Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Furnaceface
Oct 21, 2004




DJExile posted:

Guarantee Chicago shot the idea down before it could go anywhere

Didnt the Leafs do the same thing with Hamilton/Toronto2?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

yellowcar
Feb 14, 2010

Furnaceface posted:

Didnt the Leafs do the same thing with Hamilton/Toronto2?

Yeah the then CEO of RIM tried to buy the Coyotes and move them to Hamilton. It didn't go very far.

Gio
Jun 20, 2005


Spring Break My Heart posted:

The Coyotes weren't an expansion team, they got a fairly functional Jets team and made the playoffs 5 times in their first 6 years upon moving to Phoenix.

hence "looking past expansion to non-traditional market teams in general"

Captain Internet
Apr 20, 2005

:love: HOTLANTA :love:
IS WHERE YOUR HEART IS

hifi posted:

arizona does this and the problem is that nobody wants to see the california teams or the bad teams back east, and now you can throw in vegas/arizona as teams that the other side is going to have a hard time filling the arena half full

On one hand, you can't bank on opposing fans to fill your home arena. On the other hand, wow, the difference between Las Vegas and Scottsdale as tourist destinations. One business plan is a bit more tenable.

iospace
Jan 19, 2038


honestly, start a franchise in Atlanta, wait a few years, then move it to wherever you want!

Kalenn Istarion
Nov 2, 2012

Maybe Senpai will finally notice me now that I've dropped :fivebux: on this snazzy av
I would like to be the first to welcome Nashville fans to the thread

iospace
Jan 19, 2038


Kalenn Istarion posted:

I would like to be the first to welcome Nashville fans to the thread

In the famous words of Yogi Berra

It ain't over till it's over.

(though it's not looking good :ohdear:)

hifi
Jul 25, 2012

Captain Internet posted:

On one hand, you can't bank on opposing fans to fill your home arena. On the other hand, wow, the difference between Las Vegas and Scottsdale as tourist destinations. One business plan is a bit more tenable.

the big tourism industry in phoenix is snowbirds

Furnaceface
Oct 21, 2004




Kalenn Istarion posted:

I would like to be the first to welcome Nashville fans to the thread

Technically youre the second.

Furnaceface posted:

So... too early to welcome the end of the season?

:smug:

hifi
Jul 25, 2012

and you absolutely can bank on other team's fans to fill your arena. plenty of teams have all sorts of schemes where you have to buy a week of games to see your hawks game or premium pricing or whatever. the problems are that you can't have a 100k seat stadium to fill to the gills with chicago assholes and then a 5k one the next day when the coyotes roll into town to play some really boring hockey

Gio
Jun 20, 2005


Schlesische posted:

The team is going to suck for a while, but until the NFL showed up it was going to be pretty safe.

Vegas is hoping that people from places like Montreal, Toronto, New York and Boston are going to go "hey, I want to go on a trip to watch my team play, why don't I double up and go on a trip to Vegas".
Vegas is also a large enough city for hockey and, if (it's a big if), they can average well over 10k every night they'll be fine.

The whole idea of the expansion was that Seattle, Portland, Kansas or Milwaukee would've put up a realistic option and made it 32.
Quebec City is literally the only slam-dunk ready to go now market the NHL has access to and Bettman has made it clear he doesn't view it as an option, so we're in a holding pattern until Seattle can sort it's poo poo out (lol, never gonna happen).

two things. first, the idea that the NFL is going to take away hockey fans is funny, and wholly indicative of why vegas is such a dumb market for hockey. second, the "snowbird hypothesis" is literally the bullshit story spun by paul newman in Slap Shot; there's a reason why it was a joke. apparently though it's an idea the NHL has taken seriously.

e: third, raw attendance doesn't mean poo poo if your tickets are the price of an ECHL game.

Gio fucked around with this message at 05:59 on Jun 1, 2017

Infidel Castro
Jun 8, 2010

Again and again
Your face reminds me of a bleak future
Despite the absence of hope
I give you this sacrifice




DJExile posted:

Guarantee Chicago shot the idea down before it could go anywhere

Don't know how much Wirtz had say in it, but the NHL was asking a $50m expansion fee for Milwaukee. Lloyd Pettit saw that as way too much so he pulled his bid.

iospace
Jan 19, 2038


50m mid-late 80s money? :psyduck:

gently caress the NHL.

hifi
Jul 25, 2012

another thing about the arizona snowbirds is that they live here so they're already here in the hockey season.

i agree that the plane ride and tickets for less than a game at home thing is probably way less occurring than message boards make it out to be, but seemingly half of phoenix is from philly/pittsburg/ny/minnesota or wherever too.

Xtanstic
Nov 23, 2007

MononcQc posted:

at least Molson stepped in and forced Bergevin to sign Subban, not that it changed much in the end.

I dunno how as an owner you step in at the 11th hour during the arbitration process, yet let him go last summer for Weber. God.

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.

Kalenn Istarion posted:

I would like to be the first to welcome Nashville fans to the thread

it's a bullshit quote but no series starts until a road team wins

FAT32 SHAMER
Aug 16, 2012



I posted in the wrong thread but rip the preds either way

Schlesische
Jul 4, 2012

Gio posted:

two things. first, the idea that the NFL is going to take away hockey fans is funny, and wholly indicative of why vegas is such a dumb market for hockey. second, the "snowbird hypothesis" is literally the bullshit story spun by paul newman in Slap Shot; there's a reason why it was a joke. apparently though it's an idea the NHL has taken seriously.

e: third, raw attendance doesn't mean poo poo if your tickets are the price of an ECHL game.

Firstly, The NFL is relevant due to the Business community, who purchase boxes and suites and are generally willing to pay significantly more than the plebs down below.
Not selling out boxes is often significantly worse for a franchise than not selling out seats because it underlines a franchise's lack of ability to attract local sponsorships and other "it's small here, but it really adds up" budget stuff.

Secondly, I never ever ever said Las Vegas was a good idea, just that the NHL was going to do it regardless because there was money on the table and it's an expansion into a market that is genuinely unserved by hockey. Same as how Arizona's (also Nashville, Florida, Tampa Bay, California, Atlanta) value is not solely in money now, but in the growth of the player pool which is potential growth in the US market. Keep in mind Hockey already has a relatively large international player pool relative to the rest of the 4 major US sports and doesn't need to go hell for leather running exhibition matches in places that don't give a poo poo (but will do so anyway because it's run by idiots).

hifi posted:

arizona does this and the problem is that nobody wants to see the california teams or the bad teams back east, and now you can throw in vegas/arizona as teams that the other side is going to have a hard time filling the arena half full

Arizona doesn't have the same kind of raw tourism appeal Las Vegas can offer.
For example, the Casinos (who plan on buying a bunch of boxes iirc) can offer their more "well off" clientelle spend a few nights in a high roller suite and, as part of the package, go watch their team from a pretty swish box. Arizona, not so much.

iospace posted:

Milwaukee had an NHL class arena ready to go.

The NHL either never bit, or they wanted to and Chicago said no.

I think they didn't really want to go to Milwaukee because they view it as served by Chicago and the Minnesota franchise. Doesn't really make sense because ?Wisconsonites? mostly have a bred-in distaste of Chicago and don't have a massive liking for Minnesota too iirc. Chicago won't say no, but the "entrance fee" from both Minnesota and Chicago might have been set high enough as a deterrent - see also "Greater Toronto Area".

Xtanstic posted:

I swear a few weeks ago Bill Daly officially said that the NHL was done waiting around for Seattle to get its poo poo together

Bettman also said something along the lines of "we just offered expansion, where the gently caress were you guys? Make us wait again, and we're loving through." when he admitted Vegas.
Seattle still has a seat that is basically theirs since there's almost no chance Kansas want one, Milwaukee can't have one, Quebec is too small and french while Portland is too busy being Portland.

Schlesische fucked around with this message at 07:56 on Jun 1, 2017

dont be mean to me
May 2, 2007

I'm interplanetary, bitch
Let's go to Mars


Schlesische posted:

Bettman also said something along the lines of "we just offered expansion, where the gently caress were you guys? Make us wait again, and we're loving through." when he admitted Vegas.
Seattle still has a seat that is basically theirs since there's almost no chance Kansas want one, Milwaukee can't have one, Quebec is too small and french while Portland is too busy being Portland.

And Seattle will never take up because they're still a Goddamn pillar of salt about the Supersonics 10 years on.

As in, among the plans for a basketball arena, at least one was specifically designed to be incompatible with ice hockey.

xzzy
Mar 5, 2009

I don't think Chicago would give a poo poo if there was a team in Milwaukee. We've already got two AHL teams, one of which I'm pretty sure is the only AHL team that actually sees a profit, and our NHL team is in bandwagon mode with a huge sellout streak and nosebleed seats are north of $100.

There's also already decent comparisons in the area.. we got two baseball teams and they both benefit from a rivalry. Plus the whole Bears/Packers thing.

Maybe under dollar bill there would have been grumbling. But now? They'd probably look at the Bears/Packers rivalry and see dollar signs.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


xzzy posted:

There's also already decent comparisons in the area.. we got two baseball teams and they both benefit from a rivalry.

I get what you're trying to say here but let's not pretend the Sox aren't anything beyond an afterthought in Chicago compared to the Cubs.

iospace
Jan 19, 2038


xzzy posted:

I don't think Chicago would give a poo poo if there was a team in Milwaukee. We've already got two AHL teams, one of which I'm pretty sure is the only AHL team that actually sees a profit, and our NHL team is in bandwagon mode with a huge sellout streak and nosebleed seats are north of $100.

There's also already decent comparisons in the area.. we got two baseball teams and they both benefit from a rivalry. Plus the whole Bears/Packers thing.

Maybe under dollar bill there would have been grumbling. But now? They'd probably look at the Bears/Packers rivalry and see dollar signs.

Well, I think part of the problem for Chicago back then, especially under the old ownership, was that they felt entitled to the Milwaukee market. 90 minute drive isn't a bad deal for NHL games. Hell, we've done it to go see Badger games.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


iospace posted:

90 minute drive isn't a bad deal for NHL games.

Tell that to the coyotes :v:

xzzy
Mar 5, 2009

iospace posted:

Well, I think part of the problem for Chicago back then, especially under the old ownership, was that they felt entitled to the Milwaukee market. 90 minute drive isn't a bad deal for NHL games. Hell, we've done it to go see Badger games.

Pfft, 90 minutes. You're looking at 2 hours or more once you factor in traffic. :v:

Getting to the united center is a loving chore.

flakeloaf
Feb 26, 2003

Still better than android clock

xzzy posted:

Pfft, 90 minutes. You're looking at 2 hours or more once you factor in traffic. :v:

Getting to the united center is a loving chore.


*pant pant pant* did someone push the senators button what did i miss

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

flakeloaf posted:

*pant pant pant* did someone push the senators button what did i miss

the SCF

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007



:thurman:

iospace
Jan 19, 2038



:vince:

Zodijackylite
Oct 18, 2005

hello bonjour, en francais we call the bread man l'homme de pain, because pain means bread and we're going to see a lot of pain this year and every nyrfan is looking forward to it and hey tony, can you wait until after my postgame interview to get on your phone? i thought you quit twitter...

:hfive:

Infidel Castro
Jun 8, 2010

Again and again
Your face reminds me of a bleak future
Despite the absence of hope
I give you this sacrifice




iospace posted:

Well, I think part of the problem for Chicago back then, especially under the old ownership, was that they felt entitled to the Milwaukee market. 90 minute drive isn't a bad deal for NHL games. Hell, we've done it to go see Badger games.

Bill Wirtz probably could have made a good case that Milwaukee should be in his television market back then. Y'know, if he actually allowed any games to be televised.

Nowadays you see Blackhawks poo poo around Milwaukee all the time, but it's probably due to a good mix of Chicago transplants and bandwagon fans. There's also quite a few Detroit fans here too.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


https://twitter.com/DarrenDreger/status/870342403655335937

fancycats gonna learn pronger physics

Benson Cunningham
Dec 9, 2006

Chief of J.U.N.K.E.R. H.Q.
As big of an rear end in a top hat as he was at times, I'm really glad he is doing well enough to be out there working again. Concussions are god drat scary.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


Yeah the interviews with him and his wife from a couple years ago were really spooky. It sounded like he was a real mess.

xzzy
Mar 5, 2009

Good news is that Pronger is a UFA next summer, be interesting to see if any teams scoop him up!

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


xzzy posted:

Good news is that Pronger is a UFA next summer, be interesting to see if any teams scoop him up!

He came off his Flyers contract as of this season, he's UFA as of the end of the finals.

Cocaine Bear
Nov 4, 2011

ACAB

Plus doesn't he have a bad back from carrying all those teams in the playoffs?

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


Hey I will have you know the 2010 Flyers were carried into the cup finals by the amazing goaltending troika of Michael Leighton, Brian Boucher, and Johan Backlund. :colbert:

iospace
Jan 19, 2038


DJExile posted:

Hey I will have you know the 2010 Flyers were carried into the cup finals by the amazing goaltending troika of Michael Leighton, Brian Boucher, and Johan Backlund. :colbert:

And then proceeded to unleash the insufferable fanbase that is Chicago Sports Fans.

Infidel Castro
Jun 8, 2010

Again and again
Your face reminds me of a bleak future
Despite the absence of hope
I give you this sacrifice




DJExile posted:

Johan Backlund.

You just made that up.

iospace posted:

And then proceeded to unleash the insufferable fanbase that is Chicago Sports Fans.

We had to soften the blow of the Cubs. Releasing that much insufferability all at once is dangerous.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


Infidel Castro posted:

You just made that up.

lol i admit i had to look him up to confirm it too, i knew there was a third

also it looks like his career died as soon as that playoff ended so, :rip:

  • Locked thread