Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good

Duckbox posted:

Saqr is going to lead the first gamer uprising in the Middle East. The Overwatch Coup will bring democracy to Arabia while also making it legal to marry big titty animes.

i'm willing to be the american weirdo who flies out and randomly joins up with them

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

GhostofJohnMuir posted:

i'm willing to be the american weirdo who flies out and randomly joins up with them

lol so you're going to be the Sidney Rittenberg of the Arabian Gamers party only without all the horrible years in prison (hopefully), rest assured I will see to it your cell has lots of videogames, online access (games only) and body pillows, in case a cultural revolution happens and you get mixed up in 'Group of 516 Cheaters'

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Fahad al-Saud has never been more prepared for anything in his life.

before this google search I never knew this dude or article existed

https://www.polygon.com/features/2015/4/30/8514675/a-saudi-prince-is-using-video-games-to-fuel-an-intellectual

I am inherently skeptical but at least there have been an awful lot of shittier princely pet projects

Looking to see if that na3m game thing still existed, I found that: https://www.disruptorawards.com/2015-honoree-blog/2017/1/19/hh-prince-fahad-al-saud-na3m-games

His instagram account is yolofahad.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Cat Mattress posted:

Looking to see if that na3m game thing still existed, I found that: https://www.disruptorawards.com/2015-honoree-blog/2017/1/19/hh-prince-fahad-al-saud-na3m-games

His instagram account is yolofahad.

I guess I maybe shouldn't have contributed to doxxing Al-Saqr

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011
More on the Sauds deliberately targeting food sources, farms, fishermen in Yemen.

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/12/bombed-into-famine-how-saudi-air-campaign-targets-yemens-food-supplies

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/12/rouhani-ready-restore-ties-saudi-arabia-171210084010955.html

quote:

In a speech broadcast Sunday, President Hassan Rouhani said that Iran is ready to restore ties with Saudi Arabia if it stops bombing Yemen and cuts its alleged ties with Israel.

Saudi Arabia severed diplomatic relations with Iran in January 2016 after Iranian demonstrators attacked Saudi diplomatic missions in response to the Saudi execution of a prominent Shiite dissident leader.

Tensions spiked again last month after the Houthis fired a ballistic missile that was intercepted near Riyadh.

Rouhani said that Iran and Saudi Arabia could have "good relations" if the Saudis end their "misguided friendship" with Israel and halt the "inhuman bombardment" of Yemen, where a Saudi-led coalition is battling Iranian-allied rebels known as Houthis.

Iranian media quoted Rouhani as saying: "If Saudi Arabia, our neighbouring country, stops bombing Yemen from tomorrow and stand up against Israel and relies on its own people, we do not see any barriers in front of improving our relations with them."

"We are not like America that has broken its promises so far in the nuclear deal. when we sign an agreement, we will remain loyal to it and keep our promises."

The president went on as saying "we are Muslim and Iranian, and we have a long and old culture, we are not the one who violates the nuclear agreement. In case the other side does this, we will have our own options."

At the end of his speech, Rohani concluded that "Palestine has been and will remain our cause, and the United States and the Zionist regime will not succeed in their recent conspiracy, and God willing, the Islamic nations will liberate al-Quds soon."

Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said in June, according to Reuters, that any future war waged by Israel against Syria or Lebanon could draw in fighters from countries including Iran and Iraq.

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Interesting.

Sprinkling some Iranian nationalism in there along with islamism. Does he normally do that?

Predictably taking the propaganda advantage from KSA moving closer with Israel.

Its probably a good thing for war prevention for the two countries to at least have diplomatic relations. At this rate that doesn't look all too likely though.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

If it didn't have real consequences beyond catty statements, Trump providing Iran with an opening to Palestine-shame the Saudis would be pretty funny.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

Count Roland posted:

Interesting.

Sprinkling some Iranian nationalism in there along with islamism. Does he normally do that?

Predictably taking the propaganda advantage from KSA moving closer with Israel.

Its probably a good thing for war prevention for the two countries to at least have diplomatic relations. At this rate that doesn't look all too likely though.

The Iranian regime has always vacillated between Iranian Nationalism and Islamism for their propaganda, and from day one never let go of the palestinian cause as a propaganda tool, in fact Yasser Arafat recognized the opportunity the Iranian revolution presented to the palestinians and immediately went to try and establish good relations with Khomeini, literally a few days after the shah left.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65xpvmCsm-c

However the arab regimes ( Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Etc.) Browbeat him into disavowing the Iranian Regime, Which I think was gigantic strategic mistake because history has shown that the arab regimes were bumbling fascists who didnt give two shits about any human beings let alone the Palestinians, and it turns out the Iranian regime are still a bunch of murderers and religious psychos but they're much more competent and they stick by their allies and dont back-stab them the way Arab countries do since unlike the arab countries they actually have a vision for what they want. If the PLO had stuck with Iran maybe they wouldve been in a much better financial and military position than what ended up happening to them.

Al-Saqr fucked around with this message at 23:28 on Dec 12, 2017

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009
Weren't the Gulf States the ones who set up Hamas as a counter to the then-socialist PLO?

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013

The X-man cometh posted:

Weren't the Gulf States the ones who set up Hamas as a counter to the then-socialist PLO?

Nope. It was Israel that did that, lmfao

Godlessdonut
Sep 13, 2005

Really loving this ongoing slapfight between Bibi and Erdogan. :allears:

https://twitter.com/AFP/status/9408...genumber%3D1483

He's not wrong, etc.

e: oh hey he elaborated a bit http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42335751?ocid=socialflow_twitter

Sultan Erdogan posted:

Addressing a summit of the Organisation for Islamic Co-operation, he said the US decision to recognise the city as Israel's capital was "null and void".

Mr Erdogan also again accused Israel of being a "state of terror".

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas said the US had "disqualified itself from playing a role in the peace process".

"We shall not accept any role for the United States in the peace process. They have proven their full bias in favour of Israel," he told the summit.

Still not wrong.

Godlessdonut fucked around with this message at 11:24 on Dec 13, 2017

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Those are all accurate statements

Toplowtech
Aug 31, 2004

FlamingLiberal posted:

Those are all accurate statements
Well, let's be honest, it's not everyday Erdogan find someone worse at diplomacy than himself, it's kinda his time to shine.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Erdogan has reason to be upset, but he's (at best) flirting with blood libel here.

https://twitter.com/CNNTURK_ENG/status/940950197651243008

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Sinteres posted:

Erdogan has reason to be upset, but he's (at best) flirting with blood libel here.

https://twitter.com/CNNTURK_ENG/status/940950197651243008

:yikes: he cozying up to the Houthis or something?

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

Sinteres posted:

Erdogan has reason to be upset, but he's (at best) flirting with blood libel here.

https://twitter.com/CNNTURK_ENG/status/940950197651243008

What do you mean blood libel? Israel kills tons of people all the time, I don't see what's wrong with what he's saying.

Also, to be honest Erdogan can scream and cry all he wants but he's not man enough to do something substantial like cease all military purchases or political ties with Israel.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Al-Saqr posted:

What do you mean blood libel? Israel kills tons of people all the time, I don't see what's wrong with what he's saying.

Also, to be honest Erdogan can scream and cry all he wants but he's not man enough to do something substantial like cease all military purchases or political ties with Israel.

Talking about Jews specifically feeding on blood is an old anti-Semitic trope. There are many valid criticisms of Israel, but at best he's unintentionally mirroring bigoted language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel

Godlessdonut
Sep 13, 2005

Sinteres posted:

Erdogan has reason to be upset, but he's (at best) flirting with blood libel here.

https://twitter.com/CNNTURK_ENG/status/940950197651243008

"I heard that they use the blood of ChristiansPalestinians in their matzo ball soup."

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747
America's inept foreign policy managed to create a Turkey-Iran axis and an Israel-KSA axis. And Saudi Arabia's inept bullying has pushed Qatar in the arms of Iran.

Congrats.


Quick map.


Red and blue: the two blocks.
Purple: disputed areas of influence. Iran seems to be winning those.
Green: countries that are trying not to attract too much attention so that they don't get involved in the mess, but if they have to choose, they'll probably side with Saudi Arabia.

What do you think?

Toplowtech
Aug 31, 2004

Cat Mattress posted:

What do you think?
Smells like 1914.

Bohemian Nights
Jul 14, 2006

When I wake up,
I look into the mirror
I can see a clearer, vision
I should start living today
Clapping Larry
At this time I don't think Turkey and Iran feel at all threatened by each other, but I wouldn't go so far as to actually call them an alliance in any sense of the word

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Cat Mattress posted:

America's inept foreign policy managed to create a Turkey-Iran axis and an Israel-KSA axis. And Saudi Arabia's inept bullying has pushed Qatar in the arms of Iran.

Congrats.


Quick map.


Red and blue: the two blocks.
Purple: disputed areas of influence. Iran seems to be winning those.
Green: countries that are trying not to attract too much attention so that they don't get involved in the mess, but if they have to choose, they'll probably side with Saudi Arabia.

What do you think?

I like maps! I'm glad that you made this.

Turkey should be independent. Aside from Erdogan being all over the place, Turkey and Iran are natural rivals and have no track record of cooperation.

Syria should be red. Yes it is still disputed, but too a much lesser degree. Lebanon is disputed as well, but it being red still mostly makes sense.

I'm tempted to split Iraq into 3 parts and color them separately.

Can we really call Qatar part of Iran's bloc? That was largely Saudi propaganda that got made true by the attempted blockade. But I don't think they're very tight?

Did you color this manually or use some service for it?

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

Sinteres posted:

Talking about Jews specifically feeding on blood is an old anti-Semitic trope. There are many valid criticisms of Israel, but at best he's unintentionally mirroring bigoted language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel

I'm familiar with that antisemitic trope but honestly I'm going to be generous to Erdogan on this one, I have no doubt that he's a kook but the use of the term ' blood' and "feeding on the the blood" and "spilling blood" and "swimming in blood" are very common terms to use in Arabic and in speeches when describing mass murderers and killers in general. The same type of terminology might exist in the Turkish language, the same type of phrasing I'm seeing here was applied to Bashar al assad as well.

So my theory is that whoever translated this translated literally, and since his target is Israel then the assosiciation between 'blood' and 'jews' (even though the speech mentioned Israel, not the Jews), so I can see where you could've made that jump, but in my experience having phrases with the word 'blood' in them is very common speech vernacular when describing killers and murderers.

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Count Roland posted:

Did you color this manually or use some service for it?

I used mapchart. It's a simple online tool to quickly get a colored map. Amusingly, the "simple" world map is more detailed for this area than the "detailed" one.

There's no real alliance between Turkey and Iran, but recently they've been on the same side wrt. Qatar, wrt. Syria, and wrt. Jerusalem. And both stand to benefit from the Saudi losing legitimacy in the Muslim world, so I can see them remaining in agreement on other diplomatic questions. If an actual war broke out between KSA and Iran, they probably wouldn't side with Iran there, but as long as the situation doesn't devolve to that point, I think they can be seen as part of the same block.

Punkin Spunkin
Jan 1, 2010

Sinteres posted:

Talking about Jews specifically feeding on blood is an old anti-Semitic trope. There are many valid criticisms of Israel, but at best he's unintentionally mirroring bigoted language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel
:rolleye:

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Al-Saqr posted:

I'm familiar with that antisemitic trope but honestly I'm going to be generous to Erdogan on this one, I have no doubt that he's a kook but the use of the term ' blood' and "feeding on the the blood" and "spilling blood" and "swimming in blood" are very common terms to use in Arabic and in speeches when describing mass murderers and killers in general. The same type of terminology might exist in the Turkish language, the same type of phrasing I'm seeing here was applied to Bashar al assad as well.

So my theory is that whoever translated this translated literally, and since his target is Israel then the assosiciation between 'blood' and 'jews' (even though the speech mentioned Israel, not the Jews), so I can see where you could've made that jump, but in my experience having phrases with the word 'blood' in them is very common speech vernacular when describing killers and murderers.

I'm a bit less inclined to be generous to Erdogan since he's had a habit of talking about shadowy bankers and "spawn of Israel" in a domestic Turkish context too, but I'll admit to the possibility that there are local tropes (which may or may not be influenced by anti-Semitism themselves) which made him more likely to unintentionally back into this kind of statement. I just wish people would be a bit more more careful about this sort of thing because it makes it helps to discredit valid criticisms (not what I was trying to do) when critics of Israel do veer into that territory. Much like Trump though, Erdogan doesn't seem to care as much about putting his best foot forward as he does about belligerent shouting, which was also in evidence when he kept calling European leaders Nazis.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Count Roland posted:

I like maps! I'm glad that you made this.

Turkey should be independent. Aside from Erdogan being all over the place, Turkey and Iran are natural rivals and have no track record of cooperation.

Syria should be red. Yes it is still disputed, but too a much lesser degree. Lebanon is disputed as well, but it being red still mostly makes sense.

I'm tempted to split Iraq into 3 parts and color them separately.

Can we really call Qatar part of Iran's bloc? That was largely Saudi propaganda that got made true by the attempted blockade. But I don't think they're very tight?

Did you color this manually or use some service for it?

I wonder if the program has hatch marks, but I would say Iraq is more firmly in the Iranian sphere at this point as well. Oman I would almost say is probably just simply neutral at this point. That said everything is in flux at any moment.

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009

Cat Mattress posted:

America's inept foreign policy managed to create a Turkey-Iran axis and an Israel-KSA axis. And Saudi Arabia's inept bullying has pushed Qatar in the arms of Iran.

Congrats.


Quick map.


Red and blue: the two blocks.
Purple: disputed areas of influence. Iran seems to be winning those.
Green: countries that are trying not to attract too much attention so that they don't get involved in the mess, but if they have to choose, they'll probably side with Saudi Arabia.

What do you think?

Bahrain needed Saudi help to brutally suppress protests in 2011, I think they're fully in bed with the Saudis.

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Ardennes posted:

I wonder if the program has hatch marks, but I would say Iraq is more firmly in the Iranian sphere at this point as well. Oman I would almost say is probably just simply neutral at this point. That said everything is in flux at any moment.


The X-man cometh posted:

Bahrain needed Saudi help to brutally suppress protests in 2011, I think they're fully in bed with the Saudis.

Yeah I agree with both of these. I checked the site, it didn't look like colours could be combined. My autistic desires will go unfulfilled.

guidoanselmi
Feb 6, 2008

I thought my ideas were so clear. I wanted to make an honest post. No lies whatsoever.

Don't forget kurdish regions with their autonomy and divisions, guys!

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
https://www.thenational.ae/world/europe/aung-san-suu-kyi-has-dublin-honour-revoked-1.684277

Jihadist backers apparently includue well known F-15 buyers and even members of NATO.

quote:

US national security adviser HR McMaster condemned Qatar and Turkey for taking on a “new role” as the main sponsors and sources of funding for extremist Islamist ideology that targets western interests.

“Radical Islamist ideology is a grave threat to all civilised people,” Gen McMaster said.

The US national security adviser said this threat has been identified “myopically” in the past.

“We didn’t pay enough attention to how it’s [radical Islamist ideology] being advanced through charities, madrassas and other social organisations."

While Gen McMaster made reference to Saudi Arabia's support for some of these organisations decades ago, he singled out Qatar and Turkey as main supporters at present. “[It] is now done more by Qatar, and by Turkey," he said.

He claimed Turkey's growing problems with the West were largely a result of the rise of the Justice and Development Party, to which president Recep Tayyip Erdogan belongs.

In a rare public policy appearance with his British counterpart Mark Sedwill at an event hosted by the Policy Exchange think tank in Washington, Gen McMaster revealed that US president Donald Trump will roll out his latest national security strategy on Monday.

Four “vital national interests” would be prioritised. These are protecting the homeland and American people, advancing American prosperity, preserving peace through strength, and advancing American influence.

Appointed to lead the National Security Council in February, Gen McMaster said the approach would contest three big threats to US interests globally. Two of these have had a major impact on the Middle East.

China and Russia are viewed by the White House “as revisionist powers” encroaching on US allies and undermining the international order. Another tier of danger was described as rogue regimes, such as Iran and North Korea, which “support terror and are seeking weapons of mass destruction”.

The third threat came from extremist Islamist organisations.

_______________

Read more:

Putin joins Erdogan in condemning Jerusalem decision during trip to Turkey

How those who push 'harmful' agendas are losing ground

_______________

Gen McMaster struck a hawkish tone on Russia. He said: “We are facing a threat from Russia that involves also so-called new generation warfare.

"These are very sophisticated campaigns of subversion and disinformation, and propaganda, using cybertools operating across multiple domains that attempt to divide our communities within our nations."

General McMaster said: “We are facing a threat from Russia that involves also so-called new generation warfare." Alexei Nikolsky / Sputnik / Kremlin Pool/ EPA
General McMaster said: “We are facing a threat from Russia that involves also so-called new generation warfare." Alexei Nikolsky / Sputnik / Kremlin Pool/ EPA
Gen McMaster called himself a “big fan” of the review conducted by former British diplomat Sir John Jenkins in 2015 about the topic. The review - which the UK government did not make public - is believed to warn of the threat of political Islam.

He added that the Trump administration is committed to countering extremist ideologies and funding and referred to the centre established during the US president’s visit to Saudi Arabia. It is a “big problem when Islamist radical ideology bridges into political Islam,” he said.

While stressing that not all the Muslim Brotherhood branches were alike, he urged to build opposition groups that respect individual freedoms, and in order to avoid another “Morsi model” in reference to former Egyptian president overthrown in 2013. Gen McMaster said that the Brotherhood operated clandestinely and monopolised opposition after the street upheavals and fall of Hosni Mubarak in 2011.

The other model that Gen McMaster identified with the Brotherhood is Turkey’s AKP. “By operating through civil society, they consolidate power through one party, sadly it is a problem contributing to Turkey’s drift from the West" he said.

On Iran, Gen McMaster described the government in Tehran as a “rogue regime also and a revisionist regional power” and said “We need to counter destabilising activity especially in Syria” as well as blocking support for its proxies and its paths to nuclear weapons. He also advocated looking for sanctions outside the nuclear deal, and abandoning the Barack Obama approach that made the deal itself a focal point of the strategy toward Iran.

Gen McMaster ended the conversation abruptly by saying “I have a phone call I absolutely have to take” but only after emphasising that US is not seeking regime change in North Korea.

"That's not our policy. What we are emphasising is the de-nuclearisation of the peninsula,” he said.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Am I the only one that thinks that is nuts in terms of geopolitical strategy? I mean calling one of your allies, which you have shared tons of expensive technology with, essentially a threat is well...a bit foolhardy.

Ardennes fucked around with this message at 07:55 on Dec 14, 2017

Toplowtech
Aug 31, 2004

Ardennes posted:

Am I the only one that thinks that is nuts in terms of geopolitical strategy?
Lol, nope.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
Today's the anniversary of one of the few true Iraqi heroes

https://twitter.com/haymarketbooks/status/941170887902064640

Immediately after doing this he was thoroughly tortured with electrical cables by Maliki, but he found an opening to escape captivity and fled Iraq to recover.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Ardennes posted:

Am I the only one that thinks that is nuts in terms of geopolitical strategy? I mean calling one of your allies, which you have shared tons of expensive technology with, essentially a threat is well...a bit foolhardy.

I wouldn't have voluntarily said the things he said in public as a government official, but I think it's increasingly clear that Turkey isn't really an ally anymore, whatever a treaty may say. The US shares some of that responsibility of course, but Erdogan hasn't been shy about attacking the US in public statements, and there really was some degree of complicity and probably even assistance between Turkey and ISIS at one point.

I think it's easier for people to accept that Erdogan isn't an ally (as others could reasonably say Trump isn't an ally of a number of countries) while the Turkish state still is, but at this point Erdogan pretty much is the Turkish state, and trying to maintain the polite fiction that everything is fine despite that tension is going to be increasingly untenable even if we want to do that.

Dr Kool-AIDS fucked around with this message at 10:18 on Dec 14, 2017

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Sinteres posted:

I wouldn't have voluntarily said the things he said in public as a government official, but I think it's increasingly clear that Turkey isn't really an ally anymore, whatever a treaty may say. The US shares some of that responsibility of course, but Erdogan hasn't been shy about attacking the US in public statements, and there really was some degree of complicity and probably even assistance between Turkey and ISIS at one point.

I think it's easier for people to accept that Erdogan isn't an ally (as others could reasonably say Trump isn't an ally of a number of countries) while the Turkish state still is, but at this point Erdogan pretty much is the Turkish state, and trying to maintain the polite fiction that everything is fine despite that tension is going to be increasingly untenable even if we want to do that.

The issue is while the rifts are clear, it really doesn't make sense to point to them and antagonize Turkey and Erdogan further, especially with charges that could far easily be applied to the Saudis. The US and NATO actually need (or needed I guess) Turkey on our side, especially if Russia is doing whatever it can to replace us. Not since 1453 has Moscow found a friendly power on the Bosphorus. Of course, there is also the issue of making an enemy that is still fully part of the West's central alliance structure including intelligence and technological sharing. Even if we wanted to kick Turkey out, there isn't a legal mechanism to do so and in all honesty, I don't know if the Europeans would back us.

Also, trying to separate Erdogan and Turkey also at this point just makes adds credence to theories that we were behind the coup. Also, honestly, Erdogan's control over the Turkish political system isn't showing any signs of slipping. Also, Qatar was also thrown under the bus because I guess we need to back MbS and his plans, no matter how stupid they are.

mediadave
Sep 8, 2011

Cat Mattress posted:

America's inept foreign policy managed to create a Turkey-Iran axis and an Israel-KSA axis. And Saudi Arabia's inept bullying has pushed Qatar in the arms of Iran.

Congrats.


Quick map.


Red and blue: the two blocks.
Purple: disputed areas of influence. Iran seems to be winning those.
Green: countries that are trying not to attract too much attention so that they don't get involved in the mess, but if they have to choose, they'll probably side with Saudi Arabia.

What do you think?

I don't think I would put Egypt in the Saudi block on this. The Egyptian Generals have been very friendly towards Iran in the recent past, to the extent of verbally (and possibly materially) supporting the Assad regime.

GaussianCopula
Jun 5, 2011
Jews fleeing the Holocaust are not in any way comparable to North Africans, who don't flee genocide but want to enjoy the social welfare systems of Northern Europe.
The Turkey-Iran pact doesn't seem very stable to me. Sure, they are both opposed to Trump's agenda (who isn't) but to me it's more a 3 way fight between Turkey, Iran and KSA for regional supremacy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fizzil
Aug 24, 2005

There are five fucks at the edge of a cliff...



Cat Mattress posted:

America's inept foreign policy managed to create a Turkey-Iran axis and an Israel-KSA axis. And Saudi Arabia's inept bullying has pushed Qatar in the arms of Iran.

Congrats.


Quick map.


Red and blue: the two blocks.
Purple: disputed areas of influence. Iran seems to be winning those.
Green: countries that are trying not to attract too much attention so that they don't get involved in the mess, but if they have to choose, they'll probably side with Saudi Arabia.

What do you think?

Jordan should be blue, they are a stooge country like bahrain which also should be blue.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply