|
lefties think that anyone not white can't be racists or bigots so there's your answer sharia law will look nice all over the UK
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:41 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 11:04 |
|
Psycho Society posted:This is what stood out to me, you have the Manchester police on Twitter making chilling statements like they're investing someone for saying "something must be done", making arrests for "sectatian language" on trains, and yet admitting support of ISIS and terror bombing is free speech? What the gently caress, Britain?
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:41 |
|
america deserved 9/11, just imho
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:43 |
|
Also btw gutting access to healthcare will kill far more people than a hundred flashy bombs going off, that doesn't stimulate the toddler-like fear centers in your brain though because you are incapable of foresight. 50,000 people a year, you dumb fucks, which is also about as many people who die because baby boomers decide not to get flu vaccines before they hold babies and visit nursing homes
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:47 |
|
Hm, it's almost like "Hate Speech Laws" are terribly one sided
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:48 |
|
Do it ironically posted:lefties think that anyone not white can't be racists or bigots so there's your answer Well you see it's actually about who has power....
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:53 |
|
Psycho Society posted:Also btw gutting access to healthcare will kill far more people than a hundred flashy bombs going off, that doesn't stimulate the toddler-like fear centers in your brain though because you are incapable of foresight. 50,000 people a year, you dumb fucks, which is also about as many people who die because baby boomers decide not to get flu vaccines before they hold babies and visit nursing homes In the Star Trek universe, Vulcans are seen to have a consistent ethical system involving satisfying the preferences of the greatest number of people, even if it means sacrificing the interests of a fewer number of people. This perspective is most similar to the human utilitarian ethical system.[15] In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, Spock sacrifices himself to save the lives of those on the Enterprise, stating that "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." In Star Trek Into Darkness (2013), Spock uses the same logic to justify his attempt to sacrifice himself. In the Star Trek: The Original Series episode "The Galileo Seven", Spock states that "it is more rational to sacrifice one life than six." In Star Trek: Enterprise, T'Pol states that "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" is a Vulcan axiom.[16]
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:54 |
|
spacetoaster posted:Well you see it's actually about who has power.... i like thinking about dropping a kkk member into china or some african country and instantly being not racist, makes a lot of sense if you think about it
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:56 |
|
Psycho Society posted:Also btw gutting access to healthcare will kill far more people than a hundred flashy bombs going off, that doesn't stimulate the toddler-like fear centers in your brain though because you are incapable of foresight. 50,000 people a year, you dumb fucks, which is also about as many people who die because baby boomers decide not to get flu vaccines before they hold babies and visit nursing homes that's exactly what I said but everyone was like ??? you monster don't you care about these 22 people? it's p lol. if we diverted even a portion of our defense spending into just making sure locals got the food and healthcare they needed we could save so many lives but I guess it's not worth it unless it also involves bombing other places.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 03:57 |
|
Harald posted:america deserved 9/11, just imho
|
# ? May 26, 2017 04:08 |
|
This just popped up on FB.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 04:34 |
|
spacetoaster posted:This just popped up on FB. If anything...
|
# ? May 26, 2017 04:43 |
|
Do it ironically posted:i like thinking about dropping a kkk member into china or some african country and instantly being not racist, makes a lot of sense if you think about it It actually the other way around - dropping an average white guy into China or africa tends to turn him into a budding kkk member
|
# ? May 26, 2017 04:43 |
|
Do it ironically posted:i like thinking about dropping a kkk member into china or some african country and instantly being not racist, makes a lot of sense if you think about it Liberal ideology has zero internal consistency and is barely pretending otherwise. It's just "our tribe versus your tribe." They don't actually give a poo poo about racism as a moral principle, they're just trying to root out Team Red versus Team Blue. Same as when the right decides "states' rights" are sacrosanct in one issue, then suddenly irrelevant in another.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 05:00 |
|
Liberals are trash that no true Leftist should tolerate
|
# ? May 26, 2017 05:01 |
|
It's a shame they keep bombing children when there are folks who would be quite happy to eat all the nails they could come up with to maintain the illusion of tolerance, but I guess blowing up powerful wealthy people is too hard.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 05:47 |
|
Nobody would cry a single tear if they blew up Davos or the Bohemian Grove or Burning Man
|
# ? May 26, 2017 05:49 |
|
I'd be a little bit upset if fyre was terrorismed, as it kind of defeats the purpose.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 05:53 |
|
Relax, no one is going to improve fyre with nail bombs
|
# ? May 26, 2017 05:54 |
|
Psycho Society posted:Also btw gutting access to healthcare will kill far more people than a hundred flashy bombs going off, that doesn't stimulate the toddler-like fear centers in your brain though because you are incapable of foresight. 50,000 people a year, you dumb fucks, which is also about as many people who die because baby boomers decide not to get flu vaccines before they hold babies and visit nursing homes you're so stupid lol. different groups of people care about different things. and guess what? poverty and healthcare are completely irrelevant to rich people. rich people decide government policy. they won't give a poo poo if a billion poors die to preventable diseases and hunger since it will never affect them ever, in any way. whereas their idiot daughter being exploded at a concert has a 0.0000000001% chance of happening but that chance is still infinitely more likely than losing healthcare lmao. it's completely logical.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 05:55 |
|
Zo posted:you're so stupid lol. different groups of people care about different things. and guess what? poverty and healthcare are completely irrelevant to rich people. rich people decide government policy. so you're saying we should murder all the rich people and take their healthcare?
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:08 |
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Nobody would cry a single tear if they blew up Davos or the Bohemian Grove or Burning Man Or any of those statutes of Klan members in the south, or the Alamo museum, or a Golden Corral, or any of the other conservative NuChrist worship centers
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:09 |
|
Piss de Bundy posted:so you're saying we should murder all the rich people and take their healthcare? OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Nobody would cry a single tear if they blew up Davos or the Bohemian Grove or Burning Man
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:10 |
|
Jukebox Hero posted:Or any of those statutes of Klan members in the south, or the Alamo museum, or a Golden Corral, or any of the other conservative NuChrist worship centers You shut your gawd darn pie-hole about golden corral you son of a bitch. Fight me irl.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:12 |
|
This might be an unpopular opinion but I"m sad that these people died.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:14 |
|
Jukebox Hero posted:Or any of those statutes of Klan members in the south, or the Alamo museum, or a Golden Corral, or any of the other conservative NuChrist worship centers Are you retarded? There's like, one thing you're supposed to do with the Alamo, and you want to gently caress it up! What the hell?!
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:16 |
|
blowing up burning man would just set off another endless debate and arguing over "well just cuz they were white and a little well off doesn't mean they deserve X Y Z" now blowing up a wallstreet building and taking out a bunch of bankers, hachi motchi!!
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:17 |
|
FisheyStix posted:Are you retarded? There's like, one thing you're supposed to do with the Alamo, and you want to gently caress it up! What the hell?! We would just start writing "Remember the Alamo!" on all our bombs.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:18 |
|
Piss de Bundy posted:blowing up burning man would just set off another endless debate and arguing over "well just cuz they were white and a little well off doesn't mean they deserve X Y Z" I can think of one thing that would convert most of the west to Islam and that has something to do with it.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:20 |
|
Zo posted:you're so stupid lol. different groups of people care about different things. and guess what? poverty and healthcare are completely irrelevant to rich people. rich people decide government policy. Yikes. No, rich people don't control every part of policy. The AHCA passed congress because a conservative majority was voted in, by americans. If we had voted in democrats (corrupt as they may be), we wouldn't be facing a rollback in quality of care that will lead to quantitatively more suffering if it passes the Senate. As strange as it may seem, your choices do matter and they have very real repercussions for people who depend on things like affordable healthcare to survive. And who do think I'm talking about? The conversations about what puts Americans (or Europeans) at risk isn't exclusive to the rich. Like what the honest gently caress are you even talking about
|
# ? May 26, 2017 06:47 |
|
Psycho Society posted:This is what stood out to me, you have the Manchester police on Twitter making chilling statements like they're investing someone for saying "something must be done", making arrests for "sectatian language" on trains, and yet admitting support of ISIS and terror bombing is free speech? What the gently caress, Britain? Im not even being a little hyperbolic when I say they think its okay because it'd be racist to stop it.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 11:32 |
|
guys racism is bad and also if you are non-white i will bend over backward to make excuses for things you do that if done by a white person i wouldn't think twice about criticizing. but really, i swear i view all people as being created equal islamists just need jobs.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 11:45 |
|
i'm the guy that wouldn't criticize a white suicide bomber
|
# ? May 26, 2017 11:46 |
|
Streak posted:i'm the guy that wouldn't criticize a white suicide bomber well sir i think you should. my position is that suicide bombing is bad.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 11:58 |
|
23 Christians just got blown up on a bus in Egypt. If I'm gonna get murdered for being non muslim in the ME I want it to go down by the beach where they cut my throat like they did those other dudes.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 12:17 |
|
Secular Humanist posted:guys racism is bad and also if you are non-white i will bend over backward to make excuses for things you do that if done by a white person i wouldn't think twice about criticizing. No, if you start to disagree politically with them then the racism comes out full force
|
# ? May 26, 2017 12:19 |
|
Gonna assume ME means mass effect, and what can I say? Same
|
# ? May 26, 2017 12:20 |
|
XxXCaptainNoxXxX posted:23 Christians just got blown up on a bus in Egypt. Aren't you supposed to try to convert infidels before blowing them up? These guys are doing this all wrong
|
# ? May 26, 2017 12:28 |
|
Psycho Society posted:Aren't you supposed to try to convert infidels before blowing them up? These guys are doing this all wrong from human shaped things to a lot of things. I think they took a leaf from the whole "let allah sort 'em out" thing.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 12:33 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 11:04 |
|
You can't judge capitalism based on the abuses of a tiny minority of its practitioners. Capitalism is an ideology of prosperity.
|
# ? May 26, 2017 12:33 |