|
Icon Of Sin posted:It was probably an analogue to our thread on Freep. Be warned before going in: we go hunting for the most vile comments uttered on that site. The comments harvested from Freep are, at their least-terrible, on-par with racist Youtube commenters. At their worst, these people are advocating the gassing of refugee children (along the lines of Hitler's Final Solution, complete with pics of German showerheads and references to Zyklon-B), the death of gays (some of them believe that anything other than vanilla missionary makes you a 'heterosexual gay'), anti-islam ("Even then you can’t trust a Muslim because they are allowed to lie to advance Islam. In practice, Muslims will lie to you about practically anything.") and removing women from any position of authority ("This is why a woman should NEVER be president, or even court judges. They are dominated by their feelings in ways that men just aren’t."). Normally they're just little hateful balls of spite, but whenever something good happens (confederate flags being taken down/disavowed, same-sex marriage becoming a thing, etc) their tears are the absolute best ugh I would need to shower after delving too deep into that filth. I have a hard enough time with the alt-right/lite.
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:21 |
|
|
sneakyfrog posted:you cant fire me, I quit! thus i am victorious! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYGxWGduCCQ
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
i so knew what that was before clicking but 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:29
|
|
|
sneakyfrog posted:ugh I would need to shower after delving too deep into that filth. I have a hard enough time with the alt-right/lite. Its a rough thread, but put into context (50-90 year old racists who the world has passed by) it's a lot easier to read. Honestly, that thread used to piss me off, now I just laugh at their impotent rage. The image of them all trying to start a revolution on their rascal scooters will never not make me laugh (they always talk about starting an uprising).
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:32
|
|
|
Zipperelli. posted:Its a rough thread, but put into context (50-90 year old racists who the world has passed by) it's a lot easier to read. Honestly, that thread used to piss me off, now I just laugh at their impotent rage. CWII is coming!!!! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
Icon Of Sin posted:CWII is coming!!!! but i hated that channel!
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:39
|
|
|
A federal judge refused Arpaio's request to clear his criminal record because he was pardoned. from Washington Post Article posted:After the pardon, the 85-year-old Arpaio petitioned the court to clear his record and prevent the ruling from being used in future litigation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:He certainly seems very upset about all these people exercising their right to free speech, doesn't he? Yeah, everyone has the right to free speech. That does NOT infer the right to make people listen. The sad thing is that this all will just feed back into his persecution complex, reinforcing the lovely behavior instead of being a wake up call.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
Samizdata posted:Yeah, everyone has the right to free speech. That does NOT infer the right to make people listen. People who are disrupting these rallies should start chanting FREE SPEECH loud enough to drown out the nazi speakers.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
Velocity Raptor posted:A federal judge refused Arpaio's request to clear his criminal record because he was pardoned. It gets weirder: the justification for the request is that since Trump functionally ended the judicial process by pardoning him, Arpaio can't appeal the conviction, which somehow means future litigation shouldn't be allowed to hold it against him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
CommonShore posted:People who are disrupting these rallies should start chanting FREE SPEECH loud enough to drown out the nazi speakers. Nice. I like it. Big fan of own petard hoisting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:50
|
|
|
Icon Of Sin posted:It was probably an analogue to our thread on Freep. Be warned before going in: we go hunting for the most vile comments uttered on that site. The comments harvested from Freep are, at their least-terrible, on-par with racist Youtube commenters. At their worst, these people are advocating the gassing of refugee children (along the lines of Hitler's Final Solution, complete with pics of German showerheads and references to Zyklon-B), the death of gays (some of them believe that anything other than vanilla missionary makes you a 'heterosexual gay'), anti-islam ("Even then you can’t trust a Muslim because they are allowed to lie to advance Islam. In practice, Muslims will lie to you about practically anything.") and removing women from any position of authority ("This is why a woman should NEVER be president, or even court judges. They are dominated by their feelings in ways that men just aren’t."). Normally they're just little hateful balls of spite, but whenever something good happens (confederate flags being taken down/disavowed, same-sex marriage becoming a thing, etc) their tears are the absolute best Would you be willing to dig up some of those same sex marriage reactions? That sounds like a real treat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
Besesoth posted:It gets weirder: the justification for the request is that since Trump functionally ended the judicial process by pardoning him, Arpaio can't appeal the conviction, which somehow means future litigation shouldn't be allowed to hold it against him. Am important legal distinction is that SCOTUS ruled back in 1833 that a pardon was a deed that required the person receiving it to accept it for it to take effect. So Trump wasn't the one that ended the judicial process, Arpaio was by accepting the pardon. He did this to himself and it's going to be hilariously hard to get a federal court to ever rule otherwise. It's delicious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
Besesoth posted:It gets weirder: the justification for the request is that since Trump functionally ended the judicial process by pardoning him, Arpaio can't appeal the conviction, which somehow means future litigation shouldn't be allowed to hold it against him. Basically, Trump pardoned him by officially rescinding his punishment that was handed down by federal court. He wasn't acquitted, which means that the official record is still that he committed the crime and was declared guilty. As long as his criminal record remains, it can be used as evidence in litigation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
Ariong posted:Would you be willing to dig up some of those same sex marriage reactions? That sounds like a real treat. Honestly https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3790452 It's really worth the read. They're amazingly horrible. Stop on November 7th 2016 though. Start back around December 7th 2016 - by that time Trump has fallen apart completely and they're starting to panic again, interspersed between praising his name in glory.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:Basically, Trump pardoned him by officially rescinding his punishment that was handed down by federal court. He wasn't acquitted, which means that the official record is still that he committed the crime and was declared guilty. As long as his criminal record remains, it can be used as evidence in litigation. And I believe it means he's forfeited his fifth amendment rights in regards to that charge
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Ariong posted:Would you be willing to dig up some of those same sex marriage reactions? That sounds like a real treat. Captain Monkey linked to the current thread, but it doesn't go back far enough for their reactions to the Obergfell ruling. If you want some freude, I ate poo poo on page one of the current thread. Tony Phillips posted:Guess what page the thread will be on when the election is called for Hillary, and win a prize! Chin up though. Even after Trump's win, the average Freeper is such crusty loving bitter rear end in a top hat that they're more or less incapable of being happy. Edit : Found the old one. https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3599372 Obergfell decision announced on 6/26/15, but the writing was on the wall a few days prior. Supreme Court also ruled in favor of health care subsidies around the same time. June was a pretty good month in that thread. Tony Phillips has a new favorite as of 18:21 on Oct 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Zipperelli. posted:X-post from the Florida thread, but this is pretty good schadenfreude. This stood out to me: quote:Brandon Gilliland, 34, of Gainesville, sporting an anti-Nazi pin, said he was terrified to be at the event, but felt it was his civic duty to attend and take up space. Good on you, Brandon. You stood up despite, no in spite of, the people who fill you with fear.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
Ariong posted:Would you be willing to dig up some of those same sex marriage reactions? That sounds like a real treat. There have been 6 threads on Freep now, jesus  The OP here covers the first 5, the 6th is still active. Page 585 of that thread is where the SCOTUS rulings hit that upheld the ACA subsidies, and they just stayed in a constant state of meltdown for like 2 weeks straight. Rewind a little bit and you've got some quality appetizer tears of when confederate flags were getting taken down after noted shithead draped one over the bodies of people he shot in a church, fast-forward a bit and you get the same-sex marriage reactions. Skip to page 594 for the main feast, but don't forget your appetizers!quote:To: C19fan quote:To: stars & stripes forever quote:To: The_Media_never_lie quote:To: C19fan quote:To: C19fan quote:To: C19fan E: old thread https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3599372&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=1
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
Side note : Dale Reed - the freeper mentioned in the OPs is now dead. No word on whether or not he actually laid down in the street to die.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
I really, really need more info on that flaming semi from hell in that FailArmy vid.  Proteus Jones posted:despite, no in spite of Brandon is a cool dude but those things mean exactly the same thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
I guess I didn't realize how recently the threads had changed out. Or how long ago Obergfell was.  Happier times.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Icon Of Sin posted:There have been 6 threads on Freep now, jesus Tag yourself I'm the Homofascist Gay Gestapo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Velocity Raptor posted:A federal judge refused Arpaio's request to clear his criminal record because he was pardoned. quote:The case raised the novel question of how far a presidential pardon actually reaches. It's not a novel question and that's a well-settled matter of law. Expungement is a matter for the courts. Seriously, WaPo reporter, this is even a FAQ: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/frequently-asked-questions-concerning-executive-clemency#18
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
Tony Phillips posted:Side note : Dale Reed - the freeper mentioned in the OPs is now dead. No word on whether or not he actually laid down in the street to die. A man so spiteful that his spirit rejected its own fleshy prison and spread itself thinly over the whole world to make everyone, like, 1% more angry at everything.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
Captain Monkey posted:I guess I didn't realize how recently the threads had changed out. Or how long ago Obergfell was. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
Proteus Jones posted:This stood out to me: it aint courage if you arent afraid. Rock on Brandon.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
It’s amazing how these freep creeps threaten to have an uprising every single time something doesn’t go their way. Like, how is it not self-evident that “it’s time for us to rise up against tyranny” loses its punch after the tenth time you say it and then plop right back down into your La-Z-Boy? EDIT: quote:To: Ray76 Like this, but once a week. Ariong has a new favorite as of 19:03 on Oct 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 19:00
|
|
|
food court bailiff posted:I really, really need more info on that flaming semi from hell in that FailArmy vid. I was trying for a play on words (that obviously failed) where "despite" = in disregard and "in spite of" = with contempt. After doing a quick search, I was completely in left field and should probably leave word play to those that can actually pull it off.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
Samizdata posted:Yeah, everyone has the right to free speech. That does NOT infer the right to make people listen. That's the point - these dopes always say they're doing it for free speech but the only speech any of them care about is and always has been their own (disclaimer: I relaise that few if any of them actually believe in freedom of speech). Captain Monkey posted:Stop on November 7th 2016 though. Start back around December 7th 2016 - by that time Trump has fallen apart completely and they're starting to panic again, interspersed between praising his name in glory. I think on some level they understand that even with a poorly-run campaign, Clinton still won the popular vote and by an appreciable margin, and even if Trump is president, he isn't the choice of the majority and his (and their) ideas were not the ones people wanted. Why else do they parrot all the, "Trump actually won the popular vote but people voted ILLEGALLY for Clinton!" rubbish?
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:That's the point - these dopes always say they're doing it for free speech but the only speech any of them care about is and always has been their own (disclaimer: I relaise that few if any of them actually believe in freedom of speech). Oh, no, they absolutely do believe in free speech -- just so long as it's speech they agree with. That's what bothers me about the Richard Spencer thing: his acolytes will frame it the same way he did: "oh those libtard snowflakes don't believe in mah right to free speech!" And never mind the fact that they want to have their cake and eat it too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 19:39
|
|
|
Once you've crossed the Rubicon of "the Holocaust didn't happen but I'm glad it did" any doublethink is tolerable.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
*in a prosopagnostic voice* IS THIS THE HOT STEP-MOTHER OF THAT GOON WHO WANTER TO gently caress HE STEP-MOTHER??!?!?
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMCFRElyaCc
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
Proteus Jones posted:I was trying for a play on words (that obviously failed) where "despite" = in disregard and "in spite of" = with contempt. After doing a quick search, I was completely in left field and should probably leave word play to those that can actually pull it off. You meant "to spite them", rather than "in spite of them". If it's any consolation I got what you were going for.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
SiKboy posted:You meant "to spite them", rather than "in spite of them". If it's any consolation I got what you were going for. quote:Phrase in spite of is recorded from c. 1400, literally "in defiance or contempt of," hence "notwithstanding."
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vCc9jiYreo
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:Once you've crossed the Rubicon of "the Holocaust didn't happen but I'm glad it did" any doublethink is tolerable. I imagine most neo-Nazis would actually find a lot of common ground with ISIS if they weren't bigoted against Muslims. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:I imagine most neo-Nazis would actually find a lot of common ground with ISIS if they weren't bigoted against Muslims. They already have a name for it: Y'all Qaeda 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 21:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:21 |
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/iti13NQ.gifv
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2017 22:46
|
|