|
Dr. Gitmo Moneyson posted:Why exactly is he transferring again? He's not going to start is probably the actual reason, but to get away from Brian Kelly is what I'm going to go with.
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 06:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 21:48 |
|
|
Dr. Gitmo Moneyson posted:I remember Malik Zaire clowning Texas when they went to Notre Dame. Hell yeah I want him. If I remember correctly, he announced his decision to transfer before Kizer entered the draft, so he might have thought he'd be benched next season at ND.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 06:56
|
|
|
Better lock him down before he shits all over UGA, imoquote:Appalachian State signed head coach Scott Satterfield to a contract extension through the 2021 season.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
It's so loving stupid that App State is our first game (or scheduled at all!) next season. Who the hell though that was a great plan (fire Greg mcgarity)
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
KKKLIP ART posted:It's so loving stupid that App State is our first game (or scheduled at all!) next season. Who the hell though that was a great plan (fire Greg mcgarity) UGA losing to App. State to start the season would be glorious. You bulldog fans need to think of every other college football fan before being so greedy. 
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/johncanzanobft/status/866017810702643201
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2017 07:39
|
|
|
Mr. World posted:UGA losing to App. State to start the season would be glorious. You bulldog fans need to think of every other college football fan before being so greedy. I fully expect to take that L just because I don't trust our o-line or Jim chaney to win it for us.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
Stoked he'll be back on the field, not looking forward to seeing him in the Civil War though.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
KKKLIP ART posted:I fully expect to take that L just because I don't trust our o-line or Jim chaney to win it for us. I hope it happens after Richt crushed them last year.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
Zaire should go to Harvard. He's only got 1 more year left anyway right? Get a real masters from an ivy league dude, he ain't making the league with how he played anyway.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 15:46
|
|
|
The Notorious ZSB posted:Zaire should go to Harvard. He's only got 1 more year left anyway right? Get a real masters from an ivy league dude, he ain't making the league with how he played anyway. UGA poached a kicker from one of the Ivys to be a walk-on and I was really confused because I know Ivys dont do traditional scholarships, but get your degree from an Ivy kicker dude.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 16:27
|
|
|
A bunch of Zippy The Roo costumes have gone missing from Akron I'm not saying this was Dogg's doing, but i'm not not saying it.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
SBNation has a set of articles on what would fix College Football The Olympic model of amateurism sounds really interesting at the least.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
Maxwells Demon posted:SBNation has a set of articles on what would fix College Football Yeah, that would probably, to me, be a good thing to implement. But of course, you'd have endless pearl clutching over it. The promotion/relegation idea is interesting, but I don't like him including Div II and III in it.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
Maxwells Demon posted:SBNation has a set of articles on what would fix College Football The Olympic model of amateurism would codify what happens under the table for a lot of the top players. Boosters would pay players to attend certain schools under the guise of endorsements and "autographs". He argues that the top schools get the top players anyway, but I argue that parity has significantly increased since the 50's and 60's when there weren't such things as recruiting limits and benefits oversights, and allowing uncontrolled booster influence would return to that sort of concentration of talents. OTOH, it would allow random schools to put together a big bit of cash to land a top recruiting class such as Ole Miss a few years back.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
Parity in college sports is an oxymoron.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
The notion that parity is somehow more important than making sure players are treated fairly is insane to me
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 19:47
|
|
|
I mean, as an Oregon fan, I definitely see the effect of a small set of boosters (say, just Phil Knight) on bringing a non-traditional power up into the national conversation for a few years. SMU fans might see that as well, or Ole Miss fans. This would just codify it, and we'd see if year-in, year-out Texas and Michigan et al would be willing to put in the cash to suppress upstart powers. But how can you say that there is parity when Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio State have already been to multiple playoffs in the 3 years the playoffs have existed?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
Haven't read yet but a few weeks ago on his podcast he had an interesting take on relegation: use it only among the G5 to fill a sixth power conference.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
Hoo boy, bringing back the video game would be GREAT
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
I dunno, FSU/UF games always being 72-69 shootouts sounds kind of fun.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
MourningView posted:The notion that parity is somehow more important than making sure players are treated fairly is insane to me College football has 3 things going for it that make it interesting: 1. major programs with no margin of error (because you can be a fan with a t-shirt) 2. upsets, upsets, upsets 3. weird, crazy offenses The NCAA has more parity now than it ever has before which means more upsets and a tighter margin of error. G5 teams can beat P5 teams and FCS teams can sometimes as well. Allowing boosters in, officially, would give a non-traditional with some rich boosters an easier path to the Phil Knight effect, but you'll lose out on the "middle" of the conferences. One or two programs would climb to the top while the rest would be forced down to the bottom. Less upsets = less interest = NCAA not as much fun anymore. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one of those "they get a free education" guys. I just feel that his assertion that Olympic amateurism won't change much is not accurate. It would lead to drastic changes.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
kayakyakr posted:College football has 3 things going for it that make it interesting: I don't see how this would end the possibility of upsets, considering this is currently the status quo. The only difference would what would attract the students, money, or the potential to be on a winning team. Take the Big 10 for example. Right now you have Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, and Wisconsin as the four teams dominating everyone else. What would change if one of those teams fell off because say Rutgers got lucky with some big booster with deep pockets. Not much, really. You still have four really dominant teams and 10 teams of varying strength.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 21:50
|
|
|
iospace posted:I don't see how this would end the possibility of upsets, considering this is currently the status quo. The only difference would what would attract the students, money, or the potential to be on a winning team. It would probably be the end of Michigan State (which had been good). And the Big Ten is a really bad example because everyone else sucks already. The Big Ten has no middle class to lose. The ACC might be a better example. Virginia Tech was a major beneficiary of the changes that ended the wild west of recruiting. Without Alabama and the other historical programs in the area soaking up all the recruits and with a decent coach, they became a fixture. Would they keep that in a world where money dominated recruiting? How about the middle of that conference? Would NC State, Georgia Tech, Louisville, and Pitt stay middling, able to upset FSU/Clemson any given year? Someone's going to have to go a lot further to convince me that letting boosters in, officially, wouldn't lead to further concentration of talent among urban schools or those with a few rich boosters.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 22:22
|
|
|
I listen to a lot of Connelly's stuff and I'm not sure I was expecting his voice yo go with that face
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
the mean lunch lady posted:Hoo boy, bringing back the video game would be GREAT Thats all I care about
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
KICK BAMA KICK posted:Haven't read yet but a few weeks ago on his podcast he had an interesting take on relegation: use it only among the G5 to fill a sixth power conference.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
Incoherence posted:This is sort of awkward because it means those schools have a harder time maintaining regional rivalries, and travel expenses will vary year to year based on who's promoted. If Hawaii gets out of the dumpster one year, suddenly the Consolation Prize Conference becomes a much less lucrative thing for G5 schools.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 00:48
|
|
|
iospace posted:I don't see how this would end the possibility of upsets, considering this is currently the status quo. The only difference would what would attract the students, money, or the potential to be on a winning team. You'd probably see Nebraska and Iowa rise, because they have the financial means to overcome the geographic and demographic difficulties they have when recruiting.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Sash! posted:You'd probably see Nebraska and Iowa rise, because they have the financial means to overcome the geographic and demographic difficulties they have when recruiting. I picked Rutgers because they're a poo poo team with probably a shithead deep pocketed booster who is willing to dump tons of money into it because they feel they're the red headed step child of the big ten and RED HEADS NEED LOVE DAMMIT.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
I actually agree with the sentiment that promotion and relegation in American sports could basically only work with college football and that it would enhance the overall product. Really even though it's blatantly idealistic I agree with large swaths of his overall points.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
iospace posted:I picked Rutgers because they're a poo poo team with probably a shithead deep pocketed booster who is willing to dump tons of money into it because they feel they're the red headed step child of the big ten and RED HEADS NEED LOVE DAMMIT. RutgersAl doesn't have that much money, I assume.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 03:21
|
|
|
Sash! posted:RutgersAl doesn't have that much money, I assume. Yearly cost in-state is over 14k. Double that for out of state.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 03:37
|
|
|
I haven't posted in a while so I just want to say Auburn fans can suck my dick
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
The Notorious ZSB posted:Zaire should go to Harvard. He's only got 1 more year left anyway right? Get a real masters from an ivy league dude, he ain't making the league with how he played anyway. Psht how much is an ivy league graduate degree worth really
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Raku posted:I haven't posted in a while so I just want to say Same, but replace Auburn with UF and also Miami.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
whiteyfats posted:Same, but replace Auburn with UF and also Miami. Jameis is a rapist and Jimbo owns a McMansion and probably has camo bedsheets with Taylor Jacobs' cumstains on them.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PardonMyTake/status/867071771278757889
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 03:33
|
|
|
LeeMajors posted:Jameis is a rapist and Jimbo owns a McMansion and probably has camo bedsheets with Taylor Jacobs' cumstains on them. Tough, but fair.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 03:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 21:48 |
|
|
Harbaugh for coach-commissioner of college football.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 03:59
|
|
