|
pubic works project posted:Okay cool. I'm dropping him for Woodhead then! I've read that he had broken ribs and then reinjured them. Not a good luck for an undersized back. Jamaal Williams has fresh legs and could be the late-season darling that breaks out every year. Just the FAAB's, Ma'am: I redid the FAAB advice article. Now every player I consider "considerable" is listed in a handy chart.
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 04:40 |
|
|
I need a solid RB2 these last weeks. Is Devonta Foreman worth going after low? Anyone think he will bounce back once he returns from his brain malfunction? Or is M. Evans too much to give up for Hyde?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
Alfalfa posted:I need a solid RB2 these last weeks. Foreman=headache Hyde=heartbreak
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Depending on how waivers go, i'm probably looking at starting either Rod Smith or Danny Woodhead this week. Have claims in for L. Murray, Jamaal Williams, Perine (ugh), and Burkhead but i'm currently 11th. rip
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:Foreman=headache Both of those sound better than me rolling out Darkwa, Murray, Woodhead, or Burkhead in a 0ppr league the rest of the season though. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
VietCampo posted:Depending on how waivers go, i'm probably looking at starting either Rod Smith or Danny Woodhead this week. Have claims in for L. Murray, Jamaal Williams, Perine (ugh), and Burkhead but i'm currently 11th. Might just be Smith cuz Woodhead may not play this week. Rob Kelley got put on IR.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:I've read that he had broken ribs and then reinjured them. Not a good luck for an undersized back. Jamaal Williams has fresh legs and could be the late-season darling that breaks out every year. Hey man just checking but is spelling his name with a C a joke, or are you not aware his name is spelled Latavius Murray and not Lactavius Murray?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
Also you call him a QB
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:Played the #1 team in BML last week and he put up literally the lowest point total anyone has scored all year (57) Hey, Thing I hate: when I'm on a website, I click a link that is internal to that website, and it opens in a new tab. Please have your links within your articles not do this poo poo (e.g. when I'm looking at your QB WW article and click 'RB' it opens in a new tab)
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2017 23:59
|
|
|
Zauper posted:Hey, Do not listen to this man. Clicking on links should open tabs. This is proper and right. e: Also, I like the new layout a lot. Also also, chuckled at Lactavius Murray. Assumed it was intentional.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:07
|
|
|
Yea new tabs 4 life.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
SouthShoreSamurai posted:Do not listen to this man. Clicking on links should open tabs. This is proper and right. No other link on their site behaves this way, including if you scroll down and click on the same link at the bottom where it has a picture. This is terrible, inconsistent, and dumb. I'm on your site, keep me in the tab I'm in. e: my company's internal A/B testing has also shown that link->new tab reduces pages/session and appeared to have a negative impact on return. https://www.oncecoupled.com/internal-link-tab/ Internal links should open in the same tab. Zauper fucked around with this message at 00:16 on Nov 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
You can just click on links with you mouse wheel if you want a new tab, in Chrome at least
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
I’m with Zauper on the Great Link Debate of Week 11. It just makes plain sense that internal links should open on the same tab. :I’mWithHim:
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
I'll throw it on the list of poo poo to figure out this off-season. I'm team new tab and only my opinion matters but I want it to be consistent, dammit. Thank you for all the feedback guys. We are working out the kinks, errors and processes on you this season to revisit and refine processes for an actual polished product next year. Some of this comes down to conflicting personal preferences here that will be roundly ignored but thanks for all the free QA.  We also already have a bunch of offseason content lined up including a new receiving yards metric I'm figuring out and a DISASTER DRAFT so we hope there's a kernel of value under all the bullshit we get wrong.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Hey man just checking but is spelling his name with a C a joke, or are you not aware his name is spelled Latavius Murray and not Lactavius Murray? The C is always intentional. Qb was a bad mistake. Thanks! Good stuff on this new tab debate. I've written for at least 30 sites, and they all do it differently and none of them have a style guide. My opinion is that if the information is supplemental, I.e. It adds something(like a source), new tab. If its a new article on a different topic, same tab. But then you get issues: Under that definition the choose your own adventure should be new tab, but nobody wants to switch tabs two dozen times for an article. Drunk Nerds fucked around with this message at 01:02 on Nov 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
OK cool cool so it's like, something about lactation
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
Lmao Leper, I feel like Drunk Nerds hates you because you're always pointing poo poo out on his site.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 01:02
|
|
|
poo poo man I'm just trying to finagle a backdoor invitation to be a paid editor when his site is making bank next year e. In my opinion re: tabs vs. in-page nav, I want a new tab when the link is opening something I'm maybe gonna read in a minute after I'm done here, or if it's going to another domain; I want the current tab to go to the link if I'm clicking on it because I'm done with this page. So like, a list of links on a sidebar to other articles: go there in this tab. A contextual link mid-sentence in a paragraph, such as identifying a source or referring back to a previous article? Open a new tab. Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 01:06 on Nov 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 01:03
|
|
|
pubic works project posted:Lmao Leper, I feel like Drunk Nerds hates you because you're always pointing poo poo out on his site. I could see that, but the opposite is true. Our irl work schedules make it hard to set up an editing rotation, so we end up editing our own articles. My brain tells me what it wants to see, rather than what is there, so another pair of eyes is always welcome. And yes, Leperflesh. I should have added that Im so excited about Lactavius thatmilk is squirting out of my nipples. I got so excited that I forgot to complete the joke
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:I could see that, but the opposite is true. Our irl work schedules make it hard to set up an editing rotation, so we end up editing our own articles. My brain tells me what it wants to see, rather than what is there, so another pair of eyes is always welcome. If you truly believed you would have quit your jobs already for this. But since you aren’t all in might as well shut it down.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
Alfalfa posted:If you truly believed you would have quit your jobs already for this. Oh, Spoeank and Sataere told me they were going to quit, then when I did they said "just kidding, you got owned!" My main job is a lot like this one, except for money. My side job is teaching standardized test prep, but that's seriously my only adult interaction irl so I would die otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
Alfalfa posted:If you truly believed you would have quit your jobs already for this. Burn the ships, bitches.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 03:01
|
|
|
pubic works project posted:Lmao Leper, I feel like Drunk Nerds hates you because you're always pointing poo poo out on his site. I legit love Leperflesh's attention to detail. I don't need to be told what I'm doing right, I need to know what I'm doing wrong and what can be done better. Alfalfa posted:If you truly believed you would have quit your jobs already for this. I just took a poo poo on the desk of my branch manager! I'M ALL IN, BABY!
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:so we end up editing our own articles. My brain tells me what it wants to see, rather than what is there, so another pair of eyes is always welcome. Change the font type and proofread it again. That always helps me. Proofreading on another device is another good way, but it’s usually a pain in the rear end to get a half-done article onto your tablet without publishing it first.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:Change the font type and proofread it again. That always helps me. Proofreading on another device is another good way, but it’s usually a pain in the rear end to get a half-done article onto your tablet without publishing it first. Not a bad idea, will try. I think my own internal monologue might still be too strong, but one of the good things about pessimism is it's always great when I'm wrong!
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 03:28
|
|
|
Need to drop Chicago for a ROS defense in standard. On WW: Philadelphia, NO, Arizona, Baltimore, Bills and Chiefs. Suggestions? edit: image not uploading er gently caress it Liquid Banjo fucked around with this message at 03:56 on Nov 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 03:50
|
|
|
Liquid Banjo posted:Need to drop Chicago for a ROS defense in standard. Suggestions? Is there a reason you don't want to go week to week? Also who is available?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 03:52
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Is there a reason you don't want to go week to week? My league tends to hoard QBs and DEF for some reason so I'd like to lock something down now that I'm 8-2.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 03:58
|
|
|
Liquid Banjo posted:Need to drop Chicago for a ROS defense in standard. On WW: Eagles
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:Change the font type and proofread it again. That always helps me. Wingdings really points out all grammatical errors.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
pubic works project posted:Eagles But look at that Chiefs schedule. I’m stuck between Chiefs and Saints ROS and I’m going Chiefs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 04:04
|
|
|
Ravens also get Cleveland/Indy in Weeks 15 and 16.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
Your league's not hoarding DEF's hard enough, because those are some p decent fantasy defenses available. 3 of them are top 7 in total points scored in my league. I'd go with Baltimore imo, they're a top 5 defense and have a cake playoff schedule with Big Ben not playing very good lately and then Cleveland and Indy. VietCampo fucked around with this message at 04:19 on Nov 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
In my 1 PPR league I'm looking to replace an underperforming Brate. I'm trying to get Evan Engram off a guy whose team is out of the playoffs and has just one playable RB this week (he's only rostering Melvin Gordon, bye week Frank Gore, and newly IR'd Rob Kelley). Duke Johnson could possibly get the deal done but he's my only dependable backup RB; everyone else is question marks at this point. I like to trade depth for better starters prior to the playoffs but will I be too thin at RB without Duke? Kind of a dropoff if Woodhead doesn't deliver. QB: Tom Brady RB: Kareem Hunt, Alvin Kamara, Duke Johnson, Danny Woodhead, Rod Smith, Orleans Darkwa, Aaron Jones (dropping for Charmander) WR: Antonio Brown, Jarvis Landry, Mike Evans, Corey Davis TE: Cameron Brate
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
Yeah I’d go Ravens out of that list. Chiefs defense has been pretty bad this year iirc?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
tonic posted:Yeah I’d go Ravens out of that list. Chiefs defense has been pretty bad this year iirc? Hmm yeah they had that great game against Den but other than that, not so hot. Ravens it is, thanks folks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
on the bored wop posted:In my 1 PPR league I'm looking to replace an underperforming Brate. I'm trying to get Evan Engram off a guy whose team is out of the playoffs and has just one playable RB this week (he's only rostering Melvin Gordon, bye week Frank Gore, and newly IR'd Rob Kelley). Duke Johnson could possibly get the deal done but he's my only dependable backup RB; everyone else is question marks at this point. I like to trade depth for better starters prior to the playoffs but will I be too thin at RB without Duke? Kind of a dropoff if Woodhead doesn't deliver. Do it for sure, helps your starters and you can worry about an RB3 if you need one and no one on your bench delivers. VietCampo posted:Your league's not hoarding DEF's hard enough, because those are some p decent fantasy defenses available. 3 of them are top 7 in total points scored in my league. Yeah, can't believe Baltimore is available anywhere. My Yahoo league has funky DST scoring, but GB with Hundley isn't scary, Houston and Detroit give up 8th and 9th most points, Pittsburgh will be rough, but then Cleveland and Indy give up 3rd and 1st most. I'd probably look to stash another defense for week 14 if you have space in the next week or two, but absolutely hold Ravens from here on out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
WARNING: THIS IS A VERY UNUSUAL AND DISTURBING FACT By FPPG, C.J. Beathard is a QB1 among non-IRed players in twelve teamers
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 06:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 04:40 |
|
|
Melvin Gordon & Jimmy Graham Or Jay Ajayi & Gronk?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2017 08:11
|
|
