|
Bribase posted:Theres already enough out there that the people in the know trying to find the leak will know its been spilled. So cut the pretense and just say it. Who says there is just one tin of beans to spill? Mayhaps there are numerous juicy beany tins? And furthermore. 
PederP fucked around with this message at 18:18 on Dec 13, 2017 |
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 21:52 |
|
|
Codezombie posted:I've done it for the daily totals. I'll play more with it later;  As anomaly;  Hav fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Dec 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:Reminds me of the suit Zenimax filed against John Carmack, saying he took ideas developed while working for them when he went over to Oculus. I think Oculus lost that to the tune of $500 millo, not that it stopped them. Or bought by Amazon because Amazon is hungry.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
The Crytek Complaint posted:15. On November 20, 2012, Crytek and Defendants entered into a Game Oooh... Ortwin might be in trouble...
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Speaking of lawsuits:quote:In September 2017, Philipp Schulz requested a refund of more than $24,000 from the team working on Star Citizen. Today, more than 80 days later, he has yet to receive the requested amount in full, or compensation for the legal fees he has incurred since that date, Schulz says. https://www.polygon.com/2017/12/13/16767590/star-citizen-refund
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
MinorInconvenience posted:Oooh... Ortwin might be in trouble... 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
Hav posted:I'll play more with it later; Sorry that should be I've done it for the *MONTHLY* totals, not daily. OP has been altered to reflect that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
This is Logic Sol's space court opportunity to shout 'OBJECTION' and then be all 'Actually I think you'll find they are now using Starengine so this case is DISMISSED YOUR MAJESTY  ' and then gesture to Messi Knessi who is sat wallowing in a green cloud in the corner 'MY I PRESENT EXHIBIT A - Our Reddit archive, Mr Knessi if you will...'
peter gabriel fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Dec 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:This is Logic Sol's space court opportunity to shout 'OBJECTION' and then be all 'Actually I think you'll find they are now using Starengine so this case id DISMISSED YOUR MAJESTY But the archive was closed! All that work, lost, just as they need it most.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:19
|
|
|
MinorInconvenience posted:Oooh... Ortwin might be in trouble... Looks like we might get some hot space court action. What you quoted is fairly brutal.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:21
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
Derek's thread has been deleted and replaced with one that doesn't link his twitter. https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/7jkocy/crytek_gmbh_v_cloud_imperium_games_corp_et_al/?st=jb5bot5k&sh=b4789a2b
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:But the archive was closed! All that work, lost, just as they need it most. Actually it was made read only as Derek's involvement is now irrelevant with the release of 3.0
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
Codezombie posted:Sorry that should be I've done it for the *MONTHLY* totals, not daily. OP has been altered to reflect that. Doesn't really matter, although the dataset itself is small. It's basically predicated on a set probability for the first digit being '1'. Larger datasets would be better, but this one is fun enough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:23
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:But the archive was closed! All that work, lost, just as they need it most. Like tears in rain....again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:23
|
|
|
quote:COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20960362 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Crytek GmbH. (Attorney Kevin James Minnick added to party Crytek GmbH(pty:pla))(Minnick, Kevin) 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
Hav posted:Doesn't really matter, although the dataset itself is small. It's basically predicated on a set probability for the first digit being '1'. Larger datasets would be better, but this one is fun enough. The daily totals are in that link I posted, but only as running totals, so its a bit more work to calculate the deltas, not impossible, but slightly more effort. If I can be arsed I'll whip up a bit of code that extracts the hourly pledges from the running totals. But it won't be till I get home tonight and have a free hour or so. Codezombie fucked around with this message at 18:29 on Dec 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
Christ, that makes the Bug smasher guy look somewhat healthy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
Amazon buys Star Citizen. Amazon fires Chris Roberts. Amazon releases Star Citizen a few years later in a massively scaled down form with private servers. Freelancer 2 finally delivered.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:I'm sure they haven't used CryEngine for ages, so don't know how they could be done for breach of copyri...oh.... Remember how I wrote a blog saying they really didn't switch? ----------------
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Crytek v. CIG (Uploaded by qwints): https://www.scribd.com/document/367101474/Crytek-v-CIG
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
Hav posted:Doesn't really matter, although the dataset itself is small. It's basically predicated on a set probability for the first digit being '1'. Larger datasets would be better, but this one is fun enough. Ignore me, I'm talking shite, again, it *is* the daily totals... *sigh* I'm thinking about extracting the *hourly* totals, and got confused. In my defense I'm writing a frequency analysis window routine, and posting during test runs, so I'm a bit distracted.  (my actual defense, clearly, is I'm an idiot)
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
so I guess it wasn't turbulent that was owed all those back dollars based on a SC release in 2017 or maybe that will be a separate lawsuit lol giving you the slow clap over here derek. I even have my assistant standing up with me doing it o7 commando
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:34
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:Derek's thread has been deleted and replaced with one that doesn't link his twitter. I don't want to bother quoting any of this. The whole thing is gold. Read it right now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:35
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:Crytek v. CIG (Uploaded by qwints): https://www.scribd.com/document/367101474/Crytek-v-CIG Look at all this delicious dirt.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
It's such delicious karma that CIG are planning a huge Squadron 42 marketing blitz.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:Crytek v. CIG (Uploaded by qwints): https://www.scribd.com/document/367101474/Crytek-v-CIG I'm so hard right now
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:Crytek v. CIG (Uploaded by qwints): https://www.scribd.com/document/367101474/Crytek-v-CIG lol at everything 'but but they are using starengine!!!' the backers cry - 'gently caress YOU NERD' replies Ironside
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:Crytek v. CIG (Uploaded by qwints): https://www.scribd.com/document/367101474/Crytek-v-CIG Yeah this is serious. I only deal with this sort of thing from the view of some work working as a coder, but *each and everytime* I provide a build, assets or even a drat code snippet, to a trusted middleware developer (usually Audiokinetic) I check that our legal agreements still stands with said developer. This is *serious* business, and if Crytek's complaints are true, then CIG is in deep doo doo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
This looks like an honest to Smart E.L.E from an unexpected angle. If those documents have any truth to them, CIG have been monumentally brazen and stupid about their license.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:Derek's thread has been deleted and replaced with one that doesn't link his twitter. "Derek's thread"? I didn't create any such thread. ----------------
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
Quoting the poo poo out of this, cause I want.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:"Derek's thread"? I didn't create any such thread. I think they meant the thread which linked directly to your tweet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:45
|
|
|
Codezombie posted:Ignore me, I'm talking shite, again, it *is* the daily totals... *sigh* Yeah, I got two digits into the daily analysis and thought, 'this seems familiar'. I was getting deep into google sheets and I should write something better. "Section 2.1.2 of the GLA contained a promise by Defendants to use CryEngine for the development of only one video game." lol quote:22. Ha, it bit them on the rear end.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
So for once the big deal is actually kind of a big deal. Impressive!
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
this is bad. like really badquote:Section 2.1.2 of the GLA expressly states that CIG has a license only to "embed CryEngine in the Game and develop the Game." The GLA limits the use of the CryEngine computer program to a single video game called Star Citizen. lol at CIG hoisting themselves from their own petard
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
Someone post this poo poo on r/Games, that'll really stir up some poo poo! God I loving love this thread/game.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
Bravo Derek! You deserve a “called it” Scooby Snack.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:this is bad. like really bad Super atomic auto-wedgie. quote:Chris Roberts publicly sought to minimize Crytek's contribution to Star Citizen, stating that "we don't call [the video game engine] CryEngine anymore, we call it Star Engine" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDROliuDczo). HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA quote:On May 6, 2015, Defendants began posting a series of videos online titled "Bugsmashers." The videos contain excerpts of information from CryEngine that were confidential, in breach of the GLA, and should not have been shown to the public. The series continues today. I take everything back, this is amazeballs. Hav fucked around with this message at 18:50 on Dec 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 21:52 |
|
|
Hav posted:
Good, gently caress em all the greedy twats
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:49
|
|