|
Bart is going to join the Mickey Mouse Club. Which is a thing again this year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-HPZfRyK7w
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 01:30 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 04:12 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Yeah, lines like "Featuring interviews with experiencers, as well as experts and major influencers in the field" seem especially telling. It sounds like like they're trying to get UFO believers to attend the session so they can present an alternative explanation (Jesus!) but they're being really cagey about the language they use so they don't scare them off. Mostly sounds like they copy pasted their languge from every startup/entrepeneur meet ever.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 01:39 |
|
Who does Disney need to buy for them to release the original version of A New Hope? Because as I recall, one reason why we haven’t seen it is because its rights are owned by three separate studios or something.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 01:57 |
|
Vegetable posted:Who does Disney need to buy for them to release the original version of A New Hope? Because as I recall, one reason why we haven’t seen it is because its rights are owned by three separate studios or something. Fox. But that's like item 37 at best for why Disney wants to buy Fox.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 02:36 |
|
Vegetable posted:Who does Disney need to buy for them to release the original version of A New Hope? Because as I recall, one reason why we haven’t seen it is because its rights are owned by three separate studios or something. There have been several releases of all the SW films since the Disney buyout, I really doubt there isn't already a working agreement between Fox and Disney.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 03:54 |
CelticPredator posted:I would love Disney forever if they murdered the Simpsons outright. Please kill that show. You know perfectly well that if Disney got The Simpsons then the show would be forced to never die.
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 04:34 |
|
Hahaha, yeah. The Simpsons nowadays is as iconic as Mickey Mouse, and guess what else Disney won't let die?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 04:37 |
|
Vegetable posted:Who does Disney need to buy for them to release the original version of A New Hope? Because as I recall, one reason why we haven’t seen it is because its rights are owned by three separate studios or something. As mentioned, that's a red herring; Fox has a stake in any release of A New Hope, original or altered, and IIRC handled most of the distribution for the SW movies for Lucasfilm prior to the Disney buyout. The most plausible reason is that they don't give a poo poo, followed slightly by "they're worried about having to resubmit the movies to the MPAA and getting slapped with PG-13s for movies that were PG beforehand." Which would be insane from any company other than Disney, but this is Disney, they don't really like acknowledging that their darker stuff exists generally (how often do you see them acknowledge The Black Hole?).
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 04:38 |
|
Ugh....All the Marvel movies are Pg-13. So are all the POTC movies. Both Star Wars movies they've released have been Pg-13.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 04:40 |
|
Yeah, a PG rating for any movie is about as rare as an NC17 nowadays.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 04:48 |
|
Phase 4 of Marvel is building up to AvX then Hickmans run and Secret Wars in Phase 5 and finally a team of Hugh Jackman being himself but called Logan given 100 million to lead Spider-man, Indiana Jones, Donald Duck, Elsa, Tron to fight Darth Vader teaming up with Doctor Doom who is trying to lead a Xenomorph army to take Pandora down.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 04:51 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:Ugh....All the Marvel movies are Pg-13. So are all the POTC movies. Both Star Wars movies they've released have been Pg-13. Pulp Fiction was rated R.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 05:08 |
|
Pirates 6: Johnny Depp finds the treasure of Tony Starks armory and black book.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 05:13 |
|
The MSJ posted:Hahaha, yeah. The Simpsons nowadays is as iconic as Mickey Mouse, and guess what else Disney won't let die? Kind of an odd comparison, because Disney is really cagey about actually using Mickey Mouse for anything, and doesn't have many long-term series of note since the original shorts. Apparently there's a Mickey cartoon running but I haven't heard anyone talk about it (in contrast to the new DuckTales) so I assume it's forgettably average. Wouldn't be too surprised if a Disney-owned Simpsons ended up rebooted with a new cast.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 06:53 |
|
Inescapable Duck posted:Kind of an odd comparison, because Disney is really cagey about actually using Mickey Mouse for anything, and doesn't have many long-term series of note since the original shorts. Apparently there's a Mickey cartoon running but I haven't heard anyone talk about it (in contrast to the new DuckTales) so I assume it's forgettably average. There's some relatively recent shorts that, from the few I've seen, are really good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bElcEMabhoU Edit: Holy poo poo, 2013? It doesn't feel that long ago.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 07:02 |
|
There are dozens of new Mickey shorts on their YouTube channel, and they're really funny. Go watch them.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 07:14 |
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:There's some relatively recent shorts that, from the few I've seen, are really good. All of the shorts from this run are really great and really bonkers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFeSDN9ApCs Big Mean Jerk fucked around with this message at 07:39 on Dec 6, 2017 |
# ? Dec 6, 2017 07:36 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:Ugh....All the Marvel movies are Pg-13. So are all the POTC movies. Both Star Wars movies they've released have been Pg-13. Skwirl posted:Yeah, a PG rating for any movie is about as rare as an NC17 nowadays. I didn't think I'd have to say this explicitly, but if there's two different versions of the OT with different age ratings, that might confuse the poo poo out of parents who want to buy their kids the Star Wars movies. This is, again, negligible to a company that's not absurdly controversy-averse, but Disney is absurdly controversy-averse and the thought of some idiot fundie starting a shitstorm because "they made Star Wars more violent than it was when I was a kid to corrupt our children" is probably not incredibly appealing to them.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:08 |
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:All of the shorts from this run are really great and really bonkers. Donald Duck pissed himself laughing in this. Also I've yet to hear an explanation of Goofy and Pluto that doesn't make me cringe.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:09 |
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:All of the shorts from this run are really great and really bonkers. Man, that's a very unexpected and DeviantArt ending.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:14 |
|
LORD OF BOOTY posted:I didn't think I'd have to say this explicitly, but if there's two different versions of the OT with different age ratings, that might confuse the poo poo out of parents who want to buy their kids the Star Wars movies. This is, again, negligible to a company that's not absurdly controversy-averse, but Disney is absurdly controversy-averse and the thought of some idiot fundie starting a shitstorm because "they made Star Wars more violent than it was when I was a kid to corrupt our children" is probably not incredibly appealing to them.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:21 |
|
Skwirl posted:Donald Duck pissed himself laughing in this.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:22 |
|
LORD OF BOOTY posted:The most plausible reason is that they don't give a poo poo, followed slightly by "they're worried about having to resubmit the movies to the MPAA and getting slapped with PG-13s for movies that were PG beforehand." Which would be insane from any company other than Disney, but this is Disney, they don't really like acknowledging that their darker stuff exists generally (how often do you see them acknowledge The Black Hole?). PG-13 was introduced in 1984. The original trilogy was modified as late as 2011 and remained PG. Doesn't seem like this is a concern.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:25 |
|
Ignoring the spoiler image which is both terrifying and points to exactly my problem, in the cute photo based on the harness attached to the (actual) dog it's probably a service animal so Goofy shouldn't loving be petting it.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:29 |
|
Skwirl posted:Ignoring the spoiler image which is both terrifying and points to exactly my problem, in the cute photo based on the harness attached to the (actual) dog it's probably a service animal so Goofy shouldn't loving be petting it. That's Pluto, you racist.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 09:23 |
|
Svensken posted:That's Pluto, you racist. Now I'm even more confused, but I stand by my original point, you don't loving pet service animals when they're working.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 10:00 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:PG-13 was introduced in 1984. The original trilogy was modified as late as 2011 and remained PG. Doesn't seem like this is a concern. I have heard rumors that the main reason Han shooting first was changed in 1997 was because the MPAA were looking at giving the film a PG-13. There is of course no confirmation of this whatsoever so it may be total bullshit, but in theory that could be one thing Fox and Disney would have to consider.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 10:29 |
|
I’m not sure where to ask this but this is the generic catch all thread so here we go. Are you all seeing LESS 3D showings of movies lately? If I check all 3 of the nearby theaters (all different chains) they have just a couple of 3D showings of movies. I’m seeing a couple for Coco, one or none for Justice League. Same for Thor. For several years and including this summer it was basically all 3D all day. Not anymore, even during a big holiday weekend like Thanksgiving. I checked my nearest IMAX theater and there’s no 3D IMAX showings for Star Wars. I’m not complaining because 3D sucks but I’m just wondering if it’s just my area or the trend now.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 14:05 |
|
Gatts posted:Phase 4 of Marvel is building up to AvX then Hickmans run and Secret Wars in Phase 5 and finally a team of Hugh Jackman being himself but called Logan given 100 million to lead Spider-man, Indiana Jones, Donald Duck, Elsa, Tron to fight Darth Vader teaming up with Doctor Doom who is trying to lead a Xenomorph army to take Pandora down. So basically Marvel vs. Capcom. Speaking of which the cutscenes from the new one basically from a movie length story and is easily more entertaining than Age of Ultron.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 14:53 |
|
Thundercracker posted:So basically Marvel vs. Capcom. Oh man. Disney will look to Japan once they have gobbled up all the American entertainment industry.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 14:56 |
|
Detective No. 27 posted:Oh man. Disney will look to Japan once they have gobbled up all the American entertainment industry. Hey that could work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl3HIZuLOFY
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 15:05 |
|
...I hate to admit you're right.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 15:14 |
|
Man, I forgot how good the new Godzilla was, thanks for reminding me. There's a pretty neat contrast between it and Shin Godzilla in its depiction of Lizardboy; 2014 was extremely reverent and borderline-obsessed with giving him respect and trying to be The First Good Western 'Zilla, while Shin Godzilla essentially casts him as a disfigured corpse being paraded around by a malevolent parasitic entity.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 16:08 |
|
'98 was a really good Western Godzilla, it just wasn't a good Western Godzilla
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 16:26 |
|
Skwirl posted:Now I'm even more confused, but I stand by my original point, you don't loving pet service animals when they're working. You can pet service dogs so long as you ask permission and their owner says it's okay to.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 16:29 |
|
Neurolimal posted:Man, I forgot how good the new Godzilla was, thanks for reminding me. Godzilla 2014 was stumbling around knocking things over like he was drunk ("Oh poo poo was that your bridge? Sorry dude!") but Shin Gozi was shuffling around like he had a really severe hangover and was trying to hold his head really still because it hurt if he moved it. In the shooting script he had an even worse hangover: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Vs4mgm4E4E He was having a really, really bad day.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 16:31 |
|
Disney doesn't own Pulp Fiction. Miramax owns Pulp Fiction. Miramax was sold off almost a decade ago. All they did was what they basically did with every Miramax release - operated as a distribution arm through their Buena Vista Film Distribution company and gave some money to anything the Weinsteins wanted, no questions asked, that was below a certain budgetary threshold. Miramax was as hands-off a relationship as the Warner Communications/New Line Cinema relationship was - complete autonomy within this gigantic company. Qatari entertainment company BeIN Media Group owns Pulp Fiction (and Jackie Brown, and Kill Bill) now. Really, if you want R-rated Disney films? Good Morning, Vietnam and Pretty Woman, since Touchstone has never been an independently operating company but just Disney's "adult" label for things they felt too much trepidation over letting release under their "golden" family brand. The Cameo fucked around with this message at 16:51 on Dec 6, 2017 |
# ? Dec 6, 2017 16:46 |
|
Byzantine posted:'98 was a really good Western Godzilla, it just wasn't a good Western Godzilla The best Western Godzilla, though, in both senses, is still Behemoth, the Sea Monster/The Giant Behemoth.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 17:00 |
|
Byzantine posted:'98 was a really good Western Godzilla, it just wasn't a good Western Godzilla If nothing else I still think it was a really good Godzilla design.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 17:05 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 04:12 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Godzilla 2014 was stumbling around knocking things over like he was drunk ("Oh poo poo was that your bridge? Sorry dude!") but Shin Gozi was shuffling around like he had a really severe hangover and was trying to hold his head really still because it hurt if he moved it. I had purposely avoided any spoilers for this movie before I saw it, so Shin’s insane 1st form took me by such complete surprise in the theater that I had uncontrollable laughter at how absurd it looked thrashing around in the Tokyo suburbs. I’m a good way though, the whole film is absurd like that.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 17:11 |