|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Why not a Cake Donut? Those are good btw. yeast 4 lyfe
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
I don't think anyone posted this Daou tweet last week btw https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/893070659454197764 i need the biggest ironicat in the universe for this
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:23
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/lumpylouise/status/895664272314834944
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:25
|
|
|
Did Brock ever pay Daou or was Daou the guy paying CTR people?
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:28
|
|
|
Do these people even know what a twitter bot is? Because they keep using it in ways that makes me feel like they don't.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:28
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:Do these people even know what a twitter bot is? Because they keep using it in ways that makes me feel like they don't. I support a livable $15 per hour wage for all Twitter chatbots
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:29
|
|
|
ThndrShk2k posted:Did Brock ever pay Daou or was Daou the guy paying CTR people? consult former forums poster Mitt Romney, who people rationally believed was a CTR operative.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:29
|
|
|
The answer may surprise you: It's Iran
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:29
|
|
|
zegermans posted:consult former forums poster Mitt Romney, who people rationally believed was a CTR operative. tbf he was broke brain enough to have actually been david brock
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:33
|
|
|
Certainly the DNC would never use paid trolls the trolls would get tax credits instead
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:33
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Certainly the DNC would never use paid trolls Tax credits? DNC trolls would consider themselves lucky if they got school credit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:Tax credits? DNC trolls would consider themselves lucky if they got school credit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 16:43
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:the nexus of the better deal seems to be this site: https://democrats.senate.gov/abetterdeal/which which rehashes schumer's op ed, tax credits for employers and all, and promises they'll have more "in the coming weeks" (i dont think theyve announced anything new in the past three weeks or so since the schumer op ed) thanks, I've looked for their online postings for the better deal but couldn't ever find them Frijolero posted:So wait what's the doughnut thing? Nina Turner and some other Our Revolution folks showed up at a DNC thing to protest or submit petitions or something the DNC refused to let them in, and to add insult to injury, the DNC bought donuts for them after they were booted out. naturally they were not very happy with this state of affairs and complained on Twitter about it bad dem twitter is hyperfocusing on the donuts and ignoring the rest, presenting it as a case of hysterical progressive pansies being driven into a frothing rage by clever DNC donut warfare, showing how crazy and unjustified the left is about everything. the centrist boosters are now super obviously trying to turn it into a meme to counter corncob
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:thanks, I've looked for their online postings for the better deal but couldn't ever find them basically dems can only speak in decorum. its ok if you want to turbofuck the poor, so long as you are nice about it and offer them donuts. the refusal of donuts is the true offense in this scenario.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
loquacius posted:I don't think anyone posted this Daou tweet last week btw I can read pages and pages of Freep posts, listen to hours and hours of right-wing talk radio, but Peter Daou posts... Those are the ones that hurt my brain. Like if there was centrist talk radio with Peter Daou and Joy Reid you couldn't pay me to listen to it. anime was right posted:basically dems can only speak in decorum. its ok if you want to turbofuck the poor, so long as you are nice about it and offer them donuts. the refusal of donuts is the true offense in this scenario. The Republicans live in constant fear of their base, while the Democrats have nothing but contempt for theirs. Montasque has issued a correction as of 17:23 on Aug 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
anime was right posted:basically dems can only speak in decorum. its ok if you want to turbofuck the poor, so long as you are nice about it and offer them donuts. the refusal of donuts is the true offense in this scenario. it's all about diversion and minimization by presenting the least important grievance as unjustified and completely ignoring all the other grievances, they can essentially erase those grievances, at least in the eyes of anyone who finds them credible and hears the story from them first by blasting it out on all cylinders from every bad Dem booster, they're hoping to get their version of the story out to as many people as possible before the real version can get any traction outside of lefty twitter
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
Montasque posted:
dems respect and lisen to their base, it's just that their base is rich yuppie professionals
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/kthalps/status/895649472977530881 I'm so confused. She has a 🌹
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:48
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/kthalps/status/895649472977530881 you're misunderstanding the headline quote:But there’s another story here that’s less about Harris than it is about the way people are responding to her critics. And it’s part of a larger story in which a chorus of outraged pseudo-woke liberals use accusations of racism and sexism and smears like “Bernie Bro,” and the “Alt Left” to distort the actual Left into a movement of straight, white, men. The narrative ignores women and people of color or pathologizes them as self-loathing or tools of the patriarchy. Universal programs like single payer health care or even economic justice itself are discredited as inherently racist and sexist. Using the language of social justice, these liberals punch left at the very programs and policies that empower the people they claim to champion.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:50
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/kthalps/status/895649472977530881 did you actually click the link and read what it said
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/kthalps/status/895649472977530881 She's a leftist yeah When she talks about erasure she's talking about this basically the erasure in question is the berniebro fallacy
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
hm very interesting how liberals are calling nina turner "street" and "loud"....
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TheOnion/status/895607433736880128
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
this article is really great, along the same lines as the halper one https://twitter.com/briebriejoy/status/895644347806343168 https://twitter.com/curaffairs/status/895644120034664449
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/kthalps/status/895649472977530881 It's a good take
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:01
|
|
|
Don't even joke, she would absolutely be willing to do that and would absolutely be able to find people to fund it
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
1. more money for us 2. gently caress you 3. have some donuts
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:this article is really great, along the same lines as the halper one TL:DR: 
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:Don't even joke, she would absolutely be willing to do that and would absolutely be able to find people to fund it The Hillary Clinton First Woman Presidential Nominee Library
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
UHD posted:1. more money for us the 3rd one really differentiates the dems from the republicans. see, they're not the same at all
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/kthalps/status/895649472977530881 #NotYourShield
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:this article is really great, along the same lines as the halper one Thoguh posted:TL:DR: I enjoyed this post combo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
zegermans posted:Speaking of which, Greenwald intentionally burned a source, sending her to jail, because she made him look bad privately. what
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
i mean, making her sit outside is a pretty big gently caress you. but donuts and water outdoors in SUMMERTIME is a radioactive level of passive-aggression. at that point you may as well just walk out and cuss at her.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:what It's true
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:what expect no actual substantiation beyond further bad posts presented on their face and that poster will never surprise you.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:what after reality winner sent the intercept government documents, the intercept resent the original documents + mailing information back to the government where it was tied back to reality winner via printer fingerprinting
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
it's was an incredibly stupid violation of their source, which given the intercept's history of protecting important whistleblowers seems suspicious basically it's either stupidity or malice, or all reality winner's fault if you're a poster here
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
Going through imgur to find that Zoux photo reminded me that this gem exists.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 18:18
|
|