|
Yeah, they're... I'm bi, but I can say that one spherical gendered body part is attractive and good and the other is... not.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 21:45 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 21:22 |
|
spog posted:Wait, does anyone actually like balls to look at? vaginas look like some kind of hosed up invertebrate creature embedded in a woman's crotch, damned if i don't find those attractive tho genitals are weird
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 21:45 |
|
Tomarse posted:I assume that despite the low mileage it is actually broken in some way, hence the many years parked up? And yes, it seems to have been neglected. I'll get into that when I do what I really should do and start a thread for my poo poo in the near future, but for now I'll just say I have never seen oil this bad in an engine. And that includes any of those "100k without an oil change?!?!?" Youtube videos.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 21:47 |
|
Rhyno posted:That show was great you hater! Pus filled boils being popped are a better show than that poo poo mate. gently caress, I'd watch Dr Who first and you know my opinion on that dumpster fire Shrugs Not Drugs posted:vaginas look like some kind of hosed up invertebrate creature embedded in a woman's crotch, damned if i don't find those attractive tho They dont call it bumping uglies for nothing.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 21:57 |
|
I'm gay and I couldn't tell you what a nice set of balls look like. I'm more of a whole package kind of guy anyway.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 22:18 |
|
InitialDave posted:Another oddity: 660cc, but four cylinders with an ickle turbo on it. Bad in what way exactly?!
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 22:19 |
|
Goober Peas posted:I'm gay and I couldn't tell you what a nice set of balls look like. I'm more of a whole package kind of guy anyway. Balls or vagina are always ugly. But I think everyone can agree a shaply rear end is a drat fine thing no matter what sex it's on
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 22:26 |
|
Shrugs Not Drugs posted:genitals are weird And fun in your mouth
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:03 |
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:Balls or vagina are always ugly. But I think everyone can agree a shaply rear end is a drat fine thing no matter what sex it's on
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:04 |
|
Same Moe, same. https://youtu.be/2nhFH25JNgc
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:12 |
|
Olympic Mathlete posted:Bad in what way exactly?!
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:15 |
|
Don't joke, that poo poo wasn't cool.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:18 |
|
NitroSpazzz posted:Movie chat: Saw this earlier on imgur and it's relevant - https://imgur.com/gallery/GAqOU I'd forgotten that there was a Kingsman sequel coming. Thank you. I'm excited about ready Player One - I've been meaning to read the book for some time. I'm also cautiously hopeful for the new Wrinkle In time movie. The last one... deviated significantly from the source. It's a testament to how much Seminal Flu posted:Or possibly they were just really nice tits. That, too. Nice boobs are always worth notice. At least from my cis-male heterosexual (did I say that right? I'm not terribly hip on all the words for gender nowadays) viewpoint. I can't speak for any other. Leperflesh posted:are we gonna talk about balls now, or Hey, you do you (see above). CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:Talk about whatever body parts turn ya all on I dont care. Not like I get any what with all these Subarus giving me negative sex appeal. QFT. spog posted:Wait, does anyone actually like balls to look at? To quote Kryten, on Red Dwarf, regarding the entire male lower arrangement: "That's it? That's what it's *supposed* to look like? the last chicken in the shop?" CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:Balls or vagina are always ugly. But I think everyone can agree a shaply rear end is a drat fine thing no matter what sex it's on I've heard that male humans are genetically predisposed to like a nice butt, because that's what we get to look at after successfully wooing the female, in the default-until-missionary-style mating ritual. Not sure about why boobs are so wondrous.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:26 |
|
Olympic Mathlete posted:Don't joke, that poo poo wasn't cool. Darchangel posted:I've heard that male humans are genetically predisposed to like a nice butt, because that's what we get to look at after successfully wooing the female, in the default-until-missionary-style mating ritual. Not sure about why boobs are so wondrous. It's all that "selfish gene" poo poo really, I suppose, evolution logically favours traits that make you want to gently caress.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:33 |
|
Ready Player One is probably 2/5 on the writing quality. A ton of references and self-fan-service, which can be really awesome or really tedious.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:33 |
|
Guys like to look at lady parts. It's not that hard to figure out.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:36 |
|
Rhyno posted:Guys like to look at lady parts. It's not that hard to figure out. Some guys want lady parts themselves as you may or may not know
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:40 |
|
KakerMix posted:Some guys want lady parts themselves as you may or may not know ...and also your man parts. Some people are greedy.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:46 |
|
Darchangel posted:Not sure about why boobs are so wondrous. Well, for the first few years of your life, that's where you get your food from, so I guess they continue to look big and tasty when you are an adult. Though for this analogy to work properly, I guess you'd have to get erections in a McDonald's.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:51 |
|
spog posted:Well, for the first few years of your life, that's where you get your food from, so I guess they continue to look big and tasty when you are an adult. Who says I don't? Mmmmmm.... Big Macs.....
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 23:57 |
|
Humans are the only species that have evolved permanent boobs (ie present outside of pregnancy/nursing) and some biologists theorize that it's specifically because we started doing missionary however many million years ago, basically they developed as like a frontal visual equivalent to rear end cheeks this has been your dumb evolutionary fact of the day, back to designing cams for my kinematics class
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 00:08 |
|
Enourmo posted:Humans are the only species that have evolved permanent boobs (ie present outside of pregnancy/nursing) and some biologists theorize that it's specifically because we started doing missionary however many million years ago, basically they developed as like a frontal visual equivalent to rear end cheeks There was a thing I watched recently that debunked that in a way that made me go 'oh yeah' but I can't recall where I saw it. It's just as well anyway, even if you aren't a boob person on birth you can certainly become one in western society in short order as that prolly has more to do with the fetishization of breasts. Lots of cultures in Africa don't care about boobs.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 00:27 |
|
BraveUlysses posted:check your balls for lumps regularly Doesn't the risk taper off as you age or am I crazy wrong here?
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 00:34 |
|
Rhyno posted:I'm no actor but my balls are pretty dope These balls made many people giggle.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 00:50 |
|
Rhyno posted:Guys like to look at lady parts. It's not that hard to figure out. ... just these days I'd rather look than deal with the BS that comes with them. Or not look in the first place and just deal with things I can understand. If it fucks flies or floats, hire it by the hour
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 00:53 |
|
Enourmo posted:
Be careful to not jerk too much!
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 00:57 |
|
KakerMix posted:There was a thing I watched recently that debunked that in a way that made me go 'oh yeah' but I can't recall where I saw it. It's just as well anyway, even if you aren't a boob person on birth you can certainly become one in western society in short order as that prolly has more to do with the fetishization of breasts. Lots of cultures in Africa don't care about boobs. You're absolutely right, and the theory that boobs are due to switching to missionary has been generally debunked by anthropologists. Here's a decent overview: https://www.livescience.com/23500-why-men-love-breasts.html The so-called "nipple-oxytocin bonding loop" is not universally accepted, but it's a better explanation than the "looks like a front butt" one.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 02:06 |
|
Holy gently caress these that have been debunked for 100+ years are bad and wrong. You lot are inquisitive, curious, educatable (and educated) dudes. Go to your hospital and ask to be admitted to the medical library. They have tons of books on how titties and vaginas work for 14 year olds. Titties are not front-top butts and that idea is so proven wrong at this point in anthropological research over the last 150 years, not to mention human sexuality research that's happened in the last 70 years. Missionary position was not invented in the late 1800s. Have you people never seen the Khaleesi showing Khal Drogo how to gently caress like a normal person? Do you think the term "French kissing' was invented during the reign of Louis XII or do you buy that it was invented by American GI's in the 1940's thanks to them bringing freedom, chocolate bars, and... nylons? To the deprived french girls? Everything in life is down to cultural norms. If you look at the first girl you made the sex with and compared her to the next 15 or 20 bitches you be loving, you will probably identify that 75% of those girls are the same body and look archetype. None of this poo poo is genetic, unless you believe that women like the big dongs because Gorillas have big dongs. (they have tiny dongs.) For the idea that titties = buttocks one would have to find a universal appreciation and sexualization of The Tittehs but as it turns out almost all of the cultures that aren't driven by strictly imagined victorian norms (the US and the UK) titties are not sexualized in the same way at all. See: Topless beaches in 99% of european places where the English blokes side-eye titties all day, the Californians pretending to be English blokes side eye the titty 24/7 because we're smart enough to wear mirrored sunglasses, and the people from there don't even notice there is even a titty. Additionally, Africa, France, Portugal, Greece, most of the non-christian paciific, and almost everywhere else where titties aren't even a loving big deal at all. Alternately, investigate how titties are dealt with in strict oppressive regimes like Saudi Arabia. Look at Pornhub data about where the biggest purveyors of porn reside. Utah, Saudi, and Pakistan.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 02:36 |
|
Ether Frenzy posted:Holy gently caress these that have been debunked for 100+ years are bad and wrong. You lot are inquisitive, curious, educatable (and educated) dudes. Go to your hospital and ask to be admitted to the medical library. They have tons of books on how titties and vaginas work for 14 year olds. Titties are not front-top butts and that idea is so proven wrong at this point in anthropological research over the last 150 years, not to mention human sexuality research that's happened in the last 70 years. Missionary position was not invented in the late 1800s. Have you people never seen the Khaleesi showing Khal Drogo how to gently caress like a normal person? Do you think the term "French kissing' was invented during the reign of Louis XII or do you buy that it was invented by American GI's in the 1940's thanks to them bringing freedom, chocolate bars, and... nylons? To the deprived french girls? I never thought I would see such a post about tits in a chat thread. About the only comment otherwise is the girls who have lowered their standards enough for my dick they were all wildly different
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 02:48 |
|
Ether Frenzy posted:Holy gently caress these that have been debunked for 100+ years are bad and wrong. I mean, yes, as other posters and myself mentioned, but you've avoided the Big Question which is why did humans evolve big boobs when they're basically a hindrance in all respects save when nursing, and the other mammals seem to manage nursing without having large teats at all times. That question is not well settled and it's an interesting subject to ponder for the layperson as well as the scientist. Similarly although less discussed is why human males have suck large dongs compared to our body size. It's certainly not a requirement for successful reproduction, plenty of mammals the same size as us manage it with smaller wedding tackle. e. \/\/\/ he also likes dicks
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 03:44 |
|
God's a boob man.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 03:45 |
|
Coworker got stuck with a customer who told him all about his butthole problems for a good 10 minutes while I went and finished my closing duties, then came over and told the coworker to do something in the back to rescue him. Notable quotes include "Every time I eat or poo poo, my rear end in a top hat pulsates for a good 10 hours man" and "Yeah, sounds like that dude was just trying to cover their rear end". Dude has nobody to talk to except his wife and I get he's lonely, but drat dude, don't dump it all out on random strangers.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 03:57 |
|
Cop Porn Popper posted:Coworker got stuck with a customer who told him all about his butthole Was it this guy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay_78K_pynU
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 04:38 |
|
Leperflesh posted:I mean, yes, as other posters and myself mentioned, but you've avoided the Big Question which is why did humans evolve big boobs when they're basically a hindrance in all respects save when nursing, and the other mammals seem to manage nursing without having large teats at all times. That question is not well settled and it's an interesting subject to ponder for the layperson as well as the scientist. Humans are also unusual in that we gently caress for fun. Rhyno posted:God's a boob man. If you saw the asses that came out of the downstairs gym at lunchtime today dressed in yoga pants you might think again. Wooow
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 04:54 |
|
Sadi posted:Be careful to not jerk too much! Got my homework submitted just under the wire once again thanks to having to wrangle Mathcad. One of these semesters I'll learn better time manahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha E: Also, one of my problems used a program called Dynacam, which seems amazing if the trial version wasn't so hamstrung. Thanks to that I learned that there is in fact another derivative of jerk, called "ping". At some point the abstraction from reality has to make these things border on useless, right?
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 05:02 |
|
Ether Frenzy posted:Holy gently caress these Whatever man, it was some poo poo I heard a while back, deemed remotely plausible, and didn't give enough of a gently caress about to debunk
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 05:09 |
|
Ether Frenzy posted:Holy gently caress these that have been debunked for 100+ years are you
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 05:16 |
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:Humans are also unusual in that we gently caress for fun. It seems to be a characteristic much more frequent among highly social group animals; dolphins and bonobos are probably most famous for it, but there's quite a few more. Sex as reinforcement of social bonds is pretty effective. (Note: certain people use this as a justification for serial infidelity, polygamy, incest, pedophilia, rape, etc.)
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 05:48 |
|
Just watched the 1978 film "The Driver" and it was great. Funny reading reviews of the time calling it 'ultra violent' though.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 09:07 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 21:22 |
|
KakerMix posted:Just watched the 1978 film "The Driver" and it was great. Funny reading reviews of the time calling it 'ultra violent' though. Reviews written by mercedes owners, no doubt.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 09:20 |