|
Alhazred posted:If you're an american at work I would think twice about clicking on this link: http://imgur.com/jB6fT1i "Risk STD?" Which one of them is infected?
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 05:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 13:53 |
|
|
Jurgan posted:"Risk STD?" Which one of them is infected? Open relationships lead to increased risk. If you aren't in a closed sexual relationship you should always get regularly checked for the good of all partners. She doesn't seem like she wants to be exclusively linked to this guy so...
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Spiffster posted:Open relationships lead to increased risk. If you aren't in a closed sexual relationship you should always get regularly checked for the good of all partners. She doesn't seem like she wants to be exclusively linked to this guy so... Yeah, I guess that's true. One of them could have something and not even know it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 05:37
|
|
|
 1 2 3The joke, if it can be called that, doesn't work if you know it's pronounced Muller.  4 5 6
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 07:08
|
|
|
First Dog on the Moon:
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 07:45
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 08:05
|
|
|
I mean, I'm not surprised Tinsley hasn't heard of soul food.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 08:36
|
|
|
Yeah Tinsley everything is racist so give up on saying anything, going outside, or interacting with other humans in any way. We won't miss you.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 09:01
|
|
|
We should set up a Gofundme to get  enough booze that he can silently drink himself to death and never has to create another comic.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 09:26
|
|
|
Apple Pie Hubbub posted:The joke, if it can be called that, doesn't work if you know it's pronounced Muller.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 10:16
|
|
|
Yay racial slurs. 
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 10:47
|
|
|
Unkempt posted:What the hell is going on here? Is that Marx at bottom left? Who are the others? Hahaha, that's amazing. How utterly, pointlessly subtle! Here's my stab at who's who  The Lenin is definite, that very strong shadow on his face. The other, I'm not so sure, I couldn't find a direct photo match. The top left is either Trotsky or a young Stalin, I went for Trotsky because in pics of Stalin with bushy, unkempt hair he's not got that huge black mustache. Similarly, I'm not 100% sold on the Sanders, but you can make out the glasses. My other guess was Gorbachov but it felt unlike Delonas to not make the most of his birthmark.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 11:06
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 11:14
|
|
|
Oh no, tiny-eyed Mueller with his giant, bushy eyebrows is going to stick his hand up my butt!    
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 11:50
|
|
3
|
In this case, the pound of flesh is literally the refugees from Middle Eastern nations we've bombed, fleeing the bloody knife of terrorism.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 12:27
|
|
|
"Well guys, it's time to call off the investigation, James O'Keefe is up to his old tricks again!" *Disappointed Democrats sigh, walk away, a couple of them kick rocks, one of them throws his hat on the ground and stomps on it with both feet*
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 13:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:08
|
|
|
 1 2
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:18
|
|
|
I'm so sick of this poo poo.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:27
|
|
|
So... just ignore it or else you aren't being a true progressive? Did Ted Rall write this?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:35
|
|
|
Durrrr protesting real fascism and corruption is the same as lying about your opponent creating death panels. I'm the reasonable democrat, please admire my ability to not care about anything.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
Ularg posted:So... just ignore it or else you aren't being a true progressive? My interpretation was "nothing you say is going to make Republicans turn on the leader of their own party anyway so there's no point in getting swept up in nationalism" There are people out there who think a Democratic politician talking about anything other than Russia will Ruin Everything somehow, as the GOP guts our healthcare
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:53
|
|
|
  Healthy skepticism is now treated the same way as believing in a hollow Earth. GG
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:53
|
|
|
Radio Shack lol well we all know where Stiglich liked to buy his remote controls
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Are there democrat politicians who talk about nothing but Russia? I figured this was mostly a media thing they like to cover. Because Russia having a hand in our election is a really big deal. It's not about trying to turn republicans on Trump, but not letting foreign governments use their powers and influence on other governments. There's also, you know, being able to care about more than one thing at the same time.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Ularg posted:Are there democrat politicians who talk about nothing but Russia? I figured this was mostly a media thing they like to cover. I'm with you on that, my take on it is "let Mueller do his job and see what he turns up," but there are people on Twitter who @ politicians angrily if they tweet something like "please stop tweeting at me about Russia because I am trying to save healthcare"
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
Ularg posted:Are there democrat politicians who talk about nothing but Russia? I figured this was mostly a media thing they like to cover. There are none, but outfits like The Intercept love to pretend that Dems are only talking about Russia.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
My take is that the Democrats are keeping it on the backburner until they can find out just how much Mueller digs up.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
Shangri-Law School posted:There are none, but outfits like The Intercept love to pretend that Dems are only talking about Russia. To be honest it feels like Dems barely talk at all to anything. Maybe it's just the media saturation of the GOP. The last Dem thing I ever saw was them doing a parody of the board-room kissing trump's rear end thing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:31
|
|
|
Ularg posted:To be honest it feels like Dems barely talk at all to anything. Maybe it's just the media saturation of the GOP. The last Dem thing I ever saw was them doing a parody of the board-room kissing trump's rear end thing. It sucks not having a lapdog propaganda network. I feel like the Tea Party got way more coverage than current resistance efforts.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:50
|
|
|
Shangri-Law School posted:It sucks not having a lapdog propaganda network. I feel like the Tea Party got way more coverage than current resistance efforts.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
Hahahaha
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:They definitely get the downside of having a propaganda network, i.e. their opponents constantly attacking them for it, but without the benefit of actually having one. I guess all those late night political comedy shows could count.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 15:59
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:I guess all those late night political comedy shows could count. None of those shows are pro-democrats, they're just anti-republicans.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 16:00
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:None of those shows are pro-democrats, they're just anti-republicans. They are pro-Democrat, if not slavishly so.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 16:03
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:They are pro-Democrat, if not slavishly so. They're really not, though.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 16:04
|
|
|
Seth Meyers, Colbert, and Noah take deep swipes at Dem leadership whenever possible, as rightly so. Those segments don't make Youtube top trending, that's all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 16:11
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:None of those shows are pro-democrats, they're just anti-republicans. They're anti-bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 16:11
|
|
Ularg posted:They're anti-bullshit. Why did you repeat what I said.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 16:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 13:53 |
|
|
Fair enough. Edit: I really like this video on the subject, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fUDIucr2eo Ularg fucked around with this message at 16:27 on Jun 28, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 16:25
|
|