|
Matt Zerella posted:Susan Sarandon Did Nothing Wrong 
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 22:02 |
|
|
you'd have to pull a Herculean level of liberalism to look at Steve loving Bannon and cry in outrage at the one good idea he has in his rotting alcoholic brain
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:you'd have to pull a Herculean level of liberalism to look at Steve loving Bannon and cry in outrage at the one good idea he has in his rotting alcoholic brain killing the tpp was another
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:more pearls of wisdom from bad-dem research bend the knee | start killing people
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
if I had a dime for every bad dem I've heard or seen post this focus-group-tested trope...quote:Use “transition” or “bridge” language to meet voters where they are and relax their defenses Even low information voters have been exposed to a lot of negative messages about health care reform, and they generally start from a position of apprehensiveness, fear, and doubt. Advocates should not be afraid to concede that the law is not perfect, or “not the law any of us would have written.” This helps make any message to follow more relatable and credible. Follow-up with a positive statement like “but it does some good things…” and briefly describe the key provisions described earlier. It is strong to talk about “improving” the health care law.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:you'd have to pull a Herculean level of liberalism to look at Steve loving Bannon and cry in outrage at the one good idea he has in his rotting alcoholic brain she was a huuuuge hill shill and got VERY MAD at Sarandon on twitter. so yeah, that's the right level.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
Scent of Worf posted:Remember how mad people would get if you didn't defend the ACA with all your might even though it was a lovely as gently caress program? if I ever forget my rap sheet will remind me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
Keep claims small, clear, and credible; don’t overpromise or “spin” what the law will deliver Large-scale claims about the broad impact of health care reform are not reassuring to voters, and big promises about what it will deliver are not credible—regardless of factual accuracy.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Talk about Congress being part of the same system (being on the same “plan” would be even stronger if true). One key to reducing skepticism about the law is to tell voters that Congress will be part of the same system. While for some the claim doesn’t seem credible, for others it’s a strong sign that the new system couldn’t be all bad if members of Congress are participating in it. eta: Requiring members of Congress get their coverage from the same plans as Americans and ensuring security was the top- testing message overall and among key persuasion audiences, such as Independents, Persuadables, low info voters and white women. Willa Rogers has issued a correction as of 01:32 on Jul 27, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJjhktV-TfI
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
FOR NON-COLLEGE EDUCATED WOMEN: Tell them health care passed. eta: FOR LATINO VOTERS: Tell them health care passed. FOR VOTERS UNDER 40: Focus on a personal story about a younger person that includes key provisions. Don’t make grand claims about the law. Use “improve it” language.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
Condiv posted:i don't know what your posts are even supposed to mean anymore women love shopping, am i rite fellow dem guys?
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
of course bannon would steal a plan from a woman without giving credit 
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
trudy lieberman's excellent story on the failings of the ACA is no longer behind a paywall.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:FOR NON-COLLEGE EDUCATED WOMEN: Tell them health care passed. never give anything to the young, you are a boomer and will live forever
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:trudy lieberman's excellent story on the failings of the ACA is no longer behind a paywall. i don't trust that name
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
Grondoth posted:i don't trust that name no, seriously... she's critiqued the ACA from the left for cjr.org since the law was passed, even though she's been attacked by bad dems for "feeding right-wing frames"
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:37
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:of course bannon would steal a plan from a woman without giving credit what the literal hell going by an article i found 235k people earned $1m+ a year in the US. if we assume all those people became 5m+ earners in 2016, that means hillary's tax plan wants to charge 47 of them 4% extra taxes? seriously? edit: ah, sorry i was reading that the other way around, an extra 4% on the 2 out of every 10000 people in the US making 5m. not some weirdo lottery tax system
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
Condiv posted:what the literal hell thats not what the 2 out of 10k means. it means 2 out of 10k taxpapers make >$5M
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:thats not what the 2 out of 10k means. it means 2 out of 10k taxpapers make >$5M i thought they were saying they were gonna charge 2 out of 10k taxpayers making >$5m the 4% it's like 3am here, sue me Condiv has issued a correction as of 02:01 on Jul 27, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
Matt Zerella posted:I want a Susan Sarandon response. or Cher WhiskeyJuvenile posted:of course bannon would steal a plan from a woman without giving credit 4% lmfao
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:01
|
|
|
Bannon's raise wasn't a surcharge but a suggestion to raise it up 5% So it's better than Hillary's.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
ThndrShk2k posted:Bannon's raise wasn't a surcharge but a suggestion to raise it up 5% i don't know why you'd compare two things that never were gonna happen to determine which is better but you do you
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:i don't know why you'd compare two things that never were gonna happen to determine which is better but you do you  💨💨💨💨💨💨 
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/890385270851481601
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:38
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:would require the left to actually recruit candidates, so no real threat there "Wow establishment dems won every position in the DNC elections!" "did you run anyone other than Ellison?" "REEEEEEEEEE"
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:45
|
|
|
"Im not going to fall for Steve Daines giving me exactly what I have wanted for years and years!"
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:52
|
|
|
Condiv posted:i don't know what your posts are even supposed to mean anymore looks like they focus-grouped it from an entirely selfish perspective instead of asking "do you think sick people have a right to healthcare", they asked people what noun they best respond to when they're sitting in the doctor's office waiting for a diagnosis on their cough rather than a "political frame" of "maybe we should help people", they focused entirely on the selfish (or "consumer") frame of how the individual felt about their own healthcare and from the look of what's on that slide, their focus-group participants were people who could afford current insurance. they were probably being focus-grouped entirely on the insurance markets and exchanges, rather than Medicaid or affordability.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:more pearls of wisdom from bad-dem research  when Dems have talked about "shoring up Social Security" they really have meant gutting it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:these new hillary clinton nicknames keep getting worse and worse and worse lmebo abuelacare  care
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
But there’s still not much appetite in the party to talk about single-payer right now. Instead, Senate Democrats say their focus has to be on defending the Affordable Care Act. “I’m optimistic the people of our country could rise up and demand a single-payer system, but right now we’re still fighting the battle of making sure they don’t succeed in repealing Obamacare,” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) told me outside the Capitol on Tuesday. “I support single-payer — but in this environment? In this environment?” Added Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) in a separate interview: “Single-payer will happen — if you’re talking in 10 or 20 years.” “It would not be good to spend our time focusing on what happens a few years from now,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) told me on Tuesday when I asked about single-payer. “We’ll have plenty of time to debate what bill we’ll craft once we get control back.” gently caress all y'all
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
the aca's gonna have something like 3-5 million people enrolled in private exchange insurance once the GOP ends up gutting the mandate. But dems will be "fighting to preserve and defend" it a decade after it's dead and something like 90 percent of voters want medicare-for-all.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:04
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:the aca's gonna have something like 3-5 million people enrolled in private insurance once the GOP ends up gutting the mandate. But dems will be "fighting to preserve and defend" it a decade after it's dead and something like 90 percent of voters want medicare-for-all. the democrats aren't going to be around in a decade
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:05
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:the democrats aren't going to be around in a decade inshallah.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
Al! posted:id hardly call goodwill small to midsize lol but ive heard bad things about goodwill specifically a lot Each region really has nothing to do with each other. Like The Delaware Goodwill has it's own CEO
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
Would it be easier to get Medicare for children passed? Maybe call on pro-lifers for support, too? Getting everything in one shot would be cool and good, but in parallel legislation to expand the age ranges covered could help.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
Corky Romanovsky posted:Would it be easier to get Medicare for children passed? Maybe call on pro-lifers for support, too? kids already get CHIPS; I'd settle for medicaid buy-in for everyone. but blumenthal saying it'll take another decade or two makes it clear that even with dem majorities in congress + having the presidency it'll never ever happen.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 22:02 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/890381076371255296
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2017 04:13
|
|
