Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Tom Perez B/K/M?
This poll is closed.
B 77 25.50%
K 160 52.98%
M 65 21.52%
Total: 229 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


call to action posted:

Maybe you could defend Obama some more to really burnish those socialist credentials

as opposed to yours when you decided it was time to defend nazis marching in the streets as "fake nazis" and that they should be left alone?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
Can't believe Obama did nothing to stop Honduran coup. That's just as bad as Reagan arming the Contras

Reagan, welcome to #theresistance

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

call to action posted:

Maybe you could defend Obama some more to really burnish those socialist credentials

Anybody who thinks Obama was as bad as Reagan knows very, very little about all the extremely lovely things that Reagan did. Also Reagan plays a pretty big role in why every major party politician for the last thirty years has had to act like a deficit hawk on the lookout for perfidious Welfare Queens. Without Reagan, America would be a very different, much more progressive country.

Majorian fucked around with this message at 23:42 on Aug 23, 2017

joepinetree
Apr 5, 2012

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Your endorsement of socdem policy instead of socialism

Marx posted:


"“If in the political struggle against the bourgeois state the workers succeed only in extracting concessions, then they are guilty of compromise; and this is contrary to eternal principles. All peaceful movements, such as those in which English and American workers have the bad habit of engaging, are therefore to be despised. Workers must not struggle to establish a legal limit to the working day, because this is to compromise with the masters, who can then only exploit them for ten or twelve hours, instead of fourteen or sixteen. They must not even exert themselves in order legally to prohibit the employment in factories of children under the age of ten, because by such means they do not bring to an end the exploitation of children over ten: they thus commit a new compromise, which stains the purity of the eternal principles. "

It cannot be denied that if the apostles of political indifferentism were to express themselves with such clarity, the working class would make short shrift of them and would resent being insulted by these doctrinaire bourgeois and displaced gentlemen, who are so stupid or so naive as to attempt to deny to the working class any real means of struggle. For all arms with which to fight must be drawn from society as it is and the fatal conditions of this struggle have the misfortune of not being easily adapted to the idealistic fantasies which these doctors in social science have exalted as divinities, under the names of Freedom, Autonomy, Anarchy.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Oh, totally engage and extract concessions, but the concessions are never the focus nor the central demand

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Can't believe Obama did nothing to stop Honduran coup. That's just as bad as Reagan arming the Contras

Reagan, welcome to #theresistance

he did more than nothing, he actively worked to legitimize it and legitimize obviously shady elections. that still doesn't make him as bad as reagan arming the contras illegally. though obama continuing to arm and train the honduran coupers after they were murdering citizens and journalists is inching close.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.
Sometimes i think the focus on the presidency is the biggest mistake we all make. I kinda wish the focus was more on eating our own until we have acquired enough purity to defeat our enemies. The only issue is that we will then be too full of ourselves to eat the rich.

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

Sometimes i think the focus on the presidency is the biggest mistake we all make. I kinda wish the focus was more on eating our own until we have acquired enough purity to defeat our enemies. The only issue is that we will then be too full of ourselves to eat the rich.

There is always room for dessert.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

Sometimes i think the focus on the presidency is the biggest mistake we all make. I kinda wish the focus was more on eating our own until we have acquired enough purity to defeat our enemies. The only issue is that we will then be too full of ourselves to eat the rich.

"Eating our own" meaning what, exactly, in this context?

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

Sometimes i think the focus on the presidency is the biggest mistake we all make. I kinda wish the focus was more on eating our own until we have acquired enough purity to defeat our enemies. The only issue is that we will then be too full of ourselves to eat the rich.

I'm not sure what you're implying here. That leftists are literally killing or otherwise preventing liberals from voting? Or that attacking liberals somehow prevents leftists from voting?

Strange analogy.

Calibanibal
Aug 25, 2015

i think what he's saying is that we should slay each other and ritually consume the heart, brain, and liver of those slain, thereby making their strength our own

call to action
Jun 10, 2016

by FactsAreUseless
I guess to me, trying to slash social security is probably just as bad, if not worse (!), than perpetuating a lovely racist caricature. even for minorities.

Condiv posted:

as opposed to yours when you decided it was time to defend nazis marching in the streets as "fake nazis" and that they should be left alone?

Don't you have more racist Alex Jones screeds to post?

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


call to action posted:

Don't you have more racist Alex Jones screeds to post?

are you still sad that i compared your nazi apologist rhetoric to alex jones? since he too believes the charlottesville nazis were actually fake nazis?

get out. you're either a nazi or a nazi apologist. neither are worthwhile

Condiv fucked around with this message at 02:02 on Aug 24, 2017

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012
I find it darkly funny that at least Obama thought we were worth the effort of lying to. "Sure, close Guantanamo, Single Payer, get tough on Wall Street. I'm for all that, just like you. Just vote for me."

The DLC and their pals don't think we deserve even that much. They fully expect to be applauded and lionized for acting like republicans circa 1992, and seem genuinely hurt and puzzled when they aren't. "You guys don't get poo poo! Just focus on, um, innovation, disruption, new economy! Hey, why are you leaving?"

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich
Are you ever going to stop screaming that everything is bing bong so simple, and the only reason Guantanamo didny close is cause Obama didnt say the magic words.

So you throw a tantrum when they don't do the impossible, so they make sure only to promise you things that can happen, and you throw another tantrum.

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

Fulchrum posted:

Are you ever going to stop screaming that everything is bing bong so simple, and the only reason Guantanamo didn't close is cause Obama didnt say the magic words.

So you throw a tantrum when they don't do the impossible, so they make sure only to promise you things that can happen, and you throw another tantrum.

That's why this thread is fun to read, and it will never change so don't bother.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich
And you're still all throwing a collective tantrum about being treated like adults and being expected to handle the truth.

Falstaff
Apr 27, 2008

I have a kind of alacrity in sinking.

"How dare you get mad at us for breaking our promises! Fine, then, I'm just not going to make any more promises, that'll show you little ingrates! Now give me your money and votes!" -A Serious Politician Treating You As An Adult

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Fulchrum posted:

Are you ever going to stop screaming that everything is bing bong so simple, and the only reason Guantanamo didny close is cause Obama didnt say the magic words.

So you throw a tantrum when they don't do the impossible, so they make sure only to promise you things that can happen, and you throw another tantrum.
The GOP doesn't seem to mind causing a Constitutional crisis after Constitutional crisis and holding the economy hostage to get its way, so at some point you have to ask "why do we keep following these stupid rules?"

"Okay I'm either going to send these prisoners to federal penitentiaries within the US and give them a proper trial or I'm going to fly them exactly back where we found them and leave them there. Take your pick, GOP." <- Obama if he was serious about GB.

"Okay McConnell I will take your lack of reply to my nomination as tacit consent and lovely compromise candidate Merrick Garland will be showing up to work at the SCOTUS on Monday. Pleasure doing business with you." <- Obama if he gave a drat about the makeup of the court (along with nominating someone other than Garland, obv).

Instead, Democrats consistently let the GOP define the terms of the debate along with what the acceptable outcomes may be, and then we're all supposed to act surprised when they set the terms such that they can never lose. The Democrats are a weak and pathetic excuse for a party and they don't deserve power. This is obvious to most of the electorate and it's why they lose every election where the GOP message rises even just to the level of "oh we want to try something different guys, we're not sure what yet". Even if that thing is fascism. The only way Democrats win is if the GOP collectively throw up their hands and admit they don't know what the gently caress they're doing.

You seem to be of the mind that the process is the most important thing. Sure, Obama couldn't close Guantanamo because the mean ol' GOP wouldn't "let" him, where "let" is dependent upon an specific interpretation of the Constitution and the willingness to give a poo poo. The GOP apparently sees no reason to limit itself that way, and the fascists sure as poo poo don't (but I repeat myself). Leftists interested in getting poo poo done will respond in kind, and I suppose liberals could as well but hardly any of you ever do. That's why you're weak even when you win elections, and consequently why no one wants to vote for liberal Democrats - even liberals - because what's the point? Even with full control of the government the first things Democrats would do is waste time figuring out if they can reinstate the filibuster without pissing people off too much, before they get on with the business of replacing RBG with a nice moderate Republican. Literally anything else is a better use of my time than voting for that poo poo - if nothing else I won't vote for liberal Democrats anymore because it means I can fill out the ballot a little bit more quickly and get on with my day sooner.

joepinetree
Apr 5, 2012
I am going to repeat myself: It is amazing that, in a situation where the democrats' popularity continues to tank and the popularity of policies further left continues to soar, centrist democrats continue to paint themselves as the pragmatic, realist ones and anyone to the left as the intransigent ones.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Falstaff posted:

"How dare you get mad at us for breaking our promises! Fine, then, I'm just not going to make any more promises, that'll show you little ingrates! Now give me your money and votes!" -A Serious Politician Treating You As An Adult

And I'm sure your dad just cancelled that trip to Disneyland because he hated you and liked lying to you. That thing about losing his job was just a part of the lie.

Kilroy posted:

The GOP doesn't seem to mind causing a Constitutional crisis after Constitutional crisis and holding the economy hostage to get its way, so at some point you have to ask "why do we keep following these stupid rules?"

"Okay I'm either going to send these prisoners to federal penitentiaries within the US and give them a proper trial or I'm going to fly them exactly back where we found them and leave them there. Take your pick, GOP." <- Obama if he was serious about GB.

"Okay McConnell I will take your lack of reply to my nomination as tacit consent and lovely compromise candidate Merrick Garland will be showing up to work at the SCOTUS on Monday. Pleasure doing business with you." <- Obama if he gave a drat about the makeup of the court (along with nominating someone other than Garland, obv).


I like how the only things you could think of rely on a Jill Stein level of idiocy about what the president can do. Which of course you will follow up with "gently caress the rules, I say what I wanna do. If dems cared about anything, they would just ignore the law".

Amazingly, try ing to airlift people out of Gitmo into Pakistan is illegal, and telling a man who isn't confirmed to sit on the supreme court just leads to that man being arrested. Weirdly, passive aggressive condescension doesn't make it legal.

Somehow, there's actually this perfect way to break the system and institute full communism now with 49 votes, but Dems are just too weak to try it. But once you full out the dems and liberals and get those 10 votes to 90 in the Senate, then you can activate the super secret ultra move that has to be there, because things are simple and the Dems are mean meanypants.

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

joepinetree posted:

I am going to repeat myself: It is amazing that, in a situation where the democrats' popularity continues to tank and the popularity of policies further left continues to soar, centrist democrats continue to paint themselves as the pragmatic, realist ones and anyone to the left as the intransigent ones.

"If those idiot leftists had done well in school and entered a respectable university, they wouldn't have to ask for entitlements to bail them out of a situation they put themselves in. Instead, they're begging the only adults in the room for solutions to unrealistic dreams, from a past that can't exist again"
- A centrist

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

joepinetree posted:

I am going to repeat myself: It is amazing that, in a situation where the democrats' popularity continues to tank and the popularity of policies further left continues to soar, centrist democrats continue to paint themselves as the pragmatic, realist ones and anyone to the left as the intransigent ones.

Show me the popularity of "Bust Khalid Sheik Mohammed out of prison and take him back to Pakistan". I want to see on the graph when it really swung into the 75% approval level.

Amazingly, you dumbshits don't gain credibility through osmosis. Your dumb loving ideas don't get less dumb or less loving by you screaming that you must be right because you're a leftist and all leftist ideas are great.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

joepinetree
Apr 5, 2012

Fulchrum posted:

Show me the popularity of "Bust Khalid Sheik Mohammed out of prison and take him back to Pakistan". I want to see on the graph when it really swung into the 75% approval level.

Amazingly, you dumbshits don't gain credibility through osmosis. Your dumb loving ideas don't get less dumb or less loving by you screaming that you must be right because you're a leftist and all leftist ideas are great.

This isn't disingenuous at all.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

joepinetree posted:

This isn't disingenuous at all.

Considering it's a direct response to the solution Kilroy said Obama was obligated to undertake in order to prove he wasn't lying about Guantanomo because he was a meany meanpants? No, it's not disingenuous in the slightest. These are the ideas leftists in this thread are holding up while other claim that all their ideas are unassailable because LEFT!!!!!

Calibanibal
Aug 25, 2015

*swears off reading the bad dem thread*

*cant resist after a week*

*reads it and gets mad*

*has a melt down*

*swears off reading the bad dem thread*

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Condiv posted:

are you still sad that i compared your nazi apologist rhetoric to alex jones? since he too believes the charlottesville nazis were actually fake nazis?

get out. you're either a nazi or a nazi apologist. neither are worthwhile

What did he actually say about Nazis I wasn't reading this thread for a while

Accretionist
Nov 7, 2012
I BELIEVE IN STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORIES

Fulchrum posted:

And you're still all throwing a collective tantrum about being treated like adults and being expected to handle the truth.

"Know your place."

- DNC


joepinetree posted:

I am going to repeat myself: It is amazing that, in a situation where the democrats' popularity continues to tank and the popularity of policies further left continues to soar, centrist democrats continue to paint themselves as the pragmatic, realist ones and anyone to the left as the intransigent ones.

It's the classic framing of 'Us : Adults :: Them : Children'

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


BENGHAZI 2 posted:

What did he actually say about Nazis I wasn't reading this thread for a while

he claimed the nazis marching in charlottesville were not actual nazis and were just trolling

call to action posted:

fake Nazis do go away when they realize they can't troll you. here's a hint, if they're wearing a polo shirt and carrying a tiki torch they're a fake nazi

fat American Nazis and the ones from 100 years ago with the contraptions on the history channel aren't the same or even similar, they're aping those affectations because they get you riled

then when i pointed out alex jones was making similar "fake nazi" claims he tried to pretend i'm a racist cause alex jones is racist

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Accretionist posted:

"Know your place."

- DNC


It's the classic framing of 'Us : Adults :: Them : Children'

Wonder where anyone could get that impression, just under you managing to confuse trying to explain basic facts with them being cruel tyrants.

BadOptics
Sep 11, 2012

Fulchrum posted:

Show me the popularity of "Bust Khalid Sheik Mohammed out of prison and take him back to Pakistan". I want to see on the graph when it really swung into the 75% approval level.

Amazingly, you dumbshits don't gain credibility through osmosis. Your dumb loving ideas don't get less dumb or less loving by you screaming that you must be right because you're a leftist and all leftist ideas are great.

IMO, if Obama was truly pragmatic he would have polled the American people on whether or not he should have continued allowing prisoners to receive yogurt enemas. On the taxpayer's dollar at that!

Edit: It might have actually been hummus. It was definitely some sort of thick condiment.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Condiv posted:

he claimed the nazis marching in charlottesville were not actual nazis and were just trolling


then when i pointed out alex jones was making similar "fake nazi" claims he tried to pretend i'm a racist cause alex jones is racist

Lmao proud boys aren't real Nazis in the way the Klan isn't

It's an academic distinction at best

Also one of the fuckin proud boy ranks is "beat up an antifa" so gently caress you guy

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747
Holy poo poo literally argued that they'll go away if we don't engage them

gently caress out of here scum

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Fulchrum posted:

Somehow, there's actually this perfect way to break the system and institute full communism now with 49 votes, but Dems are just too weak to try it. But once you full out the dems and liberals and get those 10 votes to 90 in the Senate, then you can activate the super secret ultra move that has to be there, because things are simple and the Dems are mean meanypants.
In fact, it's really about giving people a choice between socialism and fascism, and hoping they make the right choice, as opposed to the Democrats' plan of giving people a choice between fascism and nothing, and hoping that confuses people enough that they vote for nothing in slightly larger numbers. Because that's all liberalism is, that's all the ideas you'll ever bring to the table: nothing. And it doesn't even work, because too many people interpret the choice your party gives them as a choice between "nothing" and "something" and - surprise, surprise - they go with "something".

If we present that choice to the people and they truly embrace fascism, then we'll learn that we were already hosed anyway. No amount of careful messaging of liberal "ideas" is going to change the fact that most people really just want to burn the world alive, if that's what people truly want. All you and people like you do is take away what little hope our species might have left, by allowing no other alternative. So gently caress off.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Calibanibal posted:

*swears off reading the bad dem thread*

*cant resist after a week*

*reads it and gets mad*

*has a melt down*

*swears off reading the bad dem thread*

I never actually stop reading it.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Kilroy posted:

In fact, it's really about giving people a choice between socialism and fascism, and hoping they make the right choice, as opposed to the Democrats' plan of giving people a choice between fascism and nothing, and hoping that confuses people enough that they vote for nothing in slightly larger numbers. Because that's all liberalism is, that's all the ideas you'll ever bring to the table: nothing. And it doesn't even work, because too many people interpret the choice your party gives them as a choice between "nothing" and "something" and - surprise, surprise - they go with "something".

If we present that choice to the people and they truly embrace fascism, then we'll learn that we were already hosed anyway. No amount of careful messaging of liberal "ideas" is going to change the fact that most people really just want to burn the world alive, if that's what people truly want. All you and people like you do is take away what little hope our species might have left, by allowing no other alternative. So gently caress off.

It's one of the small comforts of the last election that, because of how far Hillary bent over bacwards to accommodate you petulant shits, you end up saying that the most leftist platform in history is nothing, because you keep forgetting the facts of the election and need it to be that mean old Hillary really was a centrist, because otherwise your narrative is fill of poo poo.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Fulchrum posted:

It's one of the small comforts of the last election that, because of how far Hillary bent over bacwards to accommodate you petulant shits, you end up saying that the most leftist platform in history is nothing, because you keep forgetting the facts of the election and need it to be that mean old Hillary really was a centrist, because otherwise your narrative is fill of poo poo.

The "most leftist platform in history" was a joke.

Also the platform is meaningless campaign promises, go look at Obama's platform and see how much of it got enacted.

quote:

Review NAFTA - Obama promised to review NAFTA and other free trade agreements to protect labor and the environment. He included those safeguards in agreements with Korea, Colombia, and Panama, but has not yet tackled NAFTA. He repeated his promise in the 2012 campaign to end tax breaks for outsourcing. For more, see Obama and Trade.

Reform Bankruptcy Laws - Obama promised to repeal the 2005 Bankruptcy Prevention Act. The Act made it harder to declare bankruptcy. Many experts now think this helped cause the 2008 financial crisis. That's because homeowners drained the equity in their homes to pay bills because the couldn't declare bankruptcy on their personal debt. For more, see How 2005 Bankruptcy Act Led to Recession.

Reform Minimum Wage - Obama promised to index the minimum wage to inflation. That would help low-income wage earners, the so-called working poor, to earn a decent standard of living. Congress ignored his request to raise the U.S. minimum wage to a living wage. Obama did sign an executive order that requires all government contractors to raise their minimum wage to $10.10 an hour.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Fulchrum posted:

It's one of the small comforts of the last election that, because of how far Hillary bent over bacwards to accommodate you petulant shits, you end up saying that the most leftist platform in history is nothing, because you keep forgetting the facts of the election and need it to be that mean old Hillary really was a centrist, because otherwise your narrative is fill of poo poo.
Yes, it was a very leftist platform :jerkbag: Next election we need an even leftier one, but more importantly we need a champion of that platform.

That's the sort of insight you gain when you take lessons from things like 2016, rather than searching for small comforts and basic satisfaction like a little cockroach.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

WampaLord posted:

The "most leftist platform in history" was a joke.

Also the platform is meaningless campaign promises, go look at Obama's platform and see how much of it got enacted.

We could power loving China if we could harness how quickly goalposts move when you argue.

And we're right back to there's no such thing as complications, everything always works Bing bong so simple, so they lied cause they're meanie meanpants.

And you still somehow can't grasp why you need to be treated like children.

Fulchrum fucked around with this message at 05:02 on Aug 24, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Fulchrum posted:

We could power loving China if we could harness how quickly goalposts move when you argue.

And we're right back to there's no such thing as complications, everything always works Bing bong so simple, so they lied cause they're meanie meanpants.

And you still somehow can't grasp why you need to be treated like children.

So which is it? Was it the most leftist platform ever, or should the Dems not make any promises at all because we're children and can't understand that doing things is hard?

Because if Hillary had gotten elected and then done nothing on the platform, you'd still be here calling us children for expecting her to implement it to the best of her ability.

You can't have it both ways.

  • Locked thread