in gbs
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Loosing interest?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
Black Powder = Physical Reaction C4 = Chemical Reaction
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
FecLives posted:Black Powder = Physical Reaction TBH, I came to this thread to read about actual crazies, goons playing pretend is never as entertaining
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
ikanreed posted:TBH, I came to this thread to read about actual crazies, goons playing pretend is never as entertaining Toblerone Triangular bitch
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Shelly Kimball scumbag
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
FecLives posted:Black Powder = Physical Reaction yeah you're being way too blatant. you can't just say obviously false things and keep people on the hook. you need to put in more effort than that. also work on your insult game. i was willing to play along for a bit but if you're going to be this lazy about it then nobody's having fun
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
FecLives posted:Shelly Kimball scumbag Is that supposed to mean literally anything to me
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
FecLives posted:For you physics challenged a hi explosive is a chemical reaction. C4 is an example. A low explosive is not a chemical reaction. Black powder or kerosene fit into this group. Those low explosives generate significantly less energy and are not capable of producing enough explosive force to cause the effect witnessed. "Combustion is not a chemical reaction" -- forums poster FecLives
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 23:40
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 01:09
|
|
|
Oh my goodness. 
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 04:03
|
|
|
Stop responding to the most blatant and awful bait you weirdos. VitalSigns posted:I'm seeing this Hillary Clinton and the DNC assassinated Seth Rich conspiracy theory popping up again and it's amazing. Also the assassin managed to be so bad at their task that the target didn't die until several hours later and was conscious when police arrived on the scene. It all fits case closed! 
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
right its jsut another one of these darn coincidences that he was in conrespondance with assange and that he was the one who leaked the dnc emails. also a coincidence pedosta said he needed to be made an example of. all coincidences
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 05:20
|
|
|
smoke sumthin bitch posted:right its jsut another one of these darn coincidences that he was in conrespondance with assange and that he was the one who leaked the dnc emails. also a coincidence pedosta said he needed to be made an example of. all coincidences
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:Stop responding to the most blatant and awful bait you weirdos. Mmm yes this thread is so much more thrilling when there's not a target dummy to entertain us
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 06:07
|
|
|
dwarf74 posted:Show me where he was in correspondence with Assange. he wasn't, at all. smoke somethin is gonna get another white chit at NA come monday...
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 06:18
|
|
|
dwarf74 posted:Show me where he was in correspondence with Assange. Literally no one, including the much discussed private eye hired by the family, says he was talking to Assange or Wikileaks. It's destined to become one of those unkillable "facts" that will be constantly touted on conspiracy websites though.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 06:39
|
|
|
Notably, Assange himself has not stated he was in contact with Rich. He was happy to imply and tease and use a dead man to try and keep Hillary from getting elected though.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 08:03
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:Mmm yes this thread is so much more thrilling when there's not a target dummy to entertain us It's more fun when they're real
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 12:44
|
|
|
im dead and gay
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
or am i? dun dun dunnnn!
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
Michael Jackson posted:im dead and gay But are you black or white?
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 12:50
|
|
|
pop fly to McGillicutty posted:But are you black or white? Don't matter if you're dead or gay. Dun dada dun! dun dun dun!
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 14:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 10:19 |
|
|
pop fly to McGillicutty posted:But are you black or white? i am gray ash
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 18:09
|
|