|
rovert posted:If it is no one has reported it yet. Like I said WWE can still keep stuff secret. Except that you are claiming to know, and as such, they didn't keep it secret.
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 14:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 19:02 |
|
|
Endless Mike posted:Except that you are claiming to know, and as such, they didn't keep it secret. I made no claim. I was just stating the fact that WWE has curtained off a section of the Performance Center. Which is doubling up on the secrecy the Performance Center usually operates on as people who attend there are told to keep quiet about the comings and goings.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 14:39
|
|
|
Just go pull the curtain back rov. Take some pictures buddy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain rumors.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
projecthalaxy posted:Just go pull the curtain back rov. Take some pictures buddy. I tried https://twitter.com/TonyDmachine/status/923119678519640064
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
This guy is cool
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 16:17
|
|
|
Eagerly awaiting the debut of “Rude-y” Rhoda Roundhousey.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 16:26
|
|
|
Faustian Bargain posted:Eagerly awaiting the debut of “Rude-y” Rhoda Roundhousey. https://twitter.com/DonovanDijak/status/922865511330930688
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 16:28
|
|
|
I want Rudo Ronda Rousey who uses the same mannerisms as Rush and picks fights with the lovely full sail crowd
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 16:33
|
|
|
mkay0 posted:‘Jinder is better than Brock’ - lol, never change, goons Gain, that's not the argument. Brock is way, way, way better than Jinder. Jinder sucks. But Brock's reign sucks balls. Jinder's reign sucks balls too but at least he's on the show and getting challenged for me to want to see get dethroned. Its a back handed compliment because I think all of WWE's champions suck (except maybe the SD Tag Champs). Which isn't to say the wrestlers holding the titles suck. Agree or disagree, but follow the logic? A wrestler can be good but their booking can be bad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
Garbage that shows up every week just makes you put up with an onslaught of garbage you don't care about. Brock's has been incredibly lazy and nothing but Suplex City matches, but they're still better than Jinder, and they're also less frequent so it hasn't gotten as worn out as it would if it was more often.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:he debuted on the main roster with a mighty mouse gimmick I mean he's the most technically proficient wrestler and his main events don't draw
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
spongeh posted:Garbage that shows up every week just makes you put up with an onslaught of garbage you don't care about. You also have to consider my perspective (and I've only been speaking from my view). I don't subscribe to the Network. I've subscribed many times over the years when something actually compels me too. So when I'm talking about the reins I'm talking about the big picture storytelling of the Raws/Smackdowns and PPV match results (some of which I've seen, most of which I haven't). Brock wrestling good matches is good, but the question is does WWE build that match up so that its one I'm interested in watching? My answer is simply "no." If there's no drama or storytelling to it than even if its a Match of the Year I can just go back and watch it some other time. Since I don't actually care about the story or characters. Brock is a good wrestler. WWE is bad at making me care whether he wins or loses.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
rovert posted:Anyway, no one knew about Kane's return or what is really deal with Summer Rae. WWE can still cover stuff up. What is really the deal with Summer Rae?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
Summer Rae died six months ago and was replaced by a body double like Paul McCartney
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
STAC Goat posted:You also have to consider my perspective (and I've only been speaking from my view). I don't subscribe to the Network. I've subscribed many times over the years when something actually compels me too. So when I'm talking about the reins I'm talking about the big picture storytelling of the Raws/Smackdowns and PPV match results (some of which I've seen, most of which I haven't). Brock wrestling good matches is good, but the question is does WWE build that match up so that its one I'm interested in watching? My answer is simply "no." If there's no drama or storytelling to it than even if its a Match of the Year I can just go back and watch it some other time. Since I don't actually care about the story or characters. I'd argue that that's because the story often isn't 'will Brock lose?' but 'watch Brock murder this man'. The last few title matches WERE built around the idea that the contenders were legitimate threats, in that Joe and then Joe/Reigns/Strowman were all shown to be on Brock's level, and to have tools that could take the beast down. Now outside of the four way, the matches were at best decent, but the builds were excellent, I feel, at selling the threat. And given that those programs did seem to actually pop ratings somewhat, that would indicate that it was effective on a larger scale, albeit not for you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
can you stop probating rovert for no reason
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:01
|
|
|
yea ok posted:can you stop probating rovert for no reason He keeps doing the thing J-Ru expressly and specifically told him to stop doing like a million loving times. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:09
|
|
|
yea ok posted:can you stop probating rovert for no reason 
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:16
|
|
|
what rule did he break? he said there's a curtained off area at the performance center, then, because the conversation was about wwe keeping things secret, made a joke about how they keep what's behind the curtain secret. sorry about your vendettas but it's frankly embarrassing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:34
|
|
|
they all thought he was saying he knew the secret, even though he didn't. Not only should he be taken off probation but it feels fair to give him multiple passes on the next couple since he is being scrutinized so hard like me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:35
|
|
|
Stop probating rovert, and me, and gently caress off for making me read the spoiler thread at all
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:43
|
|
|
Gaz-L posted:I'd argue that that's because the story often isn't 'will Brock lose?' but 'watch Brock murder this man'. The last few title matches WERE built around the idea that the contenders were legitimate threats, in that Joe and then Joe/Reigns/Strowman were all shown to be on Brock's level, and to have tools that could take the beast down. Now outside of the four way, the matches were at best decent, but the builds were excellent, I feel, at selling the threat. And given that those programs did seem to actually pop ratings somewhat, that would indicate that it was effective on a larger scale, albeit not for you. That's fair, just for me the appeal of "See Brock Crush" burned out a few years ago. When Joe's turn came up I wanted to get into it and I watched but I just didn't believe. Now to a certain extent that could be longterm booking and not the fault of the actual Brock/Joe build, but as I remember Joe never really looked tough against Brock. I know they sold the Clutch as a move that could beat Brock and I think they did a good job with that, but I also remember him basically jumping Brock from behind and beating up Heyman to sell it. Which all kind of felt like the same wall up between Brock and everyone else to me. But there's no doubt I'm jaded and cynical and that's why I emphasize the difference between my perspective and the average weekly viewer/Network subscriber around here who will generally be more open because they're generally more engaged and entertained.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:52
|
|
|
I don't have an issue with Brock being the next "Undertaker at Wrestlemania" except he does it every couple months when he shows up but it creates two problems right now where he's obviously only being saved for Roman Reigns (yet again) and The Miz never defends his championship anyway so it just makes RAW look like they have no champions. This is more of a WWE Thread discussion than a spoilers thread discussion tho since the feud's already started on TV
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 06:55
|
|
|
Jenkem Delivery posted:I want Rudo Ronda Rousey who uses the same mannerisms as Rush and picks fights with the lovely full sail crowd Didn't you watch Strikeforce Ronda Rousey? It was 100% a heel act until Dana White decided to turn her into the white-bread babyface of women's MMA. Edit: According to Meltzer she's been at the PC this past week, so that's probably why the secrecy. Norwegian Rudo fucked around with this message at 11:21 on Oct 26, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 10:07
|
|
|
Bard Maddox posted:Summer Rae died six months ago and was replaced by a body double like Paul McCartney I think I could tell the difference between Summer Rae and Paul McCartney in a blonde wig
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 10:50
|
|
|
St Evan Echoes posted:I think I could tell the difference between Summer Rae and Paul McCartney in a blonde wig Maybe physically, but wrestling ability-wise it's hard to distinguish.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 11:27
|
|
|
Rovert should be freed because he was waiting on Dave to talk about it in the Observer and he did and the person behind the curtain was Ronda
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 14:24
|
|
|
RealFoxy posted:I don't have an issue with Brock being the next "Undertaker at Wrestlemania" except he does it every couple months when he shows up but it creates two problems right now where he's obviously only being saved for Roman Reigns (yet again) and The Miz never defends his championship anyway so it just makes RAW look like they have no champions. this is pointless because HHH is blatantly trying to make himself the new "Undertaker at Wrestlemania" not Brock.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 14:30
|
|
|
Also free bad poster Rovert, who did nothing wrong this time
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
Dave noted the RAW Womens Survivor Series team will be as follows:quote:Alicia Fox (Captain) , Sasha Banks, Bayley, Mickie James & Nia Jax (due to return next week). Notable absence of course being Asuka. I mean they'll probably fit Asuka in somewhere on the card, hopefully still not stuck in a feud with Emma. Although I do have a theory on why they kept her off the RAW team. It would be too obvious that RAW would win then. Another more unlikely theory is they could have Asuka win the title from Alexa before Survivor Series, and go in to face Natalya. The card as it stands is very heavy on heel vs heel matches, and that makes me think its not too unlikely that they'll change things up. DarkstarIV fucked around with this message at 15:02 on Oct 26, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 14:58
|
|
|
Asuka not being on the team is all inservice of the streak.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 15:20
|
|
|
Emma is conveniently not on that team either.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
There's a reason why they made Alicia Fox the captain. She'll leave Asuka off the team because she's crazy. Then she'll get squashed on RAW the next night.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:Emma is conveniently not on that team either. Eh. While I can see the Emma vs Asuka feud continuing, it would be dragging on for way too long at that point, especially since Emma has been beaten twice in a row now by Asuka. Oh who am I kidding? Emma is the Bray Wyatt of the Womens Division.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
DarkstarIV posted:Eh. While I can see the Emma vs Asuka feud continuing, it would be dragging on for way too long at that point, especially since Emma has been beaten twice in a row now by Asuka. Sister Abigail is the Bray Wyatt if the women's division
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
Rovert vs SA mods is still a better storyline then anything WWE has done in the past 10 years
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 17:32
|
|
|
super macho dude posted:Rovert vs SA mods is still a better storyline then anything WWE has done in the past 10 years There's a really good rant from an old B&V show that probably describes what Jerusalem is feeling right now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
and much like Nia Jax walking out youre a dumb-dumb if you side with management
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 19:02 |
|
|
I would link it but Jru probated the person who mentioned it for trying to provoke rovert.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2017 17:38
|
|