Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Tender Bender
Sep 17, 2004

Milky Moor posted:

Everything I see seems to indicate that loving TLJ comes with a deep sense of bringing contemporary views to it, as opposed to enjoying the Star Wars universe for what it... was. I was going to say 'is' but that's not true anymore.

Luke is a hermit who hosed everything up? Uh, yeah, because this is 2017 and there's no heroes!
Poe is something to do with toxic masculinity, maybe? Yeah, because that's important in 2017!
The First Order are both jokes who we open a movie with 'dunking on' and incredibly scary existential threats? Because they're the alt-right!
Poe, Finn and Rose actively make the existing situation worse? This is 2017, there is no hope!
Heapings of jokes and inconsistencies? What're you, some kind of nerd? It's 2017, you should know what to expect.


It's like how you can find thinkpieces saying things like 'THE LIST OF TIMES THE LAST JEDI TOLD STAR WARS TO EAT poo poo'.

There's this certain smug meanness towards the old Star Wars (well, really, more directed to this shoggoth-like idea of 'Star Wars fans or Star Wars nerds') which, for better or worse, was born from the mind of one man. "This isn't your Star Wars anymore, which was really bad. This is Disney Star Wars now, and it's good, and we're going to make a movie every year!" It's such a dour, cynical loving film. Rey is less a character and more a symbol. The Last Jedi is less a film and more a symbol of, well, whatever Star Wars is going to become.


I love Star Wars and love TLJ, how do I fit into your formula

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MasterSlowPoke
Oct 9, 2005

Our courage will pull us through

Tender Bender posted:

I love Star Wars and love TLJ, how do I fit into your formula

I believe the phrase is Uncle Owen.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Tender Bender posted:

I love Star Wars and love TLJ, how do I fit into your formula

Ditto. This one had some awesome action scenes. Probably more than any other Star Wars.

Goffer
Apr 4, 2007
"..."

Penpal posted:

Almond

e - wait... do almonds have titties???

A traveller was walking along the road to Thebes when he was stopped by a fearsome Sphinx. “I shall let you pass if you can answer my riddle,” the Sphinx said. “Uhhh” the traveller replied “I’m kind of in a hurry right now”. “Dude I will kill you if you don’t answer it,” the beast encouraged, so the traveller agreed to answer the riddle.

“how do they make almond milk?” the Sphinx queried. “those lil nuts are dry as hell and hard as, fuckin… uhh.. the Devil’s rear end,” he continued. “So what the gently caress.” The traveller was about to call him a dumbass, and ask him if he had a human brain or a cat brain because his riddle sucked so bad it could only have been thought of by either a hugely mentally challenged toddler or an animal when another traveller appeared. “Whoa,” said the Sphinx. “There’s never been two at once.”

“Can I go?” asked the first traveller impatiently, and the second traveller pretended to be listening to music. “fuckin, no,” the Sphinx said, “just gimme a minute… you both have to answer it. But you’re not allowed to listen to each other. You have to both know the answer.” At this the travellers protested and told the Sphinx to gently caress off and gently caress his own rear end, but the Sphinx loosed a mighty roar.

“Silence!” he yelled, and the two travellers fell silent. “WHo’s got some parchment,” the Sphinx asked, and the travellers dug around in their backpacks until they found a bit of parchment. The Sphinx repeated his question. The travellers wrote down their answers and handed them to him. “when it’s young the nut is moist” he read from both. “Ah yea… got it. That makes sense. Aight seeya.” As the travellers disappeared up the road, one of them turned back and yelled “just like your mum’s pussy!!” And the Sphinx let out a great cry of anguish, for he had been Owned

Lord Hydronium
Sep 25, 2007

Non, je ne regrette rien


There’s an underlying assumption in your post that Luke in ROTJ is the apotheosis of his character, rather than just another stage in the overall story of his life. Other than not having any sequels entirely (which is a pointless hypothetical to discuss anyway, about as useless as people writing their fanfiction of how they’d do the prequels), there’s simply no way to maintain Luke in that end of ROTJ stasis. And nor should there be; I personally want something set past ROTJ to tell me how Luke has evolved since that time, not simply stayed a preternaturally wise and compassionate Jedi saint.

All this is to say that I disagree that Luke at the end of TLJ has gotten back to where he was in ROTJ. He’s better. Luke by the end of ROTJ had had to face a lot of things, but never his own failure, at least in any sense that went beyond impacting him personally. And he had never had to be a teacher, to fail or succeed at that. The Luke at the end of TLJ has learned about failure, and he’s learned about the limits of failure - Kylo’s decisions were his own, and Luke doesn’t bear responsibility for that because he screwed up once. And he’s succeeded in Rey. After his darkest moment, in the depths of his self-pity, he’s still able to be the teacher she needs and start the next generation of Jedi.

You say that the sequels could have been a story about the young people facing their own challenges unrelated to the older generation, but that’s not really the kind of story Star Wars is. Star Wars is about young people fixing the mistakes of the previous generation, and learning from their failures. The failure of the OT heroes, at least in the view of the sequels, is about as mild as you can get - they failed to live up to their own legends. They can’t solve all the problems, they can’t be perfect parents or perfect teachers or perfect Jedi saints, and learning to live with that and face the consequences is part of the journey of the old guard and the new.


Milky Moor posted:

Everything I see seems to indicate that loving TLJ comes with a deep sense of bringing contemporary views to it, as opposed to enjoying the Star Wars universe for what it... was.
I love Star Wars and I love TLJ as a reaffirmation of that.

E: Like, I loved Rogue One and I think that movie has a lot more depth than people give it credit for, but this is the most excited I've been about Star Wars and what direction it's going to go in since...I dunno, the prequels ended.

Lord Hydronium fucked around with this message at 07:07 on Dec 20, 2017

Baku
Aug 20, 2005

by Fluffdaddy

Milky Moor posted:

Everything I see seems to indicate that loving TLJ comes with a deep sense of bringing contemporary views to it

So is hating it. Everyone brings "contemporary views" to how they watch movies. You are not an island, and these films were produced in the context of our culture for consumption by people who are a part of it, just like the original films and prequels were.

A lot of peoples' politics are informing how they view the new Star Wars films, and you're in abject denial if you think that's limited to the people who like them.

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!

Lord Krangdar posted:

TLJ is not a mess, its about a messy situation.

A plot of 1 hour is not particularly messy.

Unmature
May 9, 2008
I haven't loved Star Wars for a long time and TLJ reminded me that I do. It's exactly what I needed to continue being a fan.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Cnut the Great posted:

I really don't think "It's okay to make mistakes, you know" is such a grand, majestic, and deeply interesting theme that it justifies a boring two-hour retread of ANH followed by a weird structural mess of a movie about Luke turning out to be a sad depressed failure who's basically responsible for loving up the entire galaxy again after the optimistic and uplifting ending of ROTJ, only to "redeem" himself by becoming a hologram for a few minutes and briefly distracting some pouty goober so like twenty people can run out the back door, and then dying. Luke ultimately isn't the one who has to fix all his mistakes--Rey is. In the end, Luke didn't do any better than his elders. But that he did do better than his elders is the entire point of the original story, and what makes it so powerful.

I'm guessing some people will come and start telling me how it's all such a brilliant, realistic portrayal of flawed humanity, but I feel like we already got that in spades and to retread that theme with Luke does nothing but diminish the emotional appeal of the story. To me, Star Wars is a fairy tale about a boy becoming a man by fixing the mistakes of his parents and building a brighter future for everyone. I would have preferred an ST that was about his children having to take on the responsibility of preserving that future and dealing with new challenges in the process. Let Luke have his accomplishments, he earned them. Taking a happy thing and turning it dark and depressing doesn't automatically make a story good, bold, adult, or subversive. Sometimes it just diminishes everything that came before it and transforms a fairy tale into something unnecessarily cynical.

TLJ's take on Luke isn't the genius, virtuoso move by an iconoclast visionary that people are making it out to be. It's just Rian Johnson trying to make the best of the poorly thought-out status quo he was given. Maybe they should have spent less time tearing down Luke just so they could build him back up to his ROTJ self again, and more time building a strong arc for Rey, who still doesn't really have one.


e:


The moment Ben "turned" I immediately knew exactly what was going to happen afterward: Rey was going to go, "Yeah, all right, let's go and be good together!" and Ben was going to go "No I'm actually still evil!" The only twists that couldn't be predicted in this movie were the plot mechanical ones, like Snoke getting killed. Obviously Ben wasn't going to be redeemed, because that's what happened in TESB. The movie tried so hard to be unpredictable that it was actually pretty predictable. That's what I mean when I say it adheres almost as hard to the OT movies as TFA, only from a different direction.
Hey, I've been making GBS threads on a lot of people who didn't like the movie for what I feel are bad or misguided reasons, and I just want to say that while I disagree with a lot of this, you at least dislike the movie for reasons beyond "a man got proven wrong," or "science doesn't work that way," and so I just have no argument for you, because it's an honest disagreement, and that makes me feel pretty good, really.

I know that's weird, because opinions and the internet, but I think you're making some really excellent points that have nothing to do with bad faith even though I disagree with some of their conclusions. Except that last bit about Rey and Luke. That's a bit of a silver bullet. Oof. I do wish Rey's story didn't climax with Luke and Yoda.

Anyway, it's refreshing to see an honest disagreement.

Ammanas
Jul 17, 2005

Voltes V: "Laser swooooooooord!"
Just wanna say I appreciate cnuts posts, they're elaborating my feelings almost perfectly.

Also all this talk about how Tlj makes star wars contemporary or brings star wars to 2017 is loving repulsive. Star wars should exist out of time like all great fables/heroes journeys/epics

2017 loving blows and will be remembered as a deep dark time continuing from a deep dark time that began 9/11/2001

Ammanas fucked around with this message at 10:11 on Dec 20, 2017

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Luke Skywalker is a hero and did very heroic things in this new film right there with the other heroic things in this film. I'm sorry you cannot see these things.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

CelticPredator posted:

Luke Skywalker is a hero and did very heroic things in this new film right there with the other heroic things in this film. I'm sorry you cannot see these things.
Also true.

ShineDog
May 21, 2007
It is inevitable!

CelticPredator posted:

Luke Skywalker is a hero and did very heroic things in this new film right there with the other heroic things in this film. I'm sorry you cannot see these things.

I'd go so far as to say luke is at his MOST heroic in this movie. He's at his least heroic too. He has an arc, it's ok.

Cat Machine
Jun 18, 2008

ShineDog posted:

I'd go so far as to say luke is at his MOST heroic in this movie. He's at his least heroic too. He has an arc, it's ok.
He also managed to do it all without resorting to violence, it's very much in-line with the end of ROTJ

Evilpiggie
Feb 22, 2009
Good Lord, it felt like the story structure was a bit all over the place, especially in second act.

unlawfulsoup
May 12, 2001

Welcome home boys!
What a mess.

I am sort of in the HITB camp of my feelings being it's complicated. There were some interesting elements and it seems like at times wants to break the mold, but jesus christ what a mess. Like this was a first draft script of someone who was ambitious but clueless. Then they just shrugged and said gently caress it, let's get to filming, gotta make Xmas season. I don't even know where they can go from here that isn't another sort of uninspired loop.

Ren is the strongest character and they tease an interesting idea of having some ambiguity with the force. The film should have embraced it and gone head on with him and Rey. It would have been ballsy and would have made for a more interesting premise. Instead we got a dozen meandering plots that really just lead to the weakest reset button the series has had yet.

Part of me thinks you can probably salvage a little better film by making a fan edit that trims some of the excess fat to at least make the film flow better. Meh.

unlawfulsoup fucked around with this message at 12:00 on Dec 20, 2017

kater
Nov 16, 2010

Evilpiggie posted:

Good Lord, it felt like the story structure was a bit all over the place, especially in second act.

I'm pretty sure the film has like seven acts.

teagone
Jun 10, 2003

That was pretty intense, huh?

Cnut the Great posted:

TLJ's take on Luke isn't the genius, virtuoso move by an iconoclast visionary that people are making it out to be. It's just Rian Johnson trying to make the best of the poorly thought-out status quo he was given. Maybe they should have spent less time tearing down Luke just so they could build him back up to his ROTJ self again, and more time building a strong arc for Rey, who still doesn't really have one.

While I agree Rey could have been given more of a developmental arc in TLJ, I thought grumpy iconoclast Luke was great. Even better so is the reveal of how Ben managed to shake up his ethos. I really loved how the film presented Luke having this fleeting moment of Skywalker weakness, realizing that he had the power to wipe out the darkness he sensed in Ben from the universe forever. Really felt that was a great challenge to his character; the dark path is the quicker, easier, more seductive solution but Luke managed to rise above that, naturally. He was never going to just murder his nephew, but the fact that there even was a thought like that I felt was a good and interesting expansion of the character that justifies his change in worldview. How this action tragically hosed with Ben's worldview as a consequence and shaped Kylo Ren made for a really satisfying confrontation between the two on Crait.

quote:

The moment Ben "turned" I immediately knew exactly what was going to happen afterward

Good for you! I was too caught up in the moment of how great that throne room brawl was that the film really had me thinking Ben actually came back to the light. Imagine my excitement when that's not what happened because I lacked the foresight to see it.

Tender Bender
Sep 17, 2004

Ammanas posted:

Just wanna say I appreciate cnuts posts, they're elaborating my feelings almost perfectly.

Also all this talk about how Tlj makes star wars contemporary or brings star wars to 2017 is loving repulsive. Star wars should exist out of time like all great fables/heroes journeys/epics

2017 loving blows and will be remembered as a deep dark time continuing from a deep dark time that began 9/11/2001

Buddy... What do you think the original movies were?

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

euphronius posted:

That one comedy remix of the prequels is really good. I forget what it's called but c3po is evil and hilarious.

"Friend Besto" is a lot funnier to me than it really should be.

That Dang Dad
Apr 23, 2003

Well I am
over-fucking-whelmed...
Young Orc

Jewmanji posted:

Another critical component of the OT (and to a lesser degree the PT) that really feels notably absent in TFA and TLJ is the wonderful settings. ESB in particular has incredible sets throughout the film. Echo base, Dagobah, the carbon freezing chamber and the air shaft are totally iconic. Between TFA and TLJ there's very little that feels uniquely imaginative in a way that isn't a tired riff on an existing set from the OT.

Canto Bight was pretty interesting, but the pace of it (and its general uselessness to the overall plot) made it feels somewhat frenetic and unmemorable. The characters move through the casino floor, but nothing much happens in that space, and the jail is completely vapid. The costuming on the guards was pretty good though.

Do you think this might be because we've seen unique settings for 30 years in between the OT and now? I'm not being snarky, I'm genuinely curious your take. I thought Snoke's Throne Room, the Red Crystal caves, Casino World, and Jedi Island Complete With Dark Side Void Hole were all really cool to look at and interesting to think about (I love old temples and the Casino world seemed like it has more to explore). But, I feel like after the OT, then the PT, plus films like Fifth Element, Interstellar, Arrival, and Guardians of the Galaxy and others, we've seen tons of crazy alien places and planets. Not that new creative ideas can't come along, but I wonder if at a certain point, any "grounded" alien world is going to always feel like a reference to an older one.

I guess we'll see when Wrinkle in Time comes out.

Empress Brosephine
Mar 31, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
I feel like I missed something but whats the reason exactly WHY Rey cares at all about the rebellion and didn't join Kylo?

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Finn and Han

UmOk
Aug 3, 2003

Empress Brosephine posted:

I feel like I missed something but whats the reason exactly WHY Rey cares at all about the rebellion and didn't join Kylo?

I think maybe if you look at her personal experiences with each side in the 2015 film "The Force Awakens" it will become clear.

Al Cu Ad Solte
Nov 30, 2005
Searching for
a righteous cause

Empress Brosephine posted:

I feel like I missed something but whats the reason exactly WHY Rey cares at all about the rebellion and didn't join Kylo?

Because she isn't a selfish weirdo rear end in a top hat and thinks genocide isn't cool.

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

Cnut the Great posted:

Long Cnut Post

Yeah even though I liked TLJ I think you're spot on here. My immediate impression on walking out of the movie was that Rian Johnson had "Power Rangers Fan-Filmed" Star Wars. Y'all remember that Youtube video like, a long while back that was a super serious take on Power Rangers? It went pretty viral, I think for a lot of the same reasons some people who like TFA like it: to their eyes, Star Wars finally "caught up" with pop culture in age and that is seen as a good thing

Seriously though, if any of you who liked TLJ's deconstructions are into that sort of thing, revisit the prequels with an open mind; they do a lot of really lovely and interesting things but from within the Lucas-ian Star Wars world

Arist
Feb 13, 2012

who, me?


Waffles Inc. posted:

Yeah even though I liked TLJ I think you're spot on here. My immediate impression on walking out of the movie was that Rian Johnson had "Power Rangers Fan-Filmed" Star Wars. Y'all remember that Youtube video like, a long while back that was a super serious take on Power Rangers? It went pretty viral, I think for a lot of the same reasons some people who like TFA like it: to their eyes, Star Wars finally "caught up" with pop culture in age and that is seen as a good thing

Seriously though, if any of you who liked TLJ's deconstructions are into that sort of thing, revisit the prequels with an open mind; they do a lot of really lovely and interesting things but from within the Lucas-ian Star Wars world

I feel like this is kind of a misread of why people like this movie, especially in regards to the Power Rangers thing.

Lord Krangdar
Oct 24, 2007

These are the secrets of death we teach.

Waffles Inc. posted:

Seriously though, if any of you who liked TLJ's deconstructions are into that sort of thing, revisit the prequels with an open mind; they do a lot of really lovely and interesting things but from within the Lucas-ian Star Wars world

Yeah that's why I liked TLJ so much, it used the main ideas of the Prequels to liven up the inert set-up of TFA.

Not sure about the other half of that post, though. Was the movie really so super serious?

Cnut the Great posted:

I really don't think "It's okay to make mistakes, you know" is such a grand, majestic, and deeply interesting theme that it justifies a boring two-hour retread of ANH followed by a weird structural mess of a movie about Luke turning out to be a sad depressed failure who's basically responsible for loving up the entire galaxy again after the optimistic and uplifting ending of ROTJ...


The ending of ROTJ is only optimistic because it cuts away before the real work of rebuilding the Republic starts. Which was a fine place to end that trilogy, don't get me wrong. But then the prequels showed us that the Republic was the Empire.

Lord Krangdar fucked around with this message at 15:35 on Dec 20, 2017

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

Arist posted:

I feel like this is kind of a misread of why people like this movie, especially in regards to the Power Rangers thing.

Not *everyone* who likes it likes it because of that--or maybe even knows that they do, that's not what I'm suggesting. But there's an undercurrent in the reviews of Last Jedi on some of the more contemporary online platforms that is an odd mix of liking star wars and simultaneously hating it??

I can see this is getting away from me a bit; I don't think the movie is serious, my analogy to the Power Rangers thing is that it brought in Power Rangers imagery into a new world with new rules, and I feel like TLJ does that.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Ironic detachment from authentic experience is a plague on our times.

Lord Krangdar
Oct 24, 2007

These are the secrets of death we teach.

Waffles Inc. posted:

Not *everyone* who likes it likes it because of that--or maybe even knows that they do, that's not what I'm suggesting. But there's an undercurrent in the reviews of Last Jedi on some of the more contemporary online platforms that is an odd mix of liking star wars and simultaneously hating it??

I an see it's getting away from me a bit; I don't think the movie is serious, my analogy to the Power Rangers thing is that it brought in Power Rangers imagery into a new world with new rules, and I feel like TLJ does that.

I don't hate Star Wars but I did hate seeing TFA's lifeless retread of past entries; the old movies are good but they already exist, we don't need them made again. Deconstruction isn't anything new in general, either, but like you said by the end of TLJ it feels like the world has changed, the rules have changed a little. Everything is a little more open-ended, a little more ambiguous.

Danger
Jan 4, 2004

all desire - the thirst for oil, war, religious salvation - needs to be understood according to what he calls 'the demonogrammatical decoding of the Earth's body'

Milky Moor posted:

Everything I see seems to indicate that loving TLJ comes with a deep sense of bringing contemporary views to it, as opposed to enjoying the Star Wars universe for what it... was. I was going to say 'is' but that's not true anymore.

Luke is a hermit who hosed everything up? Uh, yeah, because this is 2017 and there's no heroes!
Poe is something to do with toxic masculinity, maybe? Yeah, because that's important in 2017!
The First Order are both jokes who we open a movie with 'dunking on' and incredibly scary existential threats? Because they're the alt-right!
Poe, Finn and Rose actively make the existing situation worse? This is 2017, there is no hope!
Heapings of jokes and inconsistencies? What're you, some kind of nerd? It's 2017, you should know what to expect.


It's like how you can find thinkpieces saying things like 'THE LIST OF TIMES THE LAST JEDI TOLD STAR WARS TO EAT poo poo'.

There's this certain smug meanness towards the old Star Wars (well, really, more directed to this shoggoth-like idea of 'Star Wars fans or Star Wars nerds') which, for better or worse, was born from the mind of one man. "This isn't your Star Wars anymore, which was really bad. This is Disney Star Wars now, and it's good, and we're going to make a movie every year!" It's such a dour, cynical loving film. Rey is less a character and more a symbol. The Last Jedi is less a film and more a symbol of, well, whatever Star Wars is going to become.

So your criticism is that The Last Jedi reflects the current political climate? Star Wars was a pretty deeply political movie about the state of the world in which it was produced.

MasterSlowPoke
Oct 9, 2005

Our courage will pull us through

Cat Machine posted:

He also managed to do it all without resorting to violence, it's very much in-line with the end of ROTJ

Who started the fight with Rey after Luke found them cybering? I don't remember.

Tender Bender
Sep 17, 2004

Danger posted:

So your criticism is that The Last Jedi reflects the current political climate? Star Wars was a pretty deeply political movie about the state of the world in which it was produced.

He seems to be saying that art isn't influenced by or reflective of the context in which it's made, except for The Last Jedi which is egregiously ripped from the 2017 headlines... It's a confusing read that seems to misunderstand both TLJ and also, I guess, every other movie.

Also he's taking other people's half-baked critiques and attributing them to the movie, I think?

hiddenriverninja
May 10, 2013

life is locomotion
keep moving
trust that you'll find your way

MasterSlowPoke posted:

Who started the fight with Rey after Luke found them cybering? I don't remember.

Rey asked Luke, Luke dodged the question, Rey tells him to stop, Luke doesn't, she whacks him on the back on the head with her staff.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Star Wars (the original) is a weird fusion of grungy 70s looks and escapism that is very much out of step with new hollywood and late 70s despair and cynicism. I know some people (Jameson, Linda Hutcheon) put its retread of old genres (westerns, science fiction serials, Kurosawa) in the postmodern camp, but to me it seems like a bunch of nerds just wanting to do the stuff their nerd obsessions are built around.

Macdeo Lurjtux
Jul 5, 2011

BRRREADSTOOORRM!

Lord Krangdar posted:

The ending of ROTJ is only optimistic because it cuts away before the real work of rebuilding the Republic starts. Which was a fine place to end that trilogy, don't get me wrong. But then the prequels showed us that the Republic was the Empire.

It's one of the primary rules of story telling; the difference between a happy story and a sad one is where you put 'The End'.

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

business hammocks posted:

Star Wars (the original) is a weird fusion of grungy 70s looks and escapism that is very much out of step with new hollywood and late 70s despair and cynicism. I know some people (Jameson, Linda Hutcheon) put its retread of old genres (westerns, science fiction serials, Kurosawa) in the postmodern camp, but to me it seems like a bunch of nerds just wanting to do the stuff their nerd obsessions are built around.

My wife played this for me last night: Tom Shales' review of Star Wars for All Things Considered back in 1977

http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2015/12/14/star-wars

I love it because reading reviews of the OG movie gives us a fascinating look into how it was perceived, thematically

Tom Shales posted:

“It’s a complete science fiction fantasy with absolutely no redeeming moral values or moralistic values either.”

So I think you're right on the nose that it was outside of the "mainstream" late 70s cinema attitudes, especially given Stamberg's question essentially being, "it's not one THOSE sci fi films is it?"

In that light, it's fascinating to see praise for TLJ now 40 years later for essentially being of the zeitgeist instead of outside of it.

Not that I think this praise is bad, but the contrast is what I'm noting

Bulkiest Toaster
Jan 22, 2013

by R. Guyovich
TFA = remix of ANH and ESB
TLJ = remix of ESB and ROTJ

What we are ending up with in IX is sort of a neo OT setting with a new rebellion lead by Rey and friends against Kylo. I am guessing IX will have a few Jedi trained by Rey fighting the Knights of Ren and Kylo.

TLJ just took surface level risks to end up back at the status quo for Star Wars.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

It's not really a remix. It's a genre movie with some of the same characters. But when the genre is Star Wars I mean... what are you expecting. A film noire detective story ?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply