|
Fagmaster posted:everyone of you can help, stop buying junk and spent only for necessaries. Hey, guess what?
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 16:51 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 15:47 |
|
Rarity posted:Hey, guess what? I feel like this idea, like everything else in capitalism, has been taken to the extreme. Yes, it's true that you aren't ethical based on your brand or shopping choices. But there are certainly ways to be shittier than necessary.. A lot of them have been covered in this thread I think anyway here's a good book to buy and great place to shop @
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 17:03 |
|
maybe the sonic pic about consumption under capitalism isn't 100% serious
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 17:04 |
|
ate all the Oreos posted:Luckily for humanity, it's very hard to make a nuclear explosive explode... nuclearly. That's one of the biggest challenges beyond just getting enough material to make the bomb, actually - you have to detonate something like 32 or more points on the exact right position around a sphere of explosives at precisely the same time, like within plus or minus less than a microsecond, or the whole thing just explodes normally (and spreads a bunch of uranium around, but uranium by itself isn't dangerously radioactive). it depends on the design of the nuke. the hard part of nuclear bombs is getting enough fissile material, not the actual bomb making. you can make a nuke with two chunks of uranium 235 and a spring to slam them togeather. it doesn't need to be a complicated implosion
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 17:08 |
|
Blast of Confetti posted:maybe the sonic pic about consumption under capitalism isn't 100% serious The gently caress you say
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 17:41 |
|
Rutibex posted:it depends on the design of the nuke. the hard part of nuclear bombs is getting enough fissile material, not the actual bomb making. you can make a nuke with two chunks of uranium 235 and a spring to slam them togeather. it doesn't need to be a complicated implosion I remember a university lecturer claiming he could make a nuke using gravity and a two story gutter pipe. Sounded cool at the time but who can afford a two story building in this day and age?
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 17:50 |
|
Blast of Confetti posted:maybe the sonic pic about consumption under capitalism isn't 100% serious You are wrong, hth.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 17:51 |
|
Blast of Confetti posted:maybe the sonic pic about consumption under capitalism isn't 100% serious beauty is in the eyes of the shareholder
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 17:57 |
|
Senor Dog posted:I feel like this idea, like everything else in capitalism, has been taken to the extreme. Lol, that guy never held a shovel in his life that wasn't part of a photo op.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:11 |
|
Senor Dog posted:I feel like this idea, like everything else in capitalism, has been taken to the extreme. You can minimize your impact but ultimately the entire system is based on exploitation and thus any participation is contributory. Any consumer change you make still leaves the underlying system intact. Buying only from "ethical" companies wouldn't do much anyway . Few people can afford to buy all of their goods from companies which are "ethical." Usually the only people who can afford to do that are probably people who greatly benefit from the unequal wealth distribution produced by capitalism. COMRADES has issued a correction as of 18:32 on Aug 11, 2018 |
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:23 |
|
poopnanners posted:i sleep on my hoarded wealth like a dragon
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:43 |
|
People have been taught that consumption is politics, so when you see Black Panther you're doing your part to help black people, when you buy green products you're doin your part to stop climate change, etc. It's really one of the most effective and insidious things the capitalists have pulled off.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:47 |
|
COMRADES posted:You can minimize your impact but ultimately the entire system is based on exploitation and thus any participation is contributory. Any consumer change you make still leaves the underlying system intact. Ethical companies also often share the same parent corporation as their competitors meaning your money is ending up in the same place. Ultimately the attempt to individualise people's impact on the enrlvironment and society is designed to distract from the incredible damage that corporations do on a daily basis. Any improvements we make in our own lives mean nothing compared to that.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:50 |
|
Rarity posted:Ethical companies also often share the same parent corporation as their competitors meaning your money is ending up in the same place. Ultimately the attempt to individualise people's impact on the enrlvironment and society is designed to distract from the incredible damage that corporations do on a daily basis. Any improvements we make in our own lives mean nothing compared to that. that's why instead of a wallet i speak with my apathy
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:51 |
|
poopnanners posted:i sleep on my hoarded wealth like a dragon Are Funko Pops soft?
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:52 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:Are Funko Pops soft? The beanie baby tags keep poking me
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 18:55 |
|
Capitalism. Is it good? Is it bed? We just don't know. There is no way to tell really.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 19:11 |
|
https://twitter.com/BrianaSymoneee/status/1028043333426466816?s=19
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 19:44 |
|
Outrail posted:I remember a university lecturer claiming he could make a nuke using gravity and a two story gutter pipe. Sounded cool at the time but who can afford a two story building in this day and age? I'm guessing he's referring to a gun-type device, so this is possibly true with some caveats. For starters, it'd be heavily dependent upon the fissile material.For example weapons grade plutonium probably wouldn't actually work as it's so radioactive it'd go prompt-critical as the tamper approaches the plug and heat up considerably, dropping the rate of emission below that required for supercriticality (so it'd just sit there cycling through criticality-induced heating -> cooling -> heating, letting off bursts of Cerenkov radiation all the while). You'd want some weak poo poo like U-235 and even then it'd be "uhhh maybe" territory, at least at a first guess.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 19:50 |
|
Surely you still owe someone...right?
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 19:51 |
|
Deified Data posted:Surely you still owe someone...right? I'd just be happy a landlord had died
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 19:52 |
|
DrPossum posted:I'd just be happy a landlord had died My landlord died and I had to move out because he had three children so the estate sold the place off.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 19:57 |
|
Deified Data posted:Surely you still owe someone...right? A landlord died. A good start.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 19:59 |
|
As other guy said, landlords always raise more landlords in an endless cycle of doughy failsons until the heat-death of the universe. A capitalist dying is never bad news but it could always lead to something marginally shittier for the people he held power over.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 20:02 |
|
I am extremely into how in a few weeks or months this old lady is gonna get billed for that rent plus interest
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 20:22 |
|
Deified Data posted:As other guy said, landlords always raise more landlords in an endless cycle of doughy failsons until the heat-death of the universe. A capitalist dying is never bad news but it could always lead to something marginally shittier for the people he held power over. As with any unwanted weed infestation you need to get the outlying peripheral offspring before you move in to the heart of the problem.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 20:52 |
|
I Love Feudalism *picture of smiling serf with shovel done in the style of Norman Rockwell* By Duke Ken Langome Co-ruler of Home Depot.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2018 21:04 |
|
Deified Data posted:As other guy said, landlords always raise more landlords in an endless cycle of doughy failsons until the heat-death of the universe. A capitalist dying is never bad news but it could always lead to something marginally shittier for the people he held power over. Not always, one of my landlords she had no husband or children. Went on multiple exotic holidays each year. Told me she's spending her money and enjoying herself now because she's old and anything left when she dies will just go to her nieces and nephews. Sounded like she really did not want to share her wealth with any of her family after she passes.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 00:28 |
|
Marenghi posted:Not always, one of my landlords she had no husband or children. Went on multiple exotic holidays each year. A landlord not wanting to share their wealth? I'm shocked!
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 02:23 |
|
https://twitter.com/TopherSpiro/status/1028011131049332736?s=19 Lol
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 03:50 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCiYmCVikjo
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 03:55 |
|
Hail Satan
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 03:57 |
|
Rutibex posted:it depends on the design of the nuke. the hard part of nuclear bombs is getting enough fissile material, not the actual bomb making. you can make a nuke with two chunks of uranium 235 and a spring to slam them togeather. it doesn't need to be a complicated implosion If you don't care that the nuke explodes with less power than a comparable sized chunk of TNT I guess you could, but even gun-type weapons have to accelerate the chunks of uranium to thousands of feet per second to get them close enough that you get a proper kiloton-range nuclear explosion before the whole thing blows itself apart.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 04:27 |
|
Rarity posted:Hey, guess what? I saw people posting this as an excuse as to why they couldn't stop buying poo poo from amazon for one loving day to support that worker strike, great job assholes
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 04:29 |
|
The itsy-bitsy spider went up the waterspout Down came a small brick of processed uranium, and mildly inconvenienced it
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 04:29 |
|
ate all the Oreos posted:I saw people posting this as an excuse as to why they couldn't stop buying poo poo from amazon for one loving day to support that worker strike, great job assholes That's one helluva leap in logic and I have no clue how they got there
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 04:49 |
|
1500quidporsche posted:That's one helluva leap in logic and I have no clue how they got there “Since consumption is never ethical, it’s no less ethical to buy on the strike day than any other day.”—is how I understand it.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 05:45 |
|
Maybe boycotting is ineffective if you only do it for one day?
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 06:28 |
|
Here's the solution to capital.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 07:17 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 15:47 |
|
HCFJ posted:Maybe boycotting is ineffective if you only do it for one day? So I take it you think a strike day is when thwy put up the bumpers at the bowling alley?
|
# ? Aug 12, 2018 08:05 |