Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

i understand the concepts, but albo has a right to apply for italian citizenship that i explicitly lack, as my parents are not italian citizens. has that right ever been explicitly tested against section 44 in court?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

BBJoey posted:

i understand the concepts, but albo has a right to apply for italian citizenship that i explicitly lack, as my parents are not italian citizens. has that right ever been explicitly tested against section 44 in court?

Nope!

There isn't a lot of case law here, which is why there's the theory that Canavan is a test case.

Whitlam
Aug 2, 2014

Some goons overreact. Go figure.

BBJoey posted:

i understand the concepts, but albo has a right to apply for italian citizenship that i explicitly lack, as my parents are not italian citizens. has that right ever been explicitly tested against section 44 in court?

As far as I know it hasn't, but given how many people are entitled to dual citizenship, there's no way the High Court would disqualify on the grounds of theoretical entitlement to dual citizenship because of how many people would be disqualified. I'd be willing to bet a majority of Australians would be entitled to dual citizenship somehow (like English or Irish grandparents, for example).

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
Irish citizenship requires an Irish parent, but yeah it's a shitload of people and anyone that's a first gen Australian.

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.

BBJoey posted:

i understand the concepts, but albo has a right to apply for italian citizenship that i explicitly lack, as my parents are not italian citizens. has that right ever been explicitly tested against section 44 in court?

Luckily high court justices generally have a functioning brain

hooman
Oct 11, 2007

This guy seems legit.
Fun Shoe

Whitlam posted:

As far as I know it hasn't, but given how many people are entitled to dual citizenship, there's no way the High Court would disqualify on the grounds of theoretical entitlement to dual citizenship because of how many people would be disqualified. I'd be willing to bet a majority of Australians would be entitled to dual citizenship somehow (like English or Irish grandparents, for example).

The best outcome to this would be only aboriginal and torres straight islanders would be eligible to sit in parliament.

EDIT: and third+ generation pure Australians (like my mum!)

Senor Tron
May 26, 2006


I have to imagine that they will say that being eligible to apply for citizenship doesn't disqualify you, because I can't imagine most countries would have official procedures for people to declare they want to have that right removed.

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

hooman posted:

EDIT: and third+ generation pure Australians
Waddup.

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
I have the right to go in the green card lottery any time I want so by the same standard I'm entitled to become an American.

Eediot Jedi
Dec 25, 2007

This is where I begin to speculate what being a
man of my word costs me

Solemn Sloth posted:

Luckily high court justices generally have a functioning brain

not according to my most trusted news source, the herald sun

birdstrike
Oct 30, 2008

i;m gay

BBJoey posted:

i understand the concepts, but albo has a right to apply for italian citizenship that i explicitly lack, as my parents are not italian citizens. has that right ever been explicitly tested against section 44 in court?

actually you have a right to apply and get REJECTED

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."
https://twitter.com/J_C_Campbell/status/890765913758121984

Campbell is the National Political Editor at the Hun.

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

Whitlam posted:

As far as I know it hasn't, but given how many people are entitled to dual citizenship, there's no way the High Court would disqualify on the grounds of theoretical entitlement to dual citizenship because of how many people would be disqualified. I'd be willing to bet a majority of Australians would be entitled to dual citizenship somehow (like English or Irish grandparents, for example).

disqualifying as many australians as possible to serve in parliament seems a noble goal to me

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008

Doctor Spaceman posted:

https://twitter.com/J_C_Campbell/status/890765913758121984

Campbell is the National Political Editor at the Hun.

They just rounding up the wogs now.

birdstrike
Oct 30, 2008

i;m gay
technically parliament should be empty because everyone is Serb

NoNotTheMindProbe
Aug 9, 2010
pony porn was here

open24hours posted:

I think in this context being able to apply means that you will get citizenship if you do apply, and would thus be entitled to a passport and whatever else.

How does Section 44 interact with Section 116, which prohibits a religious testing, given that all Jews have the right to Israeli citizenship?

In that case it's Israel doing the religious testing not Australia.

Futuresight
Oct 11, 2012

IT'S ALL TURNED TO SHIT!

hooman posted:

The best outcome to this would be only aboriginal and torres straight islanders would be eligible to sit in parliament.

EDIT: and third+ generation pure Australians (like my mum!)

And excluding people of Hungarian descent forever because there's no limit on how far back your ancestor can be before you can no longer use them to get citizenship. Also Italian if your ancestor was Italian during the current form of the Italian nation. Probably some other nations like this too.

The Lord Bude
May 23, 2007

ASK ME ABOUT MY SHITTY, BOUGIE INTERIOR DECORATING ADVICE
Brisbane Times article re Julia Banks, who holds her seat with a 1.2% margin:

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/fed...728-gxkiiq.html

Looks like there is a very real possibility she has issues.

Edit: I hope those Korean dudes that make the cartoon news videos do one on this, because it's hysterical and we must be the laughing stock of the world right now (or would be if they weren't all fixated Trump.)

The Lord Bude fucked around with this message at 05:32 on Jul 28, 2017

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
I was deeply disappointed that the LNP won Chisholm so good.

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."
https://twitter.com/MarkDiStef/status/890795863412363264

norp
Jan 20, 2004

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

let's invade New Zealand, they have oil
If Ludlum quitting over this causes a constitutional crises he should get a statue of him made and put on the lawns of Parliament House as a national hero

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
*slides into di stefanos DMs*

Nautilus42
Jan 14, 2008
Unrelated sea creature

NoNotTheMindProbe posted:

In that case it's Israel doing the religious testing not Australia.

There's also the basis that the test isn't based solely on religious grounds, but of matrilineal lines with a possible partrilineal test that's more difficult to achieve.

That'd be interesting. I've heard you cannot get rid if Israeli citizenship, and I'm not sure if you necessarily are called in for duty due to the draft they have if you're also residing as a dual citizen in a different country. It'd depend on the treaties we have with Israel and whether taking "all reasonable steps" is recognized.

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

Nautilus42 posted:

There's also the basis that the test isn't based solely on religious grounds, but of matrilineal lines with a possible partrilineal test that's more difficult to achieve.

That'd be interesting. I've heard you cannot get rid if Israeli citizenship, and I'm not sure if you necessarily are called in for duty due to the draft they have if you're also residing as a dual citizen in a different country. It'd depend on the treaties we have with Israel and whether taking "all reasonable steps" is recognized.

Based on a very quick search, it appears that you can renounce Israeli citizenship, but to do so you must first be an Israeli citizen ( http://embassies.gov.il/toronto/ConsularServices/Pages/Renunciation-of-Israeli-Citizenship.aspx ). This seems to imply that you can't get rid of your right to citizenship under the Law of Return unless you first take it up?

quote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_nationality_law#Law_of_Return
Israeli law distinguishes between the Law of Return, which allows for Jews and their descendants to immigrate to Israel, and Israel's nationality law, which formally grants Israeli citizenship. In other words, the Law of Return does not itself determine Israeli citizenship; it merely allows for Jews and their eligible descendants to permanently live in Israel. Israel does, however, grant citizenship to those who immigrated under the Law of Return if the applicant so desires.

Maybe it doesn't matter.

open24hours fucked around with this message at 07:51 on Jul 28, 2017

Don Dongington
Sep 27, 2005

#ideasboom
College Slice

norp posted:

If Ludlum quitting over this causes a constitutional crises he should get a statue of him made and put on the lawns of Parliament House as a national hero

What if Plibby and Banks both get ruled ineligible, Sydney falls to the NSW greens and Chisolm goes to Labor, giving the NSW Greens and Bandt the balance of power in the house, resulting in Full Communism Sometime?

Cartoon
Jun 20, 2008

poop
Despite all the poo poo (rightfully) thrown at the Greens over this I find it interesting that they are only ones who haven't gone kicking and screaming. It's like they actually have ~*~Standards~*~.

Don Dongington
Sep 27, 2005

#ideasboom
College Slice
Or respect for the electorate,

GoldStandardConure
Jun 11, 2010

I have to kill fast
and mayflies too slow

Pillbug

Don Dongington posted:

What if Plibby and Banks both get ruled ineligible, Sydney falls to the NSW greens and Chisolm goes to Labor, giving the NSW Greens and Bandt the balance of power in the house, resulting in Full Communism Sometime?

Full Communism Eventually: A Patient Revolution

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




Here I was thinking the Greens' image would be hosed for years after they lost two, but if they take publicity advantage on the fact that their senators were the only ones to actually respect the law and step down instead of try to hold on illegally they might manage to come out ahead of the others.

That would probably require a more competent media and publicity department than they have, though.

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




BBJoey posted:

given the constitution says:

"Any person who is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives."

doesn't that mean that being eligible for foreign citizenship but not activating it still renders you ineligible for parliament? if you could receive citizenship if you apply, aren't you entitled to the rights of being a citizen?

What that means is if a person is currently entitled to the rights granted to a citizen. In the real world individuals aren't entitled to those rights until they become a citizen of said nation. It won't block individuals who only have eligibility, it's just semantics to block people from having a potential citizen-in-all-but-name status.

The right to apply for a citizenship of Italy, like albo, is not a right of an Italian citizen, it's a much broader right.

What's tricky is where you get automatic citizenship under certain circumstances. That's what'll catch most people out here.

MikeJF fucked around with this message at 08:02 on Jul 28, 2017

X13Fen
Oct 18, 2006

"Is that an accurate quote? It should be.
I think about it often enough."

Futuresight posted:

Also Italian if your ancestor was Italian during the current form of the Italian nation. Probably some other nations like this too.

Only paternal lineage, and only one generation back afaik

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.

Cartoon posted:

Despite all the poo poo (rightfully) thrown at the Greens over this I find it interesting that they are only ones who haven't gone kicking and screaming. It's like they actually have ~*~Standards~*~.

Ludlam wanted to leave anyway.

He didn't have any ticker.

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Cartoon posted:

Despite all the poo poo (rightfully) thrown at the Greens over this I find it interesting that they are only ones who haven't gone kicking and screaming. It's like they actually have ~*~Standards~*~.

It would have looked pretty bad but after all this other stuff came to light it actually makes the Greens look good because they did the right thing once it came out.

loving :laffo: at the rats scurrying for cover now the citizenship stone has been upturned though.

The Lord Bude
May 23, 2007

ASK ME ABOUT MY SHITTY, BOUGIE INTERIOR DECORATING ADVICE
Ultimately It's good that this is catching out a fuckton of people across multiple parties because it shifts the message from 'lol how disorganised must the greens have been' to 'what the gently caress, the system is retarded and needs to be fixed'.

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




JBP posted:

Ludlam wanted to leave anyway.

He didn't have any ticker.

A good man can't survive in politics.

Putrid Dog
Feb 13, 2012

"God, I wish I was dead!"

Dutch citizenship wouldn't be an issue as they don't even allow dual citizenship unless under special circumstances (You marry a dutch citizen, you were born overseas). If you hold both, they usually cancel your Dutch citizenship if you have spent 10 years overseas and haven't spent at least one year during that time in the Netherlands. Not to mention the usual way to get it is to spend up to 5 years living there in the first place. It's crazy strict.

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




At this point they just need to announce the AEC will do a formal check on all members.

hooman
Oct 11, 2007

This guy seems legit.
Fun Shoe

JBP posted:

Ludlam wanted to leave anyway.

He didn't have any ticker.

I don't know if you're trolling or not but that's pretty uncalled for.

NoNotTheMindProbe
Aug 9, 2010
pony porn was here
I have to say that as a grandchild of German immigrants this whole Wog/Jerry/Balt hunt is starting to give me chills down my spine. Especially given this nation's bad habit of mass internment for undesirable ethnic groups.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

birdstrike
Oct 30, 2008

i;m gay

NoNotTheMindProbe posted:

I have to say that as a grandchild of German immigrants this whole Wog/Jerry/Balt hunt is starting to give me chills down my spine. Especially given this nation's bad habit of mass internment for undesirable ethnic groups.

It's about time white immigrants were treated to the modern immigrant experience

  • Locked thread