|
Salt Fish posted:I like guitars, but I'm not excited by the idea of a guitar that shoots nuclear artillery everywhere after you play a chord. see when you spell it out it sounds pretty awesome
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 18:13 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 21:39 |
|
omfg that archive link ahahahaha
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 18:14 |
|
Hey they're called public keys for a reason okay. It's fine.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 18:15 |
|
BattleMaster posted:I forgot that the US was doing insane poo poo like nuclear artillery shells which have to use gun-type warheads because they're small enough for the job the navy and the army spent those dozen years scrambling to come up with nuclear-themed reasons for them to keep their funding levels, which resulted in all kinds of desperate crazypants nuclear poo poo (the davy crocket nuclear bazooka, the 'pentomic' division, etc)
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 18:16 |
|
Now you reminded me about the demon core and Louis Slotin, the patron saint of security fuckups.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 18:17 |
|
FMguru posted:for about a dozen years after hiroshima there was an overwhelming belief that all future wars would be nuclear wars and that there was no real need for armies or navies any more - just strategic bombers and missiles US went crazy mass-producing fat men with the name Mark 3 and then built even more with improvements for real field conditions with the name Mark 4 given how many fat men they had when the korean war happened it's amazing that none of them got used as well
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 18:19 |
|
BattleMaster posted:US went crazy mass-producing fat men with the name Mark it sure did
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 19:16 |
|
FMguru posted:the navy and the army spent those dozen years scrambling to come up with nuclear-themed reasons for them to keep their funding levels, which resulted in all kinds of desperate crazypants nuclear poo poo (the davy crocket nuclear bazooka, the 'pentomic' division, etc) on the other hand that gave us metal gear solid 3: snake eater
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 19:37 |
|
ChubbyThePhat posted:omfg that archive link ahahahaha me on first look: eh, it's just public keys me on second look: wait some of those aren't super-long rsa or ecc keys… i bet there's a way to get the private key back don't touch the poop though
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 19:38 |
|
NeoHentaiMaster posted:I wonder how much bigger the budget increase at next hears senate appropriations sub committee ended up being because that probably previously known group of annoying but harmless people managed to make it to the outside of a storage facility. not as much as you'd think. in a rare display of justice a bunch of people at dept of energy and oak ridge got sacked, rifed, or decided to retire early after that fiasco.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 20:53 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:me on first look: eh, it's just public keys wait. does Linux seriously have a thing where you can use public keys that expose private key data?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 20:57 |
|
Shaggar posted:wait. does Linux seriously have a thing where you can use public keys that expose private key data?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 21:09 |
|
Shaggar posted:wait. does Linux seriously have a thing where you can use public keys that expose private key data?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 21:25 |
|
BattleMaster posted:given how many fat men they had when the korean war happened it's amazing that none of them got used as well the wrong person in the oval office and it probably would have happened. macarthur was openly pushing to drop a-bombs and truman had to fire his rear end.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 22:50 |
|
anthonypants posted:same way that active directory has a thing where gpos pass around the admin password Basically this.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2018 23:28 |
|
anthonypants posted:same way that active directory has a thing where gpos pass around the admin password not sure what you're talking about. also gpos have value even if they can be configured incorrectly whereas theres no use case for a public key that leaks its private key.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 01:52 |
|
Shaggar posted:not sure what you're talking about. also gpos have value even if they can be configured incorrectly whereas theres no use case for a public key that leaks its private key.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 02:03 |
|
yes we agree that Linux is bad and has bad security.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 02:07 |
|
Shaggar posted:wait. does Linux seriously have a thing where you can use public keys that expose private key data? if the public key is small enough or the algo is old and poo poo enough, mathematically, yeah, that's why nist says to use 4096 bit rsa keys
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 02:11 |
|
oh i guess that makes sense.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 02:13 |
|
Shaggar posted:oh i guess that makes sense. yeah i forgot that windows users generally need simpler language in explanations
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 02:31 |
|
i don't have the autism to memorize key algorithms and what their keys look like. i just use windows so everything is just secure by default.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 02:35 |
|
lol if you can't read base64
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 02:38 |
|
Shaggar posted:i don't have the autism to memorize key algorithms and what their keys look like. i just use windows so everything is just secure by default.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 03:45 |
|
Shaggar posted:i don't have the autism I dont believe you
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 03:55 |
|
Shaggar posted:i don't have the autism bull loving poo poo
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 04:37 |
|
i think what he meant is that he lacks sufficient autism it's a spectrum, folks
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 04:40 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:it's a spectrum, folks
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 04:47 |
|
at least it's airgapped. and it's appropriate given the thread title
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 04:54 |
|
akadajet posted:at least it's airgapped e: ninja edit'd!
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 04:55 |
|
let's be realistic, a z80 doesn't have enough features to handle modern enterprise workloads so clearly it is time to migrate everything to xbox 360s with in-order 2 ghz PPCs
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 05:05 |
|
please do not engage shaggar
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 05:09 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:let's be realistic, a z80 doesn't have enough features to handle modern enterprise workloads That’s what the eZ80 is for.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 05:13 |
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 05:38 |
|
akadajet posted:That’s what the eZ80 is for. wikipedia posted:Available at up to 50 MHz (2004), the performance is comparable to a Z80 clocked at 150 MHz if fast memory is used (i.e. no wait states for opcode fetches, for data, or for I/O) or even higher in some applications (a 16-bit addition is 11 times as fast as in the original). holy moly
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 09:52 |
|
let's make a z80 yostop I'll start the wiki
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 10:08 |
|
i have wondered for a long time how fast some ancient processors would be if they were made with the modern nanometer processes and run at gigahertz frequency
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 11:03 |
|
just gonna put my garbage tweet(s) here. tl;dr my bank is garbage https://twitter.com/GarbageDotNet/status/971327709170167808
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 11:32 |
|
Wheany posted:i have wondered for a long time how fast some ancient processors would be if they were made with the modern nanometer processes and run at gigahertz frequency Z80 doesn't have a cache, pipelining, speculative execution, or anything like that and just grabs instructions one at a time from the memory bus in between executing them, can't do memory or I/O access during instruction fetch, has an 8-bit data bus meaning multiple fetches for multi-word instructions (3 reads for most memory instructions or jumps), and has a poor instruction per clock cycle ratio so it wouldn't be so hot even at multi-gigahertz clock speeds. It's also RISC-like (I think it predates that term) so you can't construct instructions and so many operations require several instructions in a row. CPUs have come a long way since then for better or for worse (lol speculative execution exploits) Edit: that said it's still killer for some modern applications like as a soft-core on an FPGA BattleMaster fucked around with this message at 13:24 on Mar 7, 2018 |
# ? Mar 7, 2018 13:20 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 21:39 |
|
cheese-cube posted:just gonna put my garbage tweet(s) here. tl;dr my bank is garbage i give it a 50 50 chance they "fix" it by also opting out of the ssl labs scan
|
# ? Mar 7, 2018 13:37 |