What is the best flav... you all know what this question is: This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Labour | 907 | 49.92% | |
Theresa May Team (Conservative) | 48 | 2.64% | |
Liberal Democrats | 31 | 1.71% | |
UKIP | 13 | 0.72% | |
Plaid Cymru | 25 | 1.38% | |
Green | 22 | 1.21% | |
Scottish Socialist Party | 12 | 0.66% | |
Scottish Conservative Party | 1 | 0.06% | |
Scottish National Party | 59 | 3.25% | |
Some Kind of Irish Unionist | 4 | 0.22% | |
Alliance / Irish Nonsectarian | 3 | 0.17% | |
Some Kind of Irish Nationalist | 36 | 1.98% | |
Misc. Far Left Trots | 35 | 1.93% | |
Misc. Far Right Fash | 8 | 0.44% | |
Monster Raving Loony | 49 | 2.70% | |
Space Navies Party | 39 | 2.15% | |
Independent / Single Issue | 2 | 0.11% | |
Can't Vote | 188 | 10.35% | |
Won't Vote | 8 | 0.44% | |
Spoiled Ballot | 15 | 0.83% | |
Pissflaps | 312 | 17.17% | |
Total: | 1817 votes |
|
Gove looks like some sort of creepy wooden puppet prop from a 1980's low budget B-movie that somehow got possessed through black magic by the soul of a snivelling cretin. I'd never be able to take him seriously if I had to work with him.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:37 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 19:35 |
|
mehall posted:So the BBC got back to me after my complaint, and it's a doozy:
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:38 |
|
learnincurve posted:So, yeh, this, this is the official picture they went with for the press. Just imagine if they brought Spitting Image back.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:40 |
|
Btw this is from several pages ago butJose posted:Can anyone post the tweet that had the vote swing for each constituency?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:40 |
|
Xaerael posted:Gove looks like some sort of creepy wooden puppet prop from a 1980's low budget B-movie that somehow got possessed through black magic by the soul of a snivelling cretin. I'd never be able to take him seriously if I had to work with him. He will always be Pob to me, except Pob cleaned up after himself.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:41 |
|
Crowsbeak posted:Just imagine if they brought Spitting Image back. I don't think you can make unconvincing enough puppets to adequately resemble that lot.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:42 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:So why do we all hate John Oliver again? Because he's a spineless neoliberal little weasel who will say anything to further his paymasters cause
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:43 |
Crowsbeak posted:Just imagine if they brought Spitting Image back.
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:44 |
|
OwlFancier posted:What exactly does "shoot to kill" mean? Right now, under the law, any cop shooting someone would have to justify it under the same kind of reasoning a member of public would have to make a lawful killing- that they believed there was a serious threat to themselves or others e.t.c- such as a bunch of terrorists running round stabbing people. Of course with the rozzers being entirely corrupt, its not like that de facto, but de jure it's reasonably straight and simple. Cops can't be told to kill someone, it has to be their choice based on the circumstances. "Shoot to kill" essentially would allow cops to murder at will and just point to orders and use the threat of terrorism to obscure complaint- and they already don't seem to have problems with getting away with it. I wonder how many people actually believe there is some kind of extant "shoot to kill" legislation in force that corbyn wants to remove, wouldn't be surprised if it was at least a third of the populace
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:44 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:So why do we all hate John Oliver again? Do I need a reason more than he's a liberal and liberalism is bad? Fine. I hate him because he found a better job than doing The Bugle for free.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:44 |
|
DesperateDan posted:Right now, under the law, any cop shooting someone would have to justify it under the same kind of reasoning a member of public would have to make a lawful killing- that they believed there was a serious threat to themselves or others e.t.c- such as a bunch of terrorists running round stabbing people. That's how I assumed it worked because that's basically how it has to work under any sane system because use of firearms would depend on the individual person and the individual situation. Just cos the armed cops are out still means they have to figure out if it's safe for the public for them to shoot people. It's just really hard to watch anyone discuss that policy because they all sound like complete idiots who haven't bothered to do even half a minute's research on the subject and are just repeating nonsense phrases that don't make any sense. OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 17:47 on Jun 12, 2017 |
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:44 |
|
Welp. Looks like she's not getting ousted.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:45 |
|
Bardeh posted:
yet
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:47 |
|
She just humiliated her party and herself. The wolves won't stop circling just because she got a stay of execution.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:48 |
|
Bardeh posted:
They legit can't afford to oust her and her remaining the face of the impending government collapse is cool and good.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:48 |
|
Corbs is running circles round her at the moment. If anything this is a Good Thing for Corbyn.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:48 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:Sargon himself is funny because he's such a dipshit. The guy stupid beyond belief. Almost can't dress himself dumb and out of his depth when it comes to any actual politics. It's when you see hundreds of thousands watch him and look to him for "correct thinking" that it gets depressing. Yeah but that's basically the internet
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:48 |
|
To be fair, they're out of options. Unless they want Amber Rudd with her comfy 300 vote majority or BoJo. Not much else there.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:49 |
|
Killed By Death posted:Btw this is from several pages ago but cheers
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:49 |
|
quote:She was very concerned about people who have lost their seats, the party is going to help them, some of them are in dire financial situations. She did say sorry, several times. She apologised for colleagues losing their seat, for making the call about the early election. So if you lose your seat you're immediately off the payroll? I always wondered how it worked.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:49 |
|
Gorn Myson posted:Its worth pointing out that they're all looking up to a man that once tried to unblock a toilet with a vacuum cleaner. is that a euphemism for something?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:49 |
|
Junior G-man posted:To be fair, they're out of options. Unless they want Amber Rudd with her comfy 300 vote majority or BoJo. Not much else there. I want my meme prime minister
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:50 |
|
Bardeh posted:So if you lose your seat you're immediately off the payroll? I always wondered how it worked. I would assume so, you get paid for the office, an MP out of office is unemployed.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:50 |
|
Firos posted:Corbs is running circles round her at the moment. If anything this is a Good Thing for Corbyn. I was thinking this too, but then i remembered that all the potential replacements are the people who were too stupid, treacherous and contemptible to beat May in the real leadership contest under ordinary circumstaces. Any of them would be hilarious imo.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:50 |
|
Bardeh posted:So if you lose your seat you're immediately off the payroll? I always wondered how it worked. I believe if you stand for reelection and lose you get a decent payoff but in the middle of making dinner so can't source that at the moment.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:51 |
|
Bardeh posted:
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:51 |
|
Junior G-man posted:To be fair, they're out of options. Unless they want Amber Rudd with her comfy 300 vote majority or BoJo. Not much else there.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:52 |
|
She's a weak and derided leader. Everyone know's she's lost all authority. She's a bonifide loser. Having her stay on is great, every day she stays it further nails down the weak and wobbly, grasping at power for powers own sake narrative.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:52 |
|
forkboy84 posted:I believe if you stand for reelection and lose you get a decent payoff but in the middle of making dinner so can't source that at the moment. Yeah iirc you get a lump sum equivalent to like a month's wages for each year you served or something like that, with maximum of £15k or something. Lol if there are tories who only got in in 2015 and lost their seats. Just lmao.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:53 |
|
communism bitch posted:I was thinking this too, but then i remembered that all the potential replacements are the people who were too stupid, treacherous and contemptible to beat May in the real leadership contest under ordinary circumstaces. Yeah they're all garbage people. But I do so enjoy watching May flounder
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:53 |
|
I hope there was traditional parliamentary hooting
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:53 |
|
Fun fact: if at any point Boris isn't mounting a leadership challenge, he will explode.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:57 |
|
TACD posted:I could do without the mentions of Theresa May on her knees and Tories banging on the table, thanks Raeg posted:Fun fact: if at any point Boris isn't mounting a leadership challenge, he will explode. Also less talk of Boris mounting the leadership please.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:59 |
|
Bardeh posted:So if you lose your seat you're immediately off the payroll? I always wondered how it worked. if you stand for reelection and fail, you get a generous 'resettlement payment'. equivalent of one month's salary per year served as an MP, capped at 6 maximum but you don't if you just stand down. which is probably the only reason e.g. Danczuk bothered to put his name on the ballot as an independent.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 17:59 |
|
OwlFancier posted:Also less talk of Boris mounting the leadership please. Boris is permanently mounting one, he'll never pull the trigger.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 18:00 |
|
communism bitch posted:Yeah iirc you get a lump sum equivalent to like a month's wages for each year you served or something like that, with maximum of £15k or something. 'Dire financial situations' sounds like some of them can't even pay their mortgages. I'm imagining some backbencher looking forward to their 'inevitable' victory and buying a second home or something, only to lose their seat.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 18:01 |
|
https://twitter.com/EL4JC/status/874285127593066496
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 18:02 |
|
^^^Oh that owns. SO MUCH.OwlFancier posted:Also less talk of Boris mounting the leadership please. The Whorey Party Exposed starring Boris 'Big' Johnson. namesake fucked around with this message at 18:04 on Jun 12, 2017 |
# ? Jun 12, 2017 18:02 |
|
Bardeh posted:So if you lose your seat you're immediately off the payroll? I always wondered how it worked. Surely it's just a cashflow problem?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 18:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 19:35 |
|
Tesseraction posted:Yeah it's that bit that pisses me off. He's more than capable of being funny without doing those and it often is a detriment to the narrative of the segment. It always feels like a contractual requirement to keep the stoner college students on board. I've seen bits where he seems genuinely angry about the issue he's talking about, and then he has to visibly grit his teeth and do the LOL PHOTOSHOP bit before he can get back to the actual important stuff Samantha Bee is better at the acidic humour thing but it's weird that the US has multiple 'look at this terrible poo poo in politics/social issues but with humour' shows and we just get comedy panel shows
|
# ? Jun 12, 2017 18:03 |