|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:[sound of thousands of russian tanks revving their engines]
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 03:51 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 17:44 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd_xVtcG5Dc&t=180s
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 03:53 |
|
maskenfreiheit posted:I use DuckDuckGo using duckduckgo is unabomber level of weird
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 10:58 |
|
LastInLine posted:using duckduckgo is unabomber level of weird i think you are underestimating richard stallman here but i guess he hasn't blown anything up that we know of
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 11:02 |
|
LastInLine posted:using duckduckgo is unabomber level of weird yeah, agreed. same with bing
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 15:14 |
|
flakeloaf posted:canadians think the same thing and we just finished telling zuck that he has to follow our rules nice
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 15:45 |
|
akadajet posted:yeah, agreed. same with bing bing actually doesn't freak out when you use tor, unlike google that shows crazy captchas, i fall back to bing when ddg isn't working i guess i should start looking into rural land?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 15:46 |
|
i use bing the exact amount to pick up $5 amazon credit every 3 months or so.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 15:58 |
|
maskenfreiheit posted:i was chatting with some people from a couple of EU data protection offices* once, and they apparently take the view that if you are interacting with dutch or french citizens' data, that their data protection comissioners have juridiction (regardless of if there's a physical server farm present)
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 16:04 |
|
LastInLine posted:using duckduckgo is unabomber level of weird i assume anyone using duckduckgo is looking for illegal pornography but is too dum to realize that their isp still sees everywhere they go even if their search engine doesnt
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 16:08 |
|
ufarn posted:swear to god, he better not do one of those loving apology tours through europe that would mean he wants to literally be president of the world not just figuratively by being president of america so yeah that would be bad
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 16:13 |
|
cis autodrag posted:i assume anyone using duckduckgo is looking for illegal pornography but is too dum to realize that their isp still sees everywhere they go even if their search engine doesnt some of them use tor to find their child porn, such as maskenfreiheit posted:bing actually doesn't freak out when you use tor, unlike google that shows crazy captchas, i fall back to bing when ddg isn't working
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 16:13 |
|
The Management posted:some of them use tor to find their child porn, such as lol. there's like 10 different known attacks for ummasking tor users. i guess more proof that pedophiles are the result of degenerative brain diseases.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 16:18 |
|
The Management posted:some of them use tor to find their child porn "if you don't want michael rogers to personally rub his balls on each of your packets you are literally a child molester" cis autodrag posted:lol. there's like 10 different known attacks for ummasking tor users. i guess more proof that pedophiles are the result of degenerative brain diseases. yeah if you're enabling javascript like some scrub
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 16:19 |
|
maskenfreiheit and cis autodrag are both the same people. that's why their avatars look so similar.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 20:11 |
|
my real name is ken m
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 20:27 |
|
akadajet posted:maskenfreiheit and cis autodrag are both the same people. that's why their avatars look so similar. lol i hope this theory catches on with the right people
|
# ? Jun 28, 2017 20:56 |
|
maskenfreiheit posted:"if you don't want michael rogers to personally rub his balls on each of your packets you are literally a child molester" tell us do you use tor for daily browsing
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 04:01 |
|
maskenfreiheit posted:bing actually doesn't freak out when you use tor, unlike google that shows crazy captchas, i fall back to bing when ddg isn't working i just assume anyone who uses tor does so for child pornography and i would hope the police would assume the same
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 04:40 |
|
LastInLine posted:i just assume anyone who uses tor does so for child pornography and i would hope the police would assume the same other than that and international terrorism there isn't much to be said for it being a journalist or a secret agent who wants to phone home are pretty important and what it was built for but c'mon let's be honest
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 04:45 |
|
use tor every day
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 04:54 |
|
if you're okay with being cover for pedophiles doing pedophile things
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 05:12 |
|
i use tor to defend true american heroes: teenagers buying drugs and pedophiles trading child porn
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 05:27 |
|
tor is so compromised that the government is using the breaches to catch pedos. if there was anything important that they needed to observe on tor they wouldn't have made it known that they can monitor it.
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 05:34 |
|
The Management posted:tor is so compromised that the government is using the breaches to catch pedos. if there was anything important that they needed to observe on tor they wouldn't have made it known that they can monitor it. the torpedo story was great the fact that the department of defense got caught with its pants down was a little though you know that is how the russians get you
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 05:38 |
|
i went to the stylish site to find an updated theme for google news and wtf happened to stylish it's impossible to sort things on the site anymore, who designed this garbage?
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 14:35 |
|
Dodoman posted:i went to the stylish site to find an updated theme for google news and wtf happened to stylish it's impossible to sort things on the site anymore, who designed this garbage? sort by what? i see "most popular" "newest styles" or "recently updated" in the upper left.
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 14:51 |
|
tor itself isn't compromised, it's just that idiots do stupid things like tor->vpn use a non-bundled browser, and happily post identifying information through it and don't forget ordering drugs online w/ bitcoin, the by far most popular and core feature of tor
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 14:54 |
|
Last Chance posted:sort by what? i see "most popular" "newest styles" or "recently updated" in the upper left. that takes you to a general sorted list, you used to be able to apply those sort filters by site
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:01 |
|
Dodoman posted:that takes you to a general sorted list, you used to be able to apply those sort filters by site oic. lovely. i was going to make fun of you for using user styles, then i realized i still use one to fix all the weird breadcrumb poo poo and gradients that they added to SA years ago lol
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:10 |
|
syscall girl posted:the torpedo story was great there will never be a better codename for anything
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:28 |
|
Bhodi posted:tor itself isn't compromised, it's just that idiots do stupid things like tor->vpn use a non-bundled browser, and happily post identifying information through it How is mixing a VPN with Tor bad? Your ISP knows who you are. So if you go ISP -> Tor, and Tor is somehow compromised, the feds just ask "who is the customer at IP 219.420.867.309?" If you go ISP -> VPN -> Tor, that's an additional hurdle. They might have your credit card info, but they'd probably need to then also go to the CC company to get your details. (And that's assuming the VPN provider is both in the states and reasonably happy to help LEOs.) Or is there some technical issue I'm missing? (Then again I'm assuming you establish a VPN connection then boot up TBB not some weird custom rolleded thing)
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:33 |
|
maskenfreiheit posted:How is mixing a VPN with Tor bad? tldr if you go tor->vpn it deanonymizes you because you give your personal details to the VPN provider. proper usage is the other way around, vpn->tor
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:34 |
|
tbh the sort of traffic analysis and side-channel leakage that tends to deanonymize tor users still works just fine even if you're tunneling through a vpn first.
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:45 |
|
sadly true; it's better than nothing though, avoiding being low-hanging fruit and as long as you aren't under active investigation. hell being even slightly informed as to limitations and capabilities puts you far beyond almost every user tbh, there are proper opsec guides if you google around haven't kept up on the research on whether side channels can pull out specific websites yet or what kind of metadata you're leaking, because I don't really have a pressing need beyond idle semi-professional curiosity
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:48 |
|
Bhodi posted:https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/64583/vpn-tor-go-to-jail-whats-the-logic-behind-this ah, I thought you were saying VPN -> Tor is bad. Reverse makes sense.
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:53 |
|
Jabor posted:tbh the sort of traffic analysis and side-channel leakage that tends to deanonymize tor users still works just fine even if you're tunneling through a vpn first. Anything the NSA thinks stinks is good enough for me.
|
# ? Jun 29, 2017 15:56 |
|
maskenfreiheit posted:Anything the NSA thinks stinks is good enough for me. some important notes:
|
# ? Jul 1, 2017 21:20 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:[*]already, in 2012, they had concluded it was in their best interests for targets to default to using tor That was mostly because content exits Tor unencrypted (save for HTTPS, which had much less adoption in 2012), so they can start up malicious nodes and watch (or inject)
|
# ? Jul 1, 2017 21:30 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 17:44 |
|
|
# ? Jul 4, 2017 08:18 |