|
gradenko_2000 posted:Green Ronin just announced that they're developing this didn't the book start as an online rpg some folks were playing on like a message board? what system were they using
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:27 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 15:07 |
|
Serf posted:didn't the book start as an online rpg some folks were playing on like a message board? what system were they using Rumor has it it was Stars Without Number
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:29 |
this thread really really should read twilight of the elites it's insanely spot on and it predicts like 80% of what would happen five years later america is beyond hosed and the rot has metastasized meritocracy is a lie, it's the same as it always has been, rule of the many by the few the elites just keep on swapping out how exactly "the few" are chosen, it doesn't matter what the political structure is, communist, capitalist, neoliberal, local mayordoms, state governorships, the same thing keeps happening over and over and over
|
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:29 |
|
Frijolero posted:1. Skyrim macho man mod??? Relevant Tangent posted:There are five good RPG systems and hundreds of good implementations of those systems. Most people will (if they're lucky) find a good group and at that point the system almost doesn't matter. are there any cool semi-simple tabletop setups for solo play? like 1-2 hr campaigns?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:31 |
|
got any sevens posted:macho man mod??? Galaxy brain: playing rpgs by yourself
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:32 |
|
https://twitter.com/fart/status/900019994250981376
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:32 |
|
Phi230 posted:Rumor has it it was Stars Without Number thats a p good system. crawford does good work
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:32 |
|
I played the ASOIAF RPG before I ever read a ASOIAF book or watched GOT and I can confirm that it is not very good I played a commoner (grizzled veteran master-at-arms) because at the time I didn't understand how obsessed with the nobility the franchise is
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:33 |
|
DEMOCRATS: shame on you @fart
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:33 |
|
SKULL.GIF posted:this thread really really should read twilight of the elites yeah i read it a few years ago it's a pretty good snapshot and bringing-to-the-obama-era of a bit of c wright mills
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:34 |
|
https://twitter.com/andsat/status/899762876662988800
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:35 |
|
got any sevens posted:macho man mod??? You're probably looking for a well-designed point system for that, maybe Iron Kingdoms or Fragged Empire. Something with miniatures and positioning and a ruleset that treats PCs and NPCs the same. You can't really role-play very well solo though, that I've ever heard of anyway.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:36 |
|
Serf posted:didn't the book start as an online rpg some folks were playing on like a message board? what system were they using i really want a system designed for pbp/pbem or some other way of connecting distributed players who have trouble organizing a stable meeting time at this point a resolution system requiring me to take pictures of birds w my phone and send them on a group text would more easily accommodate a game for me than the usual weird dice would
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:42 |
|
Under socialism there will be mandatory community rpg sessions
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:43 |
Squizzle posted:if you wanna talk 90s games w greg stolze involvement and which feel cspam af the answer is unknown armies Seconding this. You get your magic by being super brokebrained and there's even a path that's basically Trump! (The Demagogue).
|
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:45 |
|
Ted_Haggard posted:Seconding this. You get your magic by being super brokebrained and there's even a path that's basically Trump! (The Demagogue). UA was one of the most interesting modern settings I'd seen in a long time when I first picked it up about ten, fifteen years ago. Pity the system's such complete garbage.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:46 |
|
Relevant Tangent posted:You're probably looking for a well-designed point system for that, maybe Iron Kingdoms or Fragged Empire. Something with miniatures and positioning and a ruleset that treats PCs and NPCs the same. You can't really role-play very well solo though, that I've ever heard of anyway. positioning is ok in small doses but most systems take it too far. i'd like something like a board game crossed with a choose-your-own-adventure book, but stripped down almost to the basics so it doesnt require more than 5 minutes of prep and you'd have like ten possible adventures broken up into three arcs, which you combine randomly. like you'd start in the town/city/farm, do a random starter quest in tavern/castle/etc, it leads into rescuing slaves from the mine overrun with bandits/orcs/witches/vampires, then that segues into assaulting their boss's fortress/witch house/hell portal/etc. between areas you'd have a random encounter, or it might be a traveling merchant so you can stock up on potions or buy a rare +3 mace or whatever fun to imagine this stuff while high anyway, probably more of a pita to design it
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:53 |
|
adnd 1st edition is best nerds
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:53 |
|
Problem with tabletop RPGs is that they're actually hard to do well, and all the people who can do them well make way more money making video games.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:54 |
|
Squizzle posted:i really want a system designed for pbp/pbem or some other way of connecting distributed players who have trouble organizing a stable meeting time Discord chat
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:55 |
|
Karl Barks posted:adnd 1st edition is best nerds Truest post in the thread.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 18:56 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Discord chat also would be fine, as long as it was schedule-agnostic i want something where people can still play together even if theyre at conferences/caring for or visiting w children or grandkids/in multuple diff timezones/just incredibly lovely at scheduling
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:06 |
|
http://imgur.com/a/3TUzr Whitey McCrystals4Prez
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:08 |
|
Squizzle posted:also would be fine, as long as it was schedule-agnostic same my old D&D group never plays anymore because two of us moved away and we put together a Roll20 campaign that we're taking turns running one-offs in but it's still really hard to get everyone free on the same afternoon
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:09 |
|
loquacius posted:same My old D&D/Deadlands/whatever group still meets up, albeit not as often as we did back in our 20s, but I'm like seven hours away now and it sucks. Haven't done any regular gaming since like 2009, the odd one-shots not withstanding.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:17 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg8Ceu6Mwjs
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:17 |
|
its such an obv niche for elfgames, esp because so much of the tg industry orbits around internet forums that have both grognard conversation and pbp poo poo like half the conversation around these things happens right next to play by post games and no one has come up w a system specifically for that????? why are they all so dumb????????
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:21 |
|
Squizzle posted:its not worth making d&d mechanics if you cant include owlbears HOLY gently caress AN OWLBEAR
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:24 |
|
Tabletop games take too long and are boring to me.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:25 |
|
punk rebel ecks posted:Tabletop games take too long and are boring to me. i know a fun tabletop game
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:26 |
|
punk rebel ecks posted:Tabletop games take too long and are boring to me. this is why trump won
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:26 |
|
interesting question i saw the other day that the democrats thread can answer: what would you call owlbear babies
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:26 |
|
my group's been doing tuesday nights for 2-3 hours via google hangouts for video + roll20 for playing and it's actually working way better than anyone expected. we just either play someone's char or have them sit out if they're on vacation (obv if the dm's out of town we just don't play) one time we had huge technical issues and just did a conference call which worked surprisingly well since we weren't doing super focused combat that night
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:27 |
|
got any sevens posted:macho man mod???
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:28 |
|
Democrats love security fences not border walls.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:28 |
|
Rand alPaul posted:Democrats love security fences not border walls. snopes is a psyop
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:30 |
|
Serf posted:interesting question i saw the other day that the democrats thread can answer: what would you call owlbear babies hmmmmm im going w owlcubs but im willing to be convinced otherwise
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:30 |
|
zegermans posted:http://imgur.com/a/3TUzr lol i was going to comment on the number of albanians but then i remembered hoxha
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:32 |
|
Rand alPaul posted:Democrats love security fences not border walls. What's a metal wall, that you can see through, and it doesn't let people through?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:33 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 15:07 |
|
Taintrunner posted:snopes is a psyop This was NYT's live FACT CHECKER during the debates
|
# ? Aug 22, 2017 19:34 |