Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

i dunno about you but i like having windows that don't make up the entire outward-facing wall

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...
It's just so wrong on its face. As if living in prewar buildings in upscale neighborhoods isn't also insanely expensive.

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




Mechafunkzilla posted:

It's just so wrong on its face. As if living in prewar buildings in upscale neighborhoods isn't also insanely expensive.

moved into this after wife got done with grad and added a second income to family and yep. the crown moulding and all is cool but not really worth the combo of bleeding money and everything in your building breaking constantly because its 90 years old

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

michael grimm says he wants to primary challenge dan donovan. is grimm doing that for ideological "never work with the other side" reasons, or is he doing it because he's just that full of himself?

Chevy Slyme
May 2, 2004

We're Gonna Run.

We're Gonna Crawl.

Kick Down Every Wall.

get that OUT of my face posted:

michael grimm says he wants to primary challenge dan donovan. is grimm doing that for ideological "never work with the other side" reasons, or is he doing it because he's just that full of himself?

All of the above.

Awkward Davies
Sep 3, 2009
Grimey Drawer
https://twitter.com/eorden/status/893473143125397504

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
sure i'll take it

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

running for office to unseat a corrupt egotistical governor is such a miranda move. i think. i never watched sex & the city

MizPiz
May 29, 2013

by Athanatos

I have this nagging feeling that Cuomo and his camp are going to try to make a connection between Cynthia and Richard Nixon. It's an extremely stupid idea and would require a complete detachment from reality to think it could work, which is exactly why I think the Dems would try it.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

MizPiz posted:

I have this nagging feeling that Cuomo and his camp are going to try to make a connection between Cynthia and Richard Nixon. It's an extremely stupid idea and would require a complete detachment from reality to think it could work, which is exactly why I think the Dems would try it.
interesting theory, but they'll almost certainly try to connect her to bill de blasio. she was (and still is) a big booster for him, and the cuomo camp can make hay out of that by portraying her as an out-of-touch city slicker who has no idea how bad upstate has it. both of these things can apply to cuomo too, but details

regardless of who runs, there needs to be only one challenger. city council district 41 (mainly crown heights, lefferts gardens, and flatbush with a sprinkling of other neighborhoods in it) has a do-nothing photo op guy in Mathieu Eugene as the incumbent, but he's got four different primary challengers so he'll win easily. the same thing can't happen for governor

the black husserl
Feb 25, 2005

if you thought the anti-de blasio narrative was powerful before, holy poo poo get ready for everyone and your mother to think BDB is the devil himself

cause he's going to try to tax the rich to pay for the subways (lmao)

quote:

Mr. de Blasio will announce a so-called millionaires tax on Monday for wealthy New York City residents to pay for subway and bus upgrades and for reduced fares for some riders, an idea that has been successful in Seattle.

“Rather than sending the bill to working families and subway and bus riders already feeling the pressure of rising fares and bad service, we are asking the wealthiest in our city to chip in a little extra to help move our transit system into the 21st century,” Mr. de Blasio said in a statement.

after Uber showed that a minor media spend could completely trash a mayor, i dont think this has a snowballs chance of succeeding, but i do think it guarantees BDB getting hosed

the black husserl has issued a correction as of 20:39 on Aug 6, 2017

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

the black husserl posted:

if you thought the anti-de blasio narrative was powerful before, holy poo poo get ready for everyone and your mother to think BDB is the devil himself

cause he's going to try to tax the rich to pay for the subways (lmao)


after Uber showed that a minor media spend could completely trash a mayor, i dont think this has a snowballs chance of succeeding, but i do think it guarantees BDB getting hosed

There is no way this will pass any legislative body anywhere.

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

I love that than the solution is to continue to let our mass transit infrastructure crumble because it's not like it's one of the most important things to the city that makes it habitable

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
deBlasio sucks but taxing the rich who disproportionately benefit from having a functional subway is absolutely what has to be done. Throw all the lovely subway ads out too while we're at it.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

it's a good start, but the real problem is the godawful set-up of the MTA that allows and encourages the appointment of know-nothing cronies by the governor. cuomo wasn't the first to use the agency as his own slush fund and he won't be the last

if this prevents two more fare hikes in 2019 and 2021, though, i'll be content

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
One of the advantages of a ConCon would be forcing the MTA to be funded a minimum amount via state taxes. Also classifying all tax breaks as corruption.

Scrub-Niggurath
Nov 27, 2007

can't wait for my $6 subway fare in 2024

zakharov
Nov 30, 2002

:kimchi: Tater Love :kimchi:
Lmao, Cuomo hates Bill so much that he's going to back a congestion charge (which is a good idea).

https://twitter.com/ZackFinkNews/status/894296097052663812

Well done Bill.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

that's actually not a bad idea. and this time we don't have silver to singlehandedly kill it

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/894608061322711040

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

cuomo's dumb corporate subway station adoption idea gets a funny response from a streaming porn site

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

LA actually tried to do the naming rights for stations thing but they shut it down after their lawyers told them they wouldn't be able to reject bids for political reasons (like, they couldn't stop Hobby Lobby from buying rights because of their anti-choice stance)

apparently it's because of the first amendment

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
Yet more evidence that democrats are morally debased authoritarian cowards.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

also who was the last mayor that the nyc press hated as much as deblasio? dinkins?

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Why would you have naming rights for a station? The name should be the drat location.



Badger of Basra posted:

also who was the last mayor that the nyc press hated as much as deblasio? dinkins?

Sounds about right and provably both for the same reason cause I've never heard Right Wingers in NYC complain about him that didn't start off with the fact his wife is black and bi-sexual

Chevy Slyme
May 2, 2004

We're Gonna Run.

We're Gonna Crawl.

Kick Down Every Wall.
I'm honestly not bothered by corporate sponsored subway stations?

I mean, its Adopt-A-Highway for mass transit mostly. It's fine.

Let them sell their ads or a plaque honoring whatever corporate donor they want.

It's laughable that people think it will actually fix anything; but hey, if it raises 100m out of the billion needed, why say no?

zakharov
Nov 30, 2002

:kimchi: Tater Love :kimchi:
The problem is that no company is buying. There's not much value in it.

Scrub-Niggurath
Nov 27, 2007

it's also bad because it's basically admitting that the city (and government as a whole) is unable to function in its most basic role of providing public transportation for its citizens, requiring the private sector to step in and save the day

zakharov
Nov 30, 2002

:kimchi: Tater Love :kimchi:
Whoops, your racism is showing.

https://twitter.com/BobbyBigWheel/status/895296318326923264

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

CaptainPsyko posted:

I'm honestly not bothered by corporate sponsored subway stations?

I mean, its Adopt-A-Highway for mass transit mostly. It's fine.

Let them sell their ads or a plaque honoring whatever corporate donor they want.

It's laughable that people think it will actually fix anything; but hey, if it raises 100m out of the billion needed, why say no?

In addition to what has been said here, it also makes the subway less convenient. Deducing where the 86th Street Station on the Lexington line is allows someone who is on the UES for some reason to easilly get to the subway station that is close by. Good luck remembering where the pantsonhead.com station off the Coca-Cola section of the American Airlines line is.

Grondoth
Feb 18, 2011

Scrub-Niggurath posted:

it's also bad because it's basically admitting that the city (and government as a whole) is unable to function in its most basic role of providing public transportation for its citizens, requiring the private sector to step in and save the day

NYC already sold out to the banks decades ago.

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)

Grondoth posted:

NYC already sold out to the banks decades ago.

*hypernomalisation music plays*

Anne Whateley
Feb 11, 2007
:unsmith: i like nice words
Wouldn't the names just be like existing ones, like "8th St NYU" or "Jay St. MetroTech"? Am I being too optimistic?

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)

Anne Whateley posted:

Wouldn't the names just be like existing ones, like "8th St NYU" or "Jay St. MetroTech"? Am I being too optimistic?

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/daily-shouts/l-p-d-libertarian-police-department

Grondoth
Feb 18, 2011

Matt Zerella posted:

*hypernomalisation music plays*

But a funny thing happened

zakharov
Nov 30, 2002

:kimchi: Tater Love :kimchi:

Anne Whateley posted:

Wouldn't the names just be like existing ones, like "8th St NYU" or "Jay St. MetroTech"? Am I being too optimistic?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Station

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011


Yeah but Philadelphia sucks why should we follow their example

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015

Nobody loving calls it AT&T station.

zakharov
Nov 30, 2002

:kimchi: Tater Love :kimchi:

Agnosticnixie posted:

Nobody loving calls it AT&T station.

Probably a big reason why companies aren't jumping to buy NYC station naming rights!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Grondoth
Feb 18, 2011

zakharov posted:

Probably a big reason why companies aren't jumping to buy NYC station naming rights!

Yeah, not everyone is a sportscaster. You can't MAKE people say the name of your product and/or company every time they talk about a station.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply