Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


even in my upper middle class area they closed the "convenient" dmv (it was always packed no matter what time you went but was 15 minutes away) and now the closest one is a half hour away.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
Democrats are absolutely interested in voter suppression to protect incumbents and kneecap progressives. AOC is the exception to the rule. ESPECIALLY here in NY.

But either way calling voters dumb is ridiculous and lovely and you'd think people learned their lesson after the basket of deplorables gaffe but here we are.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Matt Zerella posted:

Democrats are absolutely interested in voter suppression to protect incumbents and kneecap progressives. AOC is the exception to the rule. ESPECIALLY here in NY.

But either way calling voters dumb is ridiculous and lovely and you'd think people learned their lesson after the basket of deplorables gaffe but here we are.

They don't actually care if it hurts them, they just want to look down on people for not being morally superior, pragmatic and progressive.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Skex posted:

As far as Crowley and AOC yeah I'd feel a lot better about it if he was more proactive in his support for her. However to be fair shits kind of busy in Washington right now what with Trump trying to sell us all out to the Russians so I can see how he might have other things on his plate.

lmaooooooooooo gently caress off forever with this bullshit

I'm gonna go tell voters to not vote for Dems and there's nothing you can do to stop me! I might even complain about Democrats online where swing voters can see it! BE SCARED!!!!

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


Crowley was too busy to even bother campaigning or show up to debates during the primary so that holds water.

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)

Radish posted:

Crowley was too busy to even bother campaigning or show up to debates during the primary so that holds water.

He showed up to one and got owned.

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


It's weird how the mentality of "don't run against (in the case of that California jungle primary election), criticize, or primary anyone since we will lose their priceless Experience" has led to weak politicians that fold upon any sort of preasure.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Radish posted:

It's weird how the mentality of "don't run against (in the case of that California jungle primary election), criticize, or primary anyone since we will lose their priceless Experience" has led to weak politicians that fold upon any sort of preasure.

It would help if they had to defend their convictions every time they try and get comfortable. At this point no elected official should feel safe in their seat. turn up the heat on all of them in the primary and the general. I hope to see sit ins and protests in the offices of democratic congresspeople and senators before the midterms. Like why hasn't Machin's office been turned into an occupied campsite at this point?

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


Yeah defending yourself from a primary should be just the accepted thing since worst case it keeps them on their toes and sharp. No politician is so important they can't be replaced if they get too lazy in their duties.

It's only a problem if you have constant bad faith actors that are just muddying the water with baseless character assassination.

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
At the same time, AOC proved you can take advantage of lazy politicians who aren't used to being challenged.

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

Ghost Leviathan posted:

They don't actually care if it hurts them, they just want to look down on people for not being morally superior, pragmatic and progressive.

I don't think I'm any better than the dumbshit mainline Dem voters in any way outside of political animus. It's just objectively true that their politics suck rear end and produce terrible results, and it's no wonder. They've been indoctrinated by west wing bougie lib poo poo and the root of my annoyance is that they refuse to re-evaluate even as Trump and climate change plunge us toward hell.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

I don't think I'm any better than the dumbshit mainline Dem voters in any way outside of political animus. It's just objectively true that their politics suck rear end and produce terrible results, and it's no wonder. They've been indoctrinated by west wing bougie lib poo poo and the root of my annoyance is that they refuse to re-evaluate even as Trump and climate change plunge us toward hell.

I think this is an accurate view of where someone like me was 4-5 years ago. If you're like I was then and haven't come to the conclusion that while Obama was generally good, but his style of leadership is responsible for getting us to where we are; you're falling behind, and will likely end up being more conservative than progressive as things continue to slide. Change your opinions before you end up a loving moron like the PUMAs or all those terrible #resistance people.

Heck Yes! Loam! fucked around with this message at 16:48 on Jul 19, 2018

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.
I mean I used to be a Republican, I am 100% ok with people changing their political beliefs over time.

Obama's style of leadership, btw, is to be a morally bankrupt shill who covers it up with nice speeches and cashes in on his celebrity and buckrakes off his buddies, which is exactly what he's done since he left office. Sorry Loam but I just can't get behind a drone-assassinating banker-lover who dropped millions of Americans into economic hell as being "generally good"

Megaman's Jockstrap fucked around with this message at 17:28 on Jul 19, 2018

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Skex posted:

This is why the first step is getting Republican's out of power. Because all of that poo poo is them, Democrats have no interest in suppressing votes because they know that the more people who vote the more elections they win, and the GOP know this as well which is why they engage in so much vote suppression.

...

Now if you are all keeping your moaning here just to vent your frustration great, but please do not spread that crap out in the greater electorate when we need every loving vote we can scrape together to be able to arrest the slide towards Fascism.

The Democrats are unlikely to make gerrymandering worse, but neither will they fix it. Most Democratic politicians who currently hold power benefit from the status quo, even if the party as a whole suffers. And, more importantly, attitudes like yours are far, far more of a problem when it comes to decreasing voter enthusiasm than the left. Your memory may be short, but the radical left had very little presence in American political discourse until the past couple years, and our current situation was mostly arrived at prior to then.

Despite saying all this, I know where you're coming from, even if it's super wrong. I think that it's easy to look at American politics and say "the Republicans are obviously terrible, so we should focus on beating them." But the problem is that that viewpoint is not mutually exclusive with being upset with the Democrats also being very bad, and (perhaps more importantly) the Democrats becoming good is vital to beating Republicans. It's not like a bunch of liberals condemning Republicans is going to magically "defeat" them. And the "focus on the Republicans" side also completely and utterly dominates in the mainstream media, so it comes off as extremely absurd when people like you get all salty about what is ultimately a minority of the American left wanting to focus on the glaring flaws with the Democratic Party.

The fundamental flaw in your perspective is that you seem to view the Democrats becoming not-bad as being counter to the goal of defeating the Republicans. Don't you realize how absurd this is? There is no rational reason to think that the radical left is a threat to Democrats defeating Republicans. The Democrats have done a fine job of losing to Republicans long before the radical left gained any non-negligible amount of influence in American politics. At best, outrage at Trump might allow the Democrats to win once, before prompting losing power in the same vein as 2010. If you want them to hold power long enough to actually accomplish anything, you need to focus on the Democrats. Otherwise the absolute best outcome you can hope for is a repeat of Obama, and that's an extremely depressing outcome for those of us who aren't privileged enough to enjoy the status quo.

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006
say bad things about Obama, and Skex says that's sabotaging the dems.
refuse to take your name off the ballot for a congressional seat, because you think you might still be able to steal it? well, surely he has his reasons.

presented with an actual vote-splitter, the nightmare-demon he most fears, coming from within his beloved faction's ranks, Skex says 'oh i'm sure it's fine. because Russia.'

do you see, Skex, why we say liberals hate the left more than fascists.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011


White centrists sure as hell aren't held to this new...uh... "don't thank a Republican for debating them" rule, so I guess this is just a special standard for Latina women of color?

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





VitalSigns posted:

White centrists sure as hell aren't held to this new...uh... "don't thank a Republican for debating them" rule, so I guess this is just a special standard for Latina women of color?
The thanking I don't mind, personally, but the favorable comparisons of Buckley... well... :chloe:

We expect centrists to suck, VS. That's the difference.

It was just a stupid thing to say. If it was the only thing you ever heard AOC talk about or the only thing you ever heard she did, you'd be totally justified in having a tentatively low opinion of her as a result.

It's not, of course, so you can incorporate it into your opinion of her which is now only ever so slightly lower than it was. But you don't need to sugar-coat it.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

I have a hard time caring that she complimented Buckley for being willing to debate socialists and communists in a time when liberals refused to pretend they even existed, let me know when she praises his horrible views instead of his willingness to debate and I'll give a poo poo

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

VitalSigns posted:

I have a hard time caring that she complimented Buckley for being willing to debate socialists and communists in a time when liberals refused to pretend they even existed, let me know when she praises his horrible views instead of his willingness to debate and I'll give a poo poo

Yeah, this is pretty much how I feel. People aren't 100% good or bad, and you can praise the good aspect of a bad person without endorsing their bad aspects.

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
And I'll say once again, go watch some of those debates on YouTube, they're great. Also the documentary.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

VitalSigns posted:

I have a hard time caring that she complimented Buckley for being willing to debate socialists and communists in a time when liberals refused to pretend they even existed, let me know when she praises his horrible views instead of his willingness to debate and I'll give a poo poo

Holy poo poo.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

HootTheOwl posted:

Holy poo poo.

Yes I know it's a departure from Democratic Party orthodoxy to hold working class women of color or Jews to the same standards as affluent white liberals instead of inventing special barriers just for minorities, but nevertheless I believe it's the right thing to do.

VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 18:04 on Jul 20, 2018

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

*Rich white lady praises Nancy Reagan's record on AIDS*
"Why you look like a well-educated person exactly the 'right sort' for our party, come right on in."

*Poor Latina walks through the door*
"Excuse me miss, you need to take this purity test to be allowed in. Oh I'm sorry you're (too decorous/not decorous enough) [Grader's note: CIRCLE one], I'm sorry you're just not qualified."

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Bernie is gonna destroy Biden.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


more like william fuckley.

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

Nonsense posted:

Bernie is gonna destroy Biden.
From the top rope.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


https://twitter.com/JediFett/status/796128339916427264

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

BUH GAWD, Bernie just broke a chair on Biden's head! Somebody better call Mama Biden, because she's gonna be cryyyyin' tonight!

Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004

The Little Kielbasa
Mar 29, 2001

and another thing: im not mad. please dont put in the newspaper that i got mad.

Matt Zerella posted:

And I'll say once again, go watch some of those debates on YouTube, they're great. Also the documentary.

https://youtu.be/9DvmLMUfGss owns

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

VitalSigns posted:

Yes I know it's a departure from Democratic Party orthodoxy to hold working class women of color or Jews to the same standards as affluent white liberals instead of inventing special barriers just for minorities, but nevertheless I believe it's the right thing to do.

There we go. Re-calibrated.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





VitalSigns posted:

I have a hard time caring that she complimented Buckley for being willing to debate socialists and communists in a time when liberals refused to pretend they even existed, let me know when she praises his horrible views instead of his willingness to debate and I'll give a poo poo
I mean, more than once he got on stage and instead of (or perhaps in addition to) debate, threatened physical violence. Not a good look.

MSDOS KAPITAL fucked around with this message at 20:35 on Jul 20, 2018

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





VitalSigns posted:

*Poor Latina walks through the door*
"Excuse me miss, you need to take this purity test to be allowed in. Oh I'm sorry you're (too decorous/not decorous enough) [Grader's note: CIRCLE one], I'm sorry you're just not qualified."
Oh gently caress off, that's not remotely what I said. I can lower my opinion of her very slightly off of one (maybe) stupid remark and still think highly of her.

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

I mean, more than once he got on stage and instead of (or perhaps in addition to) debate, threatened physical violence. Not a good look.

Both times he was trolled into it and it was downright hilarious.

But by all means keep clutching your pearls about some made up thing you think she did.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

Oh gently caress off, that's not remotely what I said. I can lower my opinion of her very slightly off of one (maybe) stupid remark and still think highly of her.

Wasn't directed at you.

If you hold centrists to the same standard then whatever, I think there's bigger things to worry about than whether AOC has a duty to drag Buckley on social media, if she wants to it's cool if she doesn't and you want to be annoyed about it okay fine.

But for the centrists who regularly defend much more heinous words, actions, and people, well it's obvious when it comes to Ocasio-Cortez it aint the content of her character they're objecting to.

VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 21:26 on Jul 20, 2018

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Matt Zerella posted:

Both times he was trolled into it and it was downright hilarious.

But by all means keep clutching your pearls about some made up thing you think she did.
If the thing with Chomsky and Vidal were outliers or there was more going on than it appeared (with Chomsky, at least, IIRC that didn't seem like a troll), then mea culpa.

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

If the thing with Chomsky and Vidal were outliers or there was more going on than it appeared (with Chomsky, at least, IIRC that didn't seem like a troll), then mea culpa.

This two really knew how to get at him, Vidal especially. I also recommend the Muhammad Ali if you want to see him in the edge of his seat and pull back his smarmy bullshit.

Buckley the person was a revolting rear end in a top hat but he actually did facilitate all kind of interesting discussions on Firing Line because it rarely devolved into a screaming match. That's what AOC was referring to and a whole lot of people are using their jump to conclusion mats that she thinks Buckley the person is good.

E:

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Okay thanks - I will now increment my opinion of AOC up by 0.03%, right back to where it was before I read that tweet :)

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
Welcome back.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


https://twitter.com/NancyPelosi/status/1018879538762219520

we're gonna lose!!!

  • Locked thread