|
quote:OnePlus says ‘jelly’ scrolling effect on OnePlus 5 is normal - The Verge
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 12:07 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
why would the orientation of the panel matter?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 02:42
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:why would the orientation of the panel matter? um...anroid? even the mostly barely awful fridges go through basic q/a before hitting aliexpress don't try to find logic in the systematic incompetance that is any company producing google phones their ambitions are to not hit a dumpster before two months have passed but assuming that plan has failed they instead roll things over to tizen and throw another fridge towards the aisles at best buy SArnSUNG!
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:why would the orientation of the panel matter? it doesn't. this is complete nonsense. displays don't get mounted upside down. they don't even have an upside down, the scan direction is reversible. what this person is seeing is probably just lag in the touch response that gives it the rubber band effect
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 04:34
|
|
|
the ribbon cable or whatever that connects the screen to the motherboard isn't gonna have enough play to allow a screen to be mounted in more than one orientation either
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
Bulgakov posted:um...anroid? lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
Bulgakov posted:um...anroid?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 05:25
|
|
|
The Management posted:it doesn't. this is complete nonsense. displays don't get mounted upside down. they don't even have an upside down, the scan direction is reversible. what this person is seeing is probably just lag in the touch response that gives it the rubber band effect It might just be power of suggestion, but I definitely see something similar when scrolling on a pixel that's upside down. Presumably it's not the actual AMOLED module being mounted upside down, but something a little more subtle elsewhere in the chain.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 06:19
|
|
|
tried it on my iphone, scrolling is still 100% perfect like always. how is it even possible not to have 60fps scrolling, windows 95 had it on a pentium 1 with 64mb of RAM and no hardware accel. what's googles excuse?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:16
|
|
|
Hugh G. Rectum posted:what's googles excuse? anroid
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:18
|
|
|
could it be some weird trick of the sub pixel anti aliasing assuming a certain sub pixel ordering and looking "off" if it was the other way around? like how you used to have to configure cleartype for RGB or RBG especially if they are still using cheap screens with the scam where they have 2 logical pixels sharing 4 sib pixels
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:21
|
|
|
~Coxy posted:could it be some weird trick of the sub pixel anti aliasing assuming a certain sub pixel ordering and looking "off" if it was the other way around? almost sounds believable but that'd result in color aberration with text, especially white on a black background. easily verified with a microscope as well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:26
|
|
|
look up pentile
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:34
|
|
|
I know what a pentile is, but that still wouldn't explain why it only looks hosed up in motion. you still get color aberration with pentile displays, like the famous screen-door effect on those garbage samsung panels with the extra green pixels.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 08:42
|
|
|
DuckConference posted:It might just be power of suggestion, but I definitely see something similar when scrolling on a pixel that's upside down. Presumably it's not the actual AMOLED module being mounted upside down, but something a little more subtle elsewhere in the chain. perhaps the surface coating being a bit weird on some off angles (i.e. having some behavior "upwards" to avoid reflecting overhead lights too badly)? do you still think there is a difference if you lay it flat and look straight down at it? all sounds super-weird though, but a bit too consistently reported to be easy to dismiss as nonsense outright
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 09:33
|
|
|
DuckConference posted:It might just be power of suggestion, but I definitely see something similar when scrolling on a pixel that's upside down. Presumably it's not the actual AMOLED module being mounted upside down, but something a little more subtle elsewhere in the chain. what if the link between gpu and screen isn't fast enough to update the whole screen at once so it has to change row by row
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 12:33
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:what if the link between gpu and screen isn't fast enough to update the whole screen at once so it has to change row by row who could be so incredibly, insanely cheap as to do such a thing oh wait, anroid lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 13:15
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:what if the link between gpu and screen isn't fast enough to update the whole screen at once so it has to change row by row that would cause a tearing effect whenever something redraws in a translated offset Hugh G. Rectum posted:how is it even possible not to have 60fps scrolling, windows 95 had it on a pentium 1 with 64mb of RAM and no hardware accel. what's googles excuse? lol no it didn't.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 13:49
|
|
|
anroid is a blackberry clone with touch still bolted on after all these years. i imagine google wants to replace anroid entirely, but google doesnt have the drive nor the coherence required to build something better
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
How do people remember dragging a window around really fast and maxing out your CPU load pre-vista?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:How do people remember dragging a window around really fast and maxing out your CPU load pre-vista? if u turn off aero you're pc will have more megahurtz!!
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
I just recently found out that whatever kernel an android device ships with, that's the version it stays with forever, through all OS upgrades. what. the. gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 15:33
|
|
|
The Management posted:I just recently found out that whatever kernel an android device ships with, that's the version it stays with forever, through all OS upgrades. why would Qualcomm make more than one BSP when they can just make one and call it a day
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
The Management posted:that would cause a tearing effect whenever something redraws in a translated offset the iPad 3 had a slight, but noticeable display lag that was similar to the rolling shutter effect seen on digital cameras. the LCD controller or whatever couldn't update the screen fast enough. so if you scrolled in landscape orientation stuff would get a slight rolling shutter trapezoidal effect like you see when panning quickly on a GoPro. or scrolling in portrait orientation would briefly give a slight squish/stretch effect. for the anroid phone in question, its possible that rotating the device makes it fall off some optimized, direct framebuffer-to-screen drawing path, and having to go through the window compositor (so the screen contents can be rotated 180 degrees) introduces a noticeable lag. (as if anroid has an optimized drawing path  )or maybe it's too slow to handle having to invert the touch input coordinates.  who cares tho because v  v anroid is bad vv
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:the iPad 3 had a slight, but noticeable display lag that was similar to the rolling shutter effect seen on digital cameras. the LCD controller or whatever couldn't update the screen fast enough. so if you scrolled in landscape orientation stuff would get a slight rolling shutter trapezoidal effect like you see when panning quickly on a GoPro. or scrolling in portrait orientation would briefly give a slight squish/stretch effect. I've used the iPad 3 for years and never experienced that. calling horse poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
surely Project Butter solved these issues long ag-ahahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 17:59
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:I've used the iPad 3 for years and never experienced that. calling horse poo poo I own an iPad 3 as well. haven't used it in a while, but I definitely remember it having that problem. was especially noticeable when starting/stopping scrolling quickly or if you dragged your finger up & down real quick to make it abruptly change scrolling direction. browsing YOSPOS made it more noticeable because of the straight lines on a black background. edit: i just tested it, and yep, you can see it. open awful.app (or safari), and browse any thread in yospos in portrait orientation. you can easily see text etc. lagging behind the scrolling the further to the right you get, especially if you keep your finger on the screen. IIRC many people commented on this when the iPad 3 was released. it being so underpowered (even for its time) is why the iPad 4 was released only a few months later. Doc Block fucked around with this message at 18:54 on Jun 30, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
yeah i remember something similar. real subtle effect, but it was there
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:for the anroid phone in question, its possible that rotating the device makes it fall off some optimized, direct framebuffer-to-screen drawing path, and having to go through the window compositor (so the screen contents can be rotated 180 degrees) introduces a noticeable lag. (as if anroid has an optimized drawing path good catch that's probably what's happening with the upside down pixel who knows what's wrong with the oppo phone though. Yesterday it was normal, today it's a software fix EDIT: Yeah the oneplus refreshes bottom to top for some reason https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-5/how-to/960-fps-video-oneplus-5-display-t3629812 big shtick energy fucked around with this message at 02:33 on Jul 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
The Management posted:it doesn't. this is complete nonsense. displays don't get mounted upside down. they don't even have an upside down, the scan direction is reversible. what this person is seeing is probably just lag in the touch response that gives it the rubber band effect wrongo 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 04:46
|
|
|
mishaq posted:the ribbon cable or whatever that connects the screen to the motherboard isn't gonna have enough play to allow a screen to be mounted in more than one orientation either the short version is that it's not that some are leaving the factory with a panel in one orientation while others are 180 degrees from that, it's that they sources the same panels as the previous phone but designed the phone such that the panel is 180 degrees from that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
even the display wants to do a 180 away from an anroid
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:the short version is that it's not that some are leaving the factory with a panel in one orientation while others are 180 degrees from that, it's that they sources the same panels as the previous phone but designed the phone such that the panel is 180 degrees from that. because the oppo R11 had the connector on the bottom, but they wanted to use the same screen as the one plus 3, which has the connector near the top oppo, vivo, and one plus are owned by the same company, oppo and one plus share a building, and the one plus phones are built in an oppo factory
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 06:47
|
|
|
Bobby Digital posted:even the display wants to do a 180 away from an anroid
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 12:48
|
|
|
Bobby Digital posted:even the display wants to do a 180 away from an anroid
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
Bobby Digital posted:even the display wants to do a 180 away from an anroid
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Don Lapre posted:I was but still ordered one lol.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 16:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 12:07 |
|
|
et tu, don larp?
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 16:37
|
|