|
mind the walrus posted:Suspenders are going to blow your mind. I'd love to wear those without looking like a hipster. I can never find the right belt tightness where my pants stay at just the right level where my rear end crack doesn't show. Either it's too tight or too loose.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 01:06 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 03:20 |
|
Delivery McGee posted:GM almost made a US model a few years ago (they had been bringing over the sedan version as a Pontiac fora few years.) Would've also been branded as a Pontiac, but then they axed Pontiac. The Australian designed coupes were sold in a lot of different markets, they went the US as Pontiac GTOs with some cosmetic changes and in a few other markets as Vauxhalls.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 01:40 |
|
If you ever get in an antifa mood and go to your local milsurp store and try to buy black BDUs you will be amazed at the sizing. 34/36 length means you get a 40 or so waist. At least back in the day. Belt very much required but you can do that thing where you pull the waist out like in those old weight-loss commercials. Or fit a second person in the pants but that can be awkward. e: American military, fat?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 03:03 |
|
bongwizzard posted:I wore suspenders regularly for a couple years when I worked in construction sites, they are absolutely amazing, other then the fact that they sort of require you to tuck your shirt in.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 03:42 |
|
In the near future brought to you by generation X, shirt tucking will be outlawed. We're still waiting for the last boomers to die off. Have I said too much about our plans
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 03:46 |
|
Like most Gen X plans you were thwarted by Milennial upstarts before you even knew what happened. Grunge is dead. Long live the dork.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 03:54 |
|
mind the walrus posted:Like most Gen X plans you were thwarted by Milennial upstarts before you even knew what happened. I wear my flannels out and my chinos low. dwi
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 04:17 |
|
syscall girl posted:flannels In this country we call them washcloths.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 05:22 |
|
mind the walrus posted:You should tuck your shirt in most of the time anyway, said the old nerd. You'd have to for a belt. What, why?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 06:13 |
|
Mister Mind posted:In this country we call them washcloths. A flannel wouldn't make a good washcloth, they are too soft. Flannel shirts for lyfe.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 06:19 |
|
Shifty Nipples posted:A flannel wouldn't make a good washcloth, they are too soft. I was anti flannel shirts for a long time until I went down to the in-laws' farm in the middle of winter and borrowed one and now I am of the opinion that they are pretty awesome to wear while being a farm Bogan
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 06:24 |
|
Xibanya posted:I can't believe I just figured out that a belt for men's slacks is more than just decorative. Jebus
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 07:26 |
|
JoelJoel posted:So you thought the pants held up the belt and just realised that the belt holds up the pants? I mean, that's how it works for most women!
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 07:56 |
|
Xibanya posted:I mean, that's how it works for most women! It was a failed attempt at a mitch reference.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 08:15 |
|
Who's Mitch?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 08:24 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:Who's Mitch? Mitch Hedberg, he was an observational absurdist comedian.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 08:31 |
|
Memento posted:Mitch Hedberg, he was an observational absurdist comedian. I wonder if he's related to Sami Hedberg. http://i.imgur.com/UauEQ7j.mp4
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 08:47 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:I wonder if he's related to Sami Hedberg. Probably not, Mitch was a comedian.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 08:58 |
|
extradite THIS! posted:Probably not, Mitch was a comedian.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 09:17 |
|
iajanus posted:I was anti flannel shirts for a long time until I went down to the in-laws' farm in the middle of winter and borrowed one and now I am of the opinion that they are pretty awesome to wear while being a farm Bogan Then I started skating last year and this winter, they keep you warm and a decent one is thick/tough enough to stop you from getting too scuffed up on little bails.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 12:29 |
|
Croccers posted:they keep you warm and a decent one is thick/tough enough to stop you from getting too scuffed up on little bails. Try wearing better pants or maybe a sports cup? Edit: sorry, misread your post
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 14:02 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:What, why?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 14:19 |
|
just do a casual semi-tuck & light a cig :sunglasses_emoji:
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 14:30 |
|
mind the walrus posted:If you want your outfit to look decent. I mean you can (and I have) worn a belt under a loose shirt, but I never had the impression it looked good. How would anyone tell the difference if you have an untucked shirt over your belt line though. How does that possibly look different
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 14:41 |
|
Len posted:I'd love to wear those without looking like a hipster. I can never find the right belt tightness where my pants stay at just the right level where my rear end crack doesn't show. Either it's too tight or too loose. it's not hipsterism if you genuinely are using the object for its intended purpose rather than as an affect be the change you want to see in the fashion world! i'd be down for a return to suspenders Also, i dated a guy once who had a weirdly long torso and only wore these tiny white t-shirts that were probalby undershirts. he also apparently never bothered ot put the time in to finding pants that fit and just had these ill-fititng jeans he wore all the time, so he was perpetually exposing his rear end crack and his hairy belly to the entire world. he wore a belt, it made 0 difference. this was during a difficult time in my life.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 16:58 |
|
purple death ray posted:How would anyone tell the difference if you have an untucked shirt over your belt line though. How does that possibly look different If the shirt is light enough, the outline of the belt would be visible sometimes and might look weird.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 16:59 |
|
wow I thought we were talking about shirt-tucking under suspenders. I dont think ive never seen someones belt through their untucked shirt. ive noticed undershirts once in a blue moon but never a belt. thats weird.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2017 18:09 |
|
syscall girl posted:If you ever get in an antifa mood and go to your local milsurp store and try to buy black BDUs you will be amazed at the sizing. Can confirm, BDUs are amazingly comfortable and can hold a lot of stuff. Reinforced seat/knee pads/rain resistance means that I wear them 99% of the time. The downside is that you look like a military hobo but you can keep a 1L Nalgene in your side pocket no problem! I recommend propper.com for BDUs, the black pants are discreet enough to wear at (some) workplaces. 30 dollars for a pair of pants that are comfortable and functional? You can't go wrong!
|
# ? Jul 22, 2017 19:05 |
|
mind the walrus posted:If you want your outfit to look decent. I mean you can (and I have) worn a belt under a loose shirt, but I never had the impression it looked good. you won't be able to see it
|
# ? Jul 22, 2017 20:22 |
|
My wording was poor and I underestimated the number of goons rushing to defend outfits with untucked shirts. My point is that outfits with untucked shirts look like crap the vast majority of the time anyway. Wearing a belt underneath a loose shirt just means you aren't taking care of your pants.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2017 22:42 |
|
mind the walrus posted:My wording was poor and I underestimated the number of goons rushing to defend outfits with untucked shirts. My point is that outfits with untucked shirts look like crap the vast majority of the time anyway. Wearing a belt underneath a loose shirt just means you aren't taking care of your pants. So I'm supposed to tuck my t-shirt into my pants anytime I wear a belt? That's just
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 00:56 |
|
Len posted:So I'm supposed to tuck my t-shirt into my pants anytime I wear a belt? That's just I'm not saying you have to, just that doing so looks surprisingly good if you're even remotely fit.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 00:58 |
|
I've seen the WAYWT thread so I'm just going to assume all goons who claim to have a fashion sense have really poo poo fashion sense.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 01:01 |
|
T-shirt tucked into jeans with belt is an extremely dad fashion choice
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 01:03 |
|
Yes. Yes it is. This is going to sound like shifting the goal posts, but I swear to god during this original exchange I was picturing a button shirt. T-shirt depends a lot on length.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 01:33 |
|
Lol if you imagine anyone here wearing actual adult clothes. Shorts and an ill-fitting t-shirt at best, though there's the occasional tissue-thin short sleeve kmart dress shirt for formal occasions and adult onesies for everyday errands
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 03:15 |
|
mind the walrus posted:Wearing a belt underneath a loose shirt just means you aren't taking care of your pants.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 03:21 |
|
I dress like Naked Snake in MGS3 at all times
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 03:24 |
|
Even, no, especially bedtime
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 03:25 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 03:20 |
|
same
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 03:31 |