Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
90s Rememberer
Nov 30, 2017

by R. Guyovich

botany posted:

🎵who gives a gently caress why as long as they do it🎵

lol that thinking dems saying a thing means they are going to do it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA9KC8SMu3o

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Also where's this weird loving idea that people can't vote against their immediate interest and that anyone who doesn't vote dem because they're poo poo is clearly some kind of champagne swilling ultrabooj in disguise? Is it so weird to think that maybe people who need real change in their lives rather than platitudes can look at the situation and think "well I'm never going to get it by voting for megabucks mc cuntface with the blue pin on, so I'm going to vote against them as well as the republicans"

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

botany posted:

🎵who gives a gently caress why as long as they do it🎵

What's the guarantee they'll do it

Dems are opportunists and pay lip service to the issue long enough to convince people they're behind it and then do nothing unless absolutely forced to, and even then it's almost always some half rear end bullshit

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


BENGHAZI 2 posted:

Also as always it's important for me to point out that I live in a uniquely lovely situation for voting being in Syracuse

If I vote in anything bigger than city elections, it doesnt matter, because upstate is massively red outside of a couple blue holdouts like Syracuse or a couple of the other college cities

And at the national level, the city drags the whole state blue so upstate as a whole doesn't count

Upstate New York is hosed

shhh

the german who knows our political system better than anyone has assured me that if you don't vote for a dem in all elections you're supporting republicans.

he also told me that non-voters are cast into hell with the rest of the sinners

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

botany posted:

the dumb thing is in my country voting "third party" actually makes sense, since we have a functioning political system :shrug:

that's the reason i'm a member of the socialist party and politically active. because even if we're not in power, a parliamentary system means that votes for actual leftist policies have a real effect.

Which one? Die Linke?

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Condiv posted:

well, my plan was instead to vote for dems that are good, and not vote for dems that are bad, so as to hopefully purge the party of the bad dems. i call it strategic voting

It's great to be ideologically pure, but ocassionally you have to suck it up and vote for a mediocre/bad dem if the results of losing warrant it.

If you're a middle class white person, maybe no results warrant it :shrug:

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

By supporting the people who gently caress people to death, I'm an even better one

Wait is this in defense of not voting, or voting?

OwlFancier posted:

You can't change it if you keep offering uncondtional support to whoever has the blue rosette on. Because why are you going to get electoral reform if you achieve your end state of just electing any democrat that's on the ballot? Why are you going to get left candidates if literally anyone can show up and get the votes because people have to give them?

I've made this argument in the past. The issue is that the party doesn't look at your vote like this. If all you do is vote lesser evils, no you won't change the party. You need to vote lesser evils AND work at changing the party from the ground up. That takes work and that's why most internet posters end their involvement at protest voting.

quote:

Like, why are you a socialist if you think that oligarchs will just hand over power because you ask nicely while supporting everything they do? You don't get better wages by asking the boss for some but refusing to withdraw your labour. If dems want votes you have to make them work for them, because votes are the only thing they give a poo poo about, votes are their money, votes are their power, votes are what they need from you, you don't give them over freely and expect anything back in return do you?

A voter strike has different results than a labor strike. If I don't vote in a close state and Trump wins, I have actively hosed people HARD, rather than given them a lesser loving.

I'd prefer no loving(har har) but that's not one of the two options.

quote:

Why on earth do you treat democrats like some sort of ally or equal?

I don't. They occasionally ally but ideologically they're going to be liberals, and not leftists, until the party shifts(if ever).

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

OwlFancier posted:

Also where's this weird loving idea that people can't vote against their immediate interest and that anyone who doesn't vote dem because they're poo poo is clearly some kind of champagne swilling ultrabooj in disguise? Is it so weird to think that maybe people who need real change in their lives rather than platitudes can look at the situation and think "well I'm never going to get it by voting for megabucks mc cuntface with the blue pin on, so I'm going to vote against them as well as the republicans"

This is where I bust in and remind everyone that I refuse to vote for Dems and work at a lovely part time job where i scrape by, grew up somewhere between secure and not, and am the stealth redneck in any gathering of friends

You can be broke as a joke and think the system is hosed and doesn't care about you

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


OwlFancier posted:

Also where's this weird loving idea that people can't vote against their immediate interest and that anyone who doesn't vote dem because they're poo poo is clearly some kind of champagne swilling ultrabooj in disguise? Is it so weird to think that maybe people who need real change in their lives rather than platitudes can look at the situation and think "well I'm never going to get it by voting for megabucks mc cuntface with the blue pin on, so I'm going to vote against them as well as the republicans"

sorry, that's just too strategic. we need to vote for dems so they can resist the republican agenda, block trump's insane appointments, fight for minorities and dreamers, and... refuse to repeal trump's tax cuts??

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Jaxyon posted:

It's great to be ideologically pure, but ocassionally you have to suck it up and vote for a mediocre/bad dem if the results of losing warrant it.

If you're a middle class white person, maybe no results warrant it :shrug:


Wait is this in defense of not voting, or voting?


I've made this argument in the past. The issue is that the party doesn't look at your vote like this. If all you do is vote lesser evils, no you won't change the party. You need to vote lesser evils AND work at changing the party from the ground up. That takes work and that's why most internet posters end their involvement at protest voting.


A voter strike has different results than a labor strike. If I don't vote in a close state and Trump wins, I have actively hosed people HARD, rather than given them a lesser loving.

I'd prefer no loving(har har) but that's not one of the two options.


I don't. They occasionally ally but ideologically they're going to be liberals, and not leftists, until the party shifts(if ever).

I mean you're positing thAt not supporting the people who are loving us to death is bad, so by supporting them you're actually good

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

OwlFancier posted:

Also where's this weird loving idea that people can't vote against their immediate interest and that anyone who doesn't vote dem because they're poo poo is clearly some kind of champagne swilling ultrabooj in disguise? Is it so weird to think that maybe people who need real change in their lives rather than platitudes can look at the situation and think "well I'm never going to get it by voting for megabucks mc cuntface with the blue pin on, so I'm going to vote against them as well as the republicans"

Because 90% of the time when I'm arguing this on facebook it's a white upper middle class person saying "hillary and trump are functionally the same" and that's because to them, they are.

If you're an exception, wonderful, but most aren't.

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

VitalSigns posted:

Which one? Die Linke?

yep

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

Condiv posted:

shhh

the german who knows our political system better than anyone has assured me that if you don't vote for a dem in all elections you're supporting republicans.

he also told me that non-voters are cast into hell with the rest of the sinners

you live in france, you don't get to pull that "he's a foreigner" poo poo

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011


Nice, good luck

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Jaxyon posted:

I've made this argument in the past. The issue is that the party doesn't look at your vote like this. If all you do is vote lesser evils, no you won't change the party. You need to vote lesser evils AND work at changing the party from the ground up. That takes work and that's why most internet posters end their involvement at protest voting.

If they don't look at your vote like that, the issue is that you have not denied them enough votes. In a system where the majority of people don't vote, I would suggest this is already their error. A party should fear its voters. You can argue "well it's a two party system so that's never going to happen" in which case, perhaps the preferred goal is to render it no longer a two party system? By taking votes from either of the other parties?

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Jaxyon posted:

It's great to be ideologically pure, but ocassionally you have to suck it up and vote for a mediocre/bad dem if the results of losing warrant it.

If you're a middle class white person, maybe no results warrant it :shrug:

we've already established i'm a lowerclass white person. also bi, not that it matters to you. and the results of winning have to be considered too, and they don't warrant it anymore. oligarchs winning and tearing down democracy doesn't appeal to me in the slightest.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Jaxyon posted:

Because 90% of the time when I'm arguing this on facebook it's a white upper middle class person saying "hillary and trump are functionally the same" and that's because to them, they are.

If you're an exception, wonderful, but most aren't.

100% of the time when you're arguing it you're fuckin retarded

Also at the most base level, in terms of how they impact regular people's lives, there really isn't much of a difference

Hillary would still be rounding up immigrants and pursuing a forever war and not doing poo poo about healthcare and minimum wage

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

I mean you're positing thAt not supporting the people who are loving us to death is bad, so by supporting them you're actually good

OOh I can do this too!

You're posting that by supporting the people loving you harder, eventually you'll stop getting hosed. But the middle part in there is hazy and not very detailed.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


botany posted:

you live in france, you don't get to pull that "he's a foreigner" poo poo

i'm american botany. so yeah, i do, cause i'm not actually a foreigner. the talk about me being under IBR for my student loans might've clued you in to that if you were actually as aware of how america works as you claimed you were.

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

VitalSigns posted:

Nice, good luck

thanks, we're doing pretty well locally where i am. now if we could get our national leaders to play along nicely instead of infighting all the time... :sigh:

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

Condiv posted:

i'm american botany. so yeah, i do, cause i'm not actually a foreigner. the talk about me being under IBR for my student loans might've clued you in to that if you were actually as aware of how america works as you claimed you were.

you live in france. i live in germany. we presumably both have people we care about in the US. unless you want to argue that understanding of the US political system is transmitted genetically, there's no reason to discard my points but value yours.

Grimdude
Sep 25, 2006

It was a shame how he carried on

botany posted:

the fact that i understand your political system better than you should give you pause but i'm reasonably sure you couldn't pour water out of a shoe with the instruction printed on the sole so

Why am I not surprised that in this thread, much like the lovely Trump threads that died or got shut down, people are getting hung up on what country people are from instead of their actual thoughts?

Who can explain the mysteries of the human mind? For instance: can people stop themselves from arguing in bad faith? It seems like the answer is no, but I'm no doctor so who knows.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

OwlFancier posted:

If they don't look at your vote like that, the issue is that you have not denied them enough votes. In a system where the majority of people don't vote, I would suggest this is already their error. A party should fear its voters. You can argue "well it's a two party system so that's never going to happen" in which case, perhaps the preferred goal is to render it no longer a two party system? By taking votes from either of the other parties?

That's not how the system works.

If you want to change the electoral progress, change it, but don't fool yourself that simply voting 3rd party every once in a while is doing that. Currently there are things preventing third parties from progress that require more change than not voting for Dems and hoping.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


botany posted:

you live in france. i live in germany. we presumably both have people we care about in the US. unless you want to argue that understanding of the US political system is transmitted genetically, there's no reason to discard my points but value yours.

i've lived in america most of my life, and i'm an immigrant to france. i've only lived here about 5 years now. i voted for obama in 2008 and 2012, as well as a number of other state and local level elections.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Jaxyon posted:

OOh I can do this too!

You're posting that by supporting the people loving you harder, eventually you'll stop getting hosed. But the middle part in there is hazy and not very detailed.

I'm explicitly not supporting any of the people loving me to death though

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

100% of the time when you're arguing it you're fuckin retarded

Also at the most base level, in terms of how they impact regular people's lives, there really isn't much of a difference

Hillary would still be rounding up immigrants and pursuing a forever war and not doing poo poo about healthcare and minimum wage

You're a moron if you think they're functionally the same.

This is a lie you're telling yourself because either

A) you aren't reading enough

or

B) it justifies your ideology

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

I'm explicitly not supporting any of the people loving me to death though

And because of how politics works, you may be effectively doing it anyway.

This is why you should try to learn things.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Jaxyon posted:

That's not how the system works.

If you want to change the electoral progress, change it, but don't fool yourself that simply voting 3rd party every once in a while is doing that. Currently there are things preventing third parties from progress that require more change than not voting for Dems and hoping.

Who says that's all people are doing

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Jaxyon posted:

That's not how the system works.

If you want to change the electoral progress, change it, but don't fool yourself that simply voting 3rd party every once in a while is doing that. Currently there are things preventing third parties from progress that require more change than not voting for Dems and hoping.

I would suggest that any change is going to require not voting for the democrats at some point.

Because again, why are you going to get any change to the electoral system if you keep instilling the idea that people have to vote either democrat or republican? '"I want electoral change!" cries person actively reinforcing two party system' is not a very compelling argument. Neither party is going to want to change the electoral system if they're both capable of winning with it.

Either you deny the republicans it long enough that they run with electoral reform on the ticket, or you deny the democrats it long enough that they do. And I would suggest that voting democrat at present is an excellent way to ensure that it falls right back into republican hands because they appear chronically incapable of doing lasting good with their time in office resulting in swings back to republican.

Like, voting third party and encouraging everyone else to do so or just not vote seems by far the most sensible way to undermine the legitimacy of the current electoral system and also to force the existing parties to consider electoral reform to save their own skins, both of which seem like necessary steps to enact electoral reform.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 22:56 on Apr 30, 2018

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Jaxyon posted:

You're a moron if you think they're functionally the same.

This is a lie you're telling yourself because either

A) you aren't reading enough

or

B) it justifies your ideology


And because of how politics works, you may be effectively doing it anyway.

This is why you should try to learn things.

This is incredible argument, really does a great job explaining your point of view and not just asserting that you're better than me

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

Who says that's all people are doing

Nobody, but that poster specifically said withholding votes was a strategy.

At this time, until laws are changed, that's not a winning strategy at all, and actively fucks over people.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Jaxyon posted:

And because of how politics works, you may be effectively doing it anyway.

This is why you should try to learn things.

if voting means he's supporting people loving him to death, and not voting means he's supporting people loving him to death, why do you give a poo poo if he votes? people are gonna gently caress us to death in any case

edit: oh wait, you said that non-voting is less supportive of the "gently caress me to death" parties, so it looks like that's still in his best interests

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Jaxyon posted:

Nobody, but that poster specifically said withholding votes was a strategy.

At this time, until laws are changed, that's not a winning strategy at all, and actively fucks over people.

A strategy, not the only strategy

Voting for Dems also actively fucks over people

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

Condiv posted:

if voting means he's supporting people loving him to death, and not voting means he's supporting people loving him to death, why do you give a poo poo if he votes? people are gonna gently caress us to death in any case

it is amazing you can look at GOP policies and dem policies on, e.g., gay people, and conclude they're all the same and hence it doesn't matter. it's even more amazing you can type a line like the above and still argue you're not only concerned about yourself and people like you.

viral spiral
Sep 19, 2017

by R. Guyovich
It's pretty funny to watch Jaxyon and botany insist that neoliberal dems are owed our votes

Now who else have I seen say th—

oh..

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

botany posted:

it is amazing you can look at GOP policies and dem policies on, e.g., gay people, and conclude they're all the same and hence it doesn't matter. it's even more amazing you can type a line like the above and still argue you're not only concerned about yourself and people like you.

Lol if you think the Dem policy wasn't to pay lip service until joe hosed up and said he was in favor of it and forced them to get on message

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


botany posted:

it is amazing you can look at GOP policies and dem policies on, e.g., gay people, and conclude they're all the same and hence it doesn't matter. it's even more amazing you can type a line like the above and still argue you're not only concerned about yourself and people like you.

i've already told you why i won't vote for the dems. you don't need to look further than the fact that they're for crushing democracy in elections they control. why would i support that, or a party that was dragged kicking and screaming to acceptance of gay marriage by outside forces?

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747
Also queer people and PoC are working class losers like me all the time so suck my whole rear end

viral spiral
Sep 19, 2017

by R. Guyovich
botany and Jaxyon telling us the party of superdelegates cares about democracy now

man the hits keep on coming

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

Lol if you think the Dem policy wasn't to pay lip service until joe hosed up and said he was in favor of it and forced them to get on message

again: i do not give a poo poo why they do it as long as they do it

Condiv posted:

i've already told you why i won't vote for the dems. you don't need to look further than the fact that they're for crushing democracy in elections they control. why would i support that, or a party that was dragged kicking and screaming to acceptance of gay marriage by outside forces?

because, you incorrigible moron, the party that was dragged kicking and screaming into supporting a good policy is still better than the party that wasn't and isn't.

viral spiral
Sep 19, 2017

by R. Guyovich
Even the republicans haven't done anything as bad to democracy like kicking it in the nuts with superdelegates like the Democrats did

just loving ponder that for a moment and still insist that these fuckers still deserve your vote

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

viral spiral posted:

botany and Jaxyon telling us the party of superdelegates cares about democracy now

man the hits keep on coming

when the gently caress did i say that

  • Locked thread