|
pseudorandom name posted:I was trying to edit it down to something a little more manageable and it turns out its hard to keep track of which tweets you've copied and pasted twitter is garbage for storytelling imagine that!
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
The Something Awful Forums > Main > BYOB: build your own blowjob
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 05:11
|
|
|
Meat Beat Agent posted:The Something Awful Forums > Main > BYOB: build your own blowjob
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 05:44
|
|
|
I have to say The Blowjob Profile Mystery is probably the best discussion in this thread so far.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 05:50
|
|
|
don't roll your own blowjobs
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
Brings new meaning to sanitize your inputs
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 06:15
|
|
|
apseudonym posted:Brings new meaning to sanitize your inputs I like your avatar
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 06:16
|
|
|
SmokaDustbowl posted:I like your avatar Thanks  Security Fuckup Megathread - v14.1 - I caught a virus from my unsanitized blowjob
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
Condiv posted:this wouldn't have been a problem if they'd used the block chain come on, not even gonna try cockchain?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 07:13
|
|
|
what’s the proof of work on the cockchain?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 07:15
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:what’s the proof of work on the cockchain? cum obviously, but you have to hide your earnings from the 
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 07:20
|
|
|
oh i got a better one: proof of wank 
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 08:19
|
|
|
Chris Knight posted:twitter is garbage for storytelling imagine that! Or, you know, he could have just linked the first tweet and we all could have read the thread that was all of 15 tweets.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 09:32
|
|
|
ErIog posted:Or, you know, he could have just linked the first tweet and we all could have read the thread that was all of 15 tweets. Or those tweets could just be copied as text.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 12:22
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:don't roll your own blowjobs lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 13:13
|
|
|
so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 14:12
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again lmao irl
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 14:20
|
|
|
glory hole the hardware and app...whats the problem?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 14:24
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:right and according to them they downloaded a bunch of blowjobs to put in a chart, which are also the ones on which they plan to do "blowjob fingerprinting". so those blowjobs either exist in storage on that server, or they were actively intercepting all blowjob traffic over some period of time. i feel like there's something missing from their story. i think you're mixing up cause and effect. it's not that she found the security flaws and used it to download a bunch of blowjobs, it's that she was downloading and analyzing a bunch of blowjobs and that's how she found the security flaws. p sure she was just finding them publicly posted somewhere or other. the story is kinda vague and mixed in with a "please donate to my sex toy analysis patreon" pitch, though, which makes it hard to tell there's no need for the site to store the blowjob data, because the link is the blowjob data encoded. theoretically, there's no reason for the blowjob data to need to ever reach the server at all. everything she's described can be done client-side. of course, the site is probably saving it anyway. but the attack she describes just allows the injection of arbitrary javascript - that can be pretty bad for the user that runs the link, but it's not a big threat to the site itself. it won't have access to anything on the server that the victim can't already access. at worst, it could compromise the user's account and steal their blowjobs
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:secure loving fuckup: This is, almost certainly, the best thing I've read this entire year. Condiv posted:this wouldn't have been a problem if they'd used the block chain apseudonym posted:Brings new meaning to sanitize your inputs pseudorandom name posted:what’s the proof of work on the cockchain? ate all the Oreos posted:oh i got a better one: 
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 16:01
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 16:45
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 16:48
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
gonna ddos the blowjob machine until I get a buffer overflow iykwim
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
distributed denial of service
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
urethra damaging protocol flood
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
Ur Getting Fatter posted:gonna ddos the blowjob machine until I get a buffer overflow iykwim vOv posted:distributed denial of service dick denial of service
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:urethra damaging protocol flood urine dousing protocol flood
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
someone post that urine cop panel from achewood, please
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
Make sure you wrap your connection with SSL to stay safe.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
You'd have expected these guys to have done at least a bit of penetration testing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
Chalks posted:You'd have expected these guys to have done at least a bit of penetration testing. Their bug bounty didn't pay enough to catch anything.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:27
|
|
|
happy 30th anniversary of the max headroom pirate show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWdgAMYjYSs&hd=1
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
apseudonym posted:Their bug bounty didn't pay enough to catch anything. Toss into this the fact that most bug bounty programs are bullshit that'll never actually pay out
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 21:38
|
|
|
apseudonym posted:dick denial of service Dick denial of sucking
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again can we get this in a thread title friendly form?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:i think you're mixing up cause and effect. it's not that she found the security flaws and used it to download a bunch of blowjobs, it's that she was downloading and analyzing a bunch of blowjobs and that's how she found the security flaws. p sure she was just finding them publicly posted somewhere or other. the story is kinda vague and mixed in with a "please donate to my sex toy analysis patreon" pitch, though, which makes it hard to tell you wouldn't download a blowjob
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
RISCy Business posted:you wouldn't download a blowjob i'm actually quite interested in this blowjob download technology, tyvm
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2017 00:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
flakeloaf posted:so the system where a total stranger can give instructions to the robot strapped to your dick is flawed because there's an xss exploit on the site that wait can we go back to the first part again yeah, as raymond would say you're already on the other side of the airtight seal
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2017 00:38
|
|
