|
hell yeah troll us into gun chat
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 11:24 |
|
|
SimonCat posted:Better to do something that will hassle people who aren't the problem, doesn't fix the actual problem, and lets the powers that be cover their rear end by saying they did something. This whole argument would be less bullshit if the last decade hadn’t been a never ending ouroboros of “what about x, nope can’t do that”.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:This whole argument would be less bullshit if the last decade hadn’t been a never ending ouroboros of “what about x, nope can’t do that”. Then propose something that's worth a poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
mods change my name posted:While I don't agree with her objective (not getting gunned down for no drat reason) that girl sure shows some passion! - posters itt Some us believe in strong 2nd rights but are not single issue voters. I honestly wish it did not come to head like this and that we tamped down on even harder on transfer issues and penalties. Too much emotion for balanced legislation but the kids are all right.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:27
|
|
|
SimonCat posted:Then propose something that's worth a poo poo. you first bucko because the status quo isn't working and the Gunfucker Lobby shoots down literally anything. might want to hurry though because popular opinion isn't working in your favor.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:34
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:you first bucko because the status quo isn't working and the Gunfucker Lobby shoots down literally anything. my friend have you read GUNFACTS.PDF the definitive source for uhh arguments about how gun control doesn't work as can be seen in such countries as uhh the UK and uhhh Hitlers Germany???
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:37
|
|
|
Atlanta government got hit with ransomware. Life goes on. Would post a link, but phone and awful app arent cooperating apparently.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:37
|
|
|
“Too much emotion” is a silly statement along the same lines as “it’s too soon to politicize weekly massacre #736”. Up until now federal agencies were literally prohibited from researching gun violence, but the research data out in the world is pretty decidedly anti-proliferation. The heavy, illogical emotion seems to lie mostly with the confederate flag wavers threatening to murder crisis actors and not the kids who saw their friends’ brains explode in math class.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:38
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:Some us believe in strong 2nd rights but are not single issue voters. I honestly wish it did not come to head like this and that we tamped down on even harder on transfer issues and penalties. This. I am for gun control that isn't a knee jerk, useless, and emotionally skewed. AWB don't stop a majority of gun violence. Instead of focusing on the outlier, fix the common issues. UBC Training and/or license, that is free or subsidized for lower income people. More social outreach Better access to mental health (with a change in how we treat MH issues) Etc. The number one cause of gun violence in America is socioeconomic disparity and the number one tool is the handgun. But let's attack the scary thing's cosmetic features, just like all AWB do.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:41
|
|
|
Fallom posted:kids who saw their friends’ brains explode in math class Those kids aren't even part of the dialog. None of the kids who are protesting were in a class where someone was shot, not sure why you think they are.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
Point of order, sir, technically nobody’s brains “exploded”. They were liquefied and pushed through a hole. It was an exaggeration, but the point is that all of these kids went through a traumatic experience and have more of a leg to stand on, not less. Tiny Timbs fucked around with this message at 16:52 on Mar 25, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:44
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:This. If it were actually about addressing the causes of the problem then the party that falls back on the "it's a mental health and socioeconomic" issue wouldn't spend 80% of their time in Congress trying to destroy the social safety nets in the country.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:45
|
|
|
Ban all the guns, criminals gonna crime anyway amirite?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:46
|
|
|
Yo, wasn't the Stormy Daniels 60 Minutes thing due today? Is that why Trump is bitching about a "hoax" or something?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:47
|
|
|
Yea the interview is tonight. It would be a gift to Daniels and her law team if Trump began tweeting directly at them or about the case.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:53
|
|
|
Trump has been way too uncharacteristically quiet about the Stormy Daniels stuff for me to get my hopes up for some good tweets.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:54
|
|
|
Duzzy Funlop posted:Yo, wasn't the Stormy Daniels 60 Minutes thing due today? Is that why Trump is bitching about a "hoax" or something? Yup, tonight.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 16:54
|
|
|
psydude posted:If it were actually about addressing the causes of the problem then the party that falls back on the "it's a mental health and socioeconomic" issue wouldn't spend 80% of their time in Congress trying to destroy the social safety nets in the country. Agreed. I want social change in our country, but neither party really wants to change either themselves, or the system. I'm not diminishing the issue- well, not attempting to- but I am tired of neither party doing poo poo but keeping the status quo
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:02
|
|
|
how about we meet in the middle: you need a professional health screening prior to purchasing any firearm, and it has to be renewed every three years. watch how fast obamacare gets funded.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:06
|
|
|
The Pi dude posted:I'm going to watch the first 5 minutes, and then skip to the end and watch the last 45 seconds.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:08
|
|
Casimir Radon posted:I'll stick to the highlights. I don't know if I can sit through an entire interview with someone who was stupid enough to think Donnie is a kind person. it was a porn joke  (if it wasn't it is now)
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:09
|
|
|
My gun control proposal is a national database and all that poo poo, but in exchange every gunfucker gets a Ma Deuce to play with.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:10
|
|
|
In more hilarious news, two of the lawyers Trump wanted to hire won't be able to work on the special counsel case because of conflicts of interest: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/25/us/politics/trump-digenova-toensing.html
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:15
|
|
|
boop the snoot posted:how about we meet in the middle: you need a professional health screening prior to purchasing any firearm, and it has to be renewed every three years. This should be a starting point
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:15
|
|
|
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-rocket-man-blast-20180325-story.html That flat earther with the elaborate steam-powered suicide machine made it less than 1900 feet up, broke his rocket, hurt his back, and now plans to run for governor.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:16
|
|
|
psydude posted:In more hilarious news, two of the lawyers Trump wanted to hire won't be able to work on the special counsel case because of conflicts of interest: This rules so hard: https://twitter.com/kpolantz/status/977920010227277826 Trump took away the prestige of repping a rich president. HOW THE gently caress DO YOU DO THAT
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:30
|
|
|
CRUSTY MINGE posted:1. Drive to Georgia, Alabama, or Mississippi Already illegal. Edit: Oh we're not actually doing gun chat. Edit2: I was thinking about handguns for some reason. Rifles/shotguns it's usually legal. Godholio fucked around with this message at 18:53 on Mar 25, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:32
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:This rules so hard: https://twitter.com/kpolantz/status/977920010227277826 Art of the deal, baby 
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:36
|
|
|
If big name firms won't rep you, it keeps costs down. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:41
|
|
|
Godholio posted:Already illegal. wait whats illegal about buying guns from a gun show? Legit question.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:46
|
|
|
Godholio posted:Already illegal. Buying long guns across state lines is completely legal, with some caveats. What's to stop Stormy from going all OJ 'if I did it's "hypothetical" story time? I mean, there has to be a legal reason. If not, she should do that, and just watch Donnie blow up on Twitter.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:46
|
|
|
psydude posted:In more hilarious news, two of the lawyers Trump wanted to hire won't be able to work on the special counsel case because of conflicts of interest: reading through this, it feels like not only is everyone suing the Trump admin, they are also also suing each other
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:47
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:Buying long guns across state lines is completely legal, with some caveats. She would, in theory, be liable to any damages outlined in the contract if it were doing legally binding. But Trump trying to enforce it would be hilariously dumb. It would prove the hush money was real, opening him up to criminal liability for in-kind campaign contributions. Plus, she's already won the PR war. No matter what Trump tries to do to her, she can turn the knife that much more because she has the upper hand in terms of evidence and also appearing as the sympathetic party. And I'm sure there's plenty of people who would be willing to foot the bill for her legal fees Peter Thiel style.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:51
|
|
|
An unenforceable contract with a 130k mysterious payment for an act that didn't happen.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:55
|
|
|
Proud Christian Mom posted:An unenforceable contract with a 130k mysterious payment for an act that didn't happen. This. I have a lot of doubts about the legality of Cohen's contract given how he paid for it and then danced around it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:56
|
|
|
Well I think Stormy’s ultimate goal is two fold: to keep the story in the media’s eye for as long as possible, and to bait Trump into saying something incriminating towards his case. Maybe a third is to release all the material while netting a huge payday.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:57
|
|
|
I really want them to be stupid enough to send it to court so we can be peeling layers of craziness back for years
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 17:58
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:This rules so hard: https://twitter.com/kpolantz/status/977920010227277826 I'm surprised there wasn't a 7th point: pathological aversion to payment for services rendered
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 18:04
|
|
|
But couldn't she break the NDA without breaking it? "One time, a few years ago, I slept with a famous dude, known for ruining his businesses..." As long as she doesn't say names or identifying info, she could theoretically keep it vague, but be specific enough for the wink wink nudge nudge. She's probably doing it safer and smarter, but I want to see this whole thing burn like Cersei did in King's Landing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 18:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 11:24 |
|
|
Duckworth/daniels 2020
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2018 18:19
|
|