|
my Nests (thermostat and smoke detector) work fine with the internet out. first thing I tried when I got them home. same with my Z-wave light switches I don't think I can connect my Echo to a Bluetooth device without internet, because the voice command is processed in the butt
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:12 |
|
|
infernal machines posted:it still works as a speaker in some fashion though doesn't it? do they have an aux jack?
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 16:42
|
|
|
no the Dot does, for output
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 16:44
|
|
|
so is it even a very good speaker for music, i'd think it wouldn't be optimized for that at all (and mono, to boot)
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 16:45
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:my Nests (thermostat and smoke detector) work fine with the internet out. first thing I tried when I got them home. same with my Z-wave light switches they have to work with no internet otherwise they wouldn't be able to beep from inside the drink cooler
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:so is it even a very good speaker for music, i'd think it wouldn't be optimized for that at all (and mono, to boot) it sounds pretty good, yeah, for what I use it for (background music for living room at kitchen). I don't think stereo would be meaningful given the different locations I'm listening from. I didn't cross shop other speakers, but I'm told it's about what you'd expect for the price. I haven't tried to put my smoke detector in a cooler.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:they have to work with no internet otherwise they wouldn't be able to beep from inside the drink cooler lol the only nest product that gets weird about no internet is the security camera buts thats because it does additional object detection on the server so the camera cant tell a person from a pet without a connection
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
Is anyone using MS ATP? I am so sick of Symatec's garbage console and security practices, I can't wait to force them to bid. I ran a PESecurity scan on their SEP14 stack and its an inconsistent shitshow. 14 even includes a feature that forces applications to opt in to SEHOP but a ton of their own binaries and libraries opt out of it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Is anyone using MS ATP? I am so sick of Symatec's garbage console and security practices, I can't wait to force them to bid. I ran a PESecurity scan on their SEP14 stack and its an inconsistent shitshow. 14 even includes a feature that forces applications to opt in to SEHOP but a ton of their own binaries and libraries opt out of it. yep, SEP is rear end garbage. WD ATP is really good but you've got to be all windows 10 to get any real benefit from it. previous companies I've seen using SEP were very far from getting win10 rolled out... (if your co is competent enough to enforce win10 company wide it's probably competent enough to use MS ATA as well which is really great combined with WD ATP)
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
We don't have that kind of authority to get everyone up to 10 unfortunately, got another 3 years of Win7 clients hanging around before everyone takes the plunge. Not to mention almost zero 2016 adoption at this point. How much functionality is lost on Win7/8 and their server counterparts? We're still on SEP12 with the 14 rollout in progress so we don't even have heuristics at this point; the bar is pretty loving low over here.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
ookiimarukochan posted:In regards to lovely password interfaces, just going to leave this here:
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:We don't have that kind of authority to get everyone up to 10 unfortunately, got another 3 years of Win7 clients hanging around before everyone takes the plunge. Not to mention almost zero 2016 adoption at this point. How much functionality is lost on Win7/8 and their server counterparts? We're still on SEP12 with the 14 rollout in progress so we don't even have heuristics at this point; the bar is pretty loving low over here. It doesn't support versions prior to win10, win10 introduces all the telemetry it uses. which sucks, yep.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 23:38
|
|
|
Daman posted:It doesn't support versions prior to win10, win10 introduces all the telemetry it uses. which sucks, yep. The MS docs say that it isn't built in but there is a client you can install for prior versions (along with OSX and linux). I don't know what to believe any more.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:The MS docs say that it isn't built in but there is a client you can install for prior versions (along with OSX and linux). I don't know what to believe any more. endpoint protection does, but you don't get a bunch of the useful details you would into ATP they do free trials btw, you should test it out in your org and see if it's worth it
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Daman posted:endpoint protection does, but you don't get a bunch of the useful details you would into ATP This stuff has to go through RFP/bid unfortunately. It's mostly a waste of time until I hit that window. Ahhh... the life of large bureaucratic IT
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 14:51
|
|
|
really good in-depth read on virtualbox's attempts at hardening their usermode process to protect their lax kernel drivers and bypasses found then fixed: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/bypassing-virtualbox-process-hardening.html i was going to read it thoroughly before posting but it's a very long read
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
 https://twitter.com/ericlaw/status/900429796240277504 https://twitter.com/ericlaw/status/900429896941359104
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
Google's design team, everyone. Raises all around.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:22
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:Google's design team, everyone. Raises all around.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
Lmbo why aren't all the subdomains greyed out if it overruns the address field like every other sane browser in the world
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
If only hostnames were big endian
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Lmbo why aren't all the subdomains greyed out if it overruns the address field like every other sane browser in the world unlike modern ios, android doesn't really have a standardized safari/chrome thing that lets apps launch web pages in a app-specific instance of the OS browser, instead they get to use a shittier browser view that google can't relaly fix because android https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safariservices/sfsafariviewcontroller
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 17:01
|
|
|
lmbo Android
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 17:11
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:unlike modern ios, android doesn't really have a standardized safari/chrome thing that lets apps launch web pages in a app-specific instance of the OS browser, instead they get to use a shittier browser view that google can't relaly fix because android why cant they have the text field show a different thing? im having a hard time thinking of a way to make that part of the API contract
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
and even if it was fixed by someone at google tomorrow it wouldn't show up on 50% of androids in use until 2566
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
how do you even do this  
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 19:39
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:how do you even do this very carefully
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:unlike modern ios, android doesn't really have a standardized safari/chrome thing that lets apps launch web pages in a app-specific instance of the OS browser, instead they get to use a shittier browser view that google can't relaly fix because android Cocoa Crispies posted:and even if it was fixed by someone at google tomorrow it wouldn't show up on 50% of androids in use until 2566 https://developer.chrome.com/multidevice/webview/overview Since Android 5.0 (~75% of active Android devices) the webview has been a separate APK which updates through the Play Store like any other app.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:unlike modern ios, android doesn't really have a standardized safari/chrome thing that lets apps launch web pages in a app-specific instance of the OS browser, instead they get to use a shittier browser view that google can't relaly fix because android Ur wrong also that looks like a Chrome Custom Tab
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:how do you even do this what loving CA signed this??
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
wolrah posted:https://developer.chrome.com/multidevice/webview/overview
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:how do you even do this this is just to see what they can get away with before they just start putting various combinations of 420, 69, and 8008 on their certs
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:what loving CA signed this?? don't worry it's self-signed (and incorrectly, to boot!) customer set it up, it will be handling payment information eventually so i wanted to see if they had actually used an internal CA or something that my computer just didn't recognize and, well, yeah.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure the openssl command line will let you mash any idiotic numbers in there without validation because Freedom or some poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
a 2016 bit N should be as good as any other for RSA. It's just not the standard and diverting from the standard is Very Bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
the new 2018 bit keys are coming out soon
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
NFX posted:the new 2018 bit keys are coming out soon yeah the only thing i could think of is maybe they generated the key in 2016 and thought that... was... the date... field... except they generated the key three months ago so i have no fuckin' clue
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
it’s about time we had some new bits
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
these ECC certs have so few bits. They must be bad.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:12 |
|
|
maybe they just got really "lucky" with leading zeros in the key
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 23:47
|
|
