World Famous W posted:

I love the unnecessary labels in this, holy hell. One of the more I seen in awhile.

Shangri-Law School posted:

1

5

Ularg posted:

It's also very telling when Tinsley acts like people punching actual loving nazis is the same as beating up anyone who disagrees with them.

King Possum III posted:

8

King Possum III posted:

8

Trapezium Dave posted:

I'd think anyone who knows Simpsons well enough to remember individual episodes also knows what their hands are like.

After The War posted:

Wolverton labels!

King Possum III posted:

1

Abyssal Squid posted:

Psst... Marvin the Martian had technology that actually worked. Technology that he used to kick Daffy Duck's rear end. Bugs Bunny was able to thwart him by exploiting his terrible opsec, which, uh, very much isn't a problem North Korea has to worry about.

Trogdos! posted:

Shangri-Law School posted:

Whom the hell are these cartoons supposed to appeal to? At least Garrison understands his audience.

Garrison posted:

Robert Mueller is used to dirt. He was complicit in pushing the non-existent Iraq connection to 9-11, which was a lie concocted by Vice President Dick Cheney. (The power behind George W. Bush's throne). It was a fabrication that led to the death of a half million people. He defended the Patriot Act, torture and unlimited surveillance of the American people. He didn’t question the phony, ‘official’ 9-11 narrative. Like his corrupt associate Comey, Mueller is a Deep State collaborator.

He’s also a bag man who easily bends to political pressure--another similarity he shares with Comey. That’s why he was chosen for his latest assignment: the framing of President Trump. The former FBI director under Bush and Obama probably knows the Russia ‘election hacking’ narrative is nothing but a wild goose chase, so now he wants to investigate Trump’s finances. Even a CNN pointed out that this is wrong and beyond the scope. But Mueller isn’t reeling anything in on his fishing expedition so he wants to cast out farther and farther.

After losing the election in a spectacular manner, Hillary and Podesta invented the 'Russia/Trump collusion’ fairy tale not only as an excuse, but also as a means to divert attention away from their very real criminal corruption. They love to blame their enemies for the evil that they themselves commit, which is an old Saul Alinksy trick. Using the Clinton Foundation as a money-laundering operation, Hillary accepted ‘pay for play’ cash from Russia as part of her Uranium One deal. While she was Secretary of State, her husband received $500,000 for a speech he delivered in Moscow. Putin was obviously buying influence from Hillary. Now that she’s not president and can’t easily cover up her traitorous misdeeds, she found it necessary to paint President Trump as the traitor.

Hillary is using Mueller as her personal bloodhound. He’s out sniffing on a trail with no scent, but he still hopes it will lead to President Trump regardless. A far less pristine trail leads to crooked Hillary as well as Obama, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and many others. Despite the abundance of redolent clues they’ve left behind, Mueller has been assigned to sniff at President Trump. It’s a waste of time and taxpayer money.

It’s a charade designed to hide the criminal misdeeds of the Deep State itself. They may fabricate lies to remove President Trump, but in doing so they’ll also be flirting with civil war. Too many constitutional republic-loving Americans will not tolerate a coup by the swamp.

—Ben Garrison

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

1

Rigged Death Trap posted:

"BINGBONGBINGBONGBINGBONG"

Zyklon Ben! posted:

They love to blame their enemies for the evil that they themselves commit

Trogdos! posted:

Ben Garrison posted:

He defended the Patriot Act, torture and unlimited surveillance of the American people. He didn’t question the phony, ‘official’ 9-11 narrative. Like his corrupt associate Comey, Mueller is a Deep State collaborator.

He’s also a bag man who easily bends to political pressure--another similarity he shares with Comey.

Wikipedia posted:

Mueller, along with deputy attorney general James Comey, threatened to resign from office, in March 2004, if the White House overruled a Department of Justice finding that domestic wiretapping without a court warrant was unconstitutional.

Samurai Sanders posted:

I'm still never really clear on whether Mueller and Comey are good g-men or if that is even theoretically possible.

loquacius posted:

My take on Comey is that he was good at his actual job but bad at politics and not really aware of how things he said could affect the larger political landscape

Trogdos! posted:

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

1

Vib Rib posted:

How come I only ever see right wingers use the "I'll defend whatever you say even if I don't agree!" poo poo when the topic is nazis talking about ethnic cleansing and anti-semites and islamaphobes and poo poo, but never when discussing any kind of liberal speech? Is this how people actually act or is it just my own confirmation bias and smug, willful ignorance?

Lurdiak posted:

There's no loving way someone can be so politically clueless that they can't see how releasing a statement about investigating a major political candidate a few weeks before the election could have a major impact on the results of said election.

Lurdiak posted:

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

1

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

2

Garrison posted:

They love to blame their enemies for the evil that they themselves commit, which is an old Saul Alinksy trick.

Lurdiak posted:

There's no loving way someone can be so politically clueless that they can't see how releasing a statement about investigating a major political candidate a few weeks before the election could have a major impact on the results of said election.

Vib Rib posted:

How come I only ever see right wingers use the "I'll defend whatever you say even if I don't agree!" poo poo when the topic is nazis talking about ethnic cleansing and anti-semites and islamaphobes and poo poo, but never when discussing any kind of liberal speech? Is this how people actually act or is it just my own confirmation bias and smug, willful ignorance?

Kurtofan posted:

illinois conservatives

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

1

Alhazred posted:

How come you never see right wingers use the "I'll defend whatever you say even if I don't agree!" poo poo when actual nazis are punching demonstrant? I'm tempted to say that the answer to both our answers is that they secretly agrees with the nazis.

Technowolf posted:

Sir Tonk posted:

I don't remember that fashion in 2008

Jurgan posted:

I thought they already went to another planet? Wasn't that the whole plot of the last week?

Sandpuppy posted:

5