|
qkkl posted:Every Jew who moves to Israel knows very well the suffering Palestinians had to go through in order for that to happen. And they accept it, just like meat eaters accept that animals had to die to provide the meat. I feel like this has to be some kind of Tolberone Triangle level of parody or something.
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 23:40 |
|
|
it is NOT OKAY to deny hot black jews to the future of the holy land, and those behind this scheme are doing harm to their undoubtedly horny children
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I feel like this has to be some kind of Tolberone Triangle level of parody or something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxKrn8Aqa0A
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 00:55
|
|
|
lollontee posted:Courtesy of the DnD I/P thread, which I love so very deerly either that, or he'd whine about eugenics without a hint of irony get that OUT of my face has issued a correction as of 03:51 on Aug 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 03:44
|
|
|
Related video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfjsq587alY Owns so loving hard.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 03:50
|
|
|
 Finkelstein's tenure
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
*The assassins from a 1970s bond film break into your house* "Actually Israel is really good."  Just what... what the gently caress!
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
twoday has issued a correction as of 19:54 on Aug 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 19:51
|
|
|
Lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
Ya, ya, laugh it up, but guess who'll look like an rear end when when the CIA files are leaked. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2017 20:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 08:55
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 11:34
|
|
|
Is the answer no?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 11:45
|
|
|
apparently we're supposed ot feel bad for some buy to let landlord who got doxxed
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 11:47
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Is the answer no? It's always no.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 16:40
|
|
|
Jose posted:apparently we're supposed ot feel bad for some buy to let landlord who got doxxed
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 17:32
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:i don't condone doxxing but that doesn't mean we should have sympathy for landlords, who are the worst group of people in the world I'd like to clarify that my disgust is targeted at residential, inherited
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I'd like to clarify that my disgust is targeted at residential, inherited remember how long it took to rebuild the WTC because the landlords were holding out for a better price?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I'd like to clarify that my disgust is targeted at residential, inherited
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
A consistent if generic hot take:
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 23:38
|
|
|
this is better, crossposting from the "mock someone" thread. naturally, it is a tweetstorm https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/896470704908107776
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/896520378494865408
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 01:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/finestmarxman/status/896572393694535680 https://twitter.com/shaun_jen/status/896626198931013632 Pener Kropoopkin has issued a correction as of 08:06 on Aug 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 07:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 09:02
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Is the answer no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 09:11
|
|
|
Is this about  or is it something. really stupidEdit: it is about and peer review and bias in science, so it really doesn't belong here
im on the net me boys has issued a correction as of 16:24 on Aug 13, 2017 |
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 16:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/...genumber%3D5576
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 17:26
|
|
|
this one is correct though? Science is a process for building models that reflect our perceptions of reality. It isn't capital-T Truth or are you going to argue race science was True
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
Minty posted:this one is correct though? Science is a process for building models that reflect our perceptions of reality. It isn't capital-T Truth Byolante is a low tier troll
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 19:26
|
|
|
Minty posted:this one is correct though? Science is a process for building models that reflect our perceptions of reality. It isn't capital-T Truth The results of science doesn't need to reflect our preexisting perceptions of reality, that's the whole point. Science is a process to seek truth, and out of all such processes it's the most likely to give us literal truths.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
*faaaaaaart*
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 20:38
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:The results of science doesn't need to reflect our preexisting perceptions of reality, that's the whole point. Science is a process to seek truth, and out of all such processes it's the most likely to give us literal truths. nah even science anticipates current models being overturned by future models which better describe data etc like not even science reads your fantasy story above to itself before bed
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
Its really weird when not scientist people talk about science especially engineers, never let an engineer butt in on matters of science, philosophy or w/e there's 0% chance someone who is earnestly interested and capable in those topics ends up an engineer. They're all button pushers on bloated salaries because money, not the struggle to greater understanding, is what they sought in life. They got told they're smart as kids and never developed social skills so they butt in a lot but they're basically McDonalds may-I-take-your-order types pressing buttons all day with nothing going on behind the eyes, you can tell when you look at them
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
Modest Mao posted:nah Current models being overturned to be more accurate doesn't contradict what I said, it supports it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:The results of science doesn't need to reflect our preexisting perceptions of reality, that's the whole point. Science is a process to seek truth, and out of all such processes it's the most likely to give us literal truths. this process is predicated on understanding that science does not create knowledge, but is rather a method by which we test assumptions for errors what you are calling 'knowledge' is our 'preexisting perceptions of reality.' science works due to the understanding that those perceptions being based on science does not make them true.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:this process is predicated on understanding that science does not create knowledge, but is rather a method by which we test assumptions for errors Exactly. I didn't say that preexisting perceptions had to be unscientifically created. Nor did I mean to imply that the results of the scientific process are to be set in stone as the one truth forever. Hypotheses are by definition falsifiable, and experiments repeatable, for a reason. Also since we're getting philosophical here, I should specify that when I said "literal truth" I mean practical truth as opposed to absolute truth, i.e. it's useful to us as humans but we can't be 100% certain of it in a philosophical sense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:The results of science doesn't need to reflect our preexisting perceptions of reality, that's the whole point. Science is a process to seek truth, and out of all such processes it's the most likely to give us literal truths. Science literally can not seek "Truth", as you already pointed out yourself. It merely creates models, which must be able to make predictions. If those models do not make predictions that align with our actual observations, then we (hopefully) form new models that do. Those observations, whether direct or indirect, are absolutely governed by our current perceptions. And those models, no matter how accurate or precise, are not reality. C'est n'est pas une pipe and all.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
Modest Mao posted:especially engineers, never let an engineer butt in on matters of science, philosophy or w/e here's my submission for the thread
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
Minty posted:Science literally can not seek "Truth", as you already pointed out yourself. It merely creates models, which must be able to make predictions. If those models do not make predictions that align with our actual observations, then we (hopefully) form new models that do. Those observations, whether direct or indirect, are absolutely governed by our current perceptions. And those models, no matter how accurate or precise, are not reality. C'est n'est pas une pipe and all. I guess you and I were using the word "perception" differently. But for practical purposes, if a model can be explained by a process, and that process is something that exists in physical reality (which we have know way to really know yadda yadda yadda) then science has found a truth at least in the colloquial sense. And of all our methods of inquiry it's the best at doing that. That's all I'm saying. I think a few folks (or maybe just Modest Mao) have a chip on their shoulder and want to assume because I defended science I'm a positivist, or I think science is God, or at the very least I loving Love It, but no. I just think it's useful.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 23:40 |
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:I guess you and I were using the word "perception" differently. But for practical purposes, if a model can be explained by a process, and that process is something that exists in physical reality (which we have know way to really know yadda yadda yadda) then science has found a truth at least in the colloquial sense. And of all our methods of inquiry it's the best at doing that. That's all I'm saying. I think a few folks (or maybe just Modest Mao) have a chip on their shoulder and want to assume because I defended science I'm a positivist, or I think science is God, or at the very least I loving Love It, but no. I just think it's useful. I'm just going to say you are confusing symbols with what they represent, and should probably read more on epistemology, especially in regards to representationalism and realism The word is not the thing, a map is not a territory, etc etc eta: no one is "attacking" science here Minty has issued a correction as of 04:44 on Aug 14, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2017 04:32
|
|