Mr.Tophat posted:

proceed to fall and slam into mother earth harder than ... and more violently than any clipping found in the 'verse

Mr.Tophat posted:

I don't take hallucinogenics anymore for mental health reasons. Too risky for too little reward, and the knowledge of the risk might ruin the trip.

And yeah, what you say rings true. I guess it could be useful if someone's having a bad trip? "Here, smoke this, forget you saw Sandi's acting career on the ceiling and remarked, 'By God, it's full of stars...and one massive black hole.'"

trucutru posted:

Sorry, but I'm calling bullshit on this, terminal velocity is not enough. Have you installed nipple-jets on yourself?

Galarox posted:

This one was fun to do:

Mr.Tophat posted:

For two weeks, you have been asking: Who called it? This is Derek Smart speaking. I am the man who loves his blog. I am the man who does not sacrifice his verbosity or his predictability. I am the man who has deprived you of lols and thus has destroyed your subforum, and if you wish to know why you are probated—you who dread knowledge of kitty jail—I am the warlord who will now tell you.”

*links to july blog*

BluesShaman posted:

Ditto. But I would do 2c-b again if I had the chance. It has the crazy visuals of acid, and the positive mood push of ecstasy. And it's nearly impossible to have a bad trip.

Alexander Shulgin, the guy who created it (and half the known hallucinogens [and popularized ecstasy]), said it's the most perfect hallucinogen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2C-B

Quavers posted:

"Hey Chris, please can you authorise this business document?"

"Sure! Pass my the ink please..."

*splat*

BluesShaman posted:

Ditto. But I would do 2c-b again if I had the chance. It has the crazy visuals of acid, and the positive mood push of ecstasy. And it's nearly impossible to have a bad trip.

Alexander Shulgin, the guy who created it (and half the known hallucinogens [and popularized ecstasy]), said it's the most perfect hallucinogen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2C-B

BluesShaman posted:

32,900 words too short.

Spatial posted:

e: Actually I take it back because the naming thing is console marketing 101. PS2 HAS REAL TIME RENDERING!!!

Semisponge posted:

Once I took mushrooms right after moving and I kept forgetting that I was in a new place and was constantly startled and got lost on the way to the bathroom. No weed necessary!

Galarox posted:

Galarox posted:

"Ecce Homo"? Give me a link so as I can see what I have to work with?

e - this?



WTF is the story behind that?

XK posted:

His signature itself is also loving stupid.

Technically, your signature can be whatever you want it to be, but, come on.

Bofast posted:

It's fascinating how life can imitate art like this. The 1997 Mr. Bean movie:

BluesShaman posted:

I have a sickening and heartbreaking truth to share with the thread.

This is anime:

trucutru posted:

Sorry, but I'm calling bullshit on this, terminal velocity is not enough. Have you installed nipple-jets on yourself?


e: Today I learned that nipple jets are an actual thing that exists outside the 'verse

MedicineHut posted:

Courterpoint, MoMA is in fact Toast. I think he can´t post because the issue goes well over his head, since he is just a poxy paralegal. Probably less relevant than French.

quote:

We thought the Star Citizen developers' response to Crytek would have baffled them. But Crytek has just replied, and their arguments are equally convincing.

Recall from the previous episode: Crytek accused CIG of developing two games when the original contract stipulated only one. They also complained that CIG broke the contract by changing the engine, so they did not use the CryEngine any more. CIG pointed out to them that the two complaints canceled each other out and that the case was therefore irrelevant.

Crytek's response: CIG was offered a preferential rate on the CryEngine in exchange for multiple promises they did not keep:

• CIG was to use CryEngine and promote it, but today they support a competing engine;
• CIG had committed to go back to Crytek the improvements they could have made to the engine, as well as the bug fixes. But after publicly boasting of improving the engine, they never shared their work with Crytek;
• CIG violated certain confidential aspects of Crytek's technology by publishing excerpts from the code.
In summary, Crytek believes it helped CIG in the early development of Star Citizen by offering them their engine at a preferential rate. The contract specified then that CIG had to return the same to them by ensuring the promotion of the engine and by sharing the improvements that they would have brought to him. But as soon as the developers of Star Citizen started to raise millions, they paid for a massive gold toilet, they printed the contract with Crytek, and they went to sink a monumental bronze before blowing themselves with it.

Virtual Captain posted:

https://twitter.com/CliffordakaMiku/status/954941550123012096