|
https://twitter.com/DemocracyValues/status/889527933882302464 lmao
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:02 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 04:47 |
|
DEATH PANELS
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:04 |
|
oh my lord
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:05 |
|
https://twitter.com/BretRagnarsson/status/889589029930401792
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:09 |
|
Oh, my storybook lover You have underestimated my power As you shortly will discover
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:10 |
|
https://twitter.com/DemSocialists/status/889500434414669824 free advice to democrats: people's existing jobs can be made to be better
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:10 |
|
Trump, in an effort to to get his bill passed, told thousands of children that Obamacare is bad and rolled out "victims" of Obamacare to discuss how bad it is in front of millions of people. Disgusting as it may be, he's politicking and using the bully pulpit. Democrats, meanwhile, honor a ruthless rear end in a top hat who wants to kill thousands of Americans.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:11 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:
Sarah Jaffe had a big, good article recently about organizing the retail workforce. America’s Massive Retail Workforce Is Tired of Being Ignored: Long absent from discussions about employment, workers from Walmart to Bloomingdale’s are taking matters into their own hands.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:14 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:https://twitter.com/DemSocialists/status/889500434414669824 And then there's the billions of dollars in wage theft a year. I have a good "free money" policy that the Dems should push to get people excited and lower the wealth gap. Create and push for Commuter's Pay. Every single American worker who works more than 1 hour a day should get +1 hour pay per day for having to get ready/commute to work.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:18 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:Sarah Jaffe had a big, good article recently about organizing the retail workforce. I'd bet that these workers are also the same people who aren't voting.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:19 |
|
comedyblissoption posted:what a lazy and uninspired troll there's nothing really wrong with that except for the fact that it came from one of the worst public speakers in the Democratic Party the core message of "economic justice is important but we can't stop there - we need to protect civil rights as well" is Cool and Good. it's just that it came from Hillary Clinton, who as always phrased it in basically the worst way possible, and also added a bunch of caveats and maybes to the economic justice part because she's not a good enough liar to convince anyone she actually wants to break up the banks WhiskeyJuvenile posted:I'd bet that these workers are also the same people who aren't voting. who would they vote for? i don't recall any prominent candidates recently coming out in favor of better working conditions for bottom-of-barrel retail and fast food work. the Dems' preferred response to lovely low-wage work is to push education and training and pretend that literally everyone will just be able to class mobility themselves out of the lovely jobs
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:23 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:I'd bet that these workers are also the same people who aren't voting. Not everyone lives a six figgie fucktard lifestyle bub Anyway you should be out celebrating that your taxes will be lower once the ACA is repealed, go live it up
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:25 |
|
loquacius posted:You're just going down the list of stereotypes to post with no further comment huh i wish my rep was dead along with every other neolib in the world, i've voted against the fucker for a decade but he keeps winning anyway because of the fygm shitheads around here
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:27 |
|
So are dems supposed to keep their plans super secret and then surprise people with it so theres no chance for an opposition?
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:28 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:I'd bet that these workers are also the same people who aren't voting. Gee, I wonder why. I really wonder.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:29 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:I'd bet that these workers are also the same people who aren't voting. because they cant afford a day off work you rich shitstain
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:30 |
|
*works hourly job for bad pay, can't afford to take off work or might be excluded from voting due to lovely voter repression tactics* Dense, comfortable, nincompoop: Way to not vote
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:34 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:https://twitter.com/DemSocialists/status/889500434414669824 What people keep losing track of is that manufacturing and mining jobs etc were not fit to support a family on, until labor strikes happened and things changed We keep discounting the retail sector as a permanent dead-end industry, but when you come down to it it's one of the only consistent employers of Americans there is left, and we really should be focusing on making those jobs worthy of being held. If your problem is that too many people are stuck working at Wal-Mart, you can either make them all go to night school to learn coding so that maybe just maybe they can tear out each other's throats competing for a Real Job, or alternately you can make Wal-Mart jobs better. got any sevens posted:i wish my rep was dead along with every other neolib in the world, i've voted against the fucker for a decade but he keeps winning anyway because of the fygm shitheads around here I guess I should amend that to "my rep is fine", he's not a raging commie or anything but he's not a corporate shill either If someone came along to primary him who I liked better I'd vote for them, but I'm not exactly going around ringing doorbells to recruit someone to take him down
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:36 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:
yeah, they need to be engaged, and investment and tax breaks is not going to do it
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:40 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:I'd bet that these workers are also the same people who aren't voting. And of course if they aren't willing to help themselves, it's your job to punish them for their lack of moral fiber.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:41 |
|
steinrokkan posted:And of course if they aren't willing to help themselves, it's your job to punish them for their lack of moral fiber.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:43 |
|
what's jimmy mcmillan up to these days
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:50 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:can't wait for the wet fart reveal on Monday i'd like to say called it but it wasn't particularly difficult to predict
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:51 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:what's jimmy mcmillan up to these days I was just thinking about him a few days ago He was a funny meme man but when it comes down to it the things his catchphrases were about were important and needed to be said
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:53 |
|
I'm still waiting for Tom Perez to engage with me in a multifaceted way
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:54 |
|
SHY NUDIST GRRL posted:There was some piece about how the Dem's have been treating campaigning like marketing, causing dipshits like mook. And it really is the case. They don't have much else to offer, so they try to make up the difference in marketing. as someone whose degree is in marketing, that explains a lot. an organization that manufactures something is somewhat tangibly "locked in" by their choices in product, production methods, location of facilities, logistics, and other physical properties. so if you can't refine any of those traits, that's when you focus on branding and advertising, and you tailor it towards your targeted market. but that's the problem: there is no outwardly-discernible target. The market they've tried to court doesn't exist (moderate republicans) and the larger, existing demographic that does (the personally disenfranchised), is flat-out ignored. as a thought exercise: how the gently caress does tax credits for businesses to train employees convince the average disaffect to give a poo poo?
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:54 |
|
loquacius posted:I was just thinking about him a few days ago what's reverend wright up to these days
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:55 |
|
hello suck zone how are you today
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 16:57 |
|
we also probably have a retirement crisis coming up in the next decade that no one is talking about
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:00 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:we also probably have a retirement crisis coming up in the next decade that no one is talking about soylent green
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:01 |
|
NYC Mayor Signs On-Call Scheduling Banquote:NEW YORK, NY – Today, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed Intro 1387 into law, just days after the New York City Council passed the legislation that bans on-call scheduling for retail workers. This crucial legislation finally ends the abhorrent practice of on-call scheduling – a system of scheduling that disrupts workers’ lives and their families’ lives by requiring them to be available to work even when they are not scheduled to work, and with no guarantee of an actual work shift.
Employers will not be able to cancel a shift within 72 hours of the start of the shift except under extreme conditions like a natural disaster. With worker consent, employers are able to add a shift within 72 hours. Employers will be held accountable for any violations. Link to the bill:http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2900928&GUID=5A7DF104-0104-463E-96FC-A7FB1FDD9B8F&Options=ID%7CText%7C&Search=1387
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:01 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:free advice to democrats: people's existing jobs can be made to be better ya by automating them
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:04 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:we also probably have a retirement crisis coming up in the next decade that no one is talking about isn't it something like 50% of all seniors have no savings outside of social security, let alone enough to even retire on?
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:04 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:NYC Mayor Signs On-Call Scheduling Ban this would've been nice when i was working food service. my managers were always stacking more hours onto my shift. once went in for a 4 hour shift just to be pushed into a 14 hour shift
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:05 |
|
Lastgirl posted:ya by automating them fully. automated. luxury. mcdonalds.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:11 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:isn't it something like 50% of all seniors have no savings outside of social security, let alone enough to even retire on? Sounds like they shouldn't have voted away all our money so we could take care of them
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:12 |
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:as someone whose degree is in marketing, that explains a lot. an organization that manufactures something is somewhat tangibly "locked in" by their choices in product, production methods, location of facilities, logistics, and other physical properties. so if you can't refine any of those traits, that's when you focus on branding and advertising, and you tailor it towards your targeted market. and never mind that we're talking about the democratic national committee: an organization made up entirely of people who have used the phrase "i'm really just an ideas guy/gal/person" -- ideas are emphemeral. there are no physical binds to consider when tailoring your pitch, so if the ideas suck, fuckin' dump 'em! This warmed-over bullshit is toxic and yet they keep dusting it off and poppin' it back into the microwave thinking this time the voters are really gonna scarf it down because they put it on a nicer plate and added a sprig of plastic parsley. Gene Hackman Fan has issued a correction as of 17:15 on Jul 25, 2017 |
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:13 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:isn't it something like 50% of all seniors have no savings outside of social security, let alone enough to even retire on? Why save when you can sell your Levitt house that hasn't been updated in 25 years to someone for half a mil?
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:14 |
|
Matt Zerella posted:Why save when you can sell your Levitt house that hasn't been updated in 25 years to someone for half a mil? it's going to be amazing when we have both a housing crisis and people unable to sell their homes because nobody has any money to buy them i mean more so than we already do
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:16 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 04:47 |
|
Al! posted:it's going to be amazing when we have both a housing crisis and people unable to sell their homes because nobody has any money to buy them so much money invested into building houses by the rich no spending power~ by the poor
|
# ? Jul 25, 2017 17:19 |