Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Tom Perez B/K/M?
This poll is closed.
B 77 25.50%
K 160 52.98%
M 65 21.52%
Total: 229 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010


I'm just waiting till this thing is out before I make any more posts about it, it's been too much of a roller coaster of "It sounds good, it sounds bad, it sounds good again!"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
I wonder if they're making reluctant concessions because they know they're completely hosed otherwise, or if they're going to be genuinely surprised that people react positively to the prospect of good things.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
Why is all that on table instead of part and parcel of Monday's policy drop

EugeneJ
Feb 5, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

"Medicaid buy-in" worries me since "Medicaid for All" would immediately be shot down with cries of "I DON'T WANT NO POOR PEOPLE INSURANCE" while you can sell "Medicare for All" much more easily

Schumer might be purposefully trying to confuse people who don't understand the difference between Medicare and Medicaid

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich

WampaLord posted:

Wow, you turned into a loving gibbering idiot in record time. No one cares about your crazy ideas about how America is doomed and needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. You literally sound like a Metal Gear villain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmWQd8zhEg4
Abandoned, not rebuilt. I don't share senator Armstrong's optimism or action-packed agenda. Plus I was thinking of Gwar, though I don't see why anybody would hesitate to join noble bird-kind.

VitalSigns posted:

I wouldn't worry too much about this Sneakster fellow, he's not even American. He makes too many mistakes with his articles that a native English speaker would never make.
Sure, I might offend a few of the bluenoses with my bizzare grammar and inconsistenr tone - oh, I'll never be the darling of the forums posters who cluck their tongues, stroke their beards, and talk about "What's to be done with this Sneakster?

That doesn't sound promising at all. He sounds like a car salesman.

How many loving decades do we have to fall behind first world countries before the democrats consider it pressing?

Talk Down The Sticker Price posted:

Asked if single-payer was on the table, Schumer responded: "Sure."

"Many things are on the table. Medicare for people above 55 is on the table. A buy-in to Medicare is on the table. A buy-in to Medicaid is on the table," he said.
I can't help but think he has absolutely no concern when he's tepid about even less than what people wanted a decade ago.

Inescapable Duck posted:

I wonder if they're making reluctant concessions because they know they're completely hosed otherwise, or if they're going to be genuinely surprised that people react positively to the prospect of good things.
There's a reason what he said made you start wondering if pigs sweat.


Raskolnikov38 posted:

Why is all that on table instead of part and parcel of Monday's policy drop
Based off this line:

Talk Down The Sticker Price posted:

Economics is our strength, and we are going to get at it."

"How the heck did we let Exxon and Mobil merge?" he said. "And that was Democrats.".
He's a sleazy con/salesman practically referring to himself in the third person. Things are "on the table" because there is no policy, they're testing out marketing.

EugeneJ posted:

Schumer might be purposefully trying to confuse people who don't understand the difference between Medicare and Medicaid
This isn't 2008. He's being evasive on purpose, and its not cause he thinks the voters wouldn't be interested in exactly what they want.

I'm on medicaid and somehow surviving the Stalinist nightmare of socialized medicine forcing me into waiting entire days for surgery, lab work, 1$ prescriptions/refills, multiple offices conveniently located, and no copays. I don't think Americans would be able to accept anything like this, insurance companies have let Schumer know this plan would be very unpopular.

Sneakster fucked around with this message at 18:00 on Jul 23, 2017

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011
You'd have to have been asleep for the last few decades if you trust Schumer and other weaselly financed owned Democrats like him.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Sneakster posted:

Abandoned, not rebuilt.

Well, to be frank, gently caress off out of here then and don't come back. I don't want to share my country with weak cowards like you who's answer to "We have a lot of work to do" is to go "Nah gently caress that lol!"

axelord
Dec 28, 2012

College Slice

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Why is all that on table instead of part and parcel of Monday's policy drop

No you see them considering putting it in their policy proposal is a good thing because that means they will totally do it when/if they ever get in power.

What I don't get is why not shoot for the moon? It's a loving proposal to sell the Democrats.

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich

WampaLord posted:

Well, to be frank, gently caress off out of here then and don't come back. I don't want to share my country with weak cowards like you who's answer to "We have a lot of work to do" is to go "Nah gently caress that lol!"
I mean, that's kind of the plan. Get citizenship in viking land, then use US as an investment opportunity. I'll do what I can while here, but I've basically checked out at this point.

tekz posted:

You'd have to have been asleep for the last few decades if you trust Schumer and other weaselly financed owned Democrats like him.
As a citizen, yes. As an amoral financial parasite antagonistic to the well being and interests of the average American, I can probably trust Schumer to maintain an investor/grift friendly environment.

axelord posted:

What I don't get is why not shoot for the moon? It's a loving proposal to sell the Democrats.
To avoid alienating donors.

ugh its Troika
May 2, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
Lmao

Sneakster, if you -actually- leave the country, give up your citizenship, and never return, I will donate $20 to the charity of your choice. :toxx:

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich

ugh its Troika posted:

Lmao

Sneakster, if you -actually- leave the country, give up your citizenship, and never return, I will donate $20 to the charity of your choice. :toxx:
I'm not giving up citizenship, though I could mail you foreign candy if you'd like.

I have nothing but faith in America and high expectations for its future.

Sneakster fucked around with this message at 19:11 on Jul 23, 2017

Great Metal Jesus
Jun 11, 2007

Got no use for psychiatry
I can talk to the voices
in my head for free
Mood swings like an axe
Into those around me
My tongue is a double agent
Stabenow butchered Hoekstra in 2012. I don't think Kid Rock declaring that he's going to run for her seat is a damning indictment of Michigan, much less America.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010


Ronald Reagan was an actor, we had Jesse Venture and Arnold Schwarzenegger and Al Franken and so on, the idea that Kid Rock is running for senate is not some sort of portent of doom and gloom, you loving idiot.

A bad politician doesn't equal the end of the country. We survived Nixon, for gently caress's sake. You're worse than Arzy.

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich

Great Metal Jesus posted:

Stabenow butchered Hoekstra in 2012. I don't think Kid Rock declaring that he's going to run for her seat is a damning indictment of Michigan, much less America.
More of the entire human race. Maybe he'll end up AG under The Rock's administration. It was very controversial when when he brought on The Situation as Secretary of Defense.


WampaLord posted:

Ronald Reagan was an actor, we had Jesse Venture and Arnold Schwarzenegger and Al Franken and so on, the idea that Kid Rock is running for senate is not some sort of portent of doom and gloom, you loving idiot.

A bad politician doesn't equal the end of the country. We survived Nixon, for gently caress's sake. You're worse than Arzy.
Reagan was governor of California, not a redneck act emphasizing their folksy stupidity, nor were the others high-lighting the absurdity of their campaign right after Citizens United.

Sneakster fucked around with this message at 19:41 on Jul 23, 2017

Great Metal Jesus
Jun 11, 2007

Got no use for psychiatry
I can talk to the voices
in my head for free
Mood swings like an axe
Into those around me
My tongue is a double agent

Sneakster posted:

More of the entire human race.

:jerkbag::jerkbag::jerkbag:

SimonCat
Aug 12, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
College Slice

Sneakster posted:

More of the entire human race. Maybe he'll end up AG under The Rock's administration. It was very controversial when when he brought on The Situation as Secretary of Defense.

Reagan was governor of California, not a redneck act emphasizing their folksy stupidity, nor were the others high-lighting the absurdity of their campaign right after Citizens United.

I don't see what one has to do with the other. Dolph Lundgren has a Master's Degree in Chemical Engineering and is known for being a knock-off Schwarzenegger starring in low grade shlock.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Sneakster posted:

Reagan was governor of California, not a redneck act emphasizing their folksy stupidity, nor were the others high-lighting the absurdity of their campaign right after Citizens United.

Al Franken held no political office other than TV funnyman and now he's one of the better D Senators we have, so what's your point?

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich

SimonCat posted:

I don't see what one has to do with the other. Dolph Lundgren has a Master's Degree in Chemical Engineering and is known for being a knock-off Schwarzenegger starring in low grade shlock.
Dolph Lundgren is a cool guy. Schwarzenegger was capitalizing on his celebrity, not running as a time travelling robot. Al Franken wasn't running as Stuart Smalley. Robert James Ritchie is running for the senate as Kid Rock, right after Citizens united, which may or may not be related.

Celebrities running for office don't run't as the characters they played right after campaign regulations disappear. This is a new low.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

SimonCat posted:

I don't see what one has to do with the other. Dolph Lundgren has a Master's Degree in Chemical Engineering and is known for being a knock-off Schwarzenegger starring in low grade shlock.

Dolph is better than Arnold and I would vote for him for god emperor of mankind

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Sneakster posted:

This is a new low.

Only according to your broken brain.

poo poo, you'd have any sort of point if he wins, but we've always had crackpot idiots who run for office and lose. And if you go "Well he could win, because Trump won!" then you can just pre-emptively laugh at yourself on my behalf.

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

Europe has had a couple celeb politicians too, although the only examples I can think of off the top of my head are Italian and either good (the two pornstars) or godawful (Berlusconi and Beppe Grillo)

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich
Christopher Waltz running for office is not the same thing as Colonel Hans Landa running for office.

Great Metal Jesus
Jun 11, 2007

Got no use for psychiatry
I can talk to the voices
in my head for free
Mood swings like an axe
Into those around me
My tongue is a double agent
And yet both are the same in that neither shows that the nation and/or humanity is doomed. You read like a loving first year college student who has just discovered that change is hard, the world is hosed up, and sometimes bad things happen. And your reaction is to plan to fygm your way out of the country.

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

Berlusconi was basically a dry run for Trump and he deeply hosed Italy up, they're still recovering. Grillo is an out and out conspiracy theorist who doesn't believe AIDS is caused by HIV, is an anti-vaxxer and so on.

Unbelievably Fat Man
Jun 1, 2000

Innocent people. I could never hurt innocent people.


It's gonna be pretty funny when the Democrats run a bunch of empty suits with super obviously fake center left messaging and get clowned by Kid Rock, Curt Schilling, Tila Tequila and Doctor Phil. Chuck Shumer is going to lose his reelection campaign to Hulk Hogan.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Unbelievably Fat Man posted:

It's gonna be pretty funny when the Democrats run a bunch of empty suits with super obviously fake center left messaging and get clowned by Kid Rock, Curt Schilling, Tila Tequila and Doctor Phil. Chuck Shumer is going to lose his reelection campaign to Hulk Hogan.

new york is the birth place of hulkamania after all

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Lightning Lord posted:

Berlusconi was basically a dry run for Trump and he deeply hosed Italy up, they're still recovering. Grillo is an out and out conspiracy theorist who doesn't believe AIDS is caused by HIV, is an anti-vaxxer and so on.

Good news, Berlusconi is gonna run again, for president this time.

Call Me Charlie
Dec 3, 2005

by Smythe

quote:

Democratic leaders shared few details to preserve suspense around the plan, which is scheduled to be unveiled Monday at an event in Virginia’s 10th Congressional District, where the party hopes to defeat incumbent Rep. Barbara Comstock (R). But some lawmakers, aides and outside advocates consulted on the new agenda said that it is expected to focus on new proposals to fund job-training programs, renegotiate trade deals and address soaring prescription-drug costs, as well as other issues. It is also expected to endorse long-held Democratic principles, including “a living wage” of $15 per hour and already unveiled spending plans for infrastructure that would expand broadband Internet access into rural counties.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...m=.50a96b6817ff

Let's see. In 'democrats are a waste' speak, I see job-training programs = tax credits, renegotiate trade deals = more trade deals, address soaring prescription-drug costs = some type of government subsidy in the style of aca, $15 per hour = ten to twenty years from now, broadband internet access into rural countries = billions in free money for monopolist corporate ISPs to pocket just like every other time we tried to pay them to expand internet access

Kobayashi
Aug 13, 2004

by Nyc_Tattoo

Unbelievably Fat Man posted:

It's gonna be pretty funny when the Democrats run a bunch of empty suits with super obviously fake center left messaging and get clowned by Kid Rock, Curt Schilling, Tila Tequila and Doctor Phil. Chuck Shumer is going to lose his reelection campaign to Hulk Hogan.

This is true.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Call Me Charlie posted:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...m=.50a96b6817ff

Let's see. In 'the democrats are a waste' speak, I see job-training programs = tax credits, renegotiate trade deals = more trade deals, address soaring prescription-drug costs = some type of government subsidy in the style of aca, $15 per hour = ten to twenty years from now, broadband internet access into rural countries = billions in free money for monopolist corporate ISPs to pocket just like every other time we tried to pay them to expand internet access

Oh, all the good things will be in the document, alright. But if the Dems ever get back to power, they will suddenly uncover a host of procedural obstacles unfortunately preventing them from fulfilling single one of them.

Unbelievably Fat Man
Jun 1, 2000

Innocent people. I could never hurt innocent people.


The honorable senator Ouija Board Connected to the Ultimate Warrior's Corpse attempted a filibuster against the Democrats' We Have To Bring Back Slavery to Save Welfare Act but President Paltrow applied homeopathic mud to him and dispelled the Warrior's shade. His own Bring Back Slavery to Bring Back Slavery Act should be thought committee and up for a vote next week.

Call Me Charlie
Dec 3, 2005

by Smythe

steinrokkan posted:

Oh, all the good things will be in the document, alright. But if the Dems ever get back to power, they will suddenly uncover a host of procedural obstacles unfortunately preventing them from fulfilling single one of them.

I could see them doing most of that. The Democrats love shoveling obscene amounts of taxpayer money directly into corporate pockets to protect the status quo, tax credits are basically what Hillary was suggesting for West Virginia and there's nothing that gets New Democrats harder than the idea of entering bad trade deals.

The only thing that's problematic is $15 an hour but you just know they'll compromise to slowly raising it to $15 by 2035 and call it a victory. (oops the mean old republicans repealed it before it could go into effect :shrug:)

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

Call Me Charlie posted:

I could see them doing most of that. The Democrats love shoveling obscene amounts of taxpayer money directly into corporate pockets to protect the status quo, tax credits are basically what Hillary was suggesting for West Virginia and there's nothing that gets New Democrats harder than the idea of entering bad trade deals.

The only thing that's problematic is $15 an hour but you just know they'll compromise to slowly raising it to $15 by 2035 and call it a victory. (oops the mean old republicans repealed it before it could go into effect :shrug:)

I'm surprised they don't just take a page out of the GOP playbook, and symbolically try to pass it 47 times, like the GOP tried with attempting to repeal Neoliberal Obamacare.

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich

Great Metal Jesus posted:

And yet both are the same in that neither shows that the nation and/or humanity is doomed. You read like a loving first year college student who has just discovered that change is hard, the world is hosed up, and sometimes bad things happen. And your reaction is to plan to fygm your way out of the country.
I think the nazi one might be a little more concerning.

I always knew change was hard, I've just discovered that its impossible and the circumstance has gone from tragedy to farce. My reaction is a plan to achieve the American Dream: exploiting American labor and embracing social inclusion and cutting taxes on our struggling middle class while encouraging entrepreneurship via an innovative business model. I'll be best buddies with Fulchrum, we'll donate money to Tom Perez and Chuck Schumer. We'll laugh at the Bern-outs and the white trash working class complain about 'muh quality of life in a first world country' and call people retards for not groveling hard enough.

Thank God the GOP runs insane cartoons so we don't even have to worry about the base going else where. Maybe if Pelosi gets begged hard enough we can push for $12 min wage by 2030.

Psuedo edit: Oh for fucks sake

"Lucille Ball D-CA' posted:

not a course correction, but it’s a presentation correction.”

Sneakster fucked around with this message at 21:42 on Jul 23, 2017

Call Me Charlie
Dec 3, 2005

by Smythe
Oh god, I missed this part of the article.

quote:

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in an interview previewing the new plan. “So what did we do wrong? People didn’t know what we stood for, just that we were against Trump. And still believe that.”

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) agreed, explaining in a separate interview that the new focus “is not a course correction, but it’s a presentation correction.”

(...)

Schumer said the new agenda “is not about moving the party left or right, and it’s not about appealing to one coalition or another. A strong, sharp-edged, populist, bold economic message appeals to the Obama coalition and the people who voted for Trump — former Democrats who voted for Trump.”

Grumblings about the “Better Deal” plan began late last week when a reporter for the news website Vox tweeted that Democrats’ messaging would include some focus-group language — “better skills, better jobs, better wages” — first used by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.). The reporter later deleted the tweet, but the news tweaked left-wing critics who began tearing apart the alleged slogan, suggesting that “better skills” was an insult to workers — and that the “better” formulation itself evoked the corporate slogan of Papa John’s Pizza.

“Please God someone tell me this is not real,” Tommy Vietor, a former spokesman for President Barack Obama, tweeted at the news, adding later: “Fire the consultant who created it right now.”

But Schumer especially is excited by the new focus, vowing that it’s an expression “that everyone will use — a better deal for workers, a better deal for women, a better deal for prescription-drug buyers.”

That construction — similar to the pizza slogan — is what worries some liberal critics. But the Senate leader is convinced that it will work.

“Part of this is its usability, its repetition and its relation to both the New Deal and a better deal than Trump,” Schumer said. “He’s supposed to be a dealmaker; he’s not very good at that.”

Sneakster
Jul 13, 2017

by R. Guyovich
What is the fastest and most effective way to tell them this is terrible and will lose them 2018?

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Mister Facetious posted:

I'm surprised they don't just take a page out of the GOP playbook, and symbolically try to pass it 47 times, like the GOP tried with attempting to repeal Neoliberal Obamacare.

It is impossible to do that until Democrats retake the house. Democrats can't even get a vote until then.

EugeneJ
Feb 5, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Sneakster posted:

What is the fastest and most effective way to tell them this is terrible and will lose them 2018?

Their corporate donors are happy with Trump - why do they give a poo poo if they lose?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/06/21/republican-national-committee-fundraising/417547001/

quote:

The Republican National Committee raised nearly $10.9 million in May, more than twice the amount collected by its Democratic counterpart, new filings show.

The fundraising haul brings to nearly $62 million that the RNC has collected this year.

The Democratic National Committee raised $4.29 million in May and $32.7 million so far in 2017, according to the party's filings with the Federal Election Commission.

Dems are hosed

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


isn't the whole "people flipped for trump!" thing just people seeing counties flip and not realize it was depressed dem turnout and not them literally switching their votes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Groovelord Neato posted:

isn't the whole "people flipped for trump!" thing just people seeing counties flip and not realize it was depressed dem turnout and not them literally switching their votes.

You can't inject any reason right now, people are all aboard the USS Everything's hosed, maybe on Monday when we have actual details we can have a more productive discussion.

For the record, calm down, y'all. We don't actually know anything yet, stop chicken littling about how it could be the worst thing ever.

  • Locked thread