Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong
Wow, such not colonialism:




Truly the Russians only ever stayed within the boundaries of their homeland throughout the period they ran the Soviet Union.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010
That’s a lot of side track for a poo poo poster’s 3 letter zero effort post.

90s Rememberer
Nov 30, 2017

by R. Guyovich

fishmech posted:

Wow, such not colonialism:


There's nothing quite like someone confusing Russia and the USSR

HorrificExistence
Jun 25, 2017

by Athanatos
Soviet communism is empire creating by nature since it claimed it's leaders territory was not territorially bounded, i.e. world revolution. That is not a normative statement.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

self unaware posted:

There's nothing quite like someone confusing Russia and the USSR

Nothing's being confused here, the position of the actual original Russian lands versus all the extra stuff the Soviets continued to hold and even expand into illustrate how the Soviet Union was a colonial empire.

Dante80
Mar 23, 2015

WoodrowSkillson posted:

posting entire wiki articles is dumb as poo poo you can link them goddamn

It was a preemptive measure.

It failed miserably. :gonk:

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

self unaware posted:

There's nothing quite like someone confusing Russia and the USSR

USSR was Russia tho.

Saladin Rising
Nov 12, 2016

When there is no real hope we must
mint our own. If the coin be
counterfeit it may still be passed.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/976194206111879168?s=19

quote:

Corker says they plan to mark-up an AUMF on April 19th to address the fact that the US is still using an AUMF for Afghanistan to fight Al Qaeda and ISIS all over the world.
Oh hey, our war against ISIS might get some after-the-fact legal justification.

Dante80
Mar 23, 2015

Saladin Rising posted:

Oh hey, our war against ISIS might get some after-the-fact legal justification.

Technically, they are still under legal mandate, they don't need a new AUMF.

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/framework.Report_Final.pdf (page 5, onwards)

Technically..

Dante80 fucked around with this message at 21:42 on Mar 20, 2018

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Top-tier posting!

In news, Sarkozy is being held for questioning on the Gaddafi campaign contributions thing.

https://twitter.com/AJEnglish/status/976161346269122561?s=19

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Volkerball posted:

Top-tier posting!

In news, Sarkozy is being held for questioning on the Gaddafi campaign contributions thing.

https://twitter.com/AJEnglish/status/976161346269122561?s=19

Well the bribe certainly failed if that counts for anything.

Willie Tomg
Feb 2, 2006

Bip Roberts posted:

Well the bribe certainly failed if that counts for anything.

It does, which is why north korea has nukes now lol

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

Dante80 posted:

Technically, they are still under legal mandate, they don't need a new AUMF.

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/framework.Report_Final.pdf (page 5, onwards)

Technically..

It counts, since if Congress doesn't like it they're free to revoke it.

Stretch Marx
Apr 29, 2008

I'm ok with this.
The loving Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan to specifically put it under its sphere of influence. Just because they failed doesn't make it less of an imperialist act.

Also all federated countries are effectively empires. They're all comprised of individual states who are all independent to each other but all surrender sovereignty to one specific state that more or less controls the military and laws that govern those individual states.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

It's kind of funny that even Mao called the Soviet Union an empire.

Grape
Nov 16, 2017

Happily shilling for China!

self unaware posted:

Protectorates? Colonies?

I mean, there's a reason you're quoting things that say "sometimes seen as". It's because the past 60 years of Russophobia have rotted brains away to the point where they want to change the definition of Empire in some vain attempt to play "but they do the same thing as us!" even though they don't.

The Warsaw Pact pretty much perfectly fits the definition of a Protectorate set-up.

Tweezer Reprise
Aug 6, 2013

It hasn't got six strings, but it's a lot of fun.

HorrificExistence posted:

Soviet communism is empire creating by nature since it claimed it's leaders territory was not territorially bounded, i.e. world revolution. That is not a normative statement.

okay saying the USSR wasn't an empire is dumb as hell but lmfao at this

OhFunny
Jun 26, 2013

EXTREMELY PISSED AT THE DNC
https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/976203928969900033?s=21

We’re going to continue helping the Saudis grind Yemen into total misery.

Vietnom nom nom
Oct 24, 2000
Forum Veteran

OhFunny posted:

https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/976203928969900033?s=21

We’re going to continue helping the Saudis grind Yemen into total misery.

Honestly I'm surprised it got 44 against. This sort of thing flies so far below the US public's radar it usually gets rubber stamped.

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

OhFunny posted:

https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/976203928969900033?s=21

We’re going to continue helping the Saudis grind Yemen into total misery.

Lol if you think the Democrats are anti-war because they're not.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


fishmech posted:

You're forgetting there's people so dedicated to stupidity that they think "empire" means "America" and maybe "Britain".

It’s funny to me that this “YOU’RE AN EMPIRE/NO YOU’RE AN EMPIRE:regd07:” Cold War poo poo still gets people actually caremad

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


HorrificExistence posted:

Soviet communism is empire creating by nature since it claimed it's leaders territory was not territorially bounded, i.e. world revolution. That is not a normative statement.

it’s like an official universalizing ideology that recognizes no limits to its validity is one of the key characteristics of all historical empire or something

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Darkman Fanpage posted:

Lol if you think the Democrats are anti-war because they're not.

At least 4 out of 5 were today.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
IS has taken Qadam. Over 100 SAA/Mukhabarat casualties.

https://twitter.com/Dannymakkisyria/status/976132386202189824

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Bip Roberts posted:

At least 4 out of 5 were today.

I'm pretty pleased with the results tbh. Give it another decade and we'll see a flip.

CrazyLoon
Aug 10, 2015

"..."

icantfindaname posted:

it’s like an official universalizing ideology that recognizes no limits to its validity is one of the key characteristics of all historical empire or something

Or it could just be people mixing up the terms 'empire' and 'imperialism' willy nilly.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Israel acknowledged the 2007 bombing of a suspected NK built syrian nuclear facility. Is this part of a build up to an intervention in syria? I mean wevebgot gassing his own peolle checked off confirmed attempts to build WMDs is now checked off... really what more justification do the american people need to justify it in their hearts.

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010

by Pragmatica

(and can't post for 32 hours!)

Israel admits it did that strike on the Syrian nuclear reactor which everyone always knew Israel did

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Sinteres posted:

Tom Friedman must be moonlighting as the social media manager for 60 Minutes.

https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/975522490004000773

I usually have to go to pornhub to see that kind of action.

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

LeoMarr posted:

Israel acknowledged the 2007 bombing of a suspected NK built syrian nuclear facility. Is this part of a build up to an intervention in syria? I mean wevebgot gassing his own peolle checked off confirmed attempts to build WMDs is now checked off... really what more justification do the american people need to justify it in their hearts.

Yes now is the time the United States and Israel should intervene in Syria on behalf of the FSA!!!

What is wrong with you? How does Israel acknowledging something everyone in the world knows they did 10 years ago = build up to intervention?

CherryCola
Apr 15, 2002

'ahtaj alshifa
https://twitter.com/duhok__tee/status/976219543738748928?s=21

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Sinteres posted:

It's kind of funny that even Mao called the Soviet Union an empire.

Eh, the Sino-Soviet split is something that actually happened.

(Meh, both the Soviets and the US were empires that often used very similar methods to accomplish their goals. The biggest difference is the US has far more monetary resources to throw at their "top tier" allies.)

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

Ardennes posted:

Eh, the Sino-Soviet split is something that actually happened.

(Meh, both the Soviets and the US were empires that often used very similar methods to accomplish their goals. The biggest difference is the US has far more monetary resources to throw at their "top tier" allies.)

Russia also kept choice bits of what they occupied in the 1900's. Kaliningrad, the Kuril Islands, and various "independent" states governed by Russia after being propped up in choice bits of the SSRs in the 90's.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

Plus there's all the settlements of ethnic Russians in SSRs that served as the basis of the crimean invasion and ukrainian....thing.

TasogareNoKagi
Jul 11, 2013

OhFunny posted:

https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/976203928969900033?s=21

We’re going to continue helping the Saudis grind Yemen into total misery.

Colonial vs Parliamentary usage of "table" never ceases to confuse me.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Stretch Marx posted:

The loving Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan to specifically put it under its sphere of influence. Just because they failed doesn't make it less of an imperialist act.

Also all federated countries are effectively empires. They're all comprised of individual states who are all independent to each other but all surrender sovereignty to one specific state that more or less controls the military and laws that govern those individual states.

That is a very strange view of federations. A federated state has multiple levels of authority and all states are equal in their position vis a vis the higher level, which is established by a contract / constitution agreed upon by the states, not by an imperial decree. It's not like in the US New York rules over the other states, or in Germany Brandenburg is the hegemon of the federation. And if there is no dominating actor who can cpntrol the lesser partners, it's not an empire. The only exception would be autoritarian federations where in actuality one region rules, and others are powerless at the periphery.

steinrokkan fucked around with this message at 13:27 on Mar 21, 2018

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Warbadger posted:

Russia also kept choice bits of what they occupied in the 1900's. Kaliningrad, the Kuril Islands, and various "independent" states governed by Russia after being propped up in choice bits of the SSRs in the 90's.

You mean the territory they got after Second World War? This isn't unique, the US still has some islands that it got from Japan, check out the Northern Mariana Islands, and occupied Okinawa and other islands until the 1970s and later. The Soviets "got more" but admittedly they also "gave more."

The separatists republics if anything a more of a remnant of empire than anything.

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

Plus there's all the settlements of ethnic Russians in SSRs that served as the basis of the crimean invasion and ukrainian....thing.

The settlement of Russians in Crimea and Donbass goes really far back into the 18th century if not earlier with the decline and fall of the Crimean Tatars and deduced influence of the Ottoman Empire. I would say the numbers of Russians in the Baltic states were more recent, but for the individual Russians themselves, it was mostly from being re-assigned to industrial jobs in Riga/Tallinn. From their perspective, they were moving from Kansas City to Denver to take an available factory job. You could say the Soviets had an ulterior motive, but at the same time, you also had a bunch of cultural-mixing happening other cities across the Soviet Union.

Also, if you want to compare the growth of the Russian Empire and the US until 1917, usually if anything the Russians were far less assimilationist than the US and there was never any real counterpart to the reservation system. Usually, the Russian state was pretty minimal in its influence outside of major cities.

I think trying to pretend the US wasn't also an empire looking at American history is really quite laughable. We were a landed power that forced colonial settlement across North America into the 20th century, had an overseas empire (which we still retain parts of today), and were willing to fight proxy wars and overturn governments as we saw fit through the Cold War. It very much is the pot-calling-the-kettle-black for both sides.

Ardennes fucked around with this message at 13:29 on Mar 21, 2018

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
Also it's really weird to draw a line between Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, like the USSR didn't inherit the products of czarist Russian imperialism and didn't continue to exploit them.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

steinrokkan posted:

Also it's really weird to draw a line between Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, like the USSR didn't inherit the products of czarist Russian imperialism and didn't continue to exploit them.

Granted, a lot of this was situational and actually developed across the Russian Civil War. Basically, once the Bolsheviks started winning they didn't stop, but they were also fighting implacable political enemies and foreign powers that were also never going to stop as long as they still had a foothold in the borders of the former Russian Empire. It could be argued the Bolsheviks had 2 choices: lose or basically become hypocrites and start fighting onward until they achieved total(ish) victory. Can you successfully fight a civil war without imperialism?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Stretch Marx posted:

Also all federated countries are effectively empires. They're all comprised of individual states who are all independent to each other but all surrender sovereignty to one specific state that more or less controls the military and laws that govern those individual states.
You seem to be confusing the two definitions of state here. Like steinrokkan says, it's not a state (in the sub-national unit sense) that rules the US, it's the state. The empire bit comes from the territories/countries it controls but which have no ability to influence back in the way states/people within the US can.

steinrokkan posted:

And if there is no dominating actor who can cpntrol the lesser partners, it's not an empire. The only exception would be autoritarian federations where in actuality one region rules, and others are powerless at the periphery.
Which I think does apply to the German Empire, where Prussia truly was in the driver's seat. Moscow in relation to the rest of Russia seems to be sorta similar, from the way people describe its relation to the rest of the country.

steinrokkan posted:

Also it's really weird to draw a line between Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, like the USSR didn't inherit the products of czarist Russian imperialism and didn't continue to exploit them.
The fact that the USSR was specifically a continuation of the Russian Empire under new management was probably a pretty drat big part in why the USSR ended up like it did too. Really, the only reason to attempt to draw a line between the two would be to either claim all its negative sides were born out of the revolution, or to claim that it had no negative sides because the revolution gave birth to a perfect socialist state.

A Buttery Pastry fucked around with this message at 13:48 on Mar 21, 2018

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply