Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Kilroy posted:

This is all 100% true, and completely consistent with the proposition that they are people. Not all people deserve pity and compassion.

You're confused about what a person is. A fetus isn't a person. A nazi isn't a person. Both have aspects we would ascribe to a person, but neither is.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

RuanGacho
Jun 20, 2002

"You're gunna break it!"

Some of you don't seem to understand what a Nazi is.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

stone cold posted:

you’re telling km, a black Jew, that actually nazis aren’t monsters they’re really people

:allears:
Por que no los dos?

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Kilroy posted:

Por que no los dos?

I mean yeah you’re doing that and you’re

Kilroy posted:

putting [her] "in [her] place".

so in that sense you can have it both ways I guess

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY

RuanGacho posted:

Some of you don't seem to understand what a Nazi is.

It is a frog?

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008
I thought Nazis were a type of slug so this revelation that they're actually a kind of hairless monkey is really useful and illuminating, and not stupid and pointless at all.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

stone cold posted:

nazis aren’t people why is this controversial y’all got goddamn brain spiders or some poo poo

I don't think anyone (in this particular thread/discussion) is saying they're people as an attempt to humanize them or empathize with them. They're saying it to highlight the fact that some people can become irredeemable monsters.

To use an analogy, it's like if Nazis were germs; the fact that it helps to know where germs come from (and that washing your hands helps or whatever) doesn't change the fact that you still want to kill them. It's useful to examine what sort of circumstances lead to more people becoming monsters, and identifying those circumstances doesn't in any way excuse the people in question.

Honestly, I don't think it makes sense to draw a hard line between Nazis and "regular" conservatives. I think the same sort of mindset is involved in both cases, just taken to an extreme with the Nazis (and I think many conservatives could easily become Nazis under the right circumstances; if Naziism were treated as "normal" and the history of WW2 didn't exist, I absolutely believe a significant portion of conservatives would join them). I don't mean this to imply anything good about Nazis, but rather to imply something bad about conservatives.

JeffersonClay posted:

FDR was absolutely as bad as Hitler?

Not as bad (being that wealthy isn't equivalent to killing literally millions of people), but still very very bad, yes. A conservative (or fascist or whatever) wealthy person is worse than a more liberal/progressive wealthy person, but they're both deeply immoral.

edit: Like, the logic is pretty irrefutable here. If you accept that 1. countless people suffer due to a lack of money and 2. our economy is deeply unfair (honestly 2 isn't necessary, but it makes things even worse), then it is obvious that it is extremely immoral for a person to retain great wealth. There is literally no difference between that and any other situation where a person could effortlessly help people and chooses not to, and the magnitude is much, much greater due to the degree of wealth involved.

Ytlaya fucked around with this message at 21:13 on Nov 28, 2017

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

HootTheOwl posted:

You're confused about what a person is. A fetus isn't a person. A nazi isn't a person. Both have aspects we would ascribe to a person, but neither is.
When you phrase it that way, to me, it sounds like you're trying to partially absolve them of their sins. It sounds like you're robbing them of their agency at the same time as insisting they must be destroying. I don't want to rob them of their agency, they chose to be what they are, and must be destroyed for it.

But, like I said, it is splitting hairs - we both agree on what to actually do. And I came into this late and apparently rehashed some arguments other posters already made. I definitely agree with the sentiment that it isn't worth going on for pages about it.

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

GlyphGryph posted:

I have no loving clue why some people in this thread are so goddamn butthurt about calling Nazi's people, but they really do.

You're the one who got all full of piss and vinegar and decided that you really needed to tell other people at length that they're somehow lying to themselves because they disagreed with your preferred label, buddo. You kept this up while telling the people who you were insulting that it makes zero practical difference. So you don't really get an equivalency out of this no matter how hard you try.

Koalas March posted:

because they have a pathological need to be right and feel superior by putting the oppressed in their place while claiming to be their allies.

Fishmech syndrome seems like the most likely explanation, yeah.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Kilroy posted:

When you phrase it that way, to me, it sounds like you're trying to partially absolve them of their sins. It sounds like you're robbing them of their agency at the same time as insisting they must be destroying. I don't want to rob them of their agency, they chose to be what they are, and must be destroyed for it.

But, like I said, it is splitting hairs - we both agree on what to actually do. And I came into this late and apparently rehashed some arguments other posters already made. I definitely agree with the sentiment that it isn't worth going on for pages about it.

calling nazis monsters is absolving them of their sins

-an idiot

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

stone cold posted:

I mean yeah you’re doing that and you’re


so in that sense you can have it both ways I guess
That wasn't my intent and I apologize.

Ornedan
Nov 4, 2009


Cybernetic Crumb

stone cold posted:

you’re telling km, a black Jew, that actually nazis aren’t monsters they’re really people

:allears:

They're both. Which is the point the socialists in this thread have been making and you've been doing your best to misrepresent.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Ornedan posted:

They're both. Which is the point the socialists in this thread have been making and you've been doing your best to misrepresent.

Koalas March posted:

They are not men. They are monsters.


Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

stone cold posted:

calling nazis monsters is absolving them of their sins

-an idiot
A monster doesn't have the same level of responsibility for its actions that a person has. Right?

MizPiz
May 29, 2013

by Athanatos
Being a nazi is an act of dehumanization in and of itself. The inherent belief is that you and an arbitrary group are virtually of another species since you're more evolved than the rest of humanity. Humanizing them only leads to their beliefs being sympathetic and therefore gives them legitimacy; the worst you can say about dehumanizing a nazi is that it means viewing them in a lens that they're asking to be viewed.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Kilroy posted:

A monster doesn't have the same level of responsibility for its actions that a person has. Right?

monsters go to war crimes tribunals and the icc

so.........you’re stupid

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



Ornedan posted:

They're both. Which is the point the socialists in this thread have been making and you've been doing your best to misrepresent.

what is the point, goal or endgame in telling someone that their view of their oppressor is wrong?

what is the point, goal, or endgame of telling me that the people who want me dead are *~*just human beings*~*

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Kilroy posted:

When you phrase it that way, to me, it sounds like you're trying to partially absolve them of their sins. It sounds like you're robbing them of their agency at the same time as insisting they must be destroying. I don't want to rob them of their agency, they chose to be what they are, and must be destroyed for it.

But, like I said, it is splitting hairs - we both agree on what to actually do. And I came into this late and apparently rehashed some arguments other posters already made. I definitely agree with the sentiment that it isn't worth going on for pages about it.

I am having trouble understanding how you parsed a death sentence as absolution.

EDIT: By labeling themselves as an ideology they are choosing to dehumanizing themselves. I am just willing to go a step further and fully dehumanize them into a corpse.

Talmonis
Jun 24, 2012
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

Koalas March posted:

because they have a pathological need to be right and feel superior by putting the oppressed in their place while claiming to be their allies.

I apologize if I'm coming off like that, but it really isn't the case. I sure as hell don't feel superior to you, or really anybody here, for disagreeing with you. Your opinion matters, and I do take it into consideration, even if I don't agree with it in the end.

And now I sound like the whitest whitebread suburbanite I've ever encountered. I'm poo poo at explaining my viewpoint in any way but the literal.

NewForumSoftware
Oct 8, 2016

by Lowtax

Talmonis posted:

And now I sound like the whitest whitebread suburbanite I've ever encountered. I'm poo poo at explaining my viewpoint in any way but the literal.

maybe you're just wrong

just a thought

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

whole bunch of nyt reporters up in here getting weepy about goddamn nazis

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

stone cold posted:

monsters go to war crimes tribunals and the icc

so.........you’re stupid
Okay my post kind of came across as "Nazis are not monsters". They are.

HootTheOwl posted:

I am having trouble understanding how you parsed a death sentence as absolution.
Because it sounds like, though it was probably not your intention, that you're robbing them of some agency first. They chose to be what they are, and so fully deserve the death they have coming.

Anyway, I'm done with this. Like I've already stated several times this is splitting hairs anyway, and I certainly agree I have no business telling oppressed people how to view their oppressors.

RuanGacho
Jun 20, 2002

"You're gunna break it!"

MizPiz posted:

Being a nazi is an act of dehumanization in and of itself. The inherent belief is that you and an arbitrary group are virtually of another species since you're more evolved than the rest of humanity. Humanizing them only leads to their beliefs being sympathetic and therefore gives them legitimacy; the worst you can say about dehumanizing a nazi is that it means viewing them in a lens that they're asking to be viewed.

They consider themselves literally higher on the predator chain than the rest of humanity. Someone, who literally chooses this ideology is a monster. I know that's a bit of nuance but that's the difference.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Koalas March posted:

what is the point, goal or endgame in telling someone that their view of their oppressor is wrong?

what is the point, goal, or endgame of telling me that the people who want me dead are *~*just human beings*~*

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



Talmonis posted:

I apologize if I'm coming off like that, but it really isn't the case. I sure as hell don't feel superior to you, or really anybody here, for disagreeing with you. Your opinion matters, and I do take it into consideration, even if I don't agree with it in the end.

And now I sound like the whitest whitebread suburbanite I've ever encountered. I'm poo poo at explaining my viewpoint in any way but the literal.

I get it, I am awful at expressing myself and communicating.

but it's honestly so condescending to tell someone.... well honestly the last 3 pages of conversation.

like I get it. they're people who are horrible. you don't have to point that poo poo out.

I also think a lot of the strife is caused by each individuals definition of "monster"

quote:

mon·ster
ˈmänstər/Submit
noun
noun: monster; plural noun: monsters
an inhumanly cruel or wicked person.
"he was an unfeeling, treacherous monster"
synonyms: brute, fiend, beast, devil, demon, barbarian, savage, animal;

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Koalas March posted:

what is the point, goal or endgame in telling someone that their view of their oppressor is wrong?

what is the point, goal, or endgame of telling me that the people who want me dead are *~*just human beings*~*

Because it leads to a cycle of dehumanization that only makes things worse for those being oppressed currently and dehumanization isn't healthy for humans who engage in it.

quote:

It appears that dehumanization is correlated with support for the priorities of the Trump administration. When someone considers Muslims to be less human, they are more likely to support policies such as a ban on Muslim immigration to the United States. Moreover, those who are more likely to consider certain groups of people less human are more likely to support Republican candidates, such as Trump.

Researchers tested for dehumanization using two measures. First, they presented subjects with an "Ascent of Man" image and asked for a rating from 0 (far left image) to 100 (far right image) for different groups (e.g., Mexican immigrants, Muslim immigrants). Then they asked how well various terms (e.g., "savage, aggressive" or "refined and cultured") described members of these particular groups on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much so).

Not only did they find that dehumanization of immigrant groups correlates with support for Trump's policies, but they also found that being dehumanized results in "meta-dehumanization." Mexican and Muslim residents of the United States who felt dehumanized by Trump and his supporters were likely to dehumanize those who dehumanized them. In addition, they were likely to support hostile responses (e.g., spitting in the President's face). This suggests that dehumanization leads to a vicious cycle, one that puts society on a path to greater hostility.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/life-death-and-the-self/201703/the-dangers-dehumanization


quote:

People who dehumanize are more likely to blame Muslims as a whole for the actions of a few perpetrators. They are more likely to support policies restricting the immigration of Arabs to the United States. People who dehumanize low-status or marginalized groups score higher on a measure called “social dominance orientation,” meaning that they favor inequality among groups in society, with some groups dominating others.

It goes on: People who dehumanize are more likely to agree with statements such as, “Muslims are a potential cancer to this country,” and, “The attacks on San Bernardino prove it: Muslims are a threat to people from this country.”

And , in a study, blatant dehumanization of Muslims and Mexican immigrants was strongly correlated with Trump support — even when compared with support for other Republican candidates. The data is “consistent with the idea that support for some of the Republican candidates (and Trump in particular) comes not despite their dehumanizing rhetoric but in part because of it,” Kteily and Bruneau conclude in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

(Interestingly, their study found that dehumanization was negatively correlated with support for Bernie Sanders. That is, the more people dehumanized, the less likely they were to support Sanders. There was no correlation in either direction for Hillary Clinton.)

Dehumanizing policies can kick-start a cycle of retribution and hostility
During the Republican presidential primary, Kteily and Bruneau surveyed 200 Muslims in the US, and asked them to respond to statements such as, “Donald Trump sees people from Muslim backgrounds as sub-human,” and, “Donald Trump thinks of people from Muslim background as animal-like.”

On average, the Muslims in the sample “felt strongly disliked and dehumanized by both Trump and non-Muslim Americans more broadly.” On a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 indicating that Muslims did not feel dehumanized at all and 7 meaning they felt it intensely, the group average was 5.66, well beyond the halfway mark. (Similar results were found in a concurrent study of Latino Americans.)

This survey wasn’t designed to be nationally representative of all the Muslims living in America. Instead, it was designed to figure out what happens inside the mind of someone who feels dehumanized.

“And the consequences were big,” Bruneau explains. The more Muslims felt dehumanized by Trump, the more they dehumanized Trump. The more they felt dehumanized, the less likely they were to say they’d report suspicious activities in their communities.

The research predicts a vicious cycle. Trump’s policy and rhetoric gin up fear and dehumanize Muslim Americans. That provokes a more violent response from certain individuals in the Muslim community. Trump responds. And suddenly the whole country is a more hostile, less safe place for everyone, the researchers conclude in a paper that was recently published in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/3/7/14456154/dehumanization-psychology-explained

NewForumSoftware
Oct 8, 2016

by Lowtax
"ACTUALLY, nazis are members of the homo sapiens species as well as monsters"

checkmate minorities

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

Kilroy posted:

A monster doesn't have the same level of responsibility for its actions that a person has. Right?

How in the name of sweet gently caress does that follow? Like, you've literally been saying that what you call nazis is merely a semantic difference, so how exactly is it supposed to affect the responsibility that nazis bear for being nazis?

Democrazy
Oct 16, 2008

If you're not willing to lick the boot, then really why are you in politics lol? Everything is a cycle of just getting stomped on so why do you want to lose to it over and over, just submit like me, I'm very intelligent.
I know people who voted for Trump for a lot of reasons. I know people who voted for him because they were pro-pipeline, or because they thought he was going to bring industry back or that he was more pro-union and anti-business. These are all stupid reasons, and you could say that they’re complicit in Trump’s racism, and they’re almost certainly racist themselves. It’s hard for me to attribute to them the very worst of Nazi beliefs, though.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein.

NewForumSoftware
Oct 8, 2016

by Lowtax

Democrazy posted:

I know people who voted for Trump for a lot of reasons. I know people who voted for him because they were pro-pipeline, or because they thought he was going to bring industry back or that he was more pro-union and anti-business. These are all stupid reasons, and you could say that they’re complicit in Trump’s racism, and they’re almost certainly racist themselves. It’s hard for me to attribute to them the very worst of Nazi beliefs, though.

"well at least they haven't set up concentration camps for jews yet"

- a smart man defending neonazis

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Democrazy posted:

I know people who voted for Trump for a lot of reasons. I know people who voted for him because they were pro-pipeline, or because they thought he was going to bring industry back or that he was more pro-union and anti-business. These are all stupid reasons, and you could say that they’re complicit in Trump’s racism, and they’re almost certainly racist themselves. It’s hard for me to attribute to them the very worst of Nazi beliefs, though.

Racism is the number one predictor of who you voted for.

All of that bullshit is excuses.

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



Democrazy posted:

I know people who voted for Trump for a lot of reasons. I know people who voted for him because they were pro-pipeline, or because they thought he was going to bring industry back or that he was more pro-union and anti-business. These are all stupid reasons, and you could say that they’re complicit in Trump’s racism, and they’re almost certainly racist themselves. It’s hard for me to attribute to them the very worst of Nazi beliefs, though.

They knew they were getting Bannon, Sessions et al.

gently caress them.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Trabisnikof posted:

Because it leads to a cycle of dehumanization that only makes things worse for those being oppressed currently and dehumanization isn't healthy for humans who engage in it.

:rolleyes:

minorities are to blame for nazis being monsters by calling them monsters

Talmonis
Jun 24, 2012
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

NewForumSoftware posted:

maybe you're just wrong

just a thought

About the subject? Maybe, and I'm hoping that anyone here would accept that possibility themselves. But about my motivations and viewpoint? No.

Rockopolis
Dec 21, 2012

I MAKE FUN OF QUEER STORYGAMES BECAUSE I HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO WITH MY LIFE THAN MAKE OTHER PEOPLE CRY

I can't understand these kinds of games, and not getting it bugs me almost as much as me being weird
I think your view is correct and I apologize for :spergin:nitpicking, but I interpret it slightly differently.

Koalas March posted:

what is the point, goal or endgame in telling someone that their view of their oppressor is wrong?

what is the point, goal, or endgame of telling me that the people who want me dead are *~*just human beings*~*
The point should be is that they are just human beings and sometimes the moral course of action is to :killing:
The appropriate action is the same either way, so it's not a particularly practical distinction.

Rockopolis fucked around with this message at 21:22 on Nov 28, 2017

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Democrazy posted:

I know people who voted for Trump for a lot of reasons. I know people who voted for him because they were pro-pipeline, or because they thought he was going to bring industry back or that he was more pro-union and anti-business. These are all stupid reasons, and you could say that they’re complicit in Trump’s racism, and they’re almost certainly racist themselves. It’s hard for me to attribute to them the very worst of Nazi beliefs, though.

yeah because they’re people you know not because they’re not nazis

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

Trabisnikof posted:

Because it leads to a cycle of dehumanization that only makes things worse for those being oppressed currently and dehumanization isn't healthy for humans who engage in it.

Trabisnikof posted:

Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein.

Jesus gently caress you're a dumbshit. Don't you even think two seconds about what you're saying before you post?

NewForumSoftware
Oct 8, 2016

by Lowtax

Rockopolis posted:

The point should be is that they are just human beings and sometimes the moral course of action is to :killing:

why the gently caress would you care about this? who cares about this point? what are you even saying?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax
[me, small brain, bad breath]: nazis are bad. punch nazis.

[you, galaxy brain, extremely attractive]: actually, as nietzsche once said,

  • Locked thread