Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

Avalerion posted:

Is this not doing well overseas or what? Only two screenings this Saturday and both late in the evening. :(

Most slots are taken up with cars 3, the new transformers and... rough night, whatever that is. Even baywatch (why is this a thing) and boss baby has more screenings that day.

It's summer time. Kids movies will reign supreme.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Avalerion
Oct 19, 2012

Yea, would have thought super hero movies are popular with kids though.

Steve Yun
Aug 7, 2003
I'm a parasitic landlord that needs to get a job instead of stealing worker's money. Make sure to remind me when I post.
Soiled Meat
I've known a couple parents who had to run out of the theater with crying kids because the violence was too much (one of them specifically because of watching people die painfully from the poison gas)

spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

Avalerion posted:

Yea, would have thought super hero movies are popular with kids though.

Most of them (all of them?) are PG-13.

Why would someone take little kids to see people getting limbs blown off when Cars 3 is on. :smuggo:

Avalerion
Oct 19, 2012

Huh. Is that recent? I remember being into super heroes as a kid and marketing suggests likewise, you had batman and even robocop lunchboxes, toys, toothbrushes etc.

Don't think anyone actually cared about ratings unless it was outright 18+ (so basically porn) back then.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Sounds like those kids need to learn about the great darkness simmering within all of us.

Sir Kodiak
May 14, 2007


Toady posted:

People who don't see the Christian imagery are ignoring what's on the screen.

I was, earlier in this thread, accused of being an imperialistic cultural-idiot because I saw Christian imagery in the film, so you're barking up the wrong tree here. I'm taking issue with a specific statement of yours, that you don't actually address in this post, that Steve Trevor teaches that people will be saved through faith in Christ. I'm not disagreeing with the existence of Christian imagery in general.

Vegetable posted:

I wonder if the studio might have seen an early version of the No Man's Land scene because that poo poo would not be nearly as impressive without the music or CGI.

From what I recall, studio push back against the scene was in the drafting stage, prior to filming.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Sir Kodiak posted:

From what I recall, studio push back against the scene was in the drafting stage, prior to filming.
The quote I saw from Patty said she received so much pushback that she had to storyboard the whole scene and walk the executives through it with members of the crew explaining how they planned to set up the shot and everything.

spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

Avalerion posted:

Huh. Is that recent? I remember being into super heroes as a kid and marketing suggests likewise, you had batman and even robocop lunchboxes, toys, toothbrushes etc.

Don't think anyone actually cared about ratings unless it was outright 18+ (so basically porn) back then.

Robocop is rated R and full of sex and gore sooooo I don't know why parents would take their kids to see that. Teens yeah sure, but sub 12 years old? lol, no.

Seriously though, the WW movie had some brutal shots in it as far as bloody war stuff goes.

I loved the movie. My older kids loved the movie. And I'm sure my younger one will love it when they grow up a bit.

Sir Kodiak
May 14, 2007


Mr. Apollo posted:

The quote I saw from Patty said she received so much pushback that she had to storyboard the whole scene and walk the executives through it with members of the crew explaining how they planned to set up the shot and everything.

Yeah, that's what I heard too. I'm not defending the executives, just clarifying that it wasn't that they were trying to cut it because they were seeing footage without music or CGI.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Sir Kodiak posted:

Yeah, that's what I heard too. I'm not defending the executives, just clarifying that it wasn't that they were trying to cut it because they were seeing footage without music or CGI.
Correct.

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Mr. Apollo posted:

edit - One other thing I was wondering, in BvS and in he JL trailer Diana has a different shield. It has a plain front as opposed to the "star burst" pattern in WW. This is obviously deliberate but any ideas why? Would the new shield and sword still be "made by the gods"?

A lot can happen in 100 years, anything could have happened. She's also been working in the antiquities department of at least one museum during all that so who knows what historical artifacts she would have access to.

I think a much much more important question is why Spider-Man suddenly has a bunk bed in the trailer for Homecoming when he only had a single bed in Civil War. There better be a tie-in comic explaining that or there'll be trouble. :mad:

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




Mr. Apollo posted:

Plus the official novelization I linked earlier makes it pretty clear that he died (it does a weird "psychic connection" thing between the two of them before he died and that's how she realizes what he was saying to her before he ran to the plane.

That really didn't work on film, it's one of my gripes with the third act.

Oh, and this movie is totally about a Christianized theology. The first thing the movie does with the Greek pantheon is to cut it down. Most of the gods are killed, leaving only the creator and the evil tempter who is cast down. That's not an accidental parallel with God and Lucifer. Later in the film we find that Diana is the child of the Creator and a mortal non-divine woman. Sure, Steve performs the self-sacrifice to save others out of love, but Diana has the heritage.

She is the Christ with a sword, a luminous figure. Steve is the Lamb, the mortal blood sacrifice. Together, the two fulfill the Christ role. Both ascend into the heavens; he to his death, she in triumph as she realizes her destiny and puts down the source of evil in the world. For love.

That's all text, it's all on-screen and some of it is even spoken out loud.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Snowglobe of Doom posted:

A lot can happen in 100 years, anything could have happened. She's also been working in the antiquities department of at least one museum during all that so who knows what historical artifacts she would have access to.
Ohhh yeah, that's a good point. With her museum access who knows what kind of weapons and artifacts she's found over the last century.

mllaneza posted:

That really didn't work on film, it's one of my gripes with the third act.

Oh, and this movie is totally about a Christianized theology. The first thing the movie does with the Greek pantheon is to cut it down. Most of the gods are killed, leaving only the creator and the evil tempter who is cast down. That's not an accidental parallel with God and Lucifer. Later in the film we find that Diana is the child of the Creator and a mortal non-divine woman. Sure, Steve performs the self-sacrifice to save others out of love, but Diana has the heritage.

She is the Christ with a sword, a luminous figure. Steve is the Lamb, the mortal blood sacrifice. Together, the two fulfill the Christ role. Both ascend into the heavens; he to his death, she in triumph as she realizes her destiny and puts down the source of evil in the world. For love.

That's all text, it's all on-screen and some of it is even spoken out loud.
Yeah, I agree that the whole "magically remember what Steve was saying" came off as awkward. It took me a second to realize that it was a flashback.

Continuing with the Christ role, I don't think it's a coincidence that Steve's death results in Diana being "reborn" into her divine form. She even rises up in a cruciform position.

The final message of "Humans may not deserve redemption but thy are redeemable with the power of love." meshes up with stuff like John 15:12-13 “My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.”

Mr. Apollo fucked around with this message at 04:27 on Jun 22, 2017

MrJacobs
Sep 15, 2008

Snowglobe of Doom posted:

A lot can happen in 100 years, anything could have happened. She's also been working in the antiquities department of at least one museum during all that so who knows what historical artifacts she would have access to.

I think a much much more important question is why Spider-Man suddenly has a bunk bed in the trailer for Homecoming when he only had a single bed in Civil War. There better be a tie-in comic explaining that or there'll be trouble. :mad:

Oh I know this one! Tony gave him the 'ol summer camp counselor routine: "Peter, don't tell your aunt what we did back in the airport, here is some ice cream and a bunk bed. Never tell your aunt"

Mr. Apollo posted:

Ohhh yeah, that's a good point. With her museum access who knows what kind of weapons and artifacts she's found over the last century.

I love this explanation because it's really stupid and fun. "We uh found this immaculate sword that can cut through a mountain, lets put it in a museum. We also found a shield that can deflect nuclear weapons, lets not study but put on display. This cannot possibly have any kind of benefits for mankind."

MrJacobs fucked around with this message at 11:12 on Jun 22, 2017

BrianWilly
Apr 24, 2007

There is no homosexual terrorist Johnny Silverhand
I mean...I admit, I don't really know what people actually do when they discover priceless historical relics, but I'm like ~40% sure they don't shoot them with bullets and try to chop rocks with them. :v:

MrJacobs
Sep 15, 2008

BrianWilly posted:

I mean...I admit, I don't really know what people actually do when they discover priceless historical relics, but I'm like ~40% sure they don't shoot them with bullets and try to chop rocks with them. :v:

Diana doesn't play by man's rules. She will smash swords on stones like it aint no thing. If the blade breaks, it was unworthy of her museum.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Well yeah, I mean if you find an ancient shield on an archeological dig you're probably not going to test to see if it's imbued with any magical properties. However, Diana would recognize it for what it is

well why not
Feb 10, 2009




BrianWilly posted:

I mean...I admit, I don't really know what people actually do when they discover priceless historical relics, but I'm like ~40% sure they don't shoot them with bullets and try to chop rocks with them. :v:

Funny that this is exactly what happens in The Mummy (2017)

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

BrianWilly posted:

I mean...I admit, I don't really know what people actually do when they discover priceless historical relics, but I'm like ~40% sure they don't shoot them with bullets and try to chop rocks with them. :v:

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit
Funny niggles I have with the movie

* Did Steve and Diana sail all the way from the Aegean Sea to London in that little Amazon sailboat? Wouldn't it have made more sense to land in British-controlled Egypt and take a steamer to London?

* Did nobody take one or two hours to give Diana a crash course in how war and politics in Man's World works? Steve keeps saying "I don't know" to all her questions, some of which a child could answer.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

In the movie Themyscria supposed to be located somewhere in the North Sea. That means that Steve flew his plane all the way across Europe. I don't think WW1 planes would have had the range to fly from the Ottoman Empire to the North Sea. I suppose he could have landed and refuelled while maintaining his German disguise but you'd think a message would have gone out to everyone warning of a spy dressed as a German pilot and flying a stolen German plane.

As for the questions she's asking, they can all be answered by "Your preconceived notions of humankind are wrong. Yes we're capable of beautiful dreams but also horrible nightmares." and the "why" portion of that answer is pretty complicated. However, Diana is so firm in her beliefs that she really needs to be see it all for herself before it really sinks in.

Mr. Apollo fucked around with this message at 13:39 on Jun 22, 2017

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Mr. Apollo posted:

In the movie Themyscria supposed to be located somewhere in the North Sea. That means that Steve flew his plane all the way across Europe. I don't think WW1 planes would have had the range to fly from the Ottoman Empire to the North Sea. I suppose he could have landed and refuelled while maintaining his German disguise but you'd think a message would have gone out to everyone warning of a spy dressed as a German pilot and flying a stolen German plane.


Themyscria is where it needs to be. That's why Steve's compass was spinning like crazy when he was trying to figure out where he was when he was on the island.

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit
A compass doesn't tell you where you are, it only tells you which way is north. Steve should have known the general area he was in, given the landmarks he passed on the way and the time he spent in the air.

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit

MrJacobs posted:

I love this explanation because it's really stupid and fun. "We uh found this immaculate sword that can cut through a mountain, lets put it in a museum. We also found a shield that can deflect nuclear weapons, lets not study but put on display. This cannot possibly have any kind of benefits for mankind."
But it's a popular trope in comic books and even fiction in general for museums to be troves of magical weapons that nobody knows about. That's often how they introduce a magical villain: the hero stops him/her in the middle of robbing a museum.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

I don't remember, the map that Steve is looking at when he's trying to use the compass, what area does it show?

well why not
Feb 10, 2009




Kurzon posted:

Funny niggles I have with the movie

* Did Steve and Diana sail all the way from the Aegean Sea to London in that little Amazon sailboat? Wouldn't it have made more sense to land in British-controlled Egypt and take a steamer to London?


It's a movie about Zeus' daughter kicking Stormtroopers out of towers, I think we can excuse some questionable geography.

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit

well why not posted:

It's a movie about Zeus' daughter kicking Stormtroopers out of towers, I think we can excuse some questionable geography.
So much for verisimilitude...

well why not
Feb 10, 2009




verisimilitude is inappropriate in works of fantasy.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

I was just rewatching the Doomsday fight scene in BvS and when Lois Lane runs up after the battle to discover Superman is dead it's Diana who turns and looks at her. Diana understood.

Schwarzwald
Jul 27, 2004

Don't Blink

BrianWilly posted:

I mean...I admit, I don't really know what people actually do when they discover priceless historical relics, but I'm like ~40% sure they don't shoot them with bullets and try to chop rocks with them. :v:

In 1965, a Chinese excavation uncovered a bronze sword from a tomb. Finding it remarkably untarnished, they decided use it to chop a stack of paper with it to see if it was still sharp. (It was.)

http://mymodernmet.com/sword-of-goujian/

Equeen
Oct 29, 2011

Pole dance~

Mr. Apollo posted:

I was just rewatching the Doomsday fight scene in BvS and when Lois Lane runs up after the battle to discover Superman is dead it's Diana who turns and looks at her. Diana understood.

In the Ultimate edition there's an extra shot of Diana's face to further show her emphathy for Lois.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Equeen posted:

In the Ultimate edition there's an extra shot of Diana's face to further show her emphathy for Lois.
Yeah, that's the one I was watching. I was going to say it looked like she had an expression of knowing empathy.

I didn't pick up on it at the time other then "oh she's feels bad for her that Clark is dead" but after seeing WW it now has additional meaning.

Mr. Apollo fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Jun 22, 2017

Bar Crow
Oct 10, 2012

poptart_fairy posted:

She falls in love with his assumed spy alias, never truly knowing the real Steven, and her actions lead to the Nazis gaining power.

More angst to fuel WW disappearing from the world. :v:

Steven's body died but his brain was saved and granted new life in the body of a young German soldier with a funny mustache.

spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

Actually ran into someone today who was extremely upset that WW had men in it for a different reason that to be killed by WW. She was particularly infuriated that WW wasn't gay and that a romance was forced onto her character in the movie.

Also argued that the movie wasn't empowering enough for women. When I asked her to describe "empowering" she basically just wanted a movie where a bunch of super masculine women killed every man they came across.

MacheteZombie
Feb 4, 2007
I thought romance angle was a bit boring as well op

VAGENDA OF MANOCIDE
Aug 1, 2004

whoa, what just happened here?







College Slice

Mr. Apollo posted:

I was just rewatching the Doomsday fight scene in BvS and when Lois Lane runs up after the battle to discover Superman is dead it's Diana who turns and looks at her. Diana understood.

There's some other cool stuff around her in BvS, like introducing us to Diana visually while Lex is blathering on about Greek mythology at the fundraiser--seriously funny as hell while Lex manically bounces from point to point pointlessly while you can see and almost hear her eyes rolling into the back of her head. Also starting off with the definition of philanthropist, etc.

Also later on, knowing about the sword of Alexander the Great at the museum event as part of her cover job (where Bruce's interest comes at it from the angle of his crime fighting), etc.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

I've read a few reviews where people expressed disappointment that batman wasn't in the movie even as a cameo role. :confused:

wyoming
Jun 7, 2010

Like a television
tuned to a dead channel.

Mr. Apollo posted:

edit - One other thing I was wondering, in BvS and in he JL trailer Diana has a different shield. It has a plain front as opposed to the "star burst" pattern in WW. This is obviously deliberate but any ideas why? Would the new shield and sword still be "made by the gods"?

Diana is literally a god, I don't think it's a big concern.
Ares kept making swords out of tanks.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SlightlyMad
Jun 7, 2015


Gary’s Answer
Me and my wife liked the film, Gal Gadot is excellent for the role and bad-rear end. Chris Pine was good also. The final clash with the main baddie was in places a bit stereotypical for a superhero movie, but overall the movie was entertaining. Would watch again.

I don't read comics really so can not comment on the source material, but this movie made me interested in seeing more Wonder Woman.

  • Locked thread