|
I've seen the light!
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 02:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 09:37 |
|
|
The Titanic posted:Well in my unlawyer knowledge I’d try to imagine most litigations don’t include a “and if you do this our whole complaint will come crashing down teehee!” So I’d assume that CIG is also looking at the same contract for where CryTek also failed. Maybe try to prove unilateral failure and that it’s all a wash in the end. I am sure than CIG has been looking over that contract on a molecular level trying to find an out. If Derek is correct and they have been in talks for over a year now, then they know they do not have one. If so, then again I tender than any first year paralegal could have dug that clause up and presented it as a response to the complaint along with a motion to dismiss. Or better yet, they would have shown it to Crytek during those talks and told them to go pound salt up their rear end. It doesn't take Perry Mason to crack a witness stand confession to know that. A firm like Skadden is not going to allow something as careless as their client being at fault anywhere near a courtroom. They want a jury trial. They know the law is on their side and they want the courts to make it right. Another thing to consider is CIG. Take a look at how desperate they are for cash. Do you not think that if they had a leg up on CryTek that they wouldn't sue them instead? Why NOT do that and at the same time remove your liability by switching engines if you are in the right? I am sure the Mightly Ortwin Legalbegal could muster that up in his sleep.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:00
|
|
|
That's all very interesting, but what you fail to take into account is that Ortwin wrote a book thirty years ago. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:09
|
|
|
Virtual Captain posted:This is pathetic even for CIG. So what’s object container streaming? Should I be hyped about it like Face Over ip or the coats on the broken npc mission guy? Will this fix trading and enable a fun game?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:10
|
|
|
DapperDon posted:I am sure than CIG has been looking over that contract on a molecular level trying to find an out. If Derek is correct and they have been in talks for over a year now, then they know they do not have one. If so, then again I tender than any first year paralegal could have dug that clause up and presented it as a response to the complaint along with a motion to dismiss. Or better yet, they would have shown it to Crytek during those talks and told them to go pound salt up their rear end. It doesn't take Perry Mason to crack a witness stand confession to know that. A firm like Skadden is not going to allow something as careless as their client being at fault anywhere near a courtroom. They want a jury trial. They know the law is on their side and they want the courts to make it right. I get you.  But I was more interested in the possibility that CryTek was eventually helpless and simply couldn’t provide support because the requests were over the top impossible. At what point do you lose obligations to continue support when the questions are crazy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:21
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:I get you. Here is the interesting part of that. Where as CryTek is claiming that CIG has not sent them any engine updates as was a part of their deal, there can be nothing for them to support other than the branch of CryEngine that they were last on together. So the answer is pretty obvious that they cannot support something that they have no data on other than their own branch of engine. Just one more thing CIG's hubris has hamstrung them on.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:23
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:I get you. I'm almost 100% certain that is a thing that happened. CIG makes completely impossible requests due to Chris Roberts' cripping incompetence, and then tries to play it off as CryTek not being robust enough to catch up with CIG's cutting-edge abilities. Then they publicly smear CryTek's name by telling everyone they had to "improve" it into "StarEngine". The lies, incompetence, stupidity, and arrogance on CIG's part are so obvious it beggars belief. If this were any other timeline I'd say nobody would have been tricked by CIG's lies, but since we're in the Darkest Timeline, it seems $175 million was successfully defrauded by the flimsiest tall tale imaginable.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:23
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/CliffordakaMiku/status/949380430033293312 notacult
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:27
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year."
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:27
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:Build me brick by brick like one of your French women.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:27
|
|
|
Not even going to lie that March isn't anything more than a 3.0 polish patch. 3.1/Network update coming in the September update. So with the inevitable delay, we can expect '3.1' to be finished by December. This is good news for Star Citizen.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:28
|
|
|
G0RF posted:Well finally we get a “Keep-Doing-What-You’re-Doing” from Austin 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:32
|
|
|
🤣🤣🤣 And Chris will say "Truly, I tell you, one of you will betray me" during the dinner and all of them will get really sad and each will say "not me! I paid $350 to come hang out with you my Lord" and Chris replies "nah I'm just joking with you, it's actually me who has betrayed you all" and then gets up from the table with a sackful of silver and rides off into the distance to finance a remake of Dracula 2000 starring Vic's Mom. 🤣🤣🤣
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:33
|
|
|
Pixelate posted:I've seen the light!
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:33
|
|
|
didn't we already have a photoshop of chris at the last supper with ben as judas? I think we should if not
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:36
|
|
|
pew pew
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:38
|
|
|
Blue On Blue posted:didn't we already have a photoshop of chris at the last supper with ben as judas? I think it's safe to say that our resident Renaissance Art Master Galarox has probably done that one.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:38
|
|
|
Rabelais D posted:The cake that reads "Robert need more gold" should get some more love, as the Chinese either side is a qiyan (seven syllable per line) rhyming couplet: holy poo poo, isn't that cake from like 2012/13? The chinese called it first?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:51
|
|
|
Truga posted:holy poo poo, isn't that cake from like 2012/13? The chinese called it first? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:53
|
|
|
XK posted:Propofol is reversible, so they can put you under, then when they're done, they give you another shot and you wake up. There anesthesia is there additionally to enable biopsy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:54
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Go gently caress yourself. You get spoonfed details by some people on here to make it seem like you know poo poo then everyone gets to sit and giggle in the corner while you flail about like you think you know what you're talking about 1/4 of the time (and you're too stupid to realize it you dumbfuck).
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 03:59
|
|
|
Truga posted:holy poo poo, isn't that cake from like 2012/13? The chinese called it first? Oh. drat. Derek is not going to go for that one goddamned bit. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:02
|
|
|
Are there any gifs of Erris with his bowtie spinning?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:04
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/9xg9zcV.gifv
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:09
|
|
|
CrazyTolradi posted:Are there any gifs of Erris with his bowtie spinning? no but while I was digging up the cake translation post I found these from 3000 pages ago. Gotta use your imagination here + Spatial posted:I crafted a fantastic device. It will open a portal to another world. A world of dreams...
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:13
|
|
|
I'm only up to page 3392, but goddamn holy poo poo MoMA is in that amazing overlap of unknowledgeable and vocal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:24
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Courts tend not to grant them in cases where goods are taken from distribution. They tend to favor a trial and if the plaintiffs win, then the injunction gets granted. Um, obviously you're wrong here Derek, it's in both parties best interest to settle. And why would Epic want to drive Silicon Knights into bankruptcy? Businesses only care about money. Can't get anything from SK if you make them recall all their games. Also who in their right mind is going to use Unreal Engine if they go around suing their customers. Although I will admit you're absolutely right here, Amazon could be planning on bankrolling CIG's legal defence.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:38
|
|
|
Are there completionist packs for e-mail signups?  
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:38
|
|
|
It just occurred to me that the title should be "Skadden-fraud".
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:58
|
|
|
"We're focusing on dates, not features." *goes on to list the features they have planned for each patch, as if they've ever hit a date in their lives* I look forward to the bugfix* releases in July and November** *won't actually reduce the bug count **if CIG still exists by then
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 04:59
|
|
|
Isn't the dinner 1050? I thought it was 3 installments of 350.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:00
|
|
|
$350 for a seat. 3 waves of 20. 60 total. $21000 total. Only sold to concierge. Persons who have spent in excess of $1000. Event to be recorded, highlight reel to be released as a promotional piece. Expect wide eyed persons expressing amazement over what they've seen that CIG cannot otherwise trust with the general public.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:04
|
|
|
Virtual Captain posted:This is pathetic even for CIG. So CIG think they've invented the Scene Graph again? Why do they keep giving stupid names to things that already have names? The Titanic posted:So what’s object container streaming? Should I be hyped about it like Face Over ip or the coats on the broken npc mission guy? Will this fix trading and enable a fun game? As far as I can tell it's scene graphs and tree-based occlusion. techniques that have been around for at least a decade. SoftNum fucked around with this message at 05:12 on Jan 6, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:07
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:I'm only up to page 3392, but goddamn holy poo poo MoMA is in that amazing overlap of unknowledgeable and vocal. It's super glorious. My favorite was his suggestion that Skadden Arps was working on contingency. I had a friend who worked for Skadden Arps. They did not work on contingency.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:07
|
|
|
This is a horrible thing and it depresses me somehow that people see him like that and it’s not a huge joke that nobody in their right mind would actually consider doing or trying to recreate.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:09
|
|
|
Dusty Lens posted:$350 for a seat. WOW look at all the fun they're having, and ALL THE COOL stuff that they're privvy too now GEE I WISH i was a concierge member I better go sign up RIGHT NOW
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:09
|
|
|
Dusty Lens posted:$350 for a seat. the openest development that ever developed
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:11
|
|
|
You know how 90% of game development happens at the last 10% of a games completion? Well, Star Citizen isn't even 10% complete, so do the math lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 09:37 |
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Go gently caress yourself. You get spoonfed details by some people on here to make it seem like you know poo poo then everyone gets to sit and giggle in the corner while you flail about like you think you know what you're talking about 1/4 of the time (and you're too stupid to realize it you dumbfuck). 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2018 05:14
|
|
