Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



I would also add that the Israelis killed a dual citizen of the US/Turkey in that raid and only Turkey did anything in response. He was also a teenager.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Kim Jong Il posted:

From Israel's perspective, what benefit do they get from violence?
It tickles their racism glands in just the right way? Israeli officials like Avigdor Lieberman, Ayelet Shaked or Eli Ben Dahan, to say nothing of Netanyahu himself, have gone on and on about how Palestinians are subhuman vermins that need to be exterminated.

Israel's perspective is that it wants to steal the Palestinian homeland, something that is easier done when Palestinians are killed. But since they worry about optics, they can't just go full on with extermination camps -- so they content themselves with containing them in an ever-shrinking prison, and shooting them whenever they have a halfway plausible pretext. For example, kids playing with a ball on a beach look exactly like terrorists when you're far away enough, so they can safely be shelled from a warship. That's a little protip from the IDF.

Kim Jong Il posted:

If you want to be cynical about it, the best thing for them would be to just be the current stalemate and smothering all hope of rebellion, not active confrontation.
Active confrontation is part and parcel of the current stalemate. The aim, as always, is to kill Palestinians without looking like they're aiming at killing Palestinians.

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!
International law concerning unlawful/unofficial combatants is a huge gray area, in general. This is just true. Sorry?
Soldiers: For instance, retreating soldiers can lawfully come under fire even within the protections and restrictions of the Geneva Conventions. The purpose of Retreat Under Fire is a lawful tactic to force the enemy to regroup farther than they would otherwise.
Civilians: Generally dealing with civilians is a different matter but usually left up to the countries. For instance, if this were private property or any restricted government facility, no one would bat an eyelash at firing at them firing at civilian (criminal) intruders until they were out of range.
Unlawful Combatants: But in the middle are unlawful combatants, who have barely any international law pertaining to them, never mind case law. I'm not a lawyer, either, but I am able to read and parse certain laws. If you can find anything pertaining to this specific situation, I stand ready to correct myself.

But please stop calling this guy a civilian. By definition, when you attack a foreign entity (say by raiding their border, even with lovely weapons), you forfeit civilian status and civilian protections and become an Unlawful Combatant.

And there is simply very little applicable law about unlawful combatants.

Tacky-rear end Rococco posted:

As others have said, Jesus Christ.

Firing a rifle at someone isn't "dickery," you idiot. Unless the soldier firing won the gold medal at the world rifle championships, what they were doing would be judged as shooting someone in the back in any reasonable court in the world.

The target isn't that far away, especially not for IDF snipers (who are highly trained and aren't too far off from world gold medalists). Several of those shots appear to be deliberate misses intended to scare the guy as he retreated (see firing under retreat above). Warning shots. The last shot I'm guessing was just a soldier showing off to knock the tire out of his hand.

Since it doesn't look like they're even trying to kill these people, only give them a scare, yeah I'll treat it like it's harmless. The IDF had pretty good discipline on Friday and only seem to have killed people raiding the border. I know 10 of the people killed were Hamas militants engaged in combat, the other 4 I'll reserve judgment.

Zulily Zoetrope posted:

I'm no scholar of international law

mm-hmm.

quote:

but I'm pretty sure there is no such thing as "non-lethal shooting" when wielding lethal firearms, let alone with regards to unarmed, fleeing civilians.

Do you have a single source to back that up?
I can't prove a negative. There just isn't much international law pertaining to civilian/illegal/unofficial combatants.

The people apparently being shot at are not "unarmed civilians," no matter how many times you insist on calling them that. They sacrificed that status when they attacked the fence. When they meet up with the regular crowd, notice that no further shots are fired. Those people in the crowd had not attacked and did have civilian status. Hence, no shots were fired at them.

You may not agree with everything the IDF does but you do have to acknowledge that it is a very disciplined fighting force and there are certain lines that they rarely to never cross.

Internet Explorer posted:

You are a disgusting human being.

Sorry I'm showing insufficient sympathy for a death that didn't happen, I guess.

And for the 10+ militant deaths that were actually cut-and-dry legal and justified, I also spare no tears. That's war. War is terrible. People die. When you initiate combat, when you wage war, when you attack, you bear at least partial (if not total) responsibility for the casualties on your side. This was an attack on Israel's border, plain and simple, with the cover of a few thousand protestors so they could fool people unwilling to look closer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgdxnFizHpE

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!
Oh, hey, thanks for the high-key antisemitic avatar package. Hope it was worth the money.

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
It's cool you can't even stop jerking off to the IDF's marksmanship even as they shoot civilians, Steve.

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
it isn't antisemitic. You are racist. Sorry.

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!

Marxist-Jezzinist posted:

it isn't antisemitic. You are racist. Sorry.

The payot are just for decoration, then? Do you want a cookie because you (or whoever) didn't go full Le Happy Merchant?

Way to distance Anti-Zionism from its Nazi past.

Doloen
Dec 18, 2004

Nameless_Steve posted:

International law concerning unlawful/unofficial combatants is a huge gray area, in general. This is just true. Sorry?
Soldiers: For instance, retreating soldiers can lawfully come under fire even within the protections and restrictions of the Geneva Conventions. The purpose of Retreat Under Fire is a lawful tactic to force the enemy to regroup farther than they would otherwise.
Civilians: Generally dealing with civilians is a different matter but usually left up to the countries. For instance, if this were private property or any restricted government facility, no one would bat an eyelash at firing at them firing at civilian (criminal) intruders until they were out of range.
Unlawful Combatants: But in the middle are unlawful combatants, who have barely any international law pertaining to them, never mind case law. I'm not a lawyer, either, but I am able to read and parse certain laws. If you can find anything pertaining to this specific situation, I stand ready to correct myself.

But please stop calling this guy a civilian. By definition, when you attack a foreign entity (say by raiding their border, even with lovely weapons), you forfeit civilian status and civilian protections and become an Unlawful Combatant.

And there is simply very little applicable law about unlawful combatants.




Jesus loving christ what is wrong with you you loving psycho

A Terrible Person
Jan 8, 2012

The Dance of Friendship

Fun Shoe

Nameless_Steve posted:

The payot are just for decoration, then? Do you want a cookie because you (or whoever) didn't go full Le Happy Merchant?

I get the feeling literally anything from Jewish culture would have you screaming anti-semitism.

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!
Look, Streicher, if you want to give me an avatar that signals "Jew", so that all near and far on the forums will know I'm a filthy untermensch and know which train to send me to, you should just quit pussyfooting around and give me a yellow star.

A Terrible Person
Jan 8, 2012

The Dance of Friendship

Fun Shoe

Nameless_Steve posted:

Look, Streicher, if you want to give me an avatar that signals "Jew", so that all near and far on the forums will know I'm a filthy untermensch and know which train to send me to, you should just quit pussyfooting around and give me a yellow star.

Wah! I just want to suck off the Israeli military, not be associated with them! You people are MEANIES! Waaaah!

Haha, you are such a hypocrite. Calmly give us paragraphs defending murdering protesters, and now this? You're something special.

A Terrible Person fucked around with this message at 03:15 on Apr 1, 2018

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!
I'm not crying. I would be annoyed if you hadn't given me a Pesach miracle: You have thoroughly proven your Anti-Zionism actually, truly is Antisemitism. Plot twist!

And I'm too fat and high to be associated with the IDF. I'd just look silly in one of those uniforms.


"paragraphs defending murdering protestors"
The people I've been talking about, in those two videos, are not dead. They're not dead. Even Hamas isn't claiming they're dead. They're not dead.

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!

YodaTFK posted:

Jesus loving christ what is wrong with you you loving psycho

I was raised by a lawyer, does that count?

A Terrible Person
Jan 8, 2012

The Dance of Friendship

Fun Shoe

Nameless_Steve posted:

I'm not crying. I would be annoyed if you hadn't given me a Pesach miracle: You have thoroughly proven your Anti-Zionism actually, truly is Antisemitism. Plot twist!

Oh my god, grow up you loving infant. I didn't have a loving thing to do with the new text or image. I just find it hilarious when a sociopath cries about their insensitivity coming back to bite them in the rear end.

GenderSelectScreen
Mar 7, 2010

I DON'T KNOW EITHER DON'T ASK ME
College Slice

Nameless_Steve posted:

The payot are just for decoration, then? Do you want a cookie because you (or whoever) didn't go full Le Happy Merchant?

Payot? Those are straps from the construction hat Spidey avatar that someone photo-chopped a fedora over.



But keep grasping at straws you racist piece of poo poo. :allears:

A Terrible Person
Jan 8, 2012

The Dance of Friendship

Fun Shoe

Hitlers Gay Secret posted:



But keep grasping at straws you racist piece of poo poo. :allears:

Well now I feel like a loving moron, too.

S/he's still a racist sociopath, though.

fool of sound
Oct 10, 2012

Hitlers Gay Secret posted:

Payot? Those are straps from the construction hat Spidey avatar that someone photo-chopped a fedora over.



But keep grasping at straws you racist piece of poo poo. :allears:

pffhahahahaha

Samog
Dec 13, 2006
At least I'm not an 07.
it does kind of look like that to be fair

Samog
Dec 13, 2006
At least I'm not an 07.
but now that thats out of the way: nameless steve you are a depraved lunatic

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Nameless_Steve posted:

But please stop calling this guy a civilian. By definition, when you attack a foreign entity (say by raiding their border, even with lovely weapons), you forfeit civilian status and civilian protections and become an Unlawful Combatant.

There's obviously a zillion other things here, but one thing worth mentioning is that Israel loses any right to use this sort of excuse given the control it chooses to exercise over Palestinians. It is not the same as people from one country randomly being aggressive to another; the status quo itself is a state of perpetual Israeli aggression, and anything the Palestinians do should just be viewed as a response to that.

edit: I feel the need to preemptively address the likely-inevitable "well you can also view Israeli actions as a response to Palestinian aggression" response. The main thing here is that there's a tremendous power differential, where Israel exercises almost complete control over the Palestinians, to the extend of controlling what resources they can receive, etc. Not to mention the fact that Israel has caused the Palestinians orders of magnitude more harm than vice versa.

Ytlaya fucked around with this message at 04:06 on Apr 1, 2018

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!
That's idiotic. You know what it looks like and whoever dropped $10 knew it, too. If it quacks like an antisemitic duck and it walks like an antisemitic duck...

A Terrible Person posted:

Oh my god, grow up you loving infant. I didn't have a loving thing to do with the new text or image. I just find it hilarious when a sociopath cries about their insensitivity coming back to bite them in the rear end.

I don't care who did it, whoever did it proved exactly what kind of antisemites you are. And that's glorious.

Also, in no way did I ever say nor imply that Arabs are subhuman.

My alleged "racism" is limited to my criticism of the PLO, Hamas, Fatah and other specific organizations and individuals. My "sociopathy" is because I know a little bit about law, enough to recite it dispassionately.
Oh, and that one time I said it would be a better PR strategy for Palestinians to turn to self-immolations, rather than the same violent poo poo that hasn't worked out over the past 100 years.

A Terrible Person
Jan 8, 2012

The Dance of Friendship

Fun Shoe
gently caress off, sociopath.

Better yet, re-read what Ytlaya posted and then get your racist rear end gone.

Nameless_Steve
Oct 18, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!

Ytlaya posted:

There's obviously a zillion other things here, but one thing worth mentioning is that Israel loses any right to use this sort of excuse given the control it chooses to exercise over Palestinians. It is not the same as people from one country randomly being aggressive to another; the status quo itself is a state of perpetual Israeli aggression, and anything the Palestinians do should just be viewed as a response to that.

Thank you for engaging in actual discussion like an adult.

Consider the flip side: the view that the status quo itself is a state of perpetual Arab/Palestinian aggression and anything that Israel does should just be viewed as a response to that.
It certainly works much better in this case than your theory. Palestinians assaulting Israel's borders because it's the anniversary of something that happened 40 something years ago, and Israel's only defending its borders.

The relationship is much more causal and direct. Every time the Knesset has shifted rightward in its history was preceded by major Palestinian aggression. With the exception of the Suez Invasion, every war Israel has fought has been grounded in defensive reasoning responding to anti-Zionist aggression. Again, Anti-Zionism is an ideology founded and historically embodied by actual explicitly genocidal Nazis Ba'athists like Amin al-Husseyni, Faisal Qawuqji, Azzam Pasha, Gamal Abdel Nasser, and Hafez al-Assad threatening to "finish the Final Solution" and "pave the Arab roads with Jewish skulls"

Argas
Jan 13, 2008
SRW Fanatic




Nameless_Steve posted:

Thank you for engaging in actual discussion like an adult.

:thunk:

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Kim Jong Il posted:

Hamas won the 2006 parliamentary elections, which had nothing to do with them taking over Gaza from Fatah by force 18 months later.

Why, if I didn't know anything about Hamas' rise to power other than what you're telling me, I'd almost think that Hamas were the ones who launched a military coup to try to steal control of the Palestinian government from its democratically-elected leaders! Which is weird, since that's not at all what happened.

Nameless_Steve posted:


The people apparently being shot at are not "unarmed civilians," no matter how many times you insist on calling them that. They sacrificed that status when they attacked the fence. When they meet up with the regular crowd, notice that no further shots are fired. Those people in the crowd had not attacked and did have civilian status. Hence, no shots were fired at them.

You may not agree with everything the IDF does but you do have to acknowledge that it is a very disciplined fighting force and there are certain lines that they rarely to never cross.

:jerkbag:

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

Kim Jong Il posted:

Nazi? What you said is incorrect, Hamas took power in Gaza by force. I did not "justify" anything - clearly the intent with the protests was for Hamas to have people killed to help their propaganda efforts. It's a sick tragedy.

So, if a picture can be found of an Israeli civilian in an IDF uniform at some point in the past, one can say that their death was justified, then?

ANIME AKBAR
Jan 25, 2007

afu~

Kim Jong Il posted:

Hamas won the 2006 parliamentary elections, which had nothing to do with them taking over Gaza from Fatah by force 18 months later.

JFC you really think you can pull out lies like this without getting called on it?

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006
it's good to hear that not only is asking Israel not to engage in ethnic cleansing antisemitic now, so is spiderman, and people who say shooting children in the back is bad

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 4 hours!
This psycho reminds me of the psychos who get off on the police murdering black people. He's even being "opressed".

Racism is a loving nasty trait, people can be so awful.

Nameless_Steve posted:

you shouldn't earn sympathy just because you deliberately take knives to gunfights.

Yeah that's what's happening there, a "fight".

Harold Fjord fucked around with this message at 06:27 on Apr 1, 2018

Spoke Lee
Dec 31, 2004

chairizard lol
That this turd talks about an "assault on Israel's borders" while settlers are actively stealing land to expand their own is the kicker.

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.

Hitlers Gay Secret posted:

Payot? Those are straps from the construction hat Spidey avatar that someone photo-chopped a fedora over.



But keep grasping at straws you racist piece of poo poo. :allears:

I'm just going to quote this again so Nameless_Steve has to stare at it in whatever passes for shame in their mind.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Hitlers Gay Secret posted:

Payot? Those are straps from the construction hat Spidey avatar that someone photo-chopped a fedora over.



But keep grasping at straws you racist piece of poo poo. :allears:

lmao

Zulily Zoetrope
Jun 1, 2011

Muldoon

Kim Jong Il posted:

Nazi? What you said is incorrect, Hamas took power in Gaza by force. I did not "justify" anything - clearly the intent with the protests was for Hamas to have people killed to help their propaganda efforts. It's a sick tragedy.

It's kind of magical that you're the second person ITT to say that Hamas forced the IDF to gun down civilians as if that somehow absolves them of any wrongdoing. You don't get a pass for being a violent psychopath just because the victim provoked you.

Nameless_Steve posted:

I can't prove a negative. There just isn't much international law pertaining to civilian/illegal/unofficial combatants.

That very clearly is not what I was asking. Here, I'll try again:

"Non-lethal shooting (using lethal, military-grade weaponry) is a thing acknowledged by international law"

That's a positive statement you made, and one that is complete bullshit.

Nameless_Steve posted:

You may not agree with everything the IDF does but you do have to acknowledge that it is a very disciplined fighting force and there are certain lines that they rarely to never cross.

No I don't, because they aren't. The IDF routinely opens fire on people who pose no threat to them whatsoever, and by your own admission, sometimes "just to gently caress with people." There is something seriously wrong with you if you think that that is not only okay, but is evidence of their discipline and evenhandedness.

They've also been caught using human shields, doing straight up kneeling executions, and looting and making GBS threads all over any Palestinian house they pass through on raids.

XMNN
Apr 26, 2008
I am incredibly stupid

Nameless_Steve posted:

That's idiotic. You know what it looks like and whoever dropped $10 knew it, too. If it quacks like an antisemitic duck and it walks like an antisemitic duck...


I don't care who did it, whoever did it proved exactly what kind of antisemites you are. And that's glorious.

Also, in no way did I ever say nor imply that Arabs are subhuman.

My alleged "racism" is limited to my criticism of the PLO, Hamas, Fatah and other specific organizations and individuals. My "sociopathy" is because I know a little bit about law, enough to recite it dispassionately.
Oh, and that one time I said it would be a better PR strategy for Palestinians to turn to self-immolations, rather than the same violent poo poo that hasn't worked out over the past 100 years.

no, you're a sociopath because not only are you "well, actually"-ing shooting unarmed people in the back as they run away, you also make weird snide little jokes about shooting tires out of hands and Yosemite Sam

you are such a genuinely awful person and it's so strange to me that you can't see it

e: I mean, I assume you think you are a good, normal, kind and reasonable person because most people do, but I assure you, you arent

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

Hitlers Gay Secret posted:

Payot? Those are straps from the construction hat Spidey avatar that someone photo-chopped a fedora over.



But keep grasping at straws you racist piece of poo poo. :allears:

:classiclol:
But if you squint...

Ultramega
Jul 9, 2004

i hope all the people who remain posting here in some weird effort to shift the discourse on israel in any way toward a favorable position get shot in the head with an incendiary round, preferably in front of their friends.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer
This reminds me of a derail last week in the Peter Madsen murder sub thread.

A guy kept insisting that enjoying seeing people tortured was natural. But only if one knew the victim was a bad person. He kept doubling down, going so far as to post a pic of Mussolini's lynching. He dared the thread not to feel happy at the sight of him hanging from a meat hook.

I forgot how the mods got him to knock not off, but he even challenged them when they called him out on it and told him to shut up.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Kim Jong Il posted:

The protests were Hamas led, and they were clearly designed to provoke regardless of what actually occurred. By Hamas's admission, 5 of the 16 casualties are its members. Israel says 8 casualties were Hamas, with 2 others member of other militant groups.

it doesn't matter what group they were members of. that isn't a death sentence.

Panzeh posted:

So, if a picture can be found of an Israeli civilian in an IDF uniform at some point in the past, one can say that their death was justified, then?

Ultramega
Jul 9, 2004

tertullian straight up said the salvation of christians in heaven will be magnified because they will be allowed to view the torments of their earthly oppressors in hell so like, totally writing off that aspect of the human condition seems really disingenuous and not acknowledging it doesn't seem constructive.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ultramega
Jul 9, 2004

like if you wanted a more recent example there's that picture of those israelis in sderot on lawn chairs eating snacks and watching destruction rain down on gaza.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply