Are you a This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
homeowner | 39 | 22.41% | |
renter | 69 | 39.66% | |
stupid peace of poo poo | 66 | 37.93% | |
Total: | 174 votes |
https://twitter.com/actparty/status/892267420710084608
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 07:50 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 00:25 |
|
oohhboy posted:There isn't enough research for LTFR to be commercial. There is a serious problem with the materials which doesn't exist yet needed to handle the reaction without breaking down pretty fast due to how nasty the reactants are even without the radioactivity. Otherwise the underlying idea is pretty sound for now. I'unno, they had a big breakthrough on a beryllium alloy for coating the interior, since it's resistant to neutron poisoning and chemically inert against the salt mix. They also had good results from a nickel sponge for purging xenon byproducts. We technically have the materials, the main level of investment is in jimmying the stuff we have into a more economical model. Hence the whole prototype thing. If it's wastes you're worried about, LFTRs burn spent fuel to start up reactor to criticality - and most (70-90%, give or take) of the byproducts are safe after 10 years, the rest max out at 300. There's also the point that ton for ton, Thorium salt has a 1:35 ratio on the production of waste to the average LWR due to the cycling of the fuel and the efficiency of the mix. As for proliferation, that's laughable. Sure, if you (Really) wanted a nuke, you could eventually refine enough plutonium out of the mix to make a working warhead - but you'd find it a lot easier to use a conventional reactor for that. I gotta point out again and again that we already have a proliferation risk from nuclear energy: It's the poo poo we're already using, and it's better at it than the newer proposed models. It's like worrying you'll crash a tricycle when you're already flooring a Harley Davidson to and from work five times a day. Also, it'd have to be plutonium. The only weapons-grade Uranium (236, I think) you could refine out of the mix has a nasty habit of farting gamma-rays, which is a fast track to a dud warhead when it fries the ever so sensitive electronics on the thing. e: Oh poo poo, you were talking about breeders. My bad dude. This is kinda my pet passion, in case you hadn't guessed. (AIR-COOLED REACTORS, DESALINATION ON A MASSIVE SCALE, I WOULD SUCK A COCK TO HAVE IT MADE A REALITY) WarpedNaba fucked around with this message at 08:16 on Aug 1, 2017 |
# ? Aug 1, 2017 08:06 |
|
drat that liberal leftwing media drat them and their liberal bias!
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 08:32 |
|
Speaking of the Herald, Hosking wittering on about credibility is like ra-iiiii-ain on your wedding day.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 08:39 |
Chalupa Joe posted:Speaking of the Herald, Hosking wittering on about credibility is like ra-iiiii-ain on your wedding day. Not at all ironic and just plain old lovely instead?
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 09:01 |
|
Exactly.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 09:04 |
|
I lol'd
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 09:27 |
|
"Just get a load of those teeth!" - old woman that I work with
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 09:28 |
bike tory posted:drat that liberal leftwing media https://twitter.com/iamseamusbrady/status/892202436668018688
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 09:34 |
|
What kind of prehistoric disosaur still gets ads on their browser?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 10:43 |
|
Gulag, imo.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 11:11 |
|
Midget Fist posted:What kind of prehistoric disosaur still gets ads on their browser? Old people, you know the ones who actually vote.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 11:15 |
|
Varkk posted:Old people, you know the ones who actually vote. The same who watch ads on TV I guess.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 11:24 |
|
Varkk posted:Old people, you know the ones who actually vote. I have an uncle who is a] old and b] doesn't vote and c] uses ad blocking software and d] records tv so he doesn't have to watch ads Mainly doesn't vote because he hates queuing up at the polling booth and "the nats" usually win anyway and "[all political parties] are all as bad as each other" so why bother. Democracy.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 20:03 |
|
Jacinda brought in an extra $110000 over night. That'll be amazing for Labour because they're strapped for cash as it is.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 00:42 |
|
bike tory posted:Jacinda brought in an extra $110000 over night. That'll be amazing for Labour because they're strapped for cash as it is. It might cover replacing all the billboards. Speaking of which, any else not filled with confidence by the fact that the new billboards just don't have anyone's faces on them at all? Kind of screams 'who the gently caress knows who'll be leader in 7 weeks'.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 01:14 |
|
I would have just splashed red paint over Little's picture on the current boards.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 01:15 |
|
What hope remains that Dunne will not be returning next parliament ???
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 01:18 |
|
Isn't Greg "gun em all down" O'Connor standing for Labour against him? I can see people who like Dunne voting for him. I doubt those who would vote for Green or a left wing Labour candidate would.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 01:40 |
|
Last time the Labour candidate lost by 1200 votes, while the Green candidate got 3000+ votes. There's no green candidate this time... O'Connor seems like a better fit too?
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 01:42 |
|
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11897877 Nothing to see here, folks. Everything is fine. I'm sure that their organisation is in no way religious in nature as well.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 06:31 |
|
A friend of mine who is a counsellor only had good things to say about Le Va, so it's actually possible this isn't some sort of nepotism
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 06:56 |
Yeah, the Wise Group is really established + sophisticated. It's interesting that they've gone with a Pasifika-focussed provider for it though – are they overrepresented in suicide stats?
|
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 07:07 |
|
This is so offensive it has made international news. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40798966 quote:New Zealand's new opposition leader has said it is unacceptable for women in the workplace to be asked about their motherhood plans, after she was quizzed on TV about whether she wanted a child.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 08:04 |
I'm enjoying this because labour will either crash and burn as usual or do extremely well despite having unchanged policies and prove me right about marketing and personality trumping actual politics. Also she seems like a decent enough person. It would be nice to not have a tremendous oval office as PM for a change.
|
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 08:07 |
|
Yeeeeeah, watch as nothing comes of this as Labour fumbles the ball yet again.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 08:09 |
|
If Labour even take 2 or 3% off National the election is wide open
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 10:33 |
|
They will be the biggest losers
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 11:08 |
|
Internal Labour polling has them back up at 28% overnight
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 11:44 |
|
bike tory posted:Internal Labour polling has them back up at 28% overnight At whose expense?
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 12:18 |
|
Dunno I didn't see any full poll results, just got it from a friend in Labour
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 12:22 |
|
The last mainstream poll I saw in the news put the left getting into government in a coalition of 4. Labour, NZF, Greens, TOP.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 12:48 |
|
So another election next year then
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 20:40 |
|
When I think "the left" I think Winston
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 20:42 |
When I think the left I think of an insatiable lust for cat genocide.
|
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 20:48 |
|
When I think of the left I just get kind of depressed
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 21:46 |
|
oohhboy posted:The last mainstream poll I saw in the news put the left getting into government in a coalition of 4. Labour, NZF, Greens, TOP.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 23:00 |
|
Is Jacinda a Macron or a Corbyn.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 23:08 |
|
She's a
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 23:28 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 00:25 |
|
Horrible human being Matthew Hooton just posted some 'random numbers' on his twitter, I'm guessing it's National party internal polling from past 24 hours? Nats 45% Lab 35% Nzf 14% greens 6%
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 23:53 |