|
evilweasel posted:I thought basically every doc review database had that ability. Each attachment is a separate image that can be redacted and you're not producing the raw files. I’m not using any doc review software. This is just in-house responding to a TPS. I don’t have that much to produce. I’m already producing the contract that needs some light redacting, but some of the emails I’m producing have the contract as an attachment too. I’ll probably just send the redacted contract, remove the attachments, and ID the emails I removed the contract from. Will I get sanctioned?
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 16:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 16:51 |
|
|
Look Sir Droids posted:I’m not using any doc review software. This is just in-house responding to a TPS. I don’t have that much to produce. I’m already producing the contract that needs some light redacting, but some of the emails I’m producing have the contract as an attachment too. Print everything you need to produce but redact to PDF, redact the PDFs, and then produce those. Including the emails with attachments that need to be redacted but do not need to be redacted themselves.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 16:41
|
|
|
You can redact in adobe.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 17:48
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:Print everything you need to produce but redact to PDF, redact the PDFs, and then produce those. Including the emails with attachments that need to be redacted but do not need to be redacted themselves. I’m gonna do this. Thanks. I didn’t really want to produce the email files anyway. I was just hoping for a shortcut.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 17:52
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:You can redact in adobe. by the way, highlight your redactions once you're done, ctrl-c, open word, ctrl-v make drat sure that what you redacted doesn't show up, because it's real easy to just add a black square over the data but leave it there in copyable format and every year some poor soul goofs
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 18:19
|
|
|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 04:08 on Jul 13, 2021 |
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 18:51
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:What would make a state pro bono obligation setup be more effective? Biglaw firms cut checks to unemployed or underemployed lawyers to represent whoever needs representing
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 18:53
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:What would make a state pro bono obligation setup be more effective? Have the state bar manage it so that they can confirm compliance and have failure to comply be a sanctionable offense.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 19:07
|
|
|
Why should I be mandated on pain of sanction to work for free again?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 19:16
|
|
|
GamingHyena posted:Why should I be mandated on pain of sanction to work for free again? Even if they paid you, it’s problematic. Courts don’t order specific performance on service contracts. Why should I have to do something even if I’m compensated if I don’t want to? There’s no way it can be mandatory. But it could be more inviting and incentivized.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 19:46
|
|
|
It's not good policy. That's just how you'd do it to make it effective.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 19:47
|
|
|
"A legal obligation to work for free is normally slavery, but Alexis de Tocqueville once said that lawyers are the true learned, genteel, gentry class of America, and blah blah civic duty, and blah blah prestige, and blah blah honourable to perform a public service, and therefore it's not slavery if lawyers do it." - Your state bar association.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 20:07
|
|
|
Having it replace CLE would be good.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 20:14
|
|
|
It's because you get to be part of a protectionist guild. Imho there instead should be progressive bar dues funding a legal aid program that hires attorneys.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 20:21
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:Having it replace CLE would be good. As long as there's an equal expectation to give zero effort or attention to it (which is what an acquintance of mine supposedly did while making up hundreds of pro Bono hours during the downturn when she had no work to bill)
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 20:21
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:Having it replace CLE would be good. I think that’s already an option in Tennessee, but it’s some ludicrous conversion rate like 10 pro bono hours = 1 CLE hour. And it caps out at 8 CLE hrs. Even lazy pro bono work is more useful than CLE though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 20:55
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:As long as there's an equal expectation to give zero effort or attention to it (which is what an acquintance of mine supposedly did while making up hundreds of pro Bono hours during the downturn when she had no work to bill) having it be an option to replace cle, not mandatory; pay attention to your pro bono work!
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 21:17
|
|
|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 04:08 on Jul 13, 2021 |
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 21:26
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Okay, Nightmare mode: required comprehension tests following the CLE for non in-person classes beyond the "type out the code to prove you listened"
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 21:34
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:by the way, highlight your redactions once you're done, ctrl-c, open word, ctrl-v I just did so and I couldn't obtain the redacted data. Might not be full proof, but it does save it as a new pdf with meta data removed in Acrobat Pro 2017. Usually for me it's just to make stuff court filling eligible - removing ssn and birthdays. Not trying to hide the big alien secrets of the state.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 21:43
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:required comprehension tests following the CLE for non in-person classes beyond the "type out the code to prove you listened" if they wanted people to understand those, they wouldn't have told everyone exactly where the code should be, imo
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 21:47
|
|
|
Adar posted:if they wanted people to understand those, they wouldn't have told everyone exactly where the code should be, imo my personal favorite was that 12 hour long online cle i did required you to press a button every so often that would pop up to show you were paying attention but when the button would pop up it would bring itself to the front and grab the os priority so you could not miss it short of not even being near the computer that was great, more cles should do that
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 21:52
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:my personal favorite was that 12 hour long online cle i did required you to press a button every so often that would pop up to show you were paying attention PLI does that and it owns. I did in fact leave it running, go to a meeting, then come back to see the prompt there. No idea how long it had been there. Clicked. Got full credit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 22:09
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ScottGreenfield/status/1014939292731396098
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 22:17
|
|
|
While the end is definitely racist I'm not totally sure that the yellow part is
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2018 22:22
|
|
|
When I was in law school, a lawyer I know gave me $50 to watch and click the CLE button prompt.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 00:05
|
|
|
Tokelau All Star posted:When I was in law school, a lawyer I know gave me $50 to watch and click the CLE button prompt. gently caress, I wish I'd thought of that. Now I'm MCLE exempt though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 00:09
|
|
|
In Texas if you teach a cle you get credit for the time researching and writing the class. If I spend 30 hours on a one hour presentation my cle is done for 2 years.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 02:18
|
|
|
Took a doc review job. Pays much better than HR and the public defender. 6 month project. Could be worse I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 02:41
|
|
|
The circle is complete.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 02:43
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:Took a doc review job. Pays much better than HR and the public defender. 6 month project. Could be worse I guess. How many jobs have you bailed on at this point? You remind me of my friend who could never settle on anything and ultimately never passed the bar (then went to get his PhD).
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 03:30
|
|
|
My HR job was eliminated due to a merger.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 03:40
|
|
|
If he hasn't passed the bar yet (or even taken the bar) then doc review isn't such a bad way to while away the rest of the year. I'd be surprised if you could even get a PD job with no law license. Plus, since they're already taking the dregs of the legal profession I doubt they drug test for doc review so he's free to 
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 03:52
|
|
|
Long term a PD job is way better for you career than some doc review job. OTO, if you didn't want a PD job, save it for someone who does.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 03:59
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:Took a doc review job. Pays much better than HR and the public defender. 6 month project. Could be worse I guess. You absolute loving moron
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 04:49
|
|
|
nm posted:Long term a PD job is way better for you career than some doc review job. It’s the latter. I’ve just gotten bored and need to make a few bucks until bar prep in December.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 10:57
|
|
|
This CLE talk reminded me that I was supposed to file papers for my optional bar admission, but instead I'm in a hospital, so it's another half a year wait for me. We do have something resembling CLE for bar members
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 11:49
|
|
|
You ok alexy? What's a Russian hospital like? I've seen...movies...on the internet.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 11:53
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:You ok alexy? What's a Russian hospital like? I've seen...movies...on the internet. I'm in a good one, forunately, but whatever nightmarish stories you are referring to are true for ~90% of the Russian hospitals Still the bar is loving stupid for only accepting applications during a short 4-day period and only if I physically come there myself with a bunch of hard copies. It's stupid
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 12:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 16:51 |
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:Took a doc review job. Pays much better than HR and the public defender. 6 month project. Could be worse I guess. I'm glad came back in time for the denouement of the Toona arc
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2018 13:04
|
|
