|
norp posted:And If you don't agree that means you hate police, safety and President for Life Dutton. You don't want to express a negative opinion about President for Life Dutton do you citizen? *hand hovers over black old timey rotary telephone*
|
# ? May 15, 2018 10:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 03:31 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Family First officially merged with the Conservatives, Gichuhi decided not to and so became an independent. Then she joined the Libs. As long as she has declared publicly her affiliation with the Liberals then if she decided to step down before the election the Liberal party would have the right to replace her. It's why parties are so pissed off whenever somebody defects in the senate because whoever they defect to suddenly gets a new seat in parliament irrespective of whether that particular person remains there or not.
|
# ? May 15, 2018 10:20 |
|
I thought the state governments nominated who replaces a senator?
|
# ? May 15, 2018 11:30 |
|
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-15/nsw-government-to-slash-union-election-funds/9764444quote:Premier Gladys Berejiklian on Tuesday announced an overhaul of electoral funding laws, which would more than halve the amount of money unions and other third parties are allowed to spend on state elections.
|
# ? May 15, 2018 11:47 |
|
thatfatkid posted:I thought the state governments nominated who replaces a senator? yes, but by convention they will always nominate the candidate chosen by the party of the outgoing senator.
|
# ? May 15, 2018 12:23 |
|
BBJoey posted:yes, but by convention they will always nominate the candidate chosen by the party of the outgoing senator. Unless it was Sir Joh making the choice
|
# ? May 15, 2018 12:24 |
|
Convention is dead anyway.
|
# ? May 15, 2018 12:29 |
|
nobody’s gonna break convention when they know it’ll bite them in the rear end one day. remember that ensuring jobs for mates rises above partisanship
|
# ? May 15, 2018 12:56 |
|
BBJoey posted:nobody’s gonna break convention when they know it’ll bite them in the rear end one day. remember that ensuring jobs for mates rises above partisanship The Good Friday Pairing
|
# ? May 15, 2018 13:06 |
|
Lid posted:The Good Friday Pairing no you see that was a noble undertaking as an independent was ill and wouldn't be given a pair, thus to make sure dan andrews and his labor cronies couldn't ram through cfa legislation matthew guy bravely had two false pairings on religious grounds because
|
# ? May 15, 2018 13:44 |
|
And then a week later after lauding Guy on outmaneuvering evil Labor to save are CFA, the Herald Sun was implying the independent must not have been all that sick because they went on a trip to America in their official capacity.
|
# ? May 15, 2018 13:48 |
|
You Am I posted:Unless it was Sir Joh making the choice A qld lnp govt would definitely do that again.
|
# ? May 15, 2018 14:00 |
|
It's a bit lowbrow but what the hell: https://twitter.com/tonightly/status/991493923515215872
|
# ? May 16, 2018 00:07 |
|
Yet another "celebrity" shithead chef underpaying his staff: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-16/workers-owed-thousands-intimidated-at-burch-purhese-sweet-studio/9762844 Also throw in some staff intimidation for extra spice.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 00:24 |
|
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-16/legal-stoush-over-stolen-lamborghini/9759688 Am i being too judmental in thinking Mr Chellah is a scumbag?
|
# ? May 16, 2018 01:14 |
Lid posted:http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-16/legal-stoush-over-stolen-lamborghini/9759688 No. If you buy something and it turns out to be stolen, you are obliged to return it. In fact, when my bike was stolen I asked my lawyer friend what would happen if I went to find a similar bike on gumtree and found my recently stolen bike. I asked if I could ride it away with no consequences. His response was he'd prefer it if I didn't do that because it could get messy, but if I could prove without a doubt the bike was mine I could in theory jump onto it and pedal off into the sunset. Proving it, however, could be a problem, especially if the owner was also a victim (i.e. they had been sold the bike by the person who'd stolen it).
|
|
# ? May 16, 2018 01:34 |
|
Full disclosure: part of my issue with this is a bigger issue I have with one of the areas of Australian/New Zealand law i loathe (that is legal) - immediate indefeasibility which applies to torrens title. In laymans terms if somehow your house, namely your certificate of title, gets stolen and your property is then sold to a third party who does not know at all that the title was stolen and they register the property in the register then that third party now owns the house. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazer_v_Walker There is in fact a statutory fund, the Torrens Assurance Fund, to compensate people who have lost their house this way. Which to me is complete bullshit, you just lost your house well heres some money for your troubles get back in the market. http://www.registrargeneral.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf.../TAF-Information-Sheet.pdf
|
# ? May 16, 2018 01:42 |
|
Lid posted:http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-16/legal-stoush-over-stolen-lamborghini/9759688 The courts found he wasn’t acting in good faith, which means they thought he was a scumbag. Torrens title is good though
|
# ? May 16, 2018 01:49 |
|
Birdstrike posted:The courts found he wasn’t acting in good faith, which means they thought he was a scumbag. Deferred indefeasbility 5 lyf but seriously maintaining a system that can, and is, hosed over by fraud because "too hard" is god drat stupid i don't care that torrens is clearly better than old system, its the immediate indefeasibility and the sanctity of the register i loathe
|
# ? May 16, 2018 01:51 |
|
The pensioners retiring overseas because they can't afford Australia Fuckin' leaners on welfare going on overseas trips. God drat bludgers.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 02:30 |
|
Dude McAwesome posted:The pensioners retiring overseas because they can't afford Australia "Former gallery owner"
|
# ? May 16, 2018 02:35 |
|
Why the gently caress are we giving a pension to people who have a permanent address overseas?
|
# ? May 16, 2018 02:38 |
|
JBP posted:Why the gently caress are we giving a pension to people who have a permanent address overseas? Because THEY EARNED it with a LIFETIME OF HARD WORK and they PAID TAXES THEIR WHOLE LIVES. Really though, I'm going to put it down to graft and pandering.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 02:50 |
|
Dude McAwesome posted:The pensioners retiring overseas because they can't afford Australia On the ABC news last night they had an article on about rising housing cost effecting people on social security. So did they use a young person as their case study? Or a single mother with children? No, some baby boomer who used to run a business complaining about not affording rent in her inner city suburb.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 02:51 |
|
You Am I posted:On the ABC news last night they had an article on about rising housing cost effecting people on social security.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 02:57 |
|
all the tv stations are hard right atm except sbs, but someone there decided now is a good time to screen housos, so who knows what game they're playing tbh the other stations speak for themselves
|
# ? May 16, 2018 02:58 |
|
and yes i'm aware it's because only olds are watching tv speaking of olds, right now i'm in the enviable life position of being able to read the maitland mercury three times a week and let me tell you they never fail to deliver the hard-hitting journalism we need in this age of crises this broken hill fucked around with this message at 03:06 on May 16, 2018 |
# ? May 16, 2018 02:59 |
|
Lid posted:Immediate indefeasibility bad My goon. Interestingly I was in the minority for thinking it was bad at law school. Most people took the position of "well that's a bit poo poo, but it hardly ever happens, and it's the best we've got". Incidentally property law was one of my worst subjects so make of that what you will.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:00 |
|
in the days of newscorp anidav who's to say what's real anymore
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:01 |
|
this broken hill posted:all the tv stations are hard right atm except sbs, but someone there decided now is a good time to screen housos, so who knows what game they're playing tbh my partners kiwi parents loving love Housos
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:08 |
|
GoldStandardConure posted:my partners kiwi parents loving love Housos
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:09 |
|
Whitlam posted:My goon. Law students by and large don't want to think about questions asking is the law wrong, they just want to learn what the law says and apply it rote with the law must be valid because it's the law. Which is why everyone but me hated jurisprudence and how if they've never heard of John Locke they get stumped on "why do we follow law?"
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:26 |
|
this broken hill posted:enviable life position of being able to read the maitland mercury three times a week Dear God i am sorry to hear that. I "lived" in singleton for 3 months and about the only positive thing i could say about that loving dump is "well at least its not maitland". Or muswellbrook
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:32 |
|
JBP posted:Why the gently caress are we giving a pension to people who have a permanent address overseas? We have an international agreement with just about every country on Earth that we pay our citizens the pensions they're entitled to, and in return other countries pay people living in Australia what they're entitled to. My Dad's getting part pensions from three countries. They even made him apply for an Indian pension even though it was being colonised by the Brits when he was born there and I doubt they'd be too keen to give him money for the privilege.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:34 |
|
Lid posted:Law students by and large don't want to think about questions asking is the law wrong, they just want to learn what the law says and apply it rote with the law must be valid because it's the law. Which is why everyone but me hated jurisprudence and how if they've never heard of John Locke they get stumped on "why do we follow law?" Had a lawyer in my M&A class in business school like that. When prof asked why M&A law requires a takeover offer to be above the market value of the shares I responded that it's because it's assumed the takeover proponent knows more than the market about the value of the shares and therefore must bid higher than market value to compensate existing shareholders. She piped in and said she knows that's the law but wasn't sure whether that was the reason why. Prof nodded and said i was right.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:35 |
|
https://twitter.com/EwinHannan/status/996574501784535040?s=19
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:40 |
|
Lid posted:Law students by and large don't want to think about questions asking is the law wrong, they just want to learn what the law says and apply it rote with the law must be valid because it's the law. Which is why everyone but me hated jurisprudence and how if they've never heard of John Locke they get stumped on "why do we follow law?" when I first read Nozick I didn’t know Wilt Chamberlain was a real guy.
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:44 |
|
Lid posted:Law students by and large don't want to think about questions asking is the law wrong, they just want to learn what the law says and apply it rote with the law must be valid because it's the law. Which is why everyone but me hated jurisprudence and how if they've never heard of John Locke they get stumped on "why do we follow law?" My favourite exam ever was for public policy. The teacher was a huge lefty Greenie (I'm sure his name would be known to some people ITT) and the questions were basically like "how does Australia's treatment of refugees and asylum seekers make you feel?" Boy howdy was that ever a polarizing one. (Side note but my graduation is on Friday )
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:44 |
|
Whitlam posted:My favourite exam ever was for public policy. The teacher was a huge lefty Greenie (I'm sure his name would be known to some people ITT) and the questions were basically like "how does Australia's treatment of refugees and asylum seekers make you feel?" Boy howdy was that ever a polarizing one. Was this at UTAS?
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 03:31 |
|
Birdstrike posted:when I first read Nozick I didn’t know Wilt Chamberlain was a real guy. On the other hand gently caress Nozick In modern all in on Rawls (though it should be all Mill and Kant).
|
# ? May 16, 2018 03:54 |