|
hobbesmaster posted:99%? Well, no, but it feels that way when the report has made it past the initial filters and isn't about widely used third party software. James Baud fucked around with this message at 06:15 on Dec 22, 2017 |
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 06:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 19:51 |
|
|
Jewel posted:scam email going around "from" paypal@paypal.com why does PayPal not have an spf policy configured with dkim signing?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 06:15
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:why does PayPal not have an spf policy configured with dkim signing? Which bank requires it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 07:36
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:why does PayPal not have an spf policy configured with dkim signing? it looks like it has an spf policy with softfail enabled and the last e-mail i got from them does have dkim headers so maybe this really was a legit e-mail that got missent
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 08:14
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:why does PayPal not have an spf policy configured with dkim signing? They were one of the first, I remember special Gmail support to indicate PayPal messages due to the proliferation of scams.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
vOv posted:it looks like it has an spf policy with softfail enabled and the last e-mail i got from them does have dkim headers please, paypal would never be so disorganized to make a helpdesk rep not know what sender address every single official email they send comes from
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:03
|
|
|
vOv posted:it looks like it has an spf policy with softfail enabled and the last e-mail i got from them does have dkim headers MrMoo posted:They were one of the first, I remember special Gmail support to indicate PayPal messages due to the proliferation of scams. yeah something else is going on here because otherwise this should have been rejected by even the most basic filter. but maybe this is mailsploit in the wild?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:14
|
|
|
An Open Letter on Why We’re Removing Usernames, Addressed to the Worst Ones We’ve Ever Seen What’s in a name? You see, DaddyzPrincess29*, we all have real names. Good, noble names that took weeks, perhaps months to choose— from Hannah to Jordan to Chloe. And what we’ve discovered, kinkyweedzz, is that those names are actually perfectly fine when it comes to connecting with people. So listen closely laidback___stu, because this applies to you — even if you are straight chilling right now on a basement futon. Before the new year, we’re removing OkCupid usernames. It’s starting with a test group and will soon be rolled out to everyone on OkCupid, so all users will need to update their profiles with their real names. We know, this is tough to hear — especially for StayingPawwsitive, Dootdootledootd0 and Britney__Tears. It’s because, like the recent goodbye we said to AIM screen names, it’s time to keep up with the times. We want you, BigDaddyFlash916, to go by who you are, and not be hidden beneath another layer of mystique. Even if that mystique is crucial to you and your dating life, unicorn__jizz.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:41
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Dootdootledootd0
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:52
|
|
|
idk i mean, i hate usernames as a concept because weve reached the point where its difficult to find a unique one, and we already have a unique property that we can use for logging in: email addresses get rid of them and dont show anything in their place
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:53
|
|
|
yes good i want my sex profile to be easily googleable by employers in the future thanks
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
this is kind of a unique case since the entire purpose of that service is to meet irl. you can be anonymous online all you want but okc cannot be online-only by its nature although if they do this they should robots.txt the entire site, yeah
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:57
|
|
|
it'll be like facebook, where the names are still fake, we just pretend they aren't. it's also going to leak a bunch of real names of old users though, and that's bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
also lol, just loving lol, if you don't call your friends by their irk nicks irl
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:01
|
|
|
Truga posted:it'll be like facebook, where the names are still fake, we just pretend they aren't. Yeah it’s gonna be a haven for creeps tracking down women that turn them down in messages. friends have shown me the creepy messages guys send and sometimes how they get pissed off when getting shut down or ignored. now imagine that weirdo knowing your real name and googling you to get “revenge” for shutting him down after he compared you to his favorite my little pony character. if I were a woman I’d be getting out of okc immediately
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:yes good i want my sex profile to be easily googleable by employers in the future thanks what if you're a porn star and they google your profile and are like "wtf this dingus hasn't had as nearly as much sex as we expect!!!" and then you get fired. that would suck but seriously, it's on the internet, little you can do to stop your employers or anyone else really from accessing it. what one would expect is that the government would institute regulations which make such information "unactionable" or whatever by your employer. also shoring up of unfair dismissal protections would be required to move the onus onto the employer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:05
|
|
|
Ripoff posted:Yeah it’s gonna be a haven for creeps tracking down women that turn them down in messages. friends have shown me the creepy messages guys send and sometimes how they get pissed off when getting shut down or ignored. now imagine that weirdo knowing your real name and googling you to get “revenge” for shutting him down after he compared you to his favorite my little pony character. Yeah, the level of stalking that's gonna result here will be terrifying.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:12
|
|
|
cheese-cube posted:what if you're a porn star and they google your profile and are like "wtf this dingus hasn't had as nearly as much sex as we expect!!!" and then you get fired. that would suck i just want the weird perverted poo poo attached to my name to at least be on the second page of google results so any HR person cursorily looking me up would give up before finding it is that too much to ask
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
lol having your real name on your okc profile is about a billion times worse than forcing real name in WoW or some poo poo, and look how long that lasted
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:17
|
|
|
I just want to remind everyone that merely having a Facebook or Twitter account as a woman basically deputizes a Mongol horde of creeps to send you threatening and disgusting messages unprompted, and if they can attach your name to that account they will absolutely mail you poo poo, call your work with made up accusations, and phone in false reports to your local police.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:20
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:i just want the weird perverted poo poo attached to my name to at least be on the second page of google results so any HR person cursorily looking me up would give up before finding it is that too much to ask before you apply for a job upload a bunch of erotic photos of yourself which includes signage for the company you're applying for. that way they'll know you're really really dedicated
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:20
|
|
|
cis autodrag posted:I just want to remind everyone that merely having a Facebook or Twitter account as a woman basically deputizes a Mongol horde of creeps to send you threatening and disgusting messages unprompted, and if they can attach your name to that account they will absolutely mail you poo poo, call your work with made up accusations, and phone in false reports to your local police. a lady friend at my last company made the mistake of making her steam handle incredibly vaguely feminine and boy howdy does she get the most vile loving poo poo whenever she plays any game. like it's not even very feminine it's more neutral than anything but jfc do nerds pick up on this poo poo like sharks smelling a drop of blood from miles away she finds it all hilarious and sad and just blocks em' or leaves so at least it's not causing her actual problems irl 
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:a lady friend at my last company made the mistake of making her steam handle incredibly vaguely feminine and boy howdy does she get the most vile loving poo poo whenever she plays any game. like it's not even very feminine it's more neutral than anything but jfc do nerds pick up on this poo poo like sharks smelling a drop of blood from miles away This is why my steam handle is the name of a male character I played in a cyberpunk campaign in college.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
Doesn’t Tinder / Bumble already require real names (or at least facebook-real names)? Still, the old account thing could screw people-hopefully they’ll do something smart like forcing you to opt-in before you show up on and can use the site again
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
wyoak posted:Doesn’t Tinder / Bumble already require real names (or at least facebook-real names)? Those apps at least require you to be in geographic proximity, rather than some mra unabomber from the internet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:38
|
|
|
cis autodrag posted:I just want to remind everyone that merely having a Facebook or Twitter account as a woman basically deputizes a Mongol horde of creeps to send you threatening and disgusting messages unprompted, and if they can attach your name to that account they will absolutely mail you poo poo, call your work with made up accusations, and phone in false reports to your local police. once corporate prisons start running out of people to jail for simple possession, i have an idea
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:44
|
|
|
wyoak posted:Doesn’t Tinder / Bumble already require real names (or at least facebook-real names)? first name only so youd have to cross reference the photos to be able to cyber stalk
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:An Open Letter on Why We’re Removing Usernames, Addressed to the Worst Ones We’ve Ever Seen 1) they're introducing facebook account validation, so whatever your facebook name is will get pushed to okc 2) it's a new freeform field but they'll make it validate against "real" names like Hannah or Jordan or Chloe 3) everyone has to use a credit card now and even if they don't charge you they'll use the name associated with it
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
duz posted:first name only so youd have to cross reference the photos to be able to cyber stalk That's a lot of 
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 18:35
|
|
|
so I just deployed a POC for Zscaler ZPA in about two hours. pretty slick tech, and we are finding more and more uses for it to provide a secure, seamless user access experience. is anyone using this in a production environment? so far it has delivered exactly as described, and the ease of use is ridiculous.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:okcupid doesn't currently do any validation against facebook like other dating sites/apps, so either #3 is great because iRacing does the same thing and someone got to drive around as "Cardholder Name" for a while
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 19:23
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:okcupid doesn't currently do any validation against facebook like other dating sites/apps, so either I just logged in to delete my account, and got prompted to provide a first name in a freeform field. I imagine they are going to validate in some way tho or its no different than a username
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
SA Forums...good security??? Tried to access the site with IE 3.02 on NT4 and was banned!
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
Raere posted:SA Forums...good security??? pretty sure that's just cloudflare
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:pretty sure that's just cloudflare yep
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:okcupid doesn't currently do any validation against facebook like other dating sites/apps, so either https://twitter.com/okcupid/status/944255764193038343 so why are they even doing this in the first place??? also i'm relieved i haven't gotten any creepy poo poo on my (non-work-linked, personal) twitter yet but i'm sure it's just a matter of time
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 23:50
|
|
|
vOv posted:so why are they even doing this in the first place??? I guess the "no, you have to use a real name" bit is scheduled for a year from now, because it causes less attrition to phase it in as several smaller changes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2017 00:07
|
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:I guess the "no, you have to use a real name" bit is scheduled for a year from now, because it causes less attrition to phase it in as several smaller changes. well apparently they have a first name/last name field so they're already 'ahead' of the game there. no clue if they do any validation on em
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
I bet they were panicking over their user name policy. I had an account before and closed it. The notice at that time said that user name would be unavailable ever again. They also limited special characters in user name fields.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2017 00:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 19:51 |
|
|
Raere posted:SA Forums...good security??? should have faked appearance as a webtv user imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2017 00:54
|
|
