|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:let's be realistic, a z80 doesn't have enough features to handle modern enterprise workloads nope, the xbox 360 cpu is likely vulnerable to a spectre-like attack
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 14:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 23:00 |
|
|
you're going to have to go back to the mid-90s to find cpus that don't have that vulnerability p5 pentium powerpc 604 those two cpus should be free from those vulnerabilities--i am not 100% certain about the ppc but it doesn't have speculative execution iirc
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 15:32
|
|
|
amiga's back, baby!
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 15:45
|
|
|
Wheany posted:amiga's back, baby! don't tell the furries
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 16:02
|
|
|
Wheany posted:i have wondered for a long time how fast some ancient processors would be if they were made with the modern nanometer processes and run at gigahertz frequency
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 16:02
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:let's make a z80 yostop it'd have to be a yosgraphingcalculator or something
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
yo s wa tc MCD ONA LD' S! h
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 16:12
|
|
|
use one of those soviet era multi-line character displays y'all were buying off ebay a few months ago for a display
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 16:13
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:use one of those soviet era multi-line character displays y'all were buying off ebay a few months ago for a display no use these soviet EL displays i bought off ebay a few years ago:  they're real big and basically the predator font
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 16:17
|
|
|
Lain Iwakura posted:you're going to have to go back to the mid-90s to find cpus that don't have that vulnerability itanium still seems a likely candidate, little telling precisely what intel did with the later versions, but the idea of the architecture was that all speculation should be software-driven
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 16:21
|
|
|
Cell broadband engine is back baby. Scratch memorys good again awoooo (DMA howl)
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 17:09
|
|
|
Lysidas posted:i give it a 50 50 chance they "fix" it by also opting out of the ssl labs scan actually my bad i should have linked further down the thread. they're embedding JS from a third-party ad server on the fuckin internet banking login page lol https://twitter.com/GarbageDotNet/status/971330728645443584
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 17:20
|
|
|
Ah twitter-based customer support. - user: @company your product X doesn't work for me - company: @user can you tell me what's wrong - user: @company *describes some poo poo* - company: @user ok I need to look into your account for that, pls DM me your name, address, and the last 4 digits of your CC number so I can confirm your identity - user: *proceeds to post all that data in a public tweet* Just looking through tweets addressed to customer support, that sort of thing turns up more often than you'd think.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 20:19
|
|
|
#needadebitcard ready to ipo soon
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 20:19
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/slowbeef/status/971480015488671745 https://forums.oculusvr.com/community/discussion/62715/oculus-runtime-services-current-status#latest
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 21:19
|
|
|
that is amazing
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2018 21:26
|
|
|
cheese-cube posted:actually my bad i should have linked further down the thread. they're embedding JS from a third-party ad server on the fuckin internet banking login page lol  Loads fine in Firefox blocking all that poo poo, but on the greasy scale it's high. I especially love their password length restrictions, something stupidly short like 8 or 9 characters. Oh and no real MFA. Sec Fuckups and Marketing suggestions are pretty much the same thing these days.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 01:41
|
|
|
These are pro as heck https://twitter.com/DecipherSec/status/971054085028958209 https://twitter.com/DecipherSec/status/971446678912995328
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 01:54
|
|
|
What's dildog?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:01
|
|
|
the gently caress is with the filters on those pics?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:27
|
|
|
put on your 3d glasses now
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:33
|
|
|
i remember l0phtcrack
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:33
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:https://twitter.com/slowbeef/status/971480015488671745 This is utterly amazing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:43
|
|
|
of course, it’ll affect the software update channel too I’m sure goofs
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:46
|
|
|
Wheany posted:i have wondered for a long time how fast some ancient processors would be if they were made with the modern nanometer processes and run at gigahertz frequency z80 and 6502 both depended on memory responding instantly -- faster than the chip could execute instructions. that's why they didn't need caches or other crazy stuff. ddr4 3600 has a typical latency of 18 clocks.... so an old-timey processor with no caches or other wizardry could be run somewhere between 100 and 200 MHz (between 1/18th and 1/36th of the memory clock)
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:57
|
|
|
SeaborneClink posted:What's dildog? not much what's dil with you?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 02:59
|
|
|
Raere posted:i remember l0phtcrack back orifice was a solid jam too
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:08
|
|
|
Midjack posted:not much what's dil with you? Just dilin around to these BBS to see what's updog
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:10
|
|
|
SeaborneClink posted:What's dildog? Google it with safe search off. I dare you.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:13
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:z80 and 6502 both depended on memory responding instantly -- faster than the chip could execute instructions. that's why they didn't need caches or other crazy stuff. wouldn't be too hard to have the memory interface insert wait states into memory access, the z80 manual shows how to do this for memory that was too slow to keep up with the z80 even back in the day it puts a speed limit on instruction fetch and memory access/stack operations/etc but parts of the instruction cycle that do non-memory things will go at full speed fetching instructions from the memory bus one at a time is still a bitch for speed though
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:17
|
|
|
Midjack posted:not much what's dil with you? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:23
|
|
|
SeaborneClink posted:What's dildog? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:34
|
|
|
rear end in a top hat Masonanie posted:back orifice was a solid jam too netbus was better you could eject the cd rom tray
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:35
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:it puts a speed limit on instruction fetch and memory access/stack operations/etc but parts of the instruction cycle that do non-memory things will go at full speed z80 and 6502 don't have enough registers to really do anything there are no "non-memory things." the programming model on these chips was that every instruction touches memory, because memory was fast. (why waste chip space on a big register file when memory is as fast, or faster, than the chip?)
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:36
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:z80 and 6502 don't have enough registers to really do anything there are a couple of clock cycles in each operation that are not hitting memory that would be faster, plus I/O may be faster than DDR (edit: also, the DRAM refresh cycle that gets inserted after every fetch eats up a bunch of clock cycles doing nothing useful with modern memory) also 6502 doesn't have many registers but the Z80 has an absurd number of registers including a second set that can be swapped between with an instruction for a school project years ago I made a calculator that could add or subtract two numbers that had zero RAM storing everything in registers; not exactly a hardcore application but there you go Edit: obviously a hypothetical 4 ghz turbo Z80 would be useless even if there were minor gains but it's fun to think about BattleMaster fucked around with this message at 04:19 on Mar 8, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 03:50
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:also 6502 doesn't have many registers but the Z80 has an absurd number of registers including a second set that can be swapped between with an instruction it's also super loving fast to do so -- basically one memory cycle to swap BC, DE, and HL with BC', DE', and HL' and then another one to swap AF and AF'. the AF one is a separate instruction so you can basically have a set of alternate flags load instantly when you get into an IRQ. the Z80 is actually really cool and now I really want to play with a multi-GHz Z80
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 04:19
|
|
|
Loky11 posted:http://www.netresec.com/?page=PcapFiles Thanks! I'll definitely take a look at this.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 03:03
|
|
|
cheese-cube posted:just gonna put my garbage tweet(s) here. tl;dr my bank is garbage its grade B for Banking  to the ad server side of things, several large US banks also pull in ad servers but they tend toward doubleclick and other larger and maybe reputable providers. on the flip side theyre covered in tracking and metrics agents many of which sound increasingly obscure. its a testament to how much they want to mine their customers that they dont mind the hit to load time and performance those services bring
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 06:57
|
|
|
the fact that they do it on every page including ones where you enter or view sensitive info is pretty fuckin greasy
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 07:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 23:00 |
|
|
Agile Vector posted:its grade B for Banking but think of the value add to the customer
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 08:13
|
|
