|
What is the best flav... you all know what this question is: This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Labour |
|
907 | 49.92% |
| Theresa May Team (Conservative) |
|
48 | 2.64% |
| Liberal Democrats |
|
31 | 1.71% |
| UKIP |
|
13 | 0.72% |
| Plaid Cymru |
|
25 | 1.38% |
| Green |
|
22 | 1.21% |
| Scottish Socialist Party |
|
12 | 0.66% |
| Scottish Conservative Party |
|
1 | 0.06% |
| Scottish National Party |
|
59 | 3.25% |
| Some Kind of Irish Unionist |
|
4 | 0.22% |
| Alliance / Irish Nonsectarian |
|
3 | 0.17% |
| Some Kind of Irish Nationalist |
|
36 | 1.98% |
| Misc. Far Left Trots |
|
35 | 1.93% |
| Misc. Far Right Fash |
|
8 | 0.44% |
| Monster Raving Loony |
|
49 | 2.70% |
| Space Navies Party |
|
39 | 2.15% |
| Independent / Single Issue |
|
2 | 0.11% |
| Can't Vote |
|
188 | 10.35% |
| Won't Vote |
|
8 | 0.44% |
| Spoiled Ballot |
|
15 | 0.83% |
| Pissflaps |
|
312 | 17.17% |
| Total: | 1817 votes | ||
|
Andrast posted:You should definitely post on 4chan instead of here  I do both
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:37 |
|
|
 Earned themselves a nice little Twitter suspension for this.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:44
|
|
I can't get enough of are Dan
|
Oberleutnant posted:Remember a couple of years ago when Google Glass with the built-in cameras were a big deal for a minute? There was at least one story that was doing the rounds of a woman working as a waitress who felt really uncomfortable when some fedora wearing creep was recording her while she was working. As an amateur photographer I always get a little bit worried when people say that being photographed/filmed while out in public is a violation of your personal privacy. If you were going to do something about it, where do you draw the line between taking snapshots that happen to contain members of the public and unacceptable creeping on people?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
HJB posted:
Most people are going to food banks because the Jobcentre loves sanctioning people for bullshit reasons such as being late by ten minutes
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
jabby posted:As an amateur photographer I always get a little bit worried when people say that being photographed/filmed while out in public is a violation of your personal privacy. If you were going to do something about it, where do you draw the line between taking snapshots that happen to contain members of the public and unacceptable creeping on people? Usually when you put the camera under their skirts
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
HJB posted:
At what point do we start calling this match-fixing?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
Is that an actual tory party account?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
HJB posted:
Surely that isn't a real account?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
TheRat posted:At what point do we start calling this match-fixing? The moment it gets announced Boris is filling in for May on QT tonight.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
HJB posted:
It was a fake account. Hard to tell though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Obliterati posted:Personally I'm holding out for pocket size EMPs Just brick the stalker instead? Anarcho-primitivism saves the day again.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Sanitary Naptime posted:Did we jump off of the darkest timeline? Currently multi-track drifting across possible timelines, it's all very quantum right now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:It was a fake account. Hard to tell though. They played the long Con, the account had been active for over a year.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:It was a fake account. Hard to tell though. http://lincolnshirereporter.co.uk/2...able-lifestyle/
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:Considering that I've had a BNP member threaten my family due to my sisters being mixed race and being autistic myself I'd say you are wrong You're exposed to bigotry, and your response is to oppose social justice because of the actions of (mostly) idiot teens on tumblr? Social justice is a great thing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:00
|
|
|
jabby posted:As an amateur photographer I always get a little bit worried when people say that being photographed/filmed while out in public is a violation of your personal privacy. If you were going to do something about it, where do you draw the line between taking snapshots that happen to contain members of the public and unacceptable creeping on people? I think there's already a fairly obvious distinction between taking photos in public, and deliberately photographing specific people. It becomes even clearer when the division is between obviously having a camera setup because you're an amateur photographer (or even a professional one), and the kind of intrusive secret and semi-secret recording of specific individuals.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
Namtab posted:You're exposed to bigotry, and your response is to oppose social justice because of the actions of (mostly) idiot teens on tumblr? I oppose the regressive left's interpretation of social justice
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
Oberleutnant posted:Remember a couple of years ago when Google Glass with the built-in cameras were a big deal for a minute? There was at least one story that was doing the rounds of a woman working as a waitress who felt really uncomfortable when some fedora wearing creep was recording her while she was working. I'm not sure that's altogether a bad thing, because that allows for sousveillance too. BLM didn't come into existence because police started shooting an abnormally high number of black kids that year, it came into existence in part because they were doing the same poo poo as always but this time around everyone in the community had small portable recording devices. I've also heard that one of the biggest forms of antisocial behavior on council estates prevented by CCTV rollout was coppers knocking kids about for a laugh. Other forms of anti-surveillance are becoming practical at the individual/community level. Encryption was once the domain of governments, then of turbonerds, now it's easy enough that anyone can make use of it and governments are starting to piss their pants a little over it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:I oppose the regressive left's interpretation of social justice I, too, oppose fantasy bad people.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:I oppose the regressive left's interpretation of social justice you know I can totally imagine the thing in your avatar making your posts
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:State surveillance has been massive for decades, then routine business surveillance as CCTV systems and fancy routers got smaller and cheaper, now it's just happening at the personal level. Funnily enough I found this circulating on facebook https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTYERwDmCxk http://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/15313569.Controversial_arrest_video_sparks_police_investigation/
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Baron Corbyn posted:you know I can totally imagine the thing in your avatar making your posts This is what you get when the NHS does not provide decent dentists in your area and you cant afford private
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
forkboy84 posted:I mean you got to be a worthless nerd to pay People are so self hating about SA but it's still one of the few tolerable forums on the internet. Now whether that is because of the administration or despite it is a good question. I get the impression certain people would prefer SA to be a lot more right wing and like 4chan than it is. See GBS.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:08
|
|
to post on a gay dead forum.
|
Oberleutnant posted:I think there's already a fairly obvious distinction between taking photos in public, and deliberately photographing specific people. It becomes even clearer when the division is between obviously having a camera setup because you're an amateur photographer (or even a professional one), and the kind of intrusive secret and semi-secret recording of specific individuals. There's plenty of times you might want to take a picture of a specific individual though. Maybe they have an interesting look, or are doing something interesting, or they just compose a shot nicely. At the moment the assumption is that if you're out in public for everyone to see then you don't have a presumption of privacy. Is that wrong in your opinion?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:I oppose the regressive left's interpretation of social justice  Adorable, now get the gently caress out.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Oberleutnant posted:William Gibson gave an interview a few years ago and he was like "cyberpunk ahaha oh man what was I thinking??" and I was utterly bemused because the cyberpunk future happened, it's here, it's just a crap, boring, grey one with none of the style. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:I oppose the regressive left's interpretation of social justice Define regressive left, because right now it seems like a made up buzzword to sum up a couple of 17 year olds on Tumblr who don't actually exist in the real world. That seems like a bad reason to attach yourself to a movement of racists & xenophobes & misogynists. Regarde Aduck posted:People are so self hating about SA but it's still one of the few tolerable forums on the internet. It's only ironic self-hatred. I used to think the idea of paying for a forum was dumb & then all forums died & also I realised the pay barrier keeps a lot of dipshits out which makes SA really quite OK aside from a few certain areas.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
I wonder which bits he thinks he got wrong? The designer drugs are coming, mechanical limbs are close future, direct brain connections, and implants close future, weird visual hacking unlikely because why? But not impossible with all the VR poo poo going on but again hackers seem comfortable enough looking at boring code and that's not likely to change. AI's close future. True AI? Wildcard, who knows? The only thing dumb about his cyberpunk poo poo is the wacky clothes and made up cyber punk words.
Regarde Aduck fucked around with this message at 19:19 on Jun 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:I, too, oppose fantasy bad people. What's Jeremy Corbyn's stance on the Evil Men of Harad, that's what I want to know, what's he going to do about the threat they pose to Gondor? Regarde Aduck posted:made up cyber punk words. Only because real life terminology is stupider.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:16
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:What's Jeremy Corbyn's stance on the Evil Men of Harad, that's what I want to know, what's he going to do about the threat they pose to Gondor? Corbyn is strongly opposed to the evil men of Harrods
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:What's Jeremy Corbyn's stance on the Evil Men of Harad, that's what I want to know, what's he going to do about the threat they pose to Gondor?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:19
|
|
|
Finally I get a crazy independent standing in my constituency 
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:19
|
|
|
That doesn't seem so much crazy as strangely single issue.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
Regarde Aduck posted:That doesn't seem so much crazy as strangely single issue. There used to be a pub owner round here who'd stand & his platform amounted to "I hate the smoking ban". It should be added that his pub has yet to go out of business.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
Not that anyone cares what they think but the graun endorsed labour, I had wondered if they'd go lib dem this election but the prophesied collapse not coming I guess has eliminated that. Also thanks for the Capital thread shoutout in the OP. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:26
|
|
|
forkboy84 posted:Define regressive left Those who seek to limit and curtail the freedoms of a individual in order to meet their collectivist/marxist aims. Those will use underhanded means to try and destroy ideological opponents while claiming its in the name of equality and tolerance.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:26
|
|
|
Miftan posted:Field Marshal is the new TinTower. Posting about people nobody knows or cares about and is very wrong on a lot of topics.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
Regarde Aduck posted:That doesn't seem so much crazy as strangely single issue. I'd say anyone standing on a national single issue is completely wasting their time and money just because of the way Parliament is structured - even if he were somehow to be elected he's basically going to get to file a couple of early-day motions which have the same legislative power as a Facebook post. While I guess it's not strictly crazy, it's certainly wildly unrealistic even in the best-case scenario.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:28
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:Those who seek to limit and curtail the freedoms of a individual in order to meet their collectivist/marxist aims. Those will use underhanded means to try and destroy ideological opponents while claiming its in the name of equality and tolerance. Anyone who picks the freedom to say friend of the family over the freedom from starvation & homelessness is an arsehole imo. goddamnedtwisto posted:I'd say anyone standing on a national single issue is completely wasting their time and money just because of the way Parliament is structured - even if he were somehow to be elected he's basically going to get to file a couple of early-day motions which have the same legislative power as a Facebook post. While I guess it's not strictly crazy, it's certainly wildly unrealistic even in the best-case scenario. Can't remember if someone posted this in here recently or not, but it's funny.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:37 |
|
|
jabby posted:There's plenty of times you might want to take a picture of a specific individual though. Maybe they have an interesting look, or are doing something interesting, or they just compose a shot nicely. At the moment the assumption is that if you're out in public for everyone to see then you don't have a presumption of privacy. Is that wrong in your opinion? A couple of years ago I was taking my lunch at work, sitting out in the shade, and just kind of zoned out. At about 5pm I was walking out the building and a woman came up obviously surprised to see me, and said that earlier when looking around with her husband (who she said was a photographer) they had seen me at lunch and he'd taken a picture. The woman showed me the pic on her husband's phone and it was actually a nice and flattering photo. I got them to email it to me and it's still my facebook profile picture. The second time I was sat on a train going home, some random woman gets on, sits opposite, keeps glancing surreptitiously at me and eventually tried to take a sneaky photo with her camera phone. I (and everybody else nearby) knew this because the shutter noise went off and she immediately looked super embarrassed. Neither of those people asked permission, but those two situations felt different for me somehow. The second felt much more intrusive, perhaps because it was deliberately secretive (or an attempt at being so) and felt kind of pervy. The first one was just some person taking an interesting photo. So there's my humblebrag about how I'm just SO FREAKING HOT that random people take pictures of me in public, which I expect to re-read imminently on the goons.txt twitter.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:30
|
|